D-DIMER AS A NOVEL MARKER OF INFLAMMATION IN PERICARDITIS

D-dimer as a diagnostic and prognostic plasma biomarker in patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis

OBJECTIVES

The impact of plasma biomarkers on diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute pericarditis (AP) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to assess the diagnostic and prognostic role of d-dimer (DD), an easily obtainable biomarker, in patients with AP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective clinical study enrolling 265 consecutive patients hospitalized between September 2010 and May 2019 with a first episode of AP. At baseline, demographics, clinical features, laboratory and imaging findings were recorded. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 18 months. Endpoints included cardiac tamponade, new-onset atrial fibrillation, pericardial drainage, recurrent/constrictive pericarditis and death.

RESULTS

DD was measured in 165 out of 265 patients (62.3%, median levels 1456 ng/mL) Among them, 121 patients (73.3%) presented with elevated age-adjusted DD levels. Patients with elevated DD depicted a higher rate of pleural (69.4%, vs 38.6%, p<0.001) and pericardial effusions (89.3% vs 72.7%, p = 0.009). Elevated DD correlated with admission (rho=0.37) and peak (rho=0.36) C-reactive protein values. Patients with elevated DD depicted a trend towards a greater prevalence of pericardial tamponade vs those without (14.9% vs 4.5% respectively, p = 0.07). In the 43.8% of patients with elevated DD who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), no case of pulmonary embolism or aortic syndrome was unveiled.

CONCLUSION

DD elevation is detected in the majority of AP cases at presentation and may herald cardiac tamponade. In patients with chest pain not attributable to alternative causes, elevated DD denotes an inflammatory condition and should not prompt unnecessary investigations, such as CTPA.

Pericarditis and Post-cardiac Injury Syndrome as a Sequelae of Acute Myocardial Infarction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pericarditis secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is known to develop either immediately or after a latent period of few months. Due to varied presentation and timing, its diagnosis and treatment can be challenging. This article reviews underlying mechanisms and the role of cardiac imaging in investigating and managing this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Timely diagnosis of pericarditis after AMI is important to prevent potential progression to complicated pericarditis. Clinical suspicion warrants initial investigation with serum inflammatory levels, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. When findings are inconclusive, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography can provide additional diagnostic information. Pericarditis after AMI is a treatable condition. Clinicians should maintain a high suspicion in this era of revascularization and develop a strategic plan for timely diagnosis and management.