Oral involvement in autoimmune blistering diseases

Oral mucosal lesions in the mouth as first sign of dermatological diseases and disorders

Oral mucosal lesions manifest as a first sign of immune-mediated disorders. Lichen planus, pemphigus and pemphigoid are the most frequent immunologically mediated mucocutaneous diseases with oral involvement. Oral lesions are initially detected by dental health practitioners. Early detection can help in appropriate treatment and better quality of life. Based on an analysis of 6,300 medical records from the period 1997 to 2018, 105 (1.66%) were attributable to these immunologically mediated diseases, of which 86 (1.36%) were due to lichen planus, 4 (0.06%) to pemphigus and 15 (0.23%) to pemphigoid.

Immune-Mediated Desquamative Gingivitis and Optical Coherence Tomography Diagnostic Patterns: Clinical Implication from a Systematic Review

Desquamative Gingivitis (DG) comprises heterogeneous clinical manifestations of numerous immune-mediated muco-cutaneous diseases. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) has been proposed as a valuable diagnostic support even if, to date, there are no standardized OCT-diagnostic patterns applicable to DGs. A systematic review was performed to detect existing data on in vivo OCT diagnostic patterns of the most common immune-mediated DGs (i.e., pemphigus vulgaris, mucous membrane pemphigoid and oral lichen planus). It has been found that OCT exhibits specific patterns that address the diagnosis of DG by pemphigus vulgaris (i.e., intraepithelial unilocular blister, reduced epithelial thickness, presence of acantholytic cells in the blister) and by mucous membrane pemphigoid (i.e., subepithelial multilocular blister, presence of inflammatory infiltrate), but not by oral lichen planus. These patterns could offer an attractive diagnostic OCT framework to support the clinical preliminary assessment and monitoring of these complex pathological conditions.

Ultra-high frequency ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of oral pemphigus and pemphigoid: An explorative study

OBJECTIVES

Intraoral ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) is an emerging technique in oral medicine, due to its possibility to provide submillimeter resolution imaging of superficial mucosal structures. In this study, the potential role of UHFUS in the diagnosis of oral pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected oral PV or MMP were enrolled. All patients underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests, intraoral UHFUS scan, and biopsy. Histology and direct immunofluorescence were set as benchmark for diagnosis confirmation. The sensitivity and specificity of UHFUS compared to histology were assessed. Mann-Whitney test was performed to evaluate the presence of differences in the echogenicity of PV and MMP. P-value was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with PV, and twelve with MMP. The UHFUS features of PV and MMP lesions were described. Image analysis showed statistically significant differences between the echogenicity of PV and MMP lesions (P < 0.05). Good concordance between UHFUS and histology was found. UHFUS showed 75% sensitivity in the diagnosis of PV and 66.7% in the diagnosis of MMP.

CONCLUSIONS

UHFUS appears a valuable tool in the diagnosis of PV and MMP. Although histology and immunofluorescence remain the gold standard, UHFUS role in the diagnostic algorithm of PV and MMP seems promising as a chair-side tool consistently enhancing clinical evaluation of oral bullous lesions.

The optimal oral biopsy site for diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Accepted 'standard practice' for the diagnosis of immunobullous disease is a perilesional sample for direct immunofluorescence (DIF).

OBJECTIVES

To compare diagnostic outcomes of a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) with a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 251 DIF-positive patients with MMP and 77 DIF-positive patients with PV was undertaken. Parameters analysed included the intraoral sites of involvement and histopathological, DIF and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) findings.

RESULTS

For MMP, PLB was positive in 134 of 143 (93·7%) samples, compared with 129 of 144 (89·6%) by NBPB. The diagnostic sensitivities for PLB (81%, 39 of 48) and NBPB (77%, 37 of 48) among 48 patients who underwent both techniques were not significantly different (P = 0·62). In gingival-only MMP, PLB was positive in 63 of 69 (91%) and NBPB was positive in 63 of 75 (84%). For multisite MMP, PLB was positive in 71 of 74 (96%) and NBPB was positive in 66 of 69 (96%). In gingival-only MMP, biopsies from reflected alveolar mucosa in 17 consecutive patients were positive in 17 of 17 cases (100%). For PV, PLB was positive in 42 of 43 (98%), compared with 42 of 42 (100%) by NBPB. Histopathology was diagnostic in 93 of 134 (69·4%) cases of MMP and 38 of 41 (93%) cases of PV. IIF was positive in 126 of 197 (64·0%) MMP and 68 of 74 (92%) PV patient sera.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest series of combined oral DIF results in patients with MMP and PV, we have shown that NBPB is equivalent to PLB for the diagnosis of PV and multisite MMP, and is more sensitive than both histology and IIF. What's already known about this topic? The variation in sensitivity of oral biopsy sites for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) in the diagnosis of oral MMP and PV has not been studied in detail in large series of patients. Biopsy can be challenging due to difficult access and fragility of the oral mucosa. The diagnostic biopsy technique is therefore critical. What does this study add? We have shown that a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) from uninvolved oral mucosa is as sensitive as a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for diagnosis of oral PV, and superior to serology and histology. For multisite MMP, NBPB is equivalent to PLB and is more sensitive than serology and histology. The oral punch biopsy technique on uninvolved buccal mucosa tissue is a simple and safe practical method for diagnosing oral PV and MMP.

Oral mucosal diseases: Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Subepithelial vesiculobullous conditions are chronic autoimmune disorders that arise from reactions directed against components of the hemidesmosomes or basement membrane zones (BMZ) of stratified squamous epithelium to which the term immune-mediated subepithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has been given. Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is the most common, but variants do exist. Non-immune disorders that involve these epithelial components typically have a genetic basis--the main example being epidermolysis bullosa. All subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders present as blisters and erosions, and diagnosis must be confirmed by biopsy examination with immunostaining, sometimes supplemented by other investigations. No single treatment reliably controls all subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders; the immunological differences within IMSEBD may account for differences in responses to treatment. Currently, as well as improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory treatment is used to control the oral lesions of MMP, but it is not known if its specific subsets reliably respond to different agents.

Ocular manifestations of blistering diseases

Ocular manifestations are a comorbidity of a group of chronic autoimmune blistering diseases that includes mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear immunoglobulin A disease, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and ocular pemphigus vulgaris. Various diagnostic measures differentiate between the diseases and allow for appropriate treatment including a specific selection of immunomodulatory medications. New treatment modalities offer alternatives that may minimize disease severity and residual tissue damage and may reduce treatment-related complications.

Response of ocular pemphigus vulgaris to therapy. Case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune bullous disease characterized by blistering and erosions within skin and mucous membranes. Lesions appear most commonly on mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity. Ocular involvement in patients with PV has rarely been reported.

MAIN OBSERVATION

A 47-year-old male patient with a 2 month history of oral erosions and dysphagia developed severe conjunctivitis with periodical presence of purulent discharge, photophobia and burning sensations. The diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris was confirmed by histopathology, direct immunofluorescence and detection of anti-desmogelin 3 antibodies in patients' serum. Treatment was introduced with prednisone at a dose of 80 mg per day (1 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 100 mg daily (1.25 mg/kg). After 7 days of therapy a significant reduction of eye symptoms was observed and after 4 weeks of treatment full clinical remission was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

The grounds for rare involvement of conjunctiva in pemphigus vulgaris is unclear. We hypothesize that inactivation of conjunctival desmoglein 3 may be compensated by other desmosomal proteins. Severe conjunctivitis may be the dominating clinical manifestation in pemphigus vulgaris. This implies a need of establishing distinct severity criteria and therapeutic standards for ocular pemphigus. In our patient rapid clinical response was achieved after introducing combined treatment with prednisone and oral cyclophosphamide.

Mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: therapeutic approach and outcome in 113 patients

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) are the most common forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Various topical and systemic therapeutic alternatives are available, but there is no standard or definite curative treatment regimen. When making a decision about the appropriate treatment modality, the age and compliance of the patient, stage of the disease, treatment accessibility, and previous treatment history should be considered.

AIM

To determine the therapeutic response of patients with MF and SS to different treatment modalities. Patients were evaluated with respect to their clinical and demographic features.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen patients diagnosed clinically and dermatopathologically with MF and SS between March 1984 and June 2001 were included in the study.

RESULTS

Of the 113 patients studied, 110 had a diagnosis of MF and three had a diagnosis of SS; 101 patients (89.4%) were diagnosed with early stage (IA, IB, IIA) and 12 (10.6%) with late stage (IIB, III, IVA, IVB) disease. The age at diagnosis varied between 12 and 81 years (mean, 45.6+/-15.8 years). Fifty-five (48.7%) patients were male and 58 (51.3%) were female. The duration of the skin lesions varied between 1.5 months and 32 years (mean, 6.1 years). Psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) was the most commonly used initial treatment modality in early stage disease (91%), with a complete remission (CR) rate of 80.4%. With PUVA+interferon-alpha (INF-alpha) treatment, CR was 57% in the early stages and 33.3% in the late stages. For late stage disease, systemic therapies, such as pentostatin, gemcitabine, and fludarabine, alone or in combination with INF-alpha, were preferred. Of the 113 patients, eight (7% of the total and 57.1% of the advanced stage cases) died of MF; 21.4% of the late stage patients showed partial remission and 14.2% showed CR. None of the patients diagnosed with early stage disease died of MF, but two (1.9%) progressed to late stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

PUVA and PUVA+INF-alpha are effective treatment modalities, especially for early stage MF. Once the disease has progressed, both MF and SS are very resistant to treatment regimens, including chemotherapeutic agents. It is important to diagnose and treat these diseases, especially MF, in the early stages for lasting remission.

Number III Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorder. It is now quite evident that a number of sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorders may produce similar clinical pictures, and also that a range of variants of MMP exist, with antibodies directed against various hemidesmosomal components or components of the epithelial basement membrane. The term immune-mediated sub-epithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has therefore been used. Immunological differences may account for the significant differences in their clinical presentation and responses to therapy, but unfortunately data on this are few. The diagnosis and management of IMSEBD on clinical grounds alone is impossible and a full history, general, and oral examination, and biopsy with immunostaining are now invariably required, sometimes supplemented with other investigations. No single treatment regimen reliably controls all these disorders, and it is not known if the specific subsets of MMP will respond to different drugs. Currently, apart from improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory-especially immunosuppressive-therapy is typically used to control oral lesions. The present paper reviews pemphigoid, describing the present understanding of this fascinating clinical phenotype, summarising the increasing number of subsets with sometimes-different natural histories and immunological features, and outlining current clinical practice.