Solitary breast metastasis as the first sign of a squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: imaging findings

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of intramammary metastases

The purpose of this study was to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of intramammary metastases (IM). We identified 8 cases with IM, which were investigated by breast MRI (1.5T). In every case, the diagnosis of IM was proven histopathologically on breast biopsy specimens. Overall, 187 IM were identified. IM had inconsistent MRI features, which cannot be clearly classify as benign or malignant. IM should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions to avoid possible misinterpretations.

Metastases to the breast from non-mammary malignancies: primary tumors, prevalence, clinical signs, and radiological features

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Most secondary intramammary tumors occur as metastatic involvement from the contralateral breast. Breast metastases (BM) from nonmammary malignancies are very rare. The aims of this study were to estimate retrospectively the prevalence of BM from nonmammary malignancies and to describe their radiologic appearance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BM were identified in 51 patients, including 43 women and eight men with a median age of 61 years (range, 24-84 years). Computed tomography of the thoracic region identified 108 lesions in 38 patients. Mammography was available for 37 patients (54 lesions). Ultrasound evaluation was performed in 43 patients (71 lesions). In 24 patients (93 lesions), magnetic resonance imaging of the breast was done. Images were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon.

RESULTS

The prevalence of BM in several tumors ranged from 0.12% to 4.92%. On computed tomography, most metastases were round or oval in shape with marked or moderate enhancement. On mammography, solitary or multiple round or oval masses with circumscribed margins were the most common pattern of BM. Ten percent showed microcalcifications. On ultrasound, most BM were hypoechoic, oval or round in shape, with microlobulated or circumscribed margins, and posterior acoustic enhancement. Doppler imaging showed hypervascularity in 39% of BM. On magnetic resonance imaging, most lesions demonstrated marked homogenous contrast enhancement. Type 1 kinetic curve was seen in 18%, type 2 in 52%, and type 3 in 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiologic features reported in this study should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Nonmammary malignancies of the breast: ultrasound, CT, and MRI

The three major categories of nonmammary malignancies of the breast include primary and secondary lymphoreticular malignancy, primary and secondary sarcoma, and hematogenous metastasis. This article describes the imaging features of 35 nonmammary malignancies of the breast and axilla with histopathologic confirmation. These include primary and secondary breast lymphoma, primary axillary nodal lymphoma, metastatic acute lymphatic leukemia, metastatic plasmacytoma, granulocytic sarcoma, primary angiosarcoma, metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma, hematogenous metastasis from primary lung, ovarian, cervical, thyroid, and colonic carcinoma, malignant melanoma, carcinoma of the nasal cavity, and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. Wherever possible, correlation between mammography and ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is made.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasingly used as a complementary diagnostic modality in breast imaging. The sensitivity of MR imaging of the breast for malignancy has consistently been reported to be excellent. The specificity has been rather variable. Study methods and imaging techniques are not standardized and there is still a great deal of uncertainty about MR imaging's place in clinical practice. Nevertheless, radiologists should be familiar with the current technique and the varying MR appearance of breast tumors to improve the accuracy of this method. This paper reviews the techniques for breast MR imaging, the pathopysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors, and the current knowledge about detection and differentiation of breast tumors. In addition, future directions for breast MR imaging are discussed.