The controversy regarding diagnostic criteria for early myoclonic encephalopathy

Diagnosis and management of epileptic encephalopathies in children

Epileptic encephalopathies refer to a group of disorders in which the unremitting epileptic activity contributes to severe cognitive and behavioral impairments above and beyond what might be expected from the underlying pathology alone, and these can worsen over time leading to progressive cerebral dysfunction. Several syndromes have been described based on their electroclinical features (age of onset, seizure type, and EEG pattern). This review briefly describes the clinical evaluation and management of commonly encountered epileptic encephalopathies in children.

Genetic testing of epileptic encephalopathies of infancy: an approach

The epileptic encephalopathies of infancy are a group of disorders characterized by intractable seizures, persistent abnormality of cortical function documented on EEG, and consequently impaired neuro-developmental outcomes. The etiologies vary and include; structural brain malformations, acquired brain insults, and inborn errors of metabolism in the majority of the affected patients. In a proportion of these cases no obvious etiology is identifiable on investigation. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have led to the discovery of a number of gene defects that may be causal in many epileptic encephalopathies. Identification of the causative mutation is important for prognostic and genetic counseling, and may also carry treatment implications. The recently described genes include; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-Like 5 gene (CDKL5), Protocadherin 19 (PCDH19), Sodium channel neuronal type 1a subunit gene (SCN1A), Aristaless-Related Homeobox Gene (ARX), and Syntaxin binding protein 1 gene (STXBP1), amongst others. Distinct electro-clinical syndromes are increasingly being identified amongst patients carrying the various mutations. In this review, we outline the approach to clinical evaluation and genetic testing of epileptic encephalopathies in infancy.

Early-onset epileptic encephalopathies: Ohtahara syndrome and early myoclonic encephalopathy

Ohtahara syndrome and early myoclonic encephalopathy are the earliest presenting of the epileptic encephalopathies. They are typically distinguished from each other according to specific clinical and etiologic criteria. Nonetheless, considerable overlap exists between the two syndromes in terms of clinical presentation, prognosis, and electroencephalographic signature. Newer understandings of underlying etiologies of these conditions may support the previously suggested concept that they represent a single spectrum of disease rather than two distinct disorders. We review both syndromes, with particular focus on the underlying genetics and pathophysiology and implications regarding the classification of these conditions.

The genetics of monogenic idiopathic epilepsies and epileptic encephalopathies

The group of idiopathic epilepsies encompasses numerous syndromes without known organic substrate. Genetic anomalies are thought to be responsible for pathogenesis, with a monogenic or polygenic model of inheritance. Over the last two decades, a number of genetic anomalies and encoded proteins have been related to particular idiopathic epilepsies and epileptic encephalopathies. Most of these mutations involve subunits of neuronal ion channels (e.g. potassium, sodium, and chloride channels), and may result in abnormal neuronal hyperexcitability manifesting with seizures. However non-ion channel proteins may also be affected. Correlations between genotype and phenotype are not easy to establish, since genetic and non-genetic factors are likely to play a role in determining the severity of clinical features. The growing number of discoveries on this topic are improving classification, prognosis and counseling of patients and families with these forms of epilepsy, and may lead to targeted therapeutic approaches in the near future. In this article the authors have reviewed the main genetic discoveries in the field of the monogenic idiopathic epilepsies and epileptic encephalopathies, in order to provide epileptologists with a concise and comprehensive summary of clinical and genetic features of these seizure disorders.

Are early myoclonic encephalopathy (EME) and the Ohtahara syndrome (EIEE) independent of each other?

BACKGROUND

Early myoclonic encephalopathy (EME) and the Ohtahara syndrome are currently listed as two separate syndromes in the classification of epilepsies. The most prominent differentiating points are the observations that patients with Ohtahara syndrome experience predominantly tonic seizures; their seizures evolve to infantile spasms and the prognosis is often worse than patients with EME.

SUMMARY POINTS

We performed a literature review of published cases. Although syndromes may have distinct courses, the differentiation early on may be impossible as both myoclonus and tonic seizures may coexist. There is also an overlap in the etiologies. Tonic seizures are considered a manifestation of brainstem dysfunction and it is possible that this is more prominent in Ohtahara syndrome. To date, there are 17 autopsy cases (12 presumed to be Ohtahara cases and 5 EME). Evidence of hindbrain pathology was present in all. Tonic seizures or tonic posturing was a feature of all cases. We suggest that the two syndromes may represent a continuum and that the prominence of tonic seizures in the Ohtahara syndrome may be an indication of brainstem dysfunction which may play an important role in the subsequent transition to infantile spasms.

Epileptic Encephalopathies in Early Infancy With Suppression-Burst

Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy with suppression-burst, or Ohtahara syndrome (OS), and early myoclonic encephalopathy (EME) are epileptic encephalopathies with onset of frequent seizures in the neonatal and early infancy period and with a characteristic EEG pattern, namely, suppression-burst, in which higher-voltage bursts of slow waves mixed with multifocal spikes alternate with isoelectric suppression phase. Their nosologic independence is now widely accepted, although some controversy initially occurred because of their common characteristics such as age of onset, EEG features, seizure intractability, and poor prognosis. Major differences between the two syndromes include (1) tonic spasms in OS versus partial seizures and erratic myoclonias in EME, (2) continuous suppression-burst pattern in both waking and sleeping states in OS versus this EEG pattern almost limited to sleep in EME, and (3) static structural brain damage in OS versus genetic or metabolic disorders in EME. The most important differentiating point is their evolutional pattern with age, which may reflect their pathophysiologic difference. Ohtahara syndrome evolves to West syndrome and further to Lennox-Gastaut syndrome with age, but EME demonstrates no unique evolution; namely, it continues as such for a long time or changes into partial epilepsy or severe epilepsy with multiple independent spike foci.

Infantile Epileptic Encephalopathy with Hypsarrhythmia (Infantile Spasms/West Syndrome)

Infantile spasms is a unique disorder peculiar to infancy and early childhood. In this article, the clinical manifestations and electroencephalographic features of the disorder are described. The possible pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying infantile spasms and the relation of this disorder to other childhood encephalopathies are discussed. Finally, the treatment of patients with infantile spasms and their long-term outcome are briefly reviewed.

Video/EEG aspects of early-infantile epileptic encephalopathy with suppression-bursts (Ohtahara syndrome)

Early-infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EIEE) with suppression-bursts is a severe neonatal epileptic encephalopathy. The etiology is multiple, with cerebral malformations as the more frequent. We review the clinical and video/EEG aspects of eight infants with EIEE. These infants, aged between 4 and 70 days at the time of video/EEG recordings, were studied in relation to their clinical and video/EEG characteristics, evolution, persistence of suppression-burst pattern and etiology. Seven of the eight infants showed an ictal clinical sign correlated to the burst of the suppression-burst pattern, four of whom died within 11 months of age. The other three are alive. One, now aged 4 years, underwent surgery for hemimegalencephaly and is seizure-free, with good neurological outcome. One, now aged 9 months, was pyridoxine-dependent and she is seizure-free, and with normal neurological evolution under pyridoxine therapy. One, now aged 3 years and 9 months, is seizure-free, but with severe neurological and cognitive impairment. The only child who did not show a clinical ictal correlation of burst is also alive, now aged 3 years and 9 months, with drug-resistant epilepsy, and severe neurological and cognitive deficits. With regard to the etiology, three showed structural abnormalities, two more showed some signs of prenatal origin of neurological disease, and three had metabolic etiology. Our study confirms that EIEE is a severe age-dependent early epileptic encephalopathy. The etiology is mostly malformative. The prognosis is poor regarding motor and cognitive development, seizures, as well as life expectancies. The presence of an ictal burst of the suppression-burst pattern usually correlates with a negative outcome.