Evolution of DNA Topoisomerases and DNA Polymerases: a Perspective from Archaea

Archaeal DNA replication: identifying the pieces to solve a puzzle

Archaeal organisms are currently recognized as very exciting and useful experimental materials. A major challenge to molecular biologists studying the biology of Archaea is their DNA replication mechanism. Undoubtedly, a full understanding of DNA replication in Archaea requires the identification of all the proteins involved. In each of four completely sequenced genomes, only one DNA polymerase (Pol BI proposed in this review from family B enzyme) was reported. This observation suggested that either a single DNA polymerase performs the task of replicating the genome and repairing the mutations or these genomes contain other DNA polymerases that cannot be identified by amino acid sequence. Recently, a heterodimeric DNA polymerase (Pol II, or Pol D as proposed in this review) was discovered in the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrococcus furiosus. The genes coding for DP1 and DP2, the subunits of this DNA polymerase, are highly conserved in the Euryarchaeota. Euryarchaeotic DP1, the small subunit of Pol II (Pol D), has sequence similarity with the small subunit of eukaryotic DNA polymerase delta. DP2 protein, the large subunit of Pol II (Pol D), seems to be a catalytic subunit. Despite possessing an excellent primer extension ability in vitro, Pol II (Pol D) may yet require accessory proteins to perform all of its functions in euryarchaeotic cells. This review summarizes our present knowledge about archaeal DNA polymerases and their relationship with those accessory proteins, which were predicted from the genome sequences.

Tailed bacteriophages: the order caudovirales

Tailed bacteriophages have a common origin and constitute an order with three families, named Caudovirales. Their structured tail is unique. Tailed phages share a series of high-level taxonomic properties and show many facultative features that are unique or rare in viruses, for example, tail appendages and unusual bases. They share with other viruses, especially herpesviruses, elements of morphogenesis and life-style that are attributed to convergent evolution. Tailed phages present three types of lysogeny, exemplified by phages lambda, Mu, and P1. Lysogeny appears as a secondary property acquired by horizontal gene transfer. Amino acid sequence alignments (notably of DNA polymerases, integrases, and peptidoglycan hydrolases) indicate frequent events of horizontal gene transfer in tailed phages. Common capsid and tail proteins have not been detected. Tailed phages possibly evolved from small protein shells with a few genes sufficient for some basal level of productive infection. This early stage can no longer be traced. At one point, this precursor phage became perfected. Some of its features were perfect enough to be transmitted until today. It is tempting to list major present-day properties of tailed phages in the past tense to construct a tentative history of these viruses: 1. Tailed phages originated in the early Precambrian, long before eukaryotes and their viruses. 2. The ur-tailed phage, already a quite evolved virus, had an icosahedral head of about 60 nm in diameter and a long non-contractile tail with sixfold symmetry. The capsid contained a single molecule of dsDNA of about 50 kb, and the tail was probably provided with a fixation apparatus. Head and tail were held together by a connector. a. The particle contained no lipids, was heavier than most viruses to come, and had a high DNA content proportional to its capsid size (about 50%). b. Most of its DNA coded for structural proteins. Morphopoietic genes clustered at one end of the genome, with head genes preceding tail genes. Lytic enzymes were probably coded for. A part of the phage genome was nonessential and possibly bacterial. Were tailed phages general transductants since the beginning? 3. The virus infected its host from the outside, injecting its DNA. Replication involved transcription in several waves and formation of DNA concatemers. Novel phages were released by burst of the infected cell after lysis of host membranes by a peptidoglycan hydrolase (and a holin?). a. Capsids were assembled from a starting point, the connector, and around a scaffold. They underwent an elaborate maturation process involving protein cleavage and capsid expansion. Heads and tails were assembled separately and joined later. b. The DNA was cut to size and entered preformed capsids by a headful mechanism. 4. Subsequently, tailed phages diversified by: a. Evolving contractile or short tails and elongated heads. b. Exchanging genes or gene fragments with other phages. c. Becoming temperate by acquiring an integrase-excisionase complex, plasmid parts, or transposons. d. Acquiring DNA and RNA polymerases and other replication enzymes. e. Exchanging lysin genes with their hosts. f. Losing the ability to form concatemers as a consequence of acquiring transposons (Mu) or proteinprimed DNA polymerases (phi 29). Present-day tailed phages appear as chimeras, but their monophyletic origin is still inscribed in their morphology, genome structure, and replication strategy. It may also be evident in the three-dimensional structure of capsid and tail proteins. It is unlikely to be found in amino acid sequences because constitutive proteins must be so old that relationships were obliterated and most or all replication-, lysogeny-, and lysis-related proteins appear to have been borrowed. However, the sum of tailed phage properties and behavior is so characteristic that tailed phages cannot be confused with other viruses.

A gyrB-like gene from the hyperthermophilic bacterion Thermotoga maritima

We have cloned and sequenced two overlapping DNA fragments (3236 bp) containing a gene encoding the ATPase subunit of a type II DNA topoisomerase from the hyperthermophilic bacterion Thermotoga maritima (Tm Top2B). The deduced protein is composed of 636 aa with a calculated molecular mass of 72415 Da. It shares significant similarities with the ATPase subunits of mesophilic bacterial DNA topoisomerases II, either DNA gyrase (GyrB) or DNA topoisomerase IV (ParE). Although the highest similarity scores are obtained with GyrB proteins (55% identity with Bacillus subtilis DNA gyrase), a detailed phylogenetic analysis of all known DNA topoisomerases II does not allow us to determine if Tm Top2B corresponds to a DNA gyrase or a DNA topoisomerase IV. This hyperthermophilic Top2B protein exhibits a larger amount of charged amino acids than its mesophilic homologues, a feature which could be important for its thermostability. No gyrA-like gene has been found near top2B. A gene coding for a transaminase B-like protein was found in the upstream region of top2B.

The unique DNA topology and DNA topoisomerases of hyperthermophilic archaea

Hyperthermophilic archaea exhibit a unique pattern of DNA topoisomerase activities. They have a peculiar enzyme, reverse gyrase, which introduces positive superturns into DNA at the expense of ATP. This enzyme has been found in all hyperthermophiles tested so far (including Bacteria) but never in mesophiles. Reverse gyrases are formed by the association of a helicase-like domain and a 5'-type 1 DNA topoisomerase. These two domains might be located on the same polypeptide. However, in the methanogenic archaeon Methanopyrus kandleri, the topoisomerase domain is divided between two subunits. Besides reverse gyrase, Archaea contain other type 1 DNA topoisomerases; in particular, M. kandleri harbors the only known procaryotic 3'-type 1 DNA topoisomerase (Topo V). Hyperthermophilic archaea also exhibit specific type II DNA topoisomerases (Topo II), i.e. whereas mesophilic Bacteria have a Topo II that produces negative supercoiling (DNA gyrase), the Topo II from Sulfolobus and Pyrococcus lack gyrase activity and are the smallest enzymes of this type known so far. This peculiar pattern of DNA topoisomerases in hyperthermophilic archaea is paralleled by a unique DNA topology, i.e. whereas DNA isolated from Bacteria and Eucarya is negatively supercoiled, plasmidic DNA from hyperthermophilic archaea are from relaxed to positively supercoiled. The possible evolutionary implications of these findings are discussed in this review. We speculate that gyrase activity in mesophiles and reverse gyrase activity in hyperthermophiles might have originated in the course of procaryote evolution to balance the effect of temperature changes on DNA structure.

Speculations on the origin of life and thermophily: review of available information on reverse gyrase suggests that hyperthermophilic procaryotes are not so primitive

All present-day hyperthermophiles studied so far (either Bacteria or Archaea) contain a unique DNA topoisomerase, reverse gyrase, which probably helps to stabilize genomic DNA at high temperature. Herein the data relating this enzyme is reviewed and discussed from the perspective of the nature of the last detectable common ancestor and the origin of life. The sequence of the gene encoding reverse gyrase from an archaeon, Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, suggests that this enzyme contains both a helicase and a topoisomerase domains (Confalonieri et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1993, 90, 4735). Accordingly, it has been proposed that reversed gyrase originated by the fusion of DNA helicase and DNA topoisomerase genes. If reverse gyrase is essential for life at high temperature, its composite structure suggests that DNA helicases and topoisomerases appeared independently and first evolved in a mesophilic world. Such scenario contradicts the hypothesis that a direct link connects present day hyperthermophiles to a hot origin of life. We discuss different patterns for the early cellular evolution in which reverse gyrase appeared either before the emergence of the last common ancestor of Archaea, Bacteria and Eucarya, or in a lineage common to the two procaryotic domains. The later scenario could explain why all today hyperthermophiles are procaryotes.

Looking for the most "primitive" organism(s) on Earth today: the state of the art

Molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed a tripartite division of the living world into two procaryotic groups, Bacteria and Archaea, and one eucaryotic group, Eucarya. Which group is the most "primitive"? Which groups are sister? The answer to these questions would help to delineate the characters of the last common ancestor to all living beings, as a first step to reconstruct the earliest periods of biological evolution on Earth. The current "Procaryotic dogma" claims that procaryotes are primitive. Since the ancestor of Archaea was most probably a hyperthermophile, and since bacteria too might have originated from hyperthermophiles, the procaryotic dogma has been recently connected to the hot origin of life hypothesis. However, the notion that present-day hyperthermophiles are primitive has been challenged by recent findings, in these unique microorganisms, of very elaborate adaptative devices for life at high temperature. Accordingly, I discuss here alternative hypotheses that challenge the procaryotic dogma, such as the idea of a universal ancestor with molecular features in between those of eucaryotes and procaryotes, or the origin of procaryotes via thermophilic adaptation. Clearly, major evolutionary questions about early cellular evolution on Earth remain to be settled before we can speculate with confidence about which kinds of life might have appeared on other planets.

Effects of salt and temperature on plasmid topology in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii

We report here the effect of environmental parameters, salinity, temperature, and an intercalating drug on plasmid topology in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. We first studied the topological state of the plasmid pHV11 in media of different salt compositions and concentrations. The superhelical density of plasmid PHV11 varies in a way that depends on the kind of salt and on the concentrations of individual salts. With respect to growth temperature, the plasmid linking number increased at higher temperature in a linear way, contrary to what has been reported for Escherichia coli, in which the plasmid linking number decreased at higher temperature. These results suggest that some of the mechanisms that control DNA supercoiling in halophilic Archaea may be different from those described for E. coli. However, homeostatic control of DNA supercoiling seems to occur in haloarchaea, as in Bacteria, since we found that relaxation of DNA by chloroquine triggers an increase in negative supercoiling.