Medical Therapy for Patients with Aortic Insufficiency

Aortic insufficiency: Indications for surgery in children

The goals of surgery in children with chronic aortic insufficiency are to prevent irreversible left ventricular dysfunction and to provide for long-term survival. In the past, surgical options included placement of a mechanical valve, a porcine bioprosthesis, or an aortic valve homograft. Complications from these options include thromboembolism, prosthetic valve endocarditis, limited durability, and lack of growth potential. The increasing utilization of the Ross procedure to treat chronic aortic insufficiency has led to new interest in the question of when to operate on a regurgitant aortic valve. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of aortic insufficiency and the invasive and noninvasive preoperative indices that may indicate the optimal time for aortic valve surgery in the pediatric population. Copyright 1998 by W.B. Saunders Company

Mortality and need for reoperation in patients with mild-to-moderate asymptomatic aortic valve disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft alone

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may have concurrent asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic insufficiency (AI). This retrospective study was performed to evaluate outcomes in patients with aortic valve disease undergoing CABG with or without aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

Study groups included 414 patients undergoing combined AVR and CABG (AVR-CABG group) and 62 patients with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate AS, AI, or both undergoing CABG but not AVR (CABG group). End points included 30-day mortality rate, time to cardiac mortality, time to all-cause mortality, and time to aortic valve reoperation. Reoperation refers to surgery for replacement of the native aortic valve in the CABG group or replacement of the prosthetic aortic valve in the AVR-CABG group. Important patient characteristics affecting outcomes were determined by using Cox proportional-hazard analysis. These variables were then included in multivariable analyses by using logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional-hazard modeling to compare outcomes between each patient group.

RESULTS

No difference was seen in any of the mortality end points between the CABG group and the AVR-CABG group after controlling for significant differences between the groups. However, the need for reoperation for AVR was significantly higher for the CABG group than the AVR-CABG group. For patients followed for up to 6 years, the estimated need for aortic valve reoperation was 24.3% in the CABG group versus 3% in the AVR-CABG group.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of these results, patients with asymptomatic AS or AI should be considered for AVR at the time of CABG.