Reflex control of coronary vascular tone by cardiopulmonary receptors in humans

β-Adrenergic blockade enhances coronary vasoconstrictor response to forehead cooling

Forehead cooling activates the sympathetic nervous system and can trigger angina pectoris in susceptible individuals. However, the effect of forehead cooling on coronary blood flow velocity (CBV) is not well understood. In this human experiment, we tested the hypotheses that forehead cooling reduces CBV (i.e., coronary vasoconstriction) and that this vasoconstrictor effect would be enhanced under systemic β-adrenergic blockade. A total of 30 healthy subjects (age range, 23-79 years) underwent Doppler echocardiography evaluation of CBV in response to 60 s of forehead cooling (1°C ice bag on forehead). A subset of subjects (n = 10) also underwent the procedures after an intravenous infusion of propranolol. Rate pressure product (RPP) was used as an index of myocardial oxygen demand. Consistent with our first hypothesis, forehead cooling reduced CBV from 19.5 ± 0.7 to 17.5 ± 0.8 cm/s (P < 0.001), whereas mean arterial pressure increased by 11 ± 2 mmHg (P < 0.001). Consistent with our second hypothesis, forehead cooling reduced CBV under propranolol despite a significant rise in RPP. The current studies indicate that forehead cooling elicits a sympathetically mediated pressor response and a reduction in CBV, and this effect is augmented under β-blockade. The results are consistent with sympathetic activation of β-receptor coronary vasodilation in humans, as has been demonstrated in animals.

Intravenous phentolamine abolishes coronary vasoconstriction in response to mild central hypovolemia

Animal studies indicate alpha-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction helps maintain left ventricular function during physiological stress. Whether this process occurs in humans is unknown. In the current study, we used transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to test the effect of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) on coronary blood flow velocity (CBV, left anterior descending coronary artery) and myocardial function in eight young healthy subjects before and after systemic infusion of phentolamine, a nonselective alpha blocker. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were monitored on a beat-by-beat basis. Peak diastolic CBV and myocardial systolic and diastolic tissue velocities (Sm and Em), were quantified at baseline, and at -5 mmHg, -10 mmHg, and -15 mmHg LBNP. Coronary vascular resistance index (CVRI) was calculated as the quotient of diastolic BP and CBV. Phentolamine reduced baseline diastolic BP and increased HR but did not affect the reflex adjustments to LBNP. The reduction in CBV due to LBNP was blunted by phentolamine at -10 mmHg and -15 mmHg. Importantly, the increase in CVRI (i.e., coronary vasoconstriction) was abolished by phentolamine at -5 mmHg (0.21 ± 0.06 vs. 0.83 ± 0.13), -10 mmHg (0.24 ± 0.03 vs. 1.68 ± 0.31), and -15 mmHg (0.27 ± 0.10 vs. 2.34 ± 0.43). These data indicate that alpha-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction is present during low levels of LBNP. With alpha blockade, more coronary flow is needed to maintain cardiac function. Our data suggest that alpha-adrenergic tone enhances coronary flow efficiency, presumably by redistributing flow from the epicardium to the endocardium.

Differences in coronary blood flow in aortic regurgitation and systemic arterial hypertension have implications for diastolic blood pressure targets: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective was to evaluate coronary blood flow (CBF) in patients with systemic arterial hypertension (HTN) and to compare it with CBF in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR). A systematic literature search was conducted using the reference terms "coronary blood flow" and either "aortic regurgitation" or "hypertension." The selection criteria included CBF measurement in a concomitant control group, except studies evaluating CBF with aortic-valve replacement surgery. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 318 persons with HTN, with 185 controls; and 102 persons with AR, with 144 controls. Despite an overall increase in CBF in HTN, CBF per gram of left ventricular mass was significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced. In contrast, CBF per gram of left ventricular mass was significantly (P = 0.004) increased in AR. Aortic regurgitation was associated with a significant (P < 0.0001) increase in CBF during systole and away from diastole, in contrast to persons with HTN. Aortic-valve replacement reversed the increase in systolic CBF. These data suggest that patients with HTN are more vulnerable than patients with AR to lower diastolic blood pressure (DBP), because resting CBF is compromised in HTN. Furthermore, patients with HTN may not compensate for DBP reductions by shifting CBF to systole, such as can occur with the low DBP in AR. Lower DBP in patients with AR cannot be used to justify treating patients with HTN to similar DBP because of the dramatic differences in CBF between the 2 conditions.

Coronary blood flow responses to physiological stress in humans

Animal reports suggest that reflex activation of cardiac sympathetic nerves can evoke coronary vasoconstriction. Conversely, physiological stress may induce coronary vasodilation to meet an increased metabolic demand. Whether the sympathetic nervous system can modulate coronary vasomotor tone in response to stress in humans is unclear. Coronary blood velocity (CBV), an index of coronary blood flow, can be measured in humans by noninvasive duplex ultrasound. We studied 11 healthy volunteers and measured beat-by-beat changes in CBV, blood pressure, and heart rate during 1) static handgrip for 20 s at 10% and 70% of maximal voluntary contraction; 2) lower body negative pressure at -10 and -30 mmHg for 3 min each; 3) cold pressor test for 90 s; and 4) hypoxia (10% O(2)), hyperoxia (100% O(2)), and hypercapnia (5% CO(2)) for 5 min each. At the higher level of handgrip, mean blood pressure increased (P < 0.001), whereas CBV did not change [P = not significant (NS)]. In addition, during lower body negative pressure, CBV decreased (P < 0.02; and P < 0.01, for -10 and -30 mmHg, respectively), whereas blood pressure did not change (P = NS). The dissociation between the responses of CBV and blood pressure to handgrip and lower body negative pressure is consistent with coronary vasoconstriction. During hypoxia, CBV increased (P < 0.02) and decreased during hyperoxia (P < 0.01), although blood pressure did not change (P = NS), suggesting coronary vasodilation during hypoxia and vasoconstriction during hyperoxia. In contrast, concordant increases in CBV and blood pressure were noted during the cold pressor test, and hypercapnia had no effects on either parameter. Thus the physiological stress known to be associated with sympathetic activation can produce coronary vasoconstriction in humans. Contrasting responses were noted during systemic hypoxia and hyperoxia where mechanisms independent of autonomic influences appear to dominate the vascular end-organ effects.

Cardiopulmonary receptor and arterial baroreceptor reflexes after acute myocardial infarction

The baroreceptor-heart rate reflex in human is impaired 2 days after a myocardial infarction but it improves 10 days after the acute coronary event. This study investigated whether (1) the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex improvement takes the reflex back to normal, and (2) the cardiopulmonary reflex is affected by myocardial infarction. In subjects studied 8 to 11 days after a transmural anterior or inferior myocardial infarction the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex sensitivity (slope of the linear regression between negative neck chamber pressures and lengthenings in RR interval) was similar to that seen in control subjects (-6.2 +/- 0.8 vs -6.0 +/- 0.6 ms/mm Hg, mean +/- SEM) and did not change when reassessed 10 days later. In contrast, the cardiopulmonary reflex sensitivity (changes in forearm vascular resistance induced by changing central venous pressure through nonhypotensive lower body suction and leg raising) was markedly less in subjects studied 8 to 11 days after myocardial infarction than in control subjects; the reduction amounted to 58.1 +/- 8% (p less than 0.01). The cardiopulmonary reflex sensitivity greatly improved when reassessed 28 to 45 days later. Thus, the baroreflex is normal about 10 days after myocardial infarction. This condition markedly impairs the cardiopulmonary reflex, but the impairment is also transient.

Prolonged duration of myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired cardiopulmonary baroreceptor sensitivity

To investigate the potential contribution of cardiopulmonary reflexes in myocardial ischemia, the coronary vascular response to cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading and the number and the duration of spontaneous episodes of symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia were evaluated in 23 patients with coronary heart disease. Lower-body negative pressure at -10 mm Hg, which causes selective deactivation of cardiopulmonary receptors, reduced left ventricular filling pressure in all patients, but calculated coronary vascular resistance increased in only 14 patients (from 0.846 +/- 0.1 to 1.07 +/- 0.1 mm Hg/ml/min, p less than 0.01) (group 1). In the remaining nine patients, coronary resistance did not change during cardiopulmonary receptor unloading (group 2). A 60-mm Hg increase in neck tissue pressure, which induces arterial baroreflex-mediated sympathetic activation, caused comparable coronary vasoconstriction in the two groups. Clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, except that a lower ejection fraction was measured in group 1 (45 +/- 2% vs. 56 +/- 1%, p less than 0.01). In the 14 patients in group 1, 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring showed 151 episodes of myocardial ischemia (average individual value, 10.8 +/- 1), 137 of which were asymptomatic, with an individual daily ischemic period of 62 +/- 6 minutes. In contrast, the nine patients in group 2 had only symptomatic episodes of myocardial ischemia, and the daily ischemic period in these patients was longer than in patients of group 1 (104 +/- 10 minutes, p less than 0.01). After a 3-day treatment with digitalis, the patients of group 2 showed 38 asymptomatic episodes of myocardial ischemia and a shorter daily ischemic period (85 +/- 6 minutes, p less than 0.01 vs. control conditions). In contrast, no change in number and duration of the ischemic episodes was detected in group 1. The effects of acute administration of digitalis (Lanatoside-C 0.02 mg/kg body wt e.v.) on the coronary vascular response to cardiopulmonary receptor unloading were assessed in a separate group of patients with ischemic heart disease. Digitalis treatment did not significantly modify the magnitude of the coronary vascular response induced by -10 mm Hg lower-body negative pressure in the patients showing in control conditions an increase of coronary vascular resistance greater than 20% of the basal value during cardiopulmonary receptor unloading. On the contrary, digitalis potentiated the coronary reflex response to -10 mm Hg lower-body negative pressure in the patients with impaired cardiopulmonary responsiveness (delta percent increase in coronary vascular resistance: 1 +/- 1% in control conditions; 23 +/- 3.9% after digitalis, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)