Three-dimensional volume rendering of multidetector-row CT data: applicable for emergency radiology

Multimodality Imaging for 3D Printing and Surgical Rehearsal in Complex Spine Surgery

Surgery is the mainstay treatment of symptomatic spinal tumors. It aids in restoring functionality, managing pain and tumor growth, and improving overall quality of life. Over the past decade, advancements in medical imaging techniques combined with the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have enabled improvements in the surgical management of spine tumors by significantly increasing the precision, accuracy, and safety of the surgical procedures. For complex spine surgical cases, the use of multimodality imaging is necessary to fully visualize the extent of disease, including both soft-tissue and bone involvement. Integrating the information provided by these examinations in a cohesive manner to facilitate surgical planning can be challenging, particularly when multiple surgical specialties work in concert. The digital 3-dimensional (3D) model or 3D rendering and the 3D printed model created from imaging examinations such as CT and MRI not only facilitate surgical planning but also allow the placement of virtual and physical surgical or osteotomy planes, further enhancing surgical planning and rehearsal. The authors provide practical information about the 3D printing workflow, from image acquisition to postprocessing of a 3D printed model, as well as optimal material selection and incorporation of quality management systems, to help surgeons utilize 3D printing for surgical planning. The authors also highlight the process of surgical rehearsal, how to prescribe digital osteotomy planes, and integration with intraoperative surgical navigation systems through a case-based discussion. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

MDCT imaging of traumatic brain injury

The aim of emergency imaging is to detect treatable lesions before secondary neurological damage occurs. CT plays a primary role in the acute setting of head trauma, allowing accurate detection of lesions requiring immediate neurosurgical treatment. CT is also accurate in detecting secondary injuries and is therefore essential in follow-up. This review discusses the main characteristics of primary and secondary brain injuries.

Postprocessing in Maxillofacial Multidetector Computed Tomography

Multidetector computed tomography (CT) and volumetric rendering techniques have always been a useful support for the anatomical and pathological study of the maxillofacial district. Nowadays accessibility to multidetector CT scanners allows the achievement of images with an extremely thin collimation and with high spatial resolution, not only along the axial plane but also along the patient's longitudinal axis. This feature is the main theoretical assumption for multiplanar imaging and for an optimal 3-dimensional postprocessing. Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) techniques permit images along any plane in the space to be obtained, including curved planes; this feature allows the representation in a single bidimensional image of different anatomical structures that develop on multiple planes. For this reason MPR techniques represent an unavoidable step for the study of traumatic pathology as well as of malformative, neoplastic, and inflammatory pathologies. Among 3-dimensional techniques, Maximum Intensity Projection and Shaded Surface Display are routinely used in clinical practice. In addition, volumetric rendering techniques allow a better efficacy in representing the different tissues of maxillofacial district. Each of these techniques give the radiologist an undoubted support for the diagnosis and the characterization of traumatic and malformative conditions, have a critical utility in the neoplastic evaluation of primary or secondary bone involvement, and are also used in the planning of the most modern radiosurgical treatments. The aim of this article is to define the main technical aspects of imaging postprocessing in maxillofacial CT and to summarize when each technique is indicated, according to the different pathologies of this complex anatomical district.

The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the effect of scanning parameters on the accuracy of measurements from three-dimensional (3D), multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) mandible renderings. A broader range of acceptable parameters can increase the availability of computed tomographic (CT) studies for retrospective analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Three human mandibles and a phantom object were scanned using 18 combinations of slice thickness, field of view (FOV), and reconstruction algorithm and 3 different threshold-based segmentations. Measurements of 3D computed tomography (3DCT) models and specimens were compared.

RESULTS

Linear and angular measurements were accurate, irrespective of scanner parameters or rendering technique. Volume measurements were accurate with a slice thickness of 1.25 mm, but not 2.5 mm. Surface area measurements were consistently inflated.

CONCLUSIONS

Linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of mandible 3D MDCT models can be confidently obtained from a range of parameters and rendering techniques. Slice thickness is the primary factor affecting volume measurements. These findings should also apply to 3D rendering using cone-beam CT (CBCT).

Three-dimensional skull models as a problem-solving tool in suspected child abuse

BACKGROUND

The value of 3-D skull models in evaluation of young children with suspected child abuse is not known.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of 3-D skull models as a problem-solving tool in children younger than 2 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 73 children (ages 0-24 months) seen by a child protection team (CPT) who were undergoing head CT between August 2007 and July 2009.

RESULTS

Of the 73 children, volume-rendered 3-D models were obtained in 26 (35.6%). Three-dimensional models changed initial CT interpretation in nine instances (34.6%). Findings thought to be fractures were confirmed as normal variants in four children. Depressed fractures were correctly shown to be ping-pong fractures in two cases. In one case, an uncertain finding was confirmed as a fracture, and an additional contralateral fracture was identified in one child. A fracture seen on skull radiographs but not seen on axial CT images was identified on the 3-D model in one case. Changes in interpretation led to modification in management in five children.

CONCLUSION

Use of 3-D skull models can be a problem-solving tool when there is discordance among the CT reading, subsequent radiographic investigations and clinical evaluation.

Influence of multiplanar reformations on low-contrast performance in thin-collimated multidetector computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

: To analyze the influence of multiplanar reformations of thin-collimated multidetector computed tomography datasets on low-contrast performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: A low-contrast phantom simulating focal hypodense lesions (-20 HU object contrast) was scanned on a 64-slice spiral CT scanner at 4 different dose levels (25 mAs, 50 mAs, 100 mAs, 200 mAs, and no dose modulation). Other scanner parameters were as follows: tube voltage = 120 kVp, rotation time = 0.8 s, reconstructed slice thickness = 0.625 mm, reconstruction interval = 0.5 mm, reconstruction kernel = standard. Coronal reformations were created using the open-source software OsiriX. A sliding-thin-slab (STS) averaging algorithm was applied to each axial and each reformatted dataset with an increasing slab thickness from 1 to 20 slices. The low-contrast performance of all datasets was calculated semiautomatically using a reader-independent, statistical approach and is expressed as the visibility index. The results were analyzed for differences between the coronal reformations and the original axial datasets. In addition, the statistical approach used herein was validated against a reader study.

RESULTS

: The visibility index of the coronal reformatted datasets over all lesion sizes was inferior when compared with the original axial datasets and reached 75.4% (±11.7%), 79.9% (±16.3%), 79.4% (±5.5%), and 93.7% (±14.6%) for dose levels of 25, 50, 100, and 200 mAs, respectively. The overall mean low-contrast performance was 82.1% of the axial dataset (P < 0.05, except for 200 mAs). The deterioration of low-contrast performance was inversely correlated with lesion size (R = 0.91). The use of the STS averaging algorithm significantly improved image quality for all datasets (112.6%-180.2%) with the beneficial effect being stronger for the coronal reformations. There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluation of low-contrast performance between the statistical approach and the ready study.

CONCLUSION

: Coronal reformations of thin-collimated multidetector computed tomography datasets show a significant reduction of low-contrast performance when compared with the original axial dataset, especially in high noise data. The use of an STS averaging algorithm had a significant benefit for both, coronal and axial orientations. The effect was more pronounced with coronal reformations and should be routinely applied to improve image quality.

Three-dimensional fracture visualisation of multidetector CT of the skull base in trauma patients: comparison of three reconstruction algorithms

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the detection rate of skull-base fractures for three different three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction methods of cranial CT examinations in trauma patients. A total of 130 cranial CT examinations of patients with previous head trauma were subjected to 3D reconstruction of the skull base, using solid (SVR) and transparent (TVR) volume-rendering technique and maximum intensity projection (MIP). Three radiologists independently evaluated all reconstructions as well as standard high-resolution multiplanar reformations (HR-MPRs). Mean fracture detection rates for all readers reading rotating reconstructions were 39, 36, 61 and 64% for SVR, TVR, MIP and HR-MPR respectively. Although not significantly different from HR-MPR with respect to sensitivity (P = 0.9), MIP visualised 18% of fractures that were not reported in HR-MPR. Because of the relatively low detection rate using HR-MPRs alone, we recommend reading MIP reconstructions in addition to the obligatory HR-MPRs to improve fracture detection.

Location of the transition zone in CT of small-bowel obstruction: added value of multiplanar reformations

PURPOSE

To assess the additional value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in comparison with axial images alone for location of the transition zone in CT of mechanical small-bowel obstruction (SBO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients with mechanical SBO underwent 16-slice multi detector row CT (MDCT). The gold standard for the precise location of the transition zone was established by two experienced abdominal radiologists, unblinded to clinical and surgical reports, reviewing all CT examinations. On a workstation, two blinded readers independently located the transition zone using first axial slices alone and then 1 month later MPR (axial, coronal, sagittal and oblique views) according to a three-point confidence scale. Diagnostic accuracy and mean confidence score were evaluated for both the transverse and multiplanar data sets.

RESULTS

Accuracy of transition zone location for reader 1 and reader 2 was 86% and 84% with axial slices alone, and by using MPR 93% (significant: P = 0.03) and 90% (not significant: P = 0.08), respectively. Mean confidence score was significantly increased for both readers using MPR: 0.3 higher (P = 0.0001) and 0.37 higher (P = 0.0001) respectively.

CONCLUSION

MPR can increase both accuracy and confidence in the location of the transition zone in CT of SBO.

Abdominal Pain: Coronal Reformations from Isotropic Voxels with 16-Section CT—Reader Lesion Detection and Interpretation Time

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess if reader detection of intraabdominal pathologic findings on coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section computed tomography (CT) was similar to reader detection on transverse scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study, and a waiver of informed consent was obtained. Twenty-nine consecutive patients (12 men, 17 women; mean age, 48 years; age range, 21-93 years) with abdominal pain underwent 16-section CT with coronal reformations. Eight independent readers reviewed randomized scans (transverse and coronal) and identified pathologic findings in multiple organ systems. Timing for each interpretation was recorded. One month later, readers reviewed the scan reformatted in the other imaging plane. Agreement between transverse and coronal scans was measured by using Cohen kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

Agreement was moderate to near perfect between transverse and coronal interpretations for intraabdominal anatomic and pathologic findings (kappa=0.59-1.00). For transverse interpretations, more thoracic pathologic findings were noted than for coronal interpretations; for coronal interpretations, more lymph nodes were noted than for transverse interpretations. Mean transverse interpretation time was 4.9 minutes+/-1.1 (standard deviation) (range, 2.9-6.5 minutes); mean coronal interpretation time was 5.1 minutes+/-0.8 (range, 3.3-6.7 minutes). For each reader, there was no statistically significant difference in interpretation time between transverse and coronal scans (P=.06).

CONCLUSION

With regard to the presence of intraabdominal pathologic findings, coronal reformations from isotropic voxels are similar to transverse scans in terms of interpretation time and reader agreement.

Whole body 16-row multislice CT in emergency room: effects of different protocols on scanning time, image quality and radiation exposure

The objective of this study was to compare two different scanning protocols in patients suspected to have multiple trauma using multidetector 16-row computed tomography (CT) to better define scanning time, imaging quality and radiation exposure. Forty-six patients, between March 2004 and March 2005, with suspected multiple trauma (cerebral, spine, chest, abdominal and pelvis) were evaluated with two different protocols: Protocol "A" 26 patients; Protocol "B" 20 patients. Protocol A consists of a single-pass continuous whole-body acquisition (from vertex to pubic symphysis), whereas Protocol B of conventional segmented acquisition with scanning of body segments individually. Both protocols were performed using a multidetector 16-rows CT (Light-Speed 16, General Electric Medical System, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with the same technical factors. Radiation dose was evaluated in two ways: computer tomography dose index (CTDI) = dose measured in central and peripheral region of the subjects as a direct result of a CT section acquisition of T millimeters thick (independent from the two protocols) and dose length product (DLP) = total dose deposited over the length of the acquisition (dependent from the two protocols). Image quality was rated according to the following scores: 1, excellent; 2, good; 3, satisfactory; 4, moderate and 5, poor. The results were compared using Wilcoxon's test to identify significant difference in terms of image quality, scanning time, radiation exposure and presence of artifacts, assuming significance at a p value of <0.05. In the single-pass scanning, DLP was 2.671 mGy x cm and a total scan time of 35 s. In whole-body protocols, we have seen artifacts due to arm adduction in thorax and less image quality in brain. In the conventional segmented study, DLP was 3.217 mGy x cm and a total scan time of 65 s; this protocol offered less extraction capabilities of off-axial on focused images of the entire spine, aorta, facial bones or hip without rescanning. Protocol A revealed a significant decrease in scan time (35 vs 65 min, p < 0.05), time in the CT examination room (21.7 vs 31.6 min.; p < 0.05), and final image analysis (83.7 vs 102.9 min; p < 0.05) and radiation dose compared to protocol B (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found for patient transport time, image reconstruction time and imaging quality. Reconstruction and isotropic reformation of axial image acquired by whole-body, single-pass protocols due to entire spine evaluation, aortic and splanchnic CT angiography eliminate additional studies. The whole-body, single-pass protocols, compared with segmented acquisitions protocols, resulted in a reduced total radiation dose without relevant loss of diagnostic image information.

[Acute diagnosis of spinal trauma]

Most traumatic spinal injuries result from a high-energy process and are accompanied by other injuries. Following the CCSPR study, the presence of all low-risk factors (simple trauma mechanism, fully conscious, ambulatory at any time since trauma, neck rotation exceeding 45 degrees bilaterally) obviates the need to acutely image the cervical spine. Imaging is indicated in all other patients. Emergency spiral CT should be performed as the first imaging method in high-risk and moderate-risk patients; only in low-risk patients should conventional radiography be performed and trusted as the sole modality. The AO classification according to Magerl et al. is used for the subaxial spine, whereas the upper cervical spine should be classified separately because the anatomy is different at each level. Radiological evaluation of traumatic spinal injuries should be done systematically using the "ABCS" scheme.

Localization of Appendix with MDCT and Influence of Findings on Choice of Appendectomy Incision

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to show the relation between McBurney's point and the appendix in patients undergoing 3D MDCT and to investigate the effect of this information on a surgeon's choice of appendectomy incision.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Among 142 adults undergoing consecutive MDCT studies, 100 patients (35 women, 65 men; mean age, 52.1 years) with an identifiable appendix on abdominopelvic MDCT examinations were selected for the study group. The presence of intraabdominal mass or a history of abdominal surgery were the exclusion criteria. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the CT data was performed with a surface shaded display algorithm. The locations of the base of the appendix and McBurney's point were marked on a single 3D image that allowed display of the skin surface markings for each patient. The superoinferior and mediolateral distances from the level of the appendix to the level of McBurney's point were measured, and the radial distance was calculated from these measurements. A surgeon experienced in emergency abdominal surgery reviewed 3D CT images and one axial image showing the appendix, and his choice of incision for each patient based on the CT information was recorded. The influence of the superoinferior and mediolateral distances of the appendix from McBurney's point on the surgeon's decision was analyzed with a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The appendix was exactly at McBurney's point in only 4% of the patients. In 36% of the cases, the appendix was within 3 cm, in 28% of cases it was 3-5 cm, and in 36% of the cases it was more than 5 cm away from McBurney's point. Mean +/- SD superoinferior, mediolateral, and radial distances between the appendix and McBurney's point were 33.0 +/- 24.1, 20.8 +/- 19.3, and 42.1 +/- 26.7 mm, respectively. After reviewing the images, the surgeon would have altered his incision site in 35% of the cases. The surgeon preferred a higher incision in 28% and a lower incision in 7% of the cases. Both positive and negative superoinferior displacement away from McBurney's point were significant factors regarding the surgeon's decision to alter the incision (p = 0.005), and the superoinferior distance was more than 3 cm in 94% of the cases in which the surgeon would have altered the incision.

CONCLUSION

The location of the appendix varies widely among individuals, and McBurney's point has limitations as an anatomic landmark. Three-dimensional MDCT findings can be useful to surgeons customizing appendectomy incisions. Additional information about the location of the appendix in the CT report (if possible, together with a 3D image showing the location of the appendix) may be beneficial for surgeons performing appendectomy.

Optimization of Multiplanar Reformations from Isotropic Data Sets Acquired with 16–Detector Row Helical CT Scanner

Institutional review board approval and waiver of consent were obtained for the patient component of this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. By using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor detectors, radiation dose was determined for one eight-detector row and two 16-detector row computed tomographic (CT) protocols. A custom phantom was scanned by using the three protocols to identify isotropy. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were determined for the same protocols by using a third phantom. Seven patients had undergone isotropic 16-detector row CT of the abdomen and pelvis. Anonymized coronal reformations at various thicknesses were ranked qualitatively by three radiologists. Effective dose equivalents were similar for the eight- and 16-detector row protocols. When transverse and coronal reformations of data acquired in the custom phantom were compared, coronal reformations obtained with the 16-detector row and 0.625-mm section thickness protocol were found to be nearly identical to the transverse image for all sets of line pairs. CNRs were consistently highest on 5-mm-thick coronal reformations (CNR range, 1.2-3.3). For qualitative assessment, 2- and 3-mm-thick coronal reformations were consistently preferred.

Small-bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section multi-detector row CT

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess the added value of coronal reformations of the abdomen and pelvis from isotropic voxels by using 16-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction (SBO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board of this medical center with a waiver of informed consent. One hundred consecutive patients (40 men and 60 women; mean age, 55 years) suspected of having SBO and abdominal pain underwent 16-section multi-detector row CT with coronal reformations. Twenty-nine patients had a final diagnosis of SBO, and 71 patients did not. Three independent readers blinded to the diagnosis interpreted the CT scout scan, then transverse scans alone, and then transverse plus coronal scans for the presence of SBO and abnormal wall enhancement. Confidence was scored with a 1-5 scale (1 = absent, 5 = present).

RESULTS

Mean sensitivity and specificity of CT scout alone, transverse CT alone, and transverse plus coronal CT for the diagnosis of SBO were 88% and 86%, 87% and 87%, and 87% and 90%, respectively (not significant). In patients without SBO, transverse plus coronal CT enhanced confidence in the exclusion of SBO (P = .01). In patients with SBO, transverse plus coronal CT enhanced confidence in the diagnosis of SBO and identification of abnormal wall enhancement (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Transverse 16-section multi-detector row CT data sets are an excellent test for the diagnosis of SBO, while the addition of coronal reformations obtained from these isotropic data sets adds confidence to the diagnosis and exclusion of SBO.

Angiographic imaging of the lower extremities with multidetector CT

Multidetector CT (MDCT) has improved imaging of the arteries in the lower extremities. The main advantages of this novel technology are the exceptionally fast scan times, high spatial resolution, increased anatomic coverage, and capability to generate high-quality multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional (3-D) renderings from raw data that can be reprocessed easily and quickly. The applications of MDCT in imaging the lower extremities are multiple and varied. They include the evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive and aneurysmal disease, the patency and integrity of bypass grafts, and arterial injury owing to trauma. This article describes the techniques of lower extremity MDCT angiography and its use in a few clinical applications.

Evaluation of a 16-MDCT Scanner in an Emergency Department: Initial Clinical Experience and Workflow Analysis

OBJECTIVE

MDCT is especially suited for emergency purposes because it allows rapid high-resolution scans of large areas, fast high-quality reformatting in every orientation, and 3D illustration of the data set. In a prospective study, we evaluated the reliability and workflow of a dedicated emergency department 16-MDCT scanner in the management of patients presenting to the emergency department.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The use of a 16-MDCT scanner for 503 patients in the emergency department of a university clinic was evaluated. For reasons of workflow analysis, seven precise time intervals were recorded during the emergency examinations. A new setting for repositioning multiple-trauma patients after imaging of the head and neck from the head-first position to the feet-first position was introduced.

RESULTS

Six (1.2%) of the 503 patients were excluded because of technical malfunction or patient noncompliance. Image quality in the remaining 497 cases, including CT angiography and CT of multiple-trauma patients, was outstanding. Positioning of the patients took from 3 to 13 min depending on the body region examined, representing 33-67% of the mean room time, which ranged from 8 to 21 min. In multiple-trauma patients, the initial positioning took a mean of 6 min and repositioning took 8 min, representing 19% and 26% of total room time, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of a dedicated 16-MDCT scanner in the emergency department resulted in short examination times even for examinations of multiple body regions under emergency conditions. The introduced setting-repositioning of multiple-trauma patients-allowed high image quality to be maintained. The trade-off in multiple-trauma patients was prolonged room time because of patient repositioning.

Multi-detector computed tomography and 3-dimensional imaging in a multi-vendor picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) environment

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To show the impact of the introduction of multi-detector computed tomography (CT) on radiologic workflow and to demonstrate how this reflects on picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) requirements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Production measurements were obtained from different CT scanners (first two single-slice CT scanners; from December 2001 single and 4-slice CT; from April 2002 single and 16-slice CT) in number of patients from the radiologic information system. Implications on our PACS were recorded in terms of images and studies stored. Furthermore, our PACS design was made so that optimal use of 3-dimensional imaging within the radiologic workflow was possible. Finally, the number of non-diagnosed studies were recorded every day since the start of the transition to a filmless radiology department.

RESULTS

This PACS design achieved a high level of integration between simple viewing and advanced 3-dimensional imaging and is optimized for handling large amounts of data. Overall increase of patients scanned with CT from January 2002-December 2003 was 54%. The number of series increased by 286% from December 2001-April 2003 and by 130% from April 2002-December 2003. From January 2002-February 2003, the number of images per patient increased from 175 to 450 (157%). Non-diagnosed studies decreased from about 100-120 before to practically zero after PACS implementation.

CONCLUSION

PACS significantly increases productivity because of availability of the images and elimination of certain manual tasks. These results show that although the amount of examinations increases significantly with the introduction of MDCT, simultaneous introduction of PACS and filmless operation allows radiologists to handle the growth in workload.

Accuracy and Time Efficiency for the Detection of Thoracic Cage Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy and time efficiency of volume rendering (VR) compared with transverse images of multidetector-row computed tomography data to identify thoracic cage fractures.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 50 patients with acute blunt chest trauma were retrospectively analyzed by using VR and transverse images. The number, location, and type of rib and sternal fractures revealed by these viewing methods were compared, and the time needed for diagnosis was measured.

RESULTS

Thirty of 50 patients had a total of 178 rib fractures. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for their detection were similar for transverse (96%, 100%, and 99%) and VR (98%, 100%, and 100%) images. Three sternal fractures were correctly diagnosed with VR, and 1 was missed on transverse images by both readers. The time to read VR images (mean of 105 seconds) was significantly reduced compared with the time needed for transverse image reading (mean of 167 seconds; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Volume rendering of computed tomography data depicts thoracic cage fractures with a high accuracy similar to that of transverse images but is considerably faster.

MDCT-imaging of peripheral arterial disease

With the design and development of advanced computed tomography (CT) techniques and applications, like the newest generation of 16-detector-row CTs, CT angiography of the lower limb becomes a feasible tool for imaging peripheral vascular disease. Due to several advantages, compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA), including minimal invasiveness, CT angiography competes against diagnostic DSA in several clinical situations. 16-DCT offers the possibility to acquire thin slices from the diaphragm to the ankle in less than 40 sec. Easily, a data set of 800 to 1200 transverse slices may be created. To use transverse reconstructions alone to read these volumetric data sets is not appropriate. Powerful post-processing tools for volumetric analysis are required so that routine interpretation can be performed as efficiently and accurately as transverse section review. Because of its widespread availability and applicability, CT angiography of the lower extremities may be applied to patients in a pre- or post-procedural situation and also serves as a first line modality in patients with acute onset of clinical symptoms. Although multidetector CT arteriography is rapidly achieving clinical acceptance, further studies need to be performed to fully evaluate the clinical value of this method of peripheral arterial imaging. This article reviews the current status of multidetector CT peripheral arteriography, including indications, technical details, image post-processing, radiation exposure, and clinical results.