An assessment of the current applicability of the EVT endovascular graft for treatment of patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

Morphological applicability of currently available stent grafts in the endovascular repair of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm in East-Central European patients

Introduction

Currently, there is a wide range of commercially available devices for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) that differ in terms of both anatomical requirements and the technology and technique of deployment.

Aim

To assess the applicability of currently commercially available devices for EVAR in the treatment of an asymptomatic abdominal aneurysm (AAA).

Material and methods

The study group included 100 patients with infrarenal AAA with a maximum diameter ≥ 50 mm, qualified for invasive treatment at the University Hospital in 2013–2014. The aortoiliac morphological characteristics of the AAA were evaluated on preoperative computed tomography angiograms using the OsiriX DICOM viewer in the 3D-MPR mode. The morphological applicability of 14 types of CE-marked and FDA-approved stent grafts was determined based on their instructions for use (IFU).

Results

EVAR was feasible with at least one of the analysed devices in 68% of patients. The morphological applicability was as follows: Excluder Conformable (65%), Ovation iX (51%), Endurant II (47%), Treo (45%), Excluder C3 (45%), AFX 2 (45%), Incraft (44%), E-tegra (44%), Zenith Alfa (41%), Zenith Flex (40%), Anaconda (39%) Aorfix (37%), Altura (34%), and E-vita (20%). The differences in the stent graft applicability were statistically significant (p < 0.001). A wide diameter of the common iliac artery, angulated proximal neck, and diameter of proximal neck out of range constituted the most frequent causes of EVAR inapplicability.

Conclusions

The IFU-based applicability of currently available AAA stent graft systems differs significantly. Despite the constant evolution of EVAR technology, at least 32% of AAA will require a different therapeutic approach.

How Many Patients with Infrarenal Aneurysms are Candidates for Endovascular Repair? The Northern California Experience

Purpose:

To determine how many patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) meet the anatomical selection criteria for AneuRx stent-graft repair in community hospitals of Northern California.

Methods:

The records were reviewed of 220 AAA patients (171 men, 49 women) who were considered for endovascular repair by the treating vascular surgeon at 28 community hospitals in Northern California between January and October 2001. Contrast computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and selective arteriography were performed at each institution and reviewed by a centralized, independent image-reading center. Selection criteria determined by the manufacturer and published in the indications for use were applied to each set of imaging studies. The number of patients who met inclusion criteria were recorded, as were the anatomical characteristics of each aneurysm.

Results:

The mean aneurysm size in the 220 patients was 55.3±0.7 mm. Among these patients, 122 (55%) were judged to be candidates for endovascular repair and 98 (45%) were considered ineligible. The primary anatomical reason for ineligibility was a short infrarenal neck in 43 (44%) patients, followed by a large proximal neck diameter (25, 25%), iliac aneurysms (10, 10%), extremely tortuous or calcified neck (7, 7%), iliac occlusion (6, 6%), and small distal aortic bifurcation and accessory renal arteries (5, 5%). Four (4%) patients were classified as non-candidates due to poor quality imaging. There was no difference in aneurysm diameter (54.0±0.8 versus 57.1±1.2 mm, p=NS) or age (72.2±1.2 versus 74.6±2.2 years, p=NS) between candidates and non-candidates. However, proportionally more men (60%) than women (39%) were eligible for endovascular repair with the AneuRx stent-graft (p<0.05). All 122 patients who were considered candidates for endovascular repair were treated, with successful stent-graft placement achieved in 121 (99%).

Conclusions:

Fifty-five percent of patients considered for endovascular AAA repair in community hospitals in Northern California met the anatomical selection criteria for the AneuRx stent-graft. Men appeared to be twice as likely to meet the eligibility requirements as women. Unfavorable infrarenal neck anatomy was the primary exclusion criterion for endovascular repair in this community setting.

Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is still necessary in an era of advanced endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE

Recent advances in endovascular aneurysm repair have overcome substantial anatomic barriers associated with short and challenging necks. With greater range to treat more difficult anatomy from an endovascular approach, one would assume the need of open surgical repair (OSR) would be diminished. The purpose of our study was to determine the need for OSR for abdominal aortic aneurysms, in a tertiary academic setting, with a moderate volume (10-15 cases/year) of fenestrated endografting being performed.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent elective aortic aneurysm repair between January 2010 and July 2014. Computed tomography scans for patients who underwent OSR were reviewed and anatomic characteristics obtained. Instructions for use of (IFU) a commercially available fenestrated device (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) were used to determine if open repair patients had anatomy amenable to advanced endovascular repair.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 415 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Of those patients who underwent elective aneurysm repair, 105 patients had OSR. The study subsequently excluded 11 patients because they underwent secondary interventions after a failed endovascular repair and thus were not further evaluated. Also excluded were 18 patients who had OSR for an emergency intervention. The remaining 76 patients (35 female, 41 male; average age, 72 ± 8 years) had OSR and were outside the IFU of the fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) device. The average diameter of the abdominal aorta was 5.9 cm. Indications for OSR were an aneurysm neck <4 mm (71%), inclusion of at least 1 visceral vessel (69.7%), unilateral iliac artery aneurysms (15.5%), bilateral iliac artery aneurysms (14.3%), iliac artery tortuosity >40° of angulation (37.6%), extensive aortic thrombus (23.2%), and aortic neck angulation >45° (11.8%). Rejected patients had an average of 1.7 ± 0.8 anatomic constraints (range 1-4) that prevented use of the FEVAR device.

CONCLUSIONS

With evidence to support the strict adherence to IFU protocols of the FEVAR device in patients, our institution's practice has been to continue to perform open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for patients with anatomy outside device protocols. Although it was thought that the decreased requirement of aortic neck required to deploy an endograft would lead to an increased patient population amenable to endovascular repair, there is still a clinically significant need for open aortic surgery.

The risk of endoleak following stent covering of the internal iliac artery during endovascular aneurysm repair

AIM

To investigate the risk of endoleak during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) involving the distal common iliac artery (CIA) when the internal iliac artery (IIA) is covered without prior coil embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 145 (125 men, 20 women) consecutive EVAR cases. Clinical notes and radiological images were reviewed, and data collected on patient demographics, aneurysm morphology, covering of the IIA with or without embolization, presence of endoleaks, and patient symptoms relating to IIA ischaemia.

RESULTS

A total of 29 IIAs (10%) were covered in a total of 25 patients. Seven IIAs (24%) were embolized before stent covering (Embolization group), and 22 IIAs (76%) were covered only without embolization (Cover group). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean size of the abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter or CIA diameter between each group. No endoleaks from IIA retrograde filling were found in either group.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study do not support the traditional view that coverage of the IIA without prior embolization carries a high risk of endoleak, with no endoleaks seen in all 22 cases. Large-scale trials are required. However, the advent of branched-stenting techniques and the emergence of their success in long-term follow-up may preclude the former.

An optimal combination for EVAR: low profile endograft body and continuous spiral stent limbs

AIM

to evaluate the outcomes of EVAR performed with a new generation of bifurcated endografts and limbs.

METHODS

prospectively collected data from fifty consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated at our institution with a Low Profile Zenith(®) bifurcated body/Zenith(®) Spiral-Z legs combo were analysed. AngioCT scans and Ultrasound exams were performed prior to discharge. Ultrasound examination was repeated 6 months after the procedure to assess endograft patency and to depict endoleaks

RESULTS

Median age was 70.6 years [50-88] and median ASA score was 3 [2-4]. Median aortic diameter was 56 mm [49-81]. Of the 100 external iliac access vessels, 14 had a diameter of 6 mm or lower. All endografts were successfully implanted. Post-operative Ultrasound examination and angioCT scan depicted both 1 type Ia, and 10 and 19 type 2 endoleaks respectively. An asymptomatic thrombosis of the left external iliac artery distal to the endograft limb was also depicted. 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Two patients died respectively three and four months after EVAR. Both deaths were not aneurysm related. All patients underwent an ultrasound exam 6-12 months after EVAR. All endografts main bodies and limbs were patent. Five endoleaks were depicted, all were type II endoleaks (the early type Ia endoleak had sealed spontaneously; it was confirmed by an angioCT scan). One patient presented a significant stenosis of the left iliac limb at the level of a narrow and calcified aortic bifurcation. It was successfully treated by bilateral iliac angioplasty and kissing balloon stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR performed with the Zenith LP main body in combination with Spiral-Z Iliac Legs is safe and effective. No limb occlusions were diagnosed at the 6 month follow up even in challenging iliac anatomies usually considered as contra indications for EVAR. Our first results are most satisfying and calling to be completed by a longer follow up.

Sonographic Evaluation of Aortic Endografts

The selective use of endovascular devices to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms was introduced in the early 1990s. Although placement of an aortic endograft offers patients a less morbid alternative to surgical repair, this procedure is not without complications. Persistent perfusion of the residual aneurysmal sac via endoleaks may place the patient at risk for aneurysmal enlargement and subsequent rupture. Historically, serial computed tomographic angiography has been used as the primary modality for assessment of aortic endografts. In recent years, sonography has been shown to provide a valued tool for ongoing surveillance of aortic endografts and identification of endoleaks, increasing aneurysmal size, hemodynamic disorders, and graft migration and/or kinking. Standardization of the sonographic evaluation yields accurate information vital to the long-term patency of these conduits.

Reduced access aortic exposure (RAAE) technique for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair

OBJECTIVE

A reduced access aortic exposure (RAAE) technique for repair of infrarenal AAA repair has been evaluated and the short-term surgical outcomes are compared with conventional open repair (OPEN).

METHODS

All consecutive patients having repair of infrarenal AAA over a period of 3 years were included in this study. A group of these patients had AAA repair using the RAAE technique with a small midline incision (<8 cm). Patient characteristics and peri-operative outcomes were compared with the other group treated with the traditional full-length midline incision (OPEN).

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent AAA repair in this study (38 in the RAAE group and 22 in the OPEN group). The age, sex distribution and co-morbidities were similar across the two groups (median age 76 and 75 years respectively). The RAAE group had a significantly shorter Intensive care stay (2 vs. 4 days, p=0.041) and a shorter total hospital stay (9 vs. 14 days, p=0.004). Significant postoperative chest infection was recorded in 13% (5/38) in the RAAE group as compared to 41% (9/21) in the OPEN group (p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAAE technique for infra renal AAA repair is feasible and safe, and allows quicker postoperative recovery with comparable morbidity and mortality to the conventional technique.

Iliac Conduit for Renal and Visceral Artery Access During Endovascular Repair of a Pararenal Aneurysm with a Fenestrated Stent-Graft

PURPOSE

To report a technique for fenestrated stent-graft repair involving a conduit implanted at the origin of a patent aneurysmal common iliac artery (CIA) in a patient with a pararenal aortic aneurysm and iliac artery occlusion.

CASE REPORT

A 60-year-old man with multiple comorbidities presented with an 8-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with no infrarenal neck according to computed tomography (CT). Both CIAs were aneurysmal; the left was occluded, as were the left internal and external iliac arteries and the inferior mesenteric artery. Two patent accessory renal arteries were depicted. Because an infrarenal neck was absent, treatment with a fenestrated endograft was performed under general anesthesia. The right CIA was approached via an oblique retroperitoneal incision. A 10-mm polytetrafluoroethylene tube graft was implanted on the origin of the right CIA aneurysm in an end-to-side fashion to facilitate delivery of a Zenith endograft constructed with 2 small fenestrations for the renal arteries, 1 large strut-free fenestration for the superior mesenteric artery, and a scallop for the celiac trunk. The proximal fenestrated body of the Zenith device was introduced via the right iliac artery by direct puncture of the common femoral artery. The conduit was used to cannulate the 3 fenestrations for subsequent deployment and for delivery of the distal Zenith aortomonoiliac device. The procedure was completed successfully, but 12 hours after surgery, the patient developed a significant right retroperitoneal hematoma, which was treated surgically. CT confirmed patency of all visceral arteries and no endoleak. One month after the initial procedure, he had recovered totally and was discharged.

CONCLUSION

Iliac conduits could widen the feasibility of fenestrated endografting in patients unfit for open surgery with pararenal aneurysms and challenging iliac anatomy. However, this adjunctive procedure has its own morbidity.

Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review

Objectives: A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair was conducted. Although open surgery has been considered the gold standard for prevention of AAA rupture, emerging less-invasive endovascular treatments have led to increased interest in evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of treatment options.

Methods: A systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE between 1999 and 2005 reporting the cost and/or cost-effectiveness of endovascular and/or open surgical repair of nonruptured AAAs was conducted. Case series studies with less than fifty patients per treatment were excluded.

Results: Of twenty eligible articles, three were randomized controlled trials, twelve case series, four Markov models, and one systematic review. Regardless of time frame, all studies found that endovascular repair costs more than open surgery. Although the high cost of the endovascular prosthesis was partially offset by reduced intensive care, hospital length of stay, operating time, blood transfusions, and perioperative complications, hospital costs were still greater for endovascular than open surgical repair. For patients medically fit for open surgery, mid-term costs were greater for endovascular repair with no difference in overall survival or quality of life. For patients medically unfit for open surgery, endovascular repair costs more than no intervention with no difference in survival.

Conclusions: Although conclusions regarding the cost-effectiveness of AAA treatment options are time dependent and vary by institutional perspective, from a societal perspective, endovascular repair is not currently cost-effective for patients with large AAA regardless of medical fitness.

Access for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Despite advancement in stent-graft technology, access-related problems continue to occur during endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. Various techniques have been adopted to overcome difficult access situations, however. To survey these developments in arterial access, we performed a systematic literature review from 1994 through 2005 to identify relevant articles pertaining to endovascular access techniques and complications. Excessive iliac tortuosity, circumferential vessel wall calcification, significant occlusive disease, and small caliber vessels account for the majority of access problems, most of which are readily apparent with adequate baseline imaging. Even with careful preoperative assessment, however, some access problems may not be foreseen; nonetheless, the majority can be overcome using today's array of ancillary procedures, such as an iliac conduit, a brachiofemoral wire, or arterial reconstruction. Alternatively, other approach routes, such as the common carotid artery or direct aortic access, may be used to facilitate endovascular aneurysm repair.

Technical and clinical success of infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A 10-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our retrospective study was to review our single-center experience with aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) repair retrospectively.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1995 to 2005, 70 consecutive patients affected by AAA were treated by endovascular stent-graft repair. Mean follow-up was 23.9 months. Follow-up investigations were performed at 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Five different stent-graft designs were compared to each other. Primary technical success (PTS), assisted primary technical success (APTS), primary clinical success (PCS) and secondary clinical success (SCS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

All over PTS was achieved in 94.3%, APTS in 97.1%, PCS in 61.4%, APCS in 64.3% and SCS in 70%. There were 3 type I endoleaks, 25 type II endoleaks, 4 type III endoleaks, 8 limb problems, 5 conversions to open surgery, 10 aneurysm sac expansions and 14 device migrations. Patients with newer generation devices showed better results than patients with first generation prosthesis. In addition results were better for grafts with suprarenal fixation (versus infrarenal fixation) and grafts with barbs and hooks (versus grafts without barbs and hooks). Patients with bad anatomic preconditions showed a higher complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to first generation products, new stent-graft designs show acceptable technical and clinical results in endovascular AAA aneurysm repair. However, this therapy still should be reserved only for patients with significant comorbities and suitable anatomic conditions.

Evaluation of the Effect of Endovascular Options on Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular devices designed to exclude flow to infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1999. This action allowed widespread use of this technology for AAA exclusion. The purpose of this report is to examine trends for use of these modalities, rates of rupture of AAA, and to compare results of open AAA repair with endovascular repair. Results were collected for all hospitals, except for Veterans Administration hospitals, by a state-wide repository. Data for the years 1996 through 1998 and 2001 through 2002 were evaluated, and data from 1999 through 2000 were excluded because no separate codes were available to distinguish between open and endovascular repair. The information gathered is based on the All Patient Refined Diagnostic Related Group (APR-DRG®; 3M, St. Paul, MN). An average of 718 open, elective AAA was performed between 1996 and 1998. This dropped to 503 open repairs from 2001 to 2002 ( P < 0.005). During that same interval, 308 endovascular elective AAA repairs were performed, therefore the total rate of elective repair increased by 100. The average rate of ruptured AAA repairs from 1996 to 1998 was 121 per year, and this dropped to 89 from 2001 to 2002 ( P < 0.005). The mortality of open AAA repair during the 1996 to 1998 and 2001 to 2002 intervals was unchanged (4.7%). Mortality from endovascular AAA repair between 2001 and 2002 was 1.9 per cent ( P = 0.003). Major morbidity was 14.5 per cent for open, elective AAA repair and 6.3 per cent for endovascular elective repair from 2001 to 2002 ( P < 0.001). These data suggest that the advent of endovascular AAA repair has contributed to a reduction in the rate of ruptured AAA repairs, an increase in total procedures performed, and a significant decrease in perioperative deaths and major complications when compared with open AAA repair.

Consistency in endovascular aneurysm repair suitability assessment requires group decision audit

INTRODUCTION

Proper selection of patient and stent-graft combinations in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) depends on knowledge and experience with the different types of stents that have to be adapted to the patient's unique abdominal aortoiliac anatomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the consistency and variance in EVAR suitability assessment between clinicians.

METHODS

Worksheets that contained anatomic data derived from computed tomography scans and angiography were compiled for 202 patients. Five clinicians, all experienced in EVAR surgery, assessed the anatomic data on the worksheets for suitability for three types of stent-grafts. The obtained 3030 assessments represented a quantification of the likelihood of success the clinician expected for effective and durable sealing and fixation of the stent-graft in EVAR. The Delphi method was used to determine consensus in the thinking process among clinicians, and kappa analysis was used to determine the proportion of variances in the assessment result between clinicians.

RESULTS

With the Delphi method, Cronbach alpha values of 0.87, 0.87, and 0.90 were reached for the three types of stent-grafts in the second assessment round. The individual clinician-group correlation in round two was between 0.69 and 0.86 for clinicians 1, 2, 3, and 4. Between clinician 5 and the others, correlation varied between 0.43 and 0.64. The kappa values ranged between 0.32 and 0.51 among clinicians 1, 2, and 3. Between clinician 5 and the others, kappa values between 0.08 and 0.29 were reached.

CONCLUSION

EVAR suitability estimation in a cohort of patients is highly consistent in a group of experienced clinicians. The EVAR suitability estimation at the individual patient level varies substantially between clinicians, however. Aggregating expert opinions in abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomic suitability assessment for EVAR had the opportunity to replace individual clinician decision diversification in a more solid and consistent group decision process.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: CTA evaluation of contraindications

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered an acceptable alternative to open surgery in selected patients. Its feasibility depends mainly on anatomic factors that represent the important predictors of success and the most important exclusion criteria. Poor anatomic patient selection is generally associated with a higher risk for procedural complications and compromised long-term outcomes. Therefore pretreatment imaging is crucial for evaluating patient suitability for EVAR. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography represents the current standard of reference in the evaluation of the abdominal aorta and iliac axis anatomy because it provides all the details needed for selection of patients who are suitable for endograft and the choice of the appropriate device. This report identifies and reviews computed tomographic angiographic anatomic contraindications for EVAR.

Follow-up costs increase the cost disparity between endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the hospital and follow-up costs of patients who have undergone endovascular (EVAR) or open (OR) elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

The records of 195 patients (EVAR, n = 55; OR, n = 140) who underwent elective aortic aneurysm repair between 1995 and 2004 were reviewed. Primary costing data were analyzed for 54 EVAR and 135 OR patients. Hospital costs were divided into preoperative, operative, and postoperative costs. Follow-up costs for EVAR patients were recorded, with a median follow-up time of 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative costs were slightly higher in the EVAR group (AU $961/US $733 vs AU $869/US $663; not significant). Operative costs were significantly higher in the EVAR group (AU $16,124/US $12,297 vs AU $6077/US $4635; P < .001); this was entirely due to the increased cost of the endograft (AU $10,181/US $7,765 for EVAR vs AU $476/US $363 for OR). Postoperative costs were significantly reduced in the EVAR group (AU $4719/US $3599 vs AU $11,491/US $8,764; P < .001). Total hospital costs were significantly greater in the EVAR group (AU $21,804/US $16,631 vs AU $18,437/US $14,063; P < .001). The increase in total hospital costs was due to a significant difference in graft costs, which was not offset by reduced postoperative costs. The average follow-up cost per year after EVAR was AU $1316/US $999. At 1 year of follow-up, EVAR remained significantly more expensive than OR (AU $23,120/US $17,640 vs AU $18,510/US $14,122; P < .001); this cost discrepancy increased with a longer follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR results in significantly greater hospital costs compared with OR, despite reduced hospital and intensive care unit stays. The inclusion of follow-up costs further increases the cost disparity between EVAR and OR. Because EVAR requires lifelong surveillance and has a high rate of reintervention, follow-up costs must be included in any cost comparison of EVAR and OR. The economic cost, as well as the efficacy, of new technologies such as EVAR must be addressed before their widespread use is advocated.

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Following Elective Open or Endovascular AAA Repair:A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To assess health-related quality of life outcomes after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive either endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery according to a rate of 3 endovascular patients to 1 with open repair. Data on patient characteristics, operative aspects, and procedural and device-related complications were compiled at a single center. Health-related quality of life was assessed before treatment and 1 and 3 months following operation using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) and the EuroQol questionnaire.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 1999, 57 patients (54 men; mean age 69 years, range 52-82) underwent endovascular and 19 patients (16 men; mean age 68 years, range 52-81) underwent open AAA repairs. Preoperatively, comparable scores were recorded in both treatment groups. One month after operation, patients of both groups scored significantly lower on the SF-36 domains of Role Limitations due to physical problems and Pain compared to preoperative scores. Three months after operation, both groups had scores in all domains comparable to preoperative levels of functioning. There was a significant benefit for the endovascular group 1 month after operation in the SF-36 domains of Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to physical problems, Vitality, and Pain; their score on the EuroQol Usual Activities item was also significantly better. After 3 months, there were no longer differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term health-related quality of life benefits were found after endovascular repair compared with standard open surgery.

The Effect of Gender on Early and Intermediate Results of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may be gender dependent. Between September 1997 and September 2001, 118 AneuRx aortic grafts were placed for aneurysmal disease. During this period, 17 females and 101 males were treated with this device. A prospective database was maintained and supplemented with retrospectively gathered information to evaluate early and mid-term end points. A total of 113 devices were deployed in 118 attempts. Length of procedure was greater for females (3.3 +/- 1.75 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.8 hr, p = 0.05) and they were more likely to have significant arterial dissections (12% vs. 1%, p = 0.05). The mortality rates at 1 month were 12% for females and 0% for males ( p = 0.02); the complication rates at 1 month were 41% for females and 15% for males ( p = 0.02). Although technical success was not significantly different between the sexes, assisted primary technical success (requiring endovascular assistance) and assisted secondary technical success (requiring open surgical assistance) were significantly different (71% vs. 96%, p = 0.003; and 76% vs. 98%, p = 0.004, respectively). Clinical success at 1 month was 59% for females and 84% for males ( p = 0.02). This difference was also significant when assessing 1-month assisted primary clinical success (59% vs. 90%, p = 0.003) and assisted secondary clinical success as well (71% vs. 96%, p = 0.003). Clinical success and assisted primary clinical success were not different at 6- or 12-month intervals, however, assisted secondary clinical successes differed at both time intervals (56% vs. 83%, p = 0.02; and 56% vs. 81%, p = 0.05, respectively). As-yet undetermined factors appear to predispose females to complications and technical difficulties in the short term. Endovascular and open procedures required to achieve ongoing clinical success in the following months appear to favor males to a greater degree than females.

Is cross-femoral bypass grafting a disadvantage of aortomonoiliac endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

PURPOSE

The need for cross-femoral bypass grafting (CFBG) is considered by some to be a major disadvantage of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the aortomonoiliac technique. To determine the durability of CFBG in this setting, we examined data from 148 consecutive high-risk patients in a clinical trial of EVAR with a custom-made aortomonoiliac endovascular stent graft.

METHODS

All data were collected prospectively. After hospital discharge, patients were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months and annually thereafter. All CFBG was constructed of expandable polytetrafluoroethylene.

RESULTS

During follow-up averaging 23.6 +/- 16.2 months, nine CFBG complications developed in 8 patients (5.4%), including disruption (n = 2), infection (n = 3), thrombosis (n = 2), and pseudoaneurysm (n = 3). Four patients with CFBG complications died, of consequences of infection (n = 2), intracranial hemorrhage during attempted CFBG thrombolysis (n = 1), and intracranial hemorrhage during anticoagulation (n = 1). There were no amputations. At life table analysis, freedom from CFBG complication was 96.3% +/- 1.6% at 12 months, 94.1% +/- 2.2% at 24, 36, and 48 months, and 86.2% +/- 7.8% at 60 months. Overall survival for this high-risk patient group was 83.4% +/- 3.1% at 12 months, 70.4% +/- 4.1% at 24 months, 56.5% +/- 5.3% at 36 months, and 44.8% +/- 6.4% at 48 months.

CONCLUSION

CFBG is durable, with a low rate of complications in patients undergoing aortomonoiliac EVAR. Need for CFBG should not discourage use of aortomonoiliac devices in patients with anatomy unfavorable for other EVAR approaches.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with a bifurcated endovascular graft at a primary referral center: Influence of experience, age, gender, and aneurysm size on suitability

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the suitability for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) in an unselected patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1999 and May 2002 all consecutive patients with a nonemergent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were prospectively examined with contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT). Those patients probably suitable for EVAR on the basis of CT findings underwent calibrated angiography. A panel of radiologists and vascular surgeons reviewed the clinical data and vascular anatomy, and decided on the appropriateness of EVAR with the bifurcated Zenith AAA endovascular graft.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were included. Fifty-six patients (52%) had one or more contraindications for EVAR. Unsuitability was most frequently (88%) related to the proximal neck. Inadequate neck length was the most common specific reason. Inadequate iliac anatomy was the reason for unsuitability in 59% of patients. The rate of unsuitability decreased from 61% during the first half of the study to 40% during the second half (P =.03) Unsuitability was equal between men and women. Age and maximum diameter did not differ between candidates and noncandidates.

CONCLUSION

Almost half (48%) of patients with an infrarenal AAA referred to a primary referral center are suitable for EVAR with the bifurcated Zenith AAA endovascular graft. Neck anatomy was the most frequent reason for rejection. Rate of suitability increased over time, probably as a result of increasing experience. Suitability was not influenced by gender, age, or aneurysm size.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms: elective endovascular repair versus conventional surgery--evaluation with evidence-based medicine techniques

PURPOSE

To use evidence-based techniques to compare elective open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with endovascular repair by means of stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A focused clinical question formed the basis of a literature search. Evidence-based criteria were used to appraise and assign a "level of evidence" to retrieved articles. The following data were determined from the best studies: systemic, local, and/or vascular complications; graft failure rates; blood loss; mortality; length of intensive care and/or hospital stay; mid- and long-term outcomes; cost of endovascular repair versus that of surgery; and eligibility for endovascular repair. Absolute risk reductions and/or increases and numbers needed to treat or harm were calculated.

RESULTS

The best current evidence came from 22 studies, which showed that there is slight, if any, difference between mortality rates of endovascular repair and surgery. Hospital and/or intensive care stay is shorter, blood loss less, and systemic complications fewer (numbers needed to treat, two to 12) with endovascular repair. Some authors reported a significant increase in local and/or vascular complications with endovascular repair (numbers needed to harm, two to six). Graft failure is significantly more common with endovascular repair (numbers needed to harm, four), and substantive adjunctive interventions are needed. Endovascular repair is more expensive than surgery.

CONCLUSION

Elective endovascular repair has short-term benefits compared with surgery. There is slight, if any, difference in mortality. Endovascular repair costs more than surgery. At follow-up, surgical grafts performed better.

Durability of aortouniiliac endografting with femorofemoral crossover: 4-year experience in the Evt/Guidant trials

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated mid-term results of the multicenter EVT/Guidant aortouniiliac endograft (AI) trial and ascertained the durability of this endovascular technique in patients unable to undergo standard bifurcated endografting.

METHODS

From November 1996 to December 1998, 121 patients were enrolled to receive the AI device on the basis of complex iliac artery anatomy contraindicating bifurcated endografting. Clinical data were centrally collected, and radiographic data were evaluated by core facility.

RESULTS

AI placement was technically successful in 113 of 121 patients. At operation, patients who underwent AI had significantly more arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and peripheral occlusive disease (P <.05) compared with patients who underwent open aneurysmorrhaphy in the EVT/Guidant trials, indicating comorbid features in this anatomic cohort. Distal AI attachment was performed to the external iliac artery in 40 (36%) patients. Median follow-up was 38 months. In the AI group, overall aneurysm diameter decreased over the duration of study from 54.4 +/- 9.6 mm to 44.4 +/- 16.4 mm (P =.004). At 24 and 36 months after repair, reduction in aneurysm size was associated with absence of endoleak (P =.003 and P =.008, respectively). Aneurysms shrunk or remained stable in 109 (96.5%) patients. Endoleak was identified in 52.3% of patients at discharge, and at follow-up in 30.9% at 1 year, 34.8% at 2 years, 28.6% at 3 years, and 30.4% at 4 years. Type II endoleak predominated. Leak from failure to completely occlude contralateral iliac flow accounted for 8 of 58 endoleaks (13.8%) at discharge. Sixteen patients (14.2%) underwent postoperative endoleak treatment; in one of these patients open conversion was necessary at 20 months. Post-procedure thigh or buttock claudication developed in 16 patients (14.2%). Thirteen patients (81.3%) had either distal attachment in the external iliac artery or contralateral type IIA occlusion. Fifteen patients (13.3%) required intervention because of reduced limb flow; one of these patients underwent open conversion at 27 months, and another underwent axillofemoral grafting at 28 months. Device migration was confirmed in 2 (1.8%) patients, without current clinical sequelae. Whereas no femorofemoral graft thromboses occurred, graft infection developed in 3 patients (2.6%). During follow-up, aneurysm in 2 patients ruptured. Late death occurred in 41 patients (36.3%). Twenty-four patients (58.5%) died of cardiopulmonary disease; one death was endograft-related after aneurysm rupture; and one death was related to femorofemoral bypass infection. Actuarial survival was 78.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-86%) at 2 years and 63.4% (95% CI, 54%-73%) at 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with significant comorbid conditions and complex iliac anatomy unfavorable for bifurcated endografting, AI with femorofemoral bypass grafting is safe and effective. In most patients this endovascular option provides satisfactory mid-term results.

IVUS guidance of thoracic and complex abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-graft repairs using an intracardiac echocardiography probe: preliminary report

PURPOSE

To report our learning experience using an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) probe to guide endovascular aortic procedures.

METHODS

Between November 1999 and July 2001, 17 patients (12 men; mean age 73.1+/-2.3 years) underwent endovascular repair of 9 thoracic, 6 complex abdominal, and 2 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The most suitable dimensions and configuration of the stent-graft were based on preoperative computed tomographic (CTA) or magnetic resonance (MRA) angiography. Intraoperative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was obtained using a 9-F, 9-MHz ICE probe, 110 cm in length, inserted through a 10-F, 55 degrees precurved long polyethylene sheath.

RESULTS

The endografts were deployed as planned by CTA or MRA. Before stent-graft deployment, interrogation with the ICE probe visualized the aortic arch and descending thoracoabdominal aorta without position-related artefacts and identified the sites of stent-graft fixation. After stent-graft deployment, visualization with the ICE probe detected the need for additional procedures in 8 patients, including 2 incompletely expanded thoracic grafts, which were treated with adjunctive balloon angioplasty. In 1 patient, ICE probe interrogation determined that the lesion was inappropriate for endovascular exclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE probe interrogation provides accurate information on the anatomy of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms and allows rapid identification of attachment sites and stent-graft characteristics. It might be considered as a valid imaging modality for monitoring all phases of endovascular procedures.

Aortomonoiliac stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: association with iliofemoral crossover grafts

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome of endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using aortomonoiliac stent-grafts.

METHODS

Fifty-seven consecutive patients (49 men; median age 70, range 56-89) with AAA >5 cm were treated in a 6-year period with the conical ELLA stent-graft. Forty-two (73.9%) patients were classified ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IV and 6 as ASA V. In the majority of cases, the implantation procedure featured device delivery through the external iliac artery, transrenal placement of a bare stent in selected cases, and an iliofemoral crossover graft through a prevesical tunnel.

RESULTS

Successful deployment was achieved in 56 (98.2%) patients. Mean time to discharge was 8.7 days (range 2-125). Two patients died in the 30-day period. Nine endoleaks occurred in 8 (14%) patients; 4 required further intervention. Mean follow-up was 35.3 months (range 1-66), during which 5 patients died from unrelated causes. No late endoleak, graft occlusion, device twisting/migration, or aneurysm rupture was observed. No correlation between type I endoleaks and unfavorable proximal neck or iliac artery anatomical characteristics could be found. Primary technical and clinical success rates were 86.0% and 94.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this approach, the crossover graft remains in a retropubic space and consequently does not have all the disadvantages of a subcutaneously placed prosthesis. The results achieved in this group of high-risk patients support recommendation of this technique as a simple and safe alternative to bifurcated systems.

A laparoscopic approach to the abdominal aorta for thoracic stent-graft deployment: evaluation in a porcine model

PURPOSE

To develop laparoscopic techniques for aortic stent-graft placement as an alternative to the femoral approach.

METHODS

Endovascular stent-grafts were placed in 8 pigs via a totally laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach. After needle puncture, a guidewire was inserted into the abdominal aorta, followed by an 18-F sheath through which a Talent stent-graft was deployed in the descending thoracic aorta without aortic clamping. All the endovascular tools were inserted into the retroperitoneal area via the ports. After the sheath was withdrawn, hemostasis was achieved by suturing the aortic puncture under aortic cross-clamping. After sacrificing the animals, the thoracic aorta was removed to verify the position and deployment of the stent-grafts.

RESULTS

Seven (87.5%) of 8 procedures were successfully completed; the first animal died from hemorrhage due to inadvertent injury to the posterior infrarenal aortic wall. The accurate deployment and position of the stent-grafts were verified visually after sacrifice. Mean (+/- SD) procedural, implantation, and aortic cross-clamping times were 205 +/- 56, 22 +/- 9, and 30 +/- 19 minutes, respectively. Mean blood loss was 120 +/- 56 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic aortic stent-grafting using a laparoscopic approach to the infrarenal aorta is feasible. More studies will be required to define the place of combined endovascular and laparoscopic procedures as an alternative to the femoral surgical approach for stent-graft placement.

Minimally invasive vascular surgery for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with iliac involvement

PURPOSE

A minimally invasive vascular surgery (MIVS) technique for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with iliac involvement was evaluated, and its outcome was compared with conventional open repair.

METHODS

Twenty patients with AAA with iliac involvement underwent treatment with bifurcated graft replacement with the MIVS technique. The procedure was performed via minilaparotomy, with the incision length determined according to the extent of the AAA obtained with ultrasound scanning and with the small intestine confined completely within the abdominal cavity. The proximal and distal operating fields were obtained with changing the patient position and arranging for the abdominal incision to be retracted cephalad and caudad. Perioperative courses in these 20 patients (the MIVS group) were analyzed in comparison with 14 patients who underwent conventional open repair, which was performed through the full midline laparotomy with the intestine simply covered with moistened towels (the conventional group).

RESULTS

The MIVS technique for AAA repair was performed with a mean abdominal incision length of 8.4 cm and a range from 6.5 to 11.2 cm. The patients in the MIVS group showed earlier resumption of oral intake and ambulation in comparison with those patients in the conventional group (liquid diet: 1.1 +/- 0.3 days versus 2.9 +/- 1.4 days; P <.01; solid diet: 2.0 +/- 0.2 days versus 3.9 +/- 1.4 days; P <.01; ambulation: 2.1 +/- 0.8 days versus 4.3 +/- 2.3 days; P <.01), with comparable mortality and morbidity rates. Accordingly, the patients in the MIVS group were discharged earlier (20.7 +/- 6.3 days versus 33.9 +/- 12.6 days; P <.01), and total hospitalization charges were significantly decreased (2,232,791 +/- 200,747 Japanese yen versus 2,640,441 +/- 243,889 Japanese yen; P <.01).

CONCLUSION

The MIVS technique allowed earlier postoperative recovery with comparable morbidity and mortality rates with the conventional technique and, therefore, saved hospital stay length and total hospitalization charges. Thus, the MIVS technique is considered as a new and effective minimally invasive technique for open AAA repair.

Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

Wide-ranging predictions have been made about the usefulness of endovascular repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The availability of US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices has removed the restrictions on patient selection, which had been controlled by device trials. This study examined the applicability of endovascular AAA repair and identified the anatomic barriers to successful endovascular AAA repair that should guide future device development.

METHODS

All patients who came to our institution for infrarenal AAA repair between April 1998 and June 2000 were offered evaluation for endovascular repair. Thin-cut spiral computed tomography scans and arteriograms were obtained on all patients, and their anatomic characteristics were prospectively entered into a database. A wide selection of available devices allowed the treatment of diverse AAA anatomic features.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients were examined (264 men, 43 women). Of these, 204 patients (66%; 185 men, 19 women) underwent endovascular repair, and 103 patients (34%, 79 men, 24 women) were rejected. Reasons for exclusion included short aneurysm neck (56, 54%), inadequate access because of small iliac arteries (48, 47%), wide aneurysm neck (41, 40%), presence of bilateral common iliac aneurysms extending to the hypogastric artery (22, 21%), excessive neck angulation (14, 14%), extensive mural thrombus in the aneurysm neck (10, 10%), extreme tortuosity of the iliac arteries (10, 10%), accessory renal arteries originating from the AAA (6, 6%), malignancy discovered during the examination (5, 5%), and death during the examination interval (2, 2%). Rejected patients had an average of 1.9 exclusion criteria (range, 1 to 4). A disproportionate number of women were excluded because of anatomic findings (P = .0009). Although 80% of patients who were at low risk for surgery qualified for endovascular repair, only 49% of our patients who were at high risk for surgery were acceptable candidates (P < .001). Of the 103 patients who were excluded, 34 (33%) underwent open surgical repair, and the remaining 69 (67%) were deemed to be unfit for open surgery. Three patients (1.4%) failed endograft placement because of inadequate vascular access.

CONCLUSION

Most infrarenal AAAs (66%) can be treated with endovascular devices currently available commercially or through US Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical trials. However, patients who are at high risk for surgery and might benefit most from endovascular repair are less likely to qualify for the procedure (49%). Men (70%) are more likely than women (40%) to meet the anatomic criteria for endografting. Difficulties with vascular access and attachment site geometry predominate as reasons for exclusion. Our findings suggest that smaller profile devices, which can negotiate small and tortuous iliac arteries, are needed. Proximal and distal attachment site problems require devices that can accommodate wide and angulated attachment necks and achieve short seal zones.

Internal iliac artery embolization before endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: frequency, efficacy, and clinical results

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to assess the frequency, efficacy, and incidence of adverse effects of internal iliac artery embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 343 patients examined for stent-graft repair, 147 were suitable for endovascular treatment. Fifty-five patients underwent preprocedural embolization of the internal iliac artery either unilaterally (46 patients) or bilaterally (nine patients). Successful embolization was assessed angiographically and with helical CT follow-up examinations. Colonic ischemia was ruled out clinically or colonoscopically. Buttock claudication, and sexual dysfunction in men, were evaluated through a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Embolization of the internal iliac artery increased by 16% the percentage of patients for whom endovascular repair was suitable. After successful embolization in all patients, routine CT follow-up examinations after a mean time of 16.7 months showed no evidence of endoleaks related to retrograde perfusion via embolized internal iliac arteries. Nevertheless, in all patients who had undergone embolization, a primary endoleak was detected in 43.4% at the first postoperative CT examination. None of our patients had evidence of colonic ischemia. Clinical follow-up data of 46 patients were available. Of these patients, mild to severe new onset buttock claudication was found in 13 (36.1%) of 36 patients with unilateral, and in eight (80%) of 10 patients with bilateral, internal iliac artery embolization (p = 0.03). Five (25%) of 20 men had an erectile dysfunction after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Embolization of the internal iliac artery is a safe and efficient procedure that increases the applicability for endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms. However, buttock claudication and erectile dysfunction are a drawback in a substantial number of patients.

EVT endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

A variety of prostheses are now available for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Significant advantages of the EVT device are its unibody design, secure hook attachment system and graft fabric approximating that used in conventional surgery.

METHODS

Implantation of the EVT device was attempted in 60 patients who were studied prospectively with an analysis of subsequent problems encountered.

RESULTS

Conversion to open repair was required in four cases (6.7%). There were nine tube grafts inserted, 13 aorto-unilateral iliac with crossover grafts and 34 aorto-bi-iliac grafts. There was one death (mortality 1.7%). Endoleaks were identified in eight patients (14%), none of which were proximal; three sealed spontaneously, two were treated with coil embolization, two are being observed and one patient had an iliac attachment converted to an open anastomosis. Access vessel problems were seen in 21 patients (35%); two-thirds were corrected at the time of initial surgery. Seven patients (12%) had primary graft limb problems identified and treated before leaving the operating room. Nine patients (16%) developed secondary graft limb problems, which were diagnosed and treated after the initial surgery. Endovascular treatment was used in eight and was successful in six with surgical revision required in two. On review of these cases to assess if the problem could have been predicted at the time of initial surgery, it was felt that more aggressive treatment of intraoperatively diagnosed graft limb stenoses, even though considered mild, may have prevented 50% of subsequent secondary graft limb occlusions.

CONCLUSION

Although the EVT device has significant advantages in the endovascular management of aortic aneurysm, potential graft limb problems need to be actively identified with the majority able to be successfully managed by supplementary endovascular techniques.

The carotid artery as alternative access for endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair

Endograft treatment of aortic aneurysms has become a common procedure in many centers. However, not all patients are candidates for this new technology, because of their vascular anatomy and device limitations. One common problem is iliofemoral occlusive disease, which when present, even in a moderate degree, may preclude introduction of the large-diameter delivery devices currently in use. We present a case of a high-risk male patient with a thoracic aortic aneurysm and severe occlusive disease of the iliac arteries. An alternative approach for device delivery through the carotid artery was used and the procedure was successful with no neurologic complications. We recommend this technique for highly selected patients with an aneurysm who can undergo tube endograft repair without feasible access through the iliac or femoral arteries.

Suitability for endovascular aneurysm repair in an unselected population

BACKGROUND

Tertiary referral centres report that up to 60 per cent of patients may be suitable for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) presenting to a county-wide vascular service that were suitable for EVAR, and to examine the outcome of subsequent AAA repair in relation to aneurysm morphology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients being assessed for AAA repair between January 1998 and December 1999 underwent spiral computed tomography angiography to determine aneurysm morphology and suitability for EVAR. Subsequent outcome for all patients in the study was recorded in a prospective vascular database.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients was assessed. Sixty-three aneurysms (55 per cent) had one or more absolute contraindications to EVAR, a further 13 (11 per cent) had at least one relative contraindication, and 39 (34 per cent) had no contraindication. Of patients with no absolute contraindication to EVAR, ten underwent successful EVAR, five did not meet recognized criteria for surgery, one awaits EVAR, four remain under observation, one awaits open repair, and 31 underwent open repair without death.

CONCLUSION

Only 30 per cent of unselected AAAs presenting to a vascular service are entirely suitable for EVAR; most of these patients can safely undergo open AAA repair. These data suggest that increased use of EVAR is only possible by deploying devices in suboptimal morphology, and in treating patients who would not normally be considered for open AAA repair.

Banding of the common iliac artery: an expedient in endoluminal correction of aortoiliac aneurysms

Dilatation of the common iliac arteries is one of the most frequent causes for exclusion of patients in a series of endovascular correction of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). In this article we describe the banding technique we use to constrict the large iliac arteries. Four patients underwent endovascular treatment for AAAs with bifurcated grafts. Five of the eight common iliac arteries were 16 to 20 mm in diameter and were constricted around the endoprosthesis by banding with two cotton tapes through a retroperitoneal access. An angioplasty balloon was used as a counterresistance inside the graft. Completion angiogram and postoperative computed tomographic scans showed no endoleak in all cases. No complications occurred in the follow-up (3-10 months). Banding of the common iliac artery is an efficient procedure for endoluminal correction of AAAs when the diameter of the common iliac arteries is greater than 16 mm and less than 20 mm.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: eligibility rate and impact on the rate of open repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of eligibility among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) considered for endovascular repair and to examine the effect of an endovascular program on the institutional pattern of AAA repair.

METHODS

All patients evaluated for endovascular AAA repair since the inception of an endovascular program were reviewed for determination of eligibility rates and eventual treatment. Open AAA repairs were categorized as simple (uncomplicated infrarenal), complex (juxtarenal, suprarenal, thoracoabdominal, infected), or ruptured, and their rates before and after initiation of an endovascular program were compared.

RESULTS

Over 3 years, 324 patients were considered for endovascular AAA repair; 176 (54%) were candidates, 138 (43%) were not candidates, and 10 (3%) did not complete the evaluation. The rate of eligibility increased significantly from 45% (66/148 patients) during the first half of this period to 63% (110/176 patients) during the second half (P <. 001). Candidates were significantly younger (74.4 +/- 7.6 years) than noncandidates (78.3 +/- 6.7 years) (P <.01), and their aneurysm diameter tended to be smaller (57.6 +/- 9.2 mm compared with 60.8 +/- 12.3 mm; P =.06). The most common reason for ineligibility was an inadequate proximal aortic neck. Of 176 candidates, 78% underwent endovascular repair, and 6% underwent open repair. Of 138 noncandidates, 56% underwent surgical repair. Over a period of 6 years, 542 patients with AAAs (429 simple, 86 complex, 27 ruptured) underwent open repair. The total number and ratio of simple to complex open repairs for nonruptured aneurysms during the 3 years before the initiation of the endovascular program (213 simple, 44 complex) were not significantly different from the repairs over the subsequent 3-year period (216 simple, 42 complex). Similarly, no difference in the total number and the ratio of simple to complex open repairs was found between the first and the second 18-month periods since the initiation of the endovascular program.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of eligibility of patients with AAA for endovascular repair appears to be higher than previously reported. The presence of an active endovascular program has not decreased the number or shifted the distribution of open AAA repair.

Utility and reliability of endovascular aortouniiliac with femorofemoral crossover graft for aortoiliac aneurysmal disease

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the early efficacy of endovascular aortouniiliac stent grafts with femorofemoral bypass graft in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease.

METHODS

We analyzed 51 consecutive patients from January 1997 to March 1999 with a mean follow-up of 15.8 months. Patients ranged in age from 44 to 93 years (mean, 75 years) with a mean aortic aneurysm diameter of 6.2 cm. Technical success was achieved in 50 patients; one patient required conversion to open repair intraoperatively. We placed 28 custom-made and 22 commercial devices. The mean operative time was 223 minutes. The endograft was extended to the external iliac artery in 42% of cases. The contralateral common iliac artery was occluded using either a closed covered stent or intraluminal coils.

RESULTS

The median hospital stay was 4 days with an average intensive care unit stay of 0.25 days. There were no operative mortalities. Two patients died during follow-up from unrelated conditions. Endoleaks occurred in 11 patients (22%); seven patients (14%) required intervention (four catheter based, three operative). Other complications occurred in 38% of patients but were largely remote or wound related. One femorofemoral bypass graft occluded immediately postoperatively as a result of an intraprocedural external iliac dissection yielding a 98% primary patency and 100% secondary patency. Clinical success was achieved in 88% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that this strategy represents a reliable method of repair of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease and extends the capability of an endoluminal approach to patients with complex iliac anatomy.