Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair: results using a mini-open deltoid splitting approach

Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ASR) may result in less postoperative pain and better functional outcomes than the mini-open (MOR) approach. This meta-analysis provides an updated assessment of the current literature which compares the clinical outcomes of mini-open versus all arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The main online databases were accessed in October 2021. All the trials directly comparing primary ASR versus MOR for rotator cuff rupture were accessed. Studies concerning revision settings were not eligible, nor where those combining the surgical procedures with other adjuvants.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles were retrieved. Data from 1644 procedures (ASR = 995, MOR = 649) were collected. The mean follow-up was 26.7 (6.0-56.4) months. Comparability was found between ASR and MOR groups at baseline with regards to age (P = 0.3), gender (P = 0.7) and mean duration of the follow-up (P = 0.7). No difference was found between ASR and MOR with regard to surgical duration (P = 0.05), Constant score (P = 0.2), University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder (P = 0.3), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (P = 0.5), VAS (P = 0.2), forward flexion (P = 0.3), abduction (P = 0.3), external rotation (P = 0.2), internal rotation (P = 0.7), re-tear (P = 0.9), adhesive capsulitis (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair result in similar clinical outcomes. Male gender and older age lead to greater rates of rotator cuff re-tears, while longer surgical duration was associated with a greater rate of adhesive capsulitis.

The internal structure of the infraspinatus muscle: a magnetic resonance study

Purpose

This study aimed to describe the internal structure of the infraspinatus muscle. A secondary aim was to explore differences in internal structure between genders, sides, and correlations to demographic data.

Methods

In total, 106 shoulder MRI examinations of patients between 18 and 30 years of age seeking care in 2012–2020 at The Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden were re-reviewed.

Results

The number of intramuscular tendons centrally in the infraspinatus muscle varied between 3 and 8 (median = 5). Laterally, the number of intramuscular tendons varied between 1 and 5 (median = 2). There was no difference in the median between the genders or sides. No correlations between the number of intramuscular tendons and demographic data were found. The muscle volume varied between 63 and 249 ml with a median of 188 ml for males and 122 ml for females. There was no significant difference in volume between the sides. The muscle volume correlated with body weight (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.72, p < 0.001) and height (r = 0.61, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The anatomical variations of the infraspinatus muscle are widespread. In the medial part of the muscle belly, the number of intramuscular tendons varied between 3 and 8, while the number of intramuscular tendons laterally varied between 1 and 5. Results of our study may help to understand the internal structure of the infraspinatus muscle and its function in shoulder stabilization.

Increased Risk of Perioperative Complications in Dialysis Patients Following Rotator Cuff Repairs and Knee Arthroscopy

Purpose

To determine the effects of dialysis on postoperative and perioperative complications following rotator cuff repair (RCR) and knee arthroscopy (KA).

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried from 2006 to 2018. Groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, preoperative functional status, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. Chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze the comorbidities. Differences in occurrences of postoperative adverse events (AE), mortality within 30 days, reoperations with 30 days, extended hospital stay (≥2 days), and readmissions within 30 days were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Sign tests were used to evaluate differences in operative time, as well as length of hospital stay.

Results

Dialysis patients in both the RCR and KA groups had greater odds of experiencing any AE (OR: 6.33 and 7.46, P value: .031 and <.001, respectively) and readmission within 30 days (OR: 10.5 and 4.1, P value: .015 and .014, respectively). They also had significantly greater operating times (P = .049 for both). Dialysis patients undergoing KA had greater odds of staying in the hospital ≥2 days (OR: 10, P = <.001) and being reoperated on within 30 days (OR: 3.78, P = .033). The total hospital stay was significantly greater for dialysis patients in the KA group (P < .001) but not in the RCR group (P = .088). None of the individual AE’s significantly differed between the dialysis and non-dialysis patients in the RCR cohort; however, dialysis patients in the KA cohort had greater incidences of three AE’s.

Conclusions

This study identified significantly worse short-term complication rates in dialysis patients undergoing RCR and KA. Careful preoperative evaluation and postoperative surveillance are warranted in this high-risk patient group. Patients should be counseled appropriately on the increased complication risks associated with RCR and KA surgeries.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Effect of Acromioplasty on Postoperative Pain Following Rotator Cuff Repair

Background: The surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears traditionally involves rotator cuff repair (RCR) with concomitant acromioplasty. However, there is some doubt as to whether acromioplasty is of value to this procedure. Questions/Purpose: We sought to evaluate whether RCR with acromioplasty provided better outcomes than RCR without acromioplasty in a cohort of more than 1000 patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 1320 patients with rotator cuff tears who subsequently received a primary arthroscopic RCR, with acromioplasty (n = 160) or without acromioplasty (n = 1160), performed by a single surgeon. Acromioplasty was performed if there was significant mechanical impingement on the rotator cuff. To assess outcomes, all patients completed a standardized, modified L'Insalata questionnaire in which they reported the level and severity of pain at rest and during activities. An examiner assessed shoulder strength and range of motion before and 1 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months after surgery. Results: Patients who had RCR with concurrent acromioplasty had a greater level of pain and more frequent pain 1 week after surgery. However, at 6 months there were no differences between patients who underwent RCR with or without acromioplasty in any patient-reported outcome (level of pain with overhead activity, at rest and during sleep; frequency of pain with activity, sleep and extreme pain, difficulty of activity overhead and behind back, level of shoulder stiffness; and overall shoulder satisfaction). The postoperative re-tear rate in both groups was 13%. Conclusion: This study showed no additional benefit to acromioplasty in patients undergoing RCR.

Influence of fat infiltration, tear size, and post-operative tendon integrity on muscle contractility of repaired supraspinatus muscle

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of fat infiltration, tear size, and post-operative tendon integrity, on post-operative contractility.

Methods

Thirty-five patients who underwent rotator cuff repair were included. The fat infiltration, tear size, and post-operative tendon integrity were evaluated by Goutallier stage, Cofield classification, and Sugaya classification, respectively. The muscle elasticity at rest and at contraction was assessed by real-time tissue elastography pre- and one-year post-operatively. We defined the difference in elasticity between at rest and at contraction as the activity value which reflects muscle contractility.

Results

The activity value in patients with Sugaya Type I tended to increase regardless of Cofield classification, whereas those with Sugaya Type III and IV tended to decrease. While the activity value in the patients classified as stage 1 and Type I tended to increase, patients classified as stage 2 showed decreased or constant in contractility even in those subjects classified as Type I. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed both pre- (p = 0.004, r = -0.47) and post-operative activity values (p = 0.022, r = -0.39) to be significantly correlated only with the Goutallier stage.

Conclusion

Multiple regression analysis indicated only the Goutallier stage was a significant independent factor for contractility of the supraspinatus muscle. Supraspinatus muscle contractility in patients classified as Types III and IV based on the Sugaya classification tended to decrease post-operatively, while patients whose contractility increased post-operatively were characterized by having a Type I tendon integrity.

Costs, Complications, and Reoperations Associated With Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Acromioplasty and/or Biceps Tenodesis

Purpose

To evaluate the reoperations, complications, and costs up to 5 years following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) alone, with acromioplasty (acro), with biceps tenodesis (BT), or with both acro and BT.

Methods

We queried the MarketScan database to identify patients who underwent RCR from 2007 to 2016. Patients were stratified into groups based on concomitant procedures (acro and/or BT) performed on the same day as index RCR. Reoperations, complications, and costs were followed for 5 years post-index procedure. Patients without laterality codes were excluded. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding factors.

Results

This study identified 147,838 patients (mean age, 53.1 years; standard deviation, 8.3 years) who underwent primary RCR. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: (1) RCR only, (2) RCR + acro, (3) RCR + BT, and (4) RCR + acro + BT. Patients in the RCR only group experienced the highest rate of unadjusted overall postoperative complications (17.2%) versus the other groups (RCR + acro 16.4%, RCR + BT 15.1%, RCR + acro + BT 16.2%, P < .0161). The RCR only group also experienced a significantly greater number of reoperations on the ipsilateral shoulder (P < .0001), whereas the RCR + acro + BT had the highest costs at all timepoints. In the regression analysis, there was no significant differences between complications and reoperations between any groups. After adjusting for covariates, the performance of a BT with an RCR and acromioplasty led to increased costs (odds ratio, 1.47, 1.37-1.59, P < .001).

Conclusions

Concomitant biceps tenodesis does lead to higher total healthcare costs, both in the shorter and longer terms. When adjusting for confounding factors, the performance of concomitant biceps tenodesis with rotator cuff repair does not lead to a difference in postoperative complication rate or risk for revision surgery.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, economic analysis.

Inferior outcome of rotator cuff repair in chronic hemodialytic patients

BACKGROUND

Repair of rotator cuff tears has yielded excellent functional outcomes in recent decades; however, poor outcomes and dissatisfaction have been noted in specific groups. Spontaneous tendon rupture has been reported in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis owing to alteration of tendon structure, which might impede functional recovery after rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes between hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis patients after rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mini-open rotator cuff repair from Jan 2013 to Jan 2017. A total of 14 patients under chronic hemodialysis (HD) were matched to non-hemodialysis (NHD) patients at a 1:2 ratio according to age, gender, tear size, severity of fatty infiltration and history of diabetes. Pre- and post-operative functional outcome was assessed using the simple shoulder test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Clinical functional outcome at the last follow-up was adopted for comparison of the HD and NHD groups.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients were enrolled in this comparative study, with a mean age of 66.64 ± 1.68 years in the HD group and 65.71 ± 5.40 years in the NHD group. At the final clinical assessment, the post-operative functional outcome was significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). However, the functional outcome of the HD group was significantly inferior to that of the NHD group in terms of the SST score (6.50 ± 2.24 vs 9.39 ± 1.87, p < 0.001), ASES score (63.17 ± 15.93 vs 86.96 ± 11.43, p < 0.001), UCLA score (20.14 ± 7.71 vs 29.82 ± 5.08, p < 0.001) and VAS score (3.00 ± 0.96 vs 1.21 ± 1.03, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The improvement of pain and functional improvement of long-term hemodialysis patients were inferior to those of patients without hemodialysis after mini-open rotator cuff repair.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Copeland-Levy classification for arthroscopic evaluation of subacromial impingement

BACKGROUND

Defining a simple and reliable classification for acromial and bursal impingement lesions is necessary to standardize terminology, to improve communication, and to allow better evaluation of the proper treatment of impingement lesions and rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to assess orthopedic surgeons' intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Copeland-Levy classification.

METHODS

Six fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons reviewed shoulder arthroscopy videos of 69 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff tear repair or subacromial decompression. The surgeons were asked to classify impingement lesions according to the Copeland-Levy classification. One month afterward, the surgeons were requested to repeat the evaluation of the same impingement lesions. Intraobserver reliability was calculated using Cohen's weighted κ. Interobserver reliability was calculated using Kendall's W.

RESULTS

Overall intraobserver reliability for acromial and bursal lesions was κ = 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.9) and κ = 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.98), respectively. Interobserver reliability for acromial and bursal lesions was W = 0.87 and W = 0.92, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Copeland-Levy classification among senior orthopedic surgeons is excellent. Hence, we suggest the Copeland-Levy classification be used to standardize terminology of the subacromial impingement lesion.

Open Rotator Cuff Tear Repair Using Deltopectoral Approach

Background:

The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcome of the open repair of rotator cuff tears via the deltopectoral approach in patients unable to afford arthroscopic repair costs.

Methods:

We evaluated 80 consecutive patients who were treated for full-thickness rotator cuff tears by open repair through the deltopectoral approach. There were 48 men and 32 women at a mean age of 60.1 years (range, 35-80 years). Preoperative and postoperative clinical assessments were performed with the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and pain visual analog scale.

Results:

The mean follow-up period was 30.6 months (range, 18-48 months). At final follow-up visits, the ASES, Constant score, and modified UCLA score were found to have improved significantly from 33.56, 39.24, and 13.0 to 85.64, 81.46, and 32.2, respectively (P <0.01). Pain, as measured on a visual analog scale, was improved significantly (P <0.01). The mean time for recovering the full range of motion was 2.5 months. Postoperative pain at 48 hours and at 6 weeks was relatively low. There were no cases of intractable stiffness.

Conclusion:

The deltopectoral approach for open rotator cuff repair produced satisfactory results and reduces rate of shoulder stiffness and postoperative pain.

Outcomes are favorable in Asian patients undergoing deltoid-on open rotator cuff repair without acromioplasty

BACKGROUND

To evaluate if rotator cuff repair without acromioplasty would result in improvement in outcomes without the risks associated with acromioplasty in Asian patients.

METHODS

38 primary repairs of tears of the rotator cuff were performed through a deltoid-on approach. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and UCLA shoulder rating scale were measured preoperatively and at 2 years post-operatively.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the SST 2 years post-operatively (p < 0.001). UCLA scores for pain control and function (p < 0.001) also significantly improved 2 years post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes are favorable in Asians following deltoid-on open rotator cuff repair without acromioplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The role of acromioplasty for rotator cuff problems

Acromioplasty is a well-described technique used throughout the wide spectrum of treatment options for shoulder impingement and rotator cuff pathology. Several randomized prospective studies have described clinical outcomes that are statistically similar when comparing patients undergoing rotator cuff repair either with or without concomitant acromioplasty. This article reviews the current evidence for use of acromioplasty in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Despite recently published studies, more long-term data, especially with regard to failure rates and return-to-surgery rates over time, are needed to better determine the role of acromioplasty.

Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement

BACKGROUND

Impingement is a common cause of shoulder pain. Impingement mechanisms may occur subacromially (under the coraco-acromial arch) or internally (within the shoulder joint), and a number of secondary pathologies may be associated. These include subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis (inflammation of the subacromial portion of the bursa, the subdeltoid portion, or both), tendinopathy or tears affecting the rotator cuff or the long head of biceps tendon, and glenoid labral damage. Accurate diagnosis based on physical tests would facilitate early optimisation of the clinical management approach. Most people with shoulder pain are diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of physical tests for shoulder impingements (subacromial or internal) or local lesions of bursa, rotator cuff or labrum that may accompany impingement, in people whose symptoms and/or history suggest any of these disorders.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched electronic databases for primary studies in two stages. In the first stage, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and DARE (all from inception to November 2005). In the second stage, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and AMED (2005 to 15 February 2010). Searches were delimited to articles written in English.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered for inclusion diagnostic test accuracy studies that directly compared the accuracy of one or more physical index tests for shoulder impingement against a reference test in any clinical setting. We considered diagnostic test accuracy studies with cross-sectional or cohort designs (retrospective or prospective), case-control studies and randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two pairs of review authors independently performed study selection, assessed the study quality using QUADAS, and extracted data onto a purpose-designed form, noting patient characteristics (including care setting), study design, index tests and reference standard, and the diagnostic 2 x 2 table. We presented information on sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the index tests. Meta-analysis was not performed.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 33 studies involving 4002 shoulders in 3852 patients. Although 28 studies were prospective, study quality was still generally poor. Mainly reflecting the use of surgery as a reference test in most studies, all but two studies were judged as not meeting the criteria for having a representative spectrum of patients. However, even these two studies only partly recruited from primary care.The target conditions assessed in the 33 studies were grouped under five main categories: subacromial or internal impingement, rotator cuff tendinopathy or tears, long head of biceps tendinopathy or tears, glenoid labral lesions and multiple undifferentiated target conditions. The majority of studies used arthroscopic surgery as the reference standard. Eight studies utilised reference standards which were potentially applicable to primary care (local anaesthesia, one study; ultrasound, three studies) or the hospital outpatient setting (magnetic resonance imaging, four studies). One study used a variety of reference standards, some applicable to primary care or the hospital outpatient setting. In two of these studies the reference standard used was acceptable for identifying the target condition, but in six it was only partially so. The studies evaluated numerous standard, modified, or combination index tests and 14 novel index tests. There were 170 target condition/index test combinations, but only six instances of any index test being performed and interpreted similarly in two studies. Only two studies of a modified empty can test for full thickness tear of the rotator cuff, and two studies of a modified anterior slide test for type II superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, were clinically homogenous. Due to the limited number of studies, meta-analyses were considered inappropriate. Sensitivity and specificity estimates from each study are presented on forest plots for the 170 target condition/index test combinations grouped according to target condition.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence upon which to base selection of physical tests for shoulder impingements, and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement, in primary care. The large body of literature revealed extreme diversity in the performance and interpretation of tests, which hinders synthesis of the evidence and/or clinical applicability.

The role of acromioplasty for management of rotator cuff problems: where is the evidence?

The incidence of acromioplasty has increased dramatically in recent decades, but its role in rotator cuff surgery has been debated. Neer popularized the extrinsic theory of rotator cuff pathology, where mechanical compression of the coracoacromial arch leads to tearing of the rotator cuff. Under this theory, acromioplasty is advocated to modify acromial morphology as an essential part of rotator cuff surgery. Proponents of the intrinsic theory suggest rotator cuff tendons undergo degeneration through aging and overuse, and that bursectomy alone without acromioplasty is sufficient. There exist cadaveric studies, expert opinions, and numerous case series espousing both sides of the argument. Recently, however, numerous high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials have been published examining the role of acromioplasty. They have similar study design and randomization protocols, including groups of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bursectomy and acromioplasty versus isolated bursectomy. The results have been consistent across all studies, with no difference in the outcomes of the acromioplasty and isolated bursectomy groups. Current evidence does not support the routine use of acromioplasty in the treatment of rotator cuff disease.

The role of subacromial decompression in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without subacromial decompression.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (third quarter of 2011), Medline (1948 to week 1 of September 2011), and Embase (1980 to week 37 of 2011) for eligible randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers selected studies for inclusion, assessed methodologic quality, and extracted data. Pooled analyses were performed by use of a random effects and relative risk model with computation of 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We included 4 randomized trials and 373 patients. Methodologic quality was variable as assessed by the CLEAR NPT (Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Non-pharmacological Trial) tool. One trial showed that there was no difference in disease-specific quality of life (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff questionnaire) between the 2 treatment groups. A meta-analysis of shoulder-specific outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons or Constant scores) or the rate of reoperation between patients treated with subacromial decompression and those treated without it also showed no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the currently available literature, there is no statistically significant difference in subjective outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at intermediate follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, systematic review of Level I studies.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and quality-of-life indices and rates of revision surgery in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients consented and were randomly assigned intraoperatively to one of two study groups, and sixty-eight of them completed the study. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index. Secondary outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder assessment form and a count of revisions required in each group. Outcome measures were completed preoperatively and at three, six, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months after surgery.

RESULTS

WORC and ASES scores improved significantly in each group over time (p < 0.001). There were no differences in WORC or ASES scores between the groups that had arthroscopic cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at any time point. There were no differences in scores on the basis of acromion type, nor were any interaction effects identified between group and acromion type. Four participants (9%) in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair alone, one with a Type-2 and three with a Type-3 acromion, required additional surgery by the twenty-four-month time point. The number of patients who required additional surgery was greater (p = 0.05) in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair alone than in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair and acromioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are consistent with previous research reports in which there was no difference in functional and quality-of-life indices for patients who had rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty. The higher reoperation rate was found in the group without acromioplasty. Further study that includes follow-up imaging and patient-reported outcomes over a greater follow-up period is needed.

Results of arthroscopic decompression and tuberoplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic tuberoplasty for symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

This study enrolled 32 patients (32 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic tuberoplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears and were followed up for at least 24 months. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 62.4 years (range, 43 to 76 years), and the mean duration of follow-up was 40 months (range, 24 to 63 months). The Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles score were used for clinical evaluation. The acromiohumeral interval and inferior scapulohumeral line continuity were used for radiologic evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-six shoulders underwent arthroscopic tuberoplasty with concomitant acromioplasty, and 6 shoulders had only arthroscopic tuberoplasty. The Constant score increased from a preoperative mean of 47.6 points to 70.4 points at the last follow-up (P < .001). The University of California, Los Angeles score also improved from a preoperative mean of 15.4 points to 27.1 points at the last follow-up (P < .001), with 3 shoulders (9%) rated as excellent, 23 (72%) as good, and 6 (19%) as poor. The active range of forward flexion improved from 115.9° to 142.7° (P = .024). The final outcomes were not statistically affected by sex, age, preoperative mobility, and existence of a lesion of the long head of the biceps tendon. However, preoperative acromiohumeral interval and inferior scapulohumeral line continuity were statistically correlated with the final results (P < .001 and P = .047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic tuberoplasty with concomitant acromioplasty, as well as treatment of the biceps tendon when indicated, would be an option for diminishing pain and improving active forward elevation for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. In particular, satisfactory results during the minimum follow-up period of 24 months can be achieved in the cases with good preservation of the preoperative and postoperative acromiohumeral interval and continuity in the inferior scapulohumeral line, regardless of preoperative mobility.

Postoperative rupture of the anterolateral deltoid muscle following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients who have undergone open rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ruptures of the antero-lateral deltoid in patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing the delto-pectoral approach following failed mini-open or open rotator cuff repairs have not been reported in the English literature. The incidence of this complication is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 199 patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing a deltopectoral approach was performed. These procedures were performed by 2 surgeons in 2 hospitals. There were 3 patients who had postoperative rupture of the deltoid. These ruptures occurred without any history of trauma to the patient. In all 3 patients, past surgical history was significant for a rotator cuff repair utilizing a mini-open or mini-open modified to open approach. Successful repair of the deltoid was achieved using a transosseous suture repair in all 3 patients.

RESULTS

At most current follow-up (all >12 months), average forward elevation was 120°. A small residual anterior deltoid defect was present in all 3 patients, but pain was quantified as 0-4 out of 10 and radiographs demonstrated satisfactory position of the reverse arthroplasty implants.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative ruptures of the antero-lateral deltoid can occur in patients who have undergone reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, utilizing the delto-pectoral approach following failed mini-open or open rotator cuff repairs. A supero-lateral approach during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty could be useful in assessing and possibly reinforcing a deltoid origin previously damaged or repaired during mini-open or open rotator cuff repair.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff repair has shown to improve shoulder function and reduce pain experienced by patients. Successful repairs should have high fixation strength, allow minimal gap formation, maintain stability, and restore normal anatomy and function of the supraspinatus footprint. The purpose of this study is to describe our preferred method for rotator cuff repair using a knotless self-reinforcing double-row system, and to cite biomechanical data rationalizing its use.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Seventeen of 22 patients were identified as undergoing primary rotator cuff repair with minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean, 535 days; range, 370-939). The average age was 63 (range, 43-79). Data collected included average pain today, average worst pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

For all patients, average pain today and average worst pain decreased and functional scores (SANE) increased. Patient satisfaction was 9.8 out of 10 (range, 7-9). The patients also began rehabilitation earlier and returned to full activities at 4 months.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the knotless self-reinforcing double-row repair system is a viable option in treating rotator cuff tears. This system provides improved contact area and restores the native footprint of the tendon leading to better outcomes.

Quantification of rotator cuff tear geometry: the repair ratio as a guide for surgical repair in crescent and U-shaped tears

INTRODUCTION

Surgical repair of symptomatic, retracted rotator cuff tears unresponsive to non-operative treatments requires closure of the tear without undue tension and reattaching the torn tendon to its former insertion site. In this study, the length of the torn tendon edge was hypothesized to be longer than the length of the humeral insertion site. The objective of this study was to quantify the discrepancy in length of the torn tendon edge and the length of the avulsed humeral insertion site.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Full thickness, rotator cuff tears that were found in twelve fresh frozen cadaver shoulders was studied. The length of the torn tendon edge, the length of the avulsed humeral insertion site and the retraction were measured using digital calipers.

RESULTS

Each tear involved the supraspinatus and the infraspinatus was additionally torn in six. The size of the tear was medium in eight and large in four. The length of the torn tendon edge was always longer than the length of the avulsed humeral insertion site. Retraction was 29.9 +/- 9.3 mm (range 21-48 mm). The repair ratio, defined as the ratio of length of torn tendon edge to the length of avulsed humeral insertion site, was 2.6 +/- 0.4 (range 2.1-3.5).

CONCLUSION

As only the length of the torn tendon edge equal to the length of the avulsed humeral insertion site can be repaired to bone, a repair ratio more than one precludes a simple repair and an additional repair technique such as margin convergence would be necessary for the remaining unapproximated torn tendon edge in rotator cuff tears. Repair ratio may aid in selection of the surgical repair technique of these rotator cuff tears.

Indications for surgery in clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair

Full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff are common, but there is no clear consensus regarding indications for rotator cuff surgery. Because some patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who are asymptomatic or symptomatic can be successfully treated nonoperatively, clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair should describe the subjects in detail to allow appropriate interpretation of the results. However, we hypothesized the indications for surgery are poorly described in outcome studies of rotator cuff surgery. We undertook a detailed literature review over 11 years of six major orthopaedic journals to assess whether the indications for surgery were described adequately in studies of rotator cuff repair. Eighty-six papers fit the criteria for the study and were reviewed. Limitations of activities of daily living (31%), failure of nonoperative treatment (52%), duration of nonoperative treatment (26%), and history of nocturnal pain (16%) were reported in a minority of papers overall. The patients' characteristics and indications for surgery were not described in a majority of clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair. It is important for these factors to be considered and reported because, without this information, the reasons for and results of rotator cuff repair are difficult to interpret.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff

The aim of this study was to determine the functional outcome and rate of re-tears following mini-open repair of symptomatic large and massive tears of the rotator cuff using a two-row technique.

The 24 patients included in the study were assessed prospectively before and at a mean of 27 months (18 to 53) after surgery using the Constant and the Oxford Shoulder scores. Ultrasound examination was carried out at follow-up to determine the integrity of the repair. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a simple questionnaire.

The mean Constant score improved significantly from 36 before to 68 after operation (p < 0.0001) and the mean Oxford Shoulder score from 39 to 20 (p < 0.0001). Four of the 24 patients (17%) had a re-tear diagnosed by ultrasound. A total of 21 patients (87.5%) were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The repair remained intact in 20 patients (83%). However, the small number of re-tears (four patients) in the study did not allow sufficient analysis to show a difference in outcome in relation to the integrity of the repair.

Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding the results of all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with the mini-open approach. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and mini-open rotator cuff repairs.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference between the clinical results obtained from all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with mini-open repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A computerized search of articles published between 1966 and July 2006 was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. Additionally, a search of abstracts from 4 major annual meetings each held between 2000 and 2005 was performed to identify Level I to III studies comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open repair. Studies that included follow-up of an average of over 2 years and a minimum of 1 year and included the use of 1 of 4 validated functional outcome scores used to study shoulder injuries were included in the present meta-analysis. All outcome scores were converted to a 100-point scale to allow for outcome comparison.

RESULTS

Five studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified. There was no difference in functional outcome scores or complications between the arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on current literature, there was no difference in outcomes between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques.

A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears affect patients' quality of life. The evolution toward less invasive operative techniques for rotator cuff repair requires appropriate comparisons with the standard open procedure, using validated outcomes in a randomized fashion.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference in disease-specific quality of life outcomes at 2 years between an open surgical repair (open) versus an arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open (scope mini-open) repair for patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Patients with unremitting pain, failed nonoperative treatment, and imaging indicating full-thickness rotator cuff tears were included in the study. Massive irreparable cuff tears were excluded. Patients were assessed using the disease-specific Rotator Cuff-Quality of Life index, which produces a maximum score of 100, representing a high quality of life. Secondary shoulder-specific outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Society, Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, and Functional Shoulder Elevation Test) were also measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean Rotator Cuff-Quality of Life scores at an average follow-up of 28 months were not statistically different: open, 86.9 (95% confidence interval: 81.8-92.0); and scope mini-open, 87.2 (95% confidence interval: 80.6-93.8). At 3 months, the patients who underwent scope mini-open showed statistically significantly better outcomes (55.6 vs 71.3; P = .005). The baseline to 3-month difference in Rotator Cuff-Quality of Life scores between the scope mini-open and open groups was also statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Patient outcomes improved from baseline to all postoperative measurement intervals. There was no difference in outcome at 1 and 2 years after surgery between the scope mini-open and open procedures. The quality of life of patients undergoing the arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair improved statistically significantly and clinically at 3 months compared with the open group.

Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff

BACKGROUND

It is generally believed that the supraspinatus is the most commonly involved tendon in rotator cuff tears. Clinically, however, atrophy of the infraspinatus muscle is frequently observed in patients with even small to medium-size rotator cuff tears. This fact cannot be fully explained by our current understanding of the anatomical insertions of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. The purpose of this study was to reinvestigate the humeral insertions of these tendons.

METHODS

The study included 113 shoulders from sixty-four cadavers. The humeral insertion areas of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus were investigated in ninety-seven specimens. In sixteen specimens, all muscular portions of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus were removed, leaving the tendinous portions intact, in order to define the specific characteristics of the tendinous portion of the muscles. Another twenty-six shoulders were used to obtain precise measurements of the footprints of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus.

RESULTS

The supraspinatus had a long tendinous portion in the anterior half of the muscle, which always inserted into the anteriormost area of the highest impression on the greater tuberosity and which inserted into the superiormost area of the lesser tuberosity in 21% of the specimens. The footprint of the supraspinatus was triangular in shape, with an average maximum medial-to-lateral length of 6.9 mm and an average maximum anteroposterior width of 12.6 mm. The infraspinatus had a long tendinous portion in the superior half of the muscle, which curved anteriorly and extended to the anterolateral area of the highest impression of the greater tuberosity. The footprint of the infraspinatus was trapezoidal in shape, with an average maximum medial-to-lateral length of 10.2 mm and an average maximum anteroposterior width of 32.7 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The footprint of the supraspinatus on the greater tuberosity is much smaller than previously believed, and this area of the greater tuberosity is actually occupied by a substantial amount of the infraspinatus.

Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff in patients younger than 40 years

PURPOSE

Recent reports document excellent outcomes with arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears (RCT). However, full-thickness RCT are uncommon in patients younger than 40 years, and few reports document results after repair in this population. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively report results of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness RCT in patients younger than 40 years.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients younger than 40 years with full-thickness RCT underwent arthroscopic repair with suture anchors. Mean age was 37 years (range, 21 to 39). The mean size of RCT was 2.4 cm in the largest dimension (range, 1 to 4 cm). The mean number of anchors used was 2.5 (range, 1 to 4). Concomitant procedures included subacromial decompression (22), distal clavicle resection (13), SLAP repair (2), biceps tenodesis (2), anterior capsulorraphy (1), and capsular releases (1), and were performed at the discretion of the surgeon. Twenty-two patients (95%) recalled a single incipient trauma; two patients sustained a dislocation. Ten patients (43%) claimed Workers' Compensation (WC). Minimum follow-up was 24 months, and mean follow-up was 26 months (range, 24 to 29).

RESULTS

Mean preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's (ASES) self-report score was 42 (range, 22 to 60); the mean postoperative score was 92 (range, 65 to 100; P < .01). Twenty-one patients (90%) returned to their previous level of activity and employment, including 9 (90%) with WC claims. All patients (100%) reported diminished pain, and 22 (95%) reported improvement with activities of daily living. Complications included superficial wound infection (1) and axillary nerve palsy after initial dislocation (1). Given the choice, 22 patients (95%) would have same procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent outcomes were observed following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair both with and without concomitant procedures in patients younger than 40 years. Full-thickness RCT in patients younger than 40 years appeared to be traumatic in etiology. Successful repair returns patients to their pre-injury level of function. These results support arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in young, active patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Arthroscopically assisted mini-deltopectoral rotator cuff repair

This study examined the technique and outcome of arthroscopically assisted mini-deltopectoral rotator cuff repair. The mini-deltopectoral approach enables the repair of large or massive rotator cuff tears while preventing injury to the deltoid muscle and axillary nerve often caused by splitting and excessive traction during conventional mini-open repair. This technique also is useful in the repair of subscapularis tears and thus could extend the indications for mini-open repair.

The results of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears at mid-term follow-up

Background

To prospectively evaluate patients who underwent a "mini-open" repair versus a completely arthroscopic technique for small to large size rotator cuff tears.

Methods

Fifty-two patients underwent "mini-open" or all arthroscopic repair of a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff. Patients who complained of shoulder pain and/or weakness and who had failed a minimum of 6 weeks of physical therapy and had at least one sub-acromial injection were surgical candidates. Pre and post-operative clinical evaluations included the following: 1) demographics; 2) Simple Shoulder Test (SST); 3) University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) rating scale; 4) visual analog pain assessment (VAS); and 5) pre-op SF12 assessment. Descriptive analysis was performed for patient demographics and for all variables. Pre and post outcome scores, range of motion and pain scale were compared using paired t-tests. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate any effect between dependent and independent variables. Significance was set at p is less than or equal to 0.05.

Results

There were 31 females and 21 males. The average follow-up was 50.6 months (27 – 84 months). The average age was similar between the two groups [arthroscopic x = 55 years/mini-open x = 58 years, p = 0.7]. Twenty-seven patients underwent arthroscopic repair and 25 underwent repair with a mini-open incision. The average rotator cuff tear size was 3.1 cm (range: 1–5 centimeters). There was no significant difference in tear size between the two groups (arthroscopic group = 2.9 cm/mini-open group = 3.2 cm, p = 0.3). Overall, there was a significant improvement from pre-operative status in shoulder pain, shoulder function as measured on the Simple Shoulder test and UCLA Shoulder Form. Visual analog pain improved, on average, 4.4 points and the most recent Short Shoulder Form and UCLA scores were 8 and 26 respectively. Both active and passive glenohumeral joint range of motion improved significantly from pre-operatively.

Conclusion

Based upon the number available, we found no statistical difference in outcome between the two groups, indicating that either procedure is efficacious in the treatment of small and medium size rotator cuff tears.

Level of Evidence

Type III

Frequency of various tear patterns in full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff

PURPOSE

We define specific rotator cuff tear patterns, prospectively document their occurrences, and emphasize the importance of tear pattern recognition during arthroscopy.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 193 full-thickness rotator cuff tears intraoperatively from a single surgeon's practice. We address specific tear patterns, tear size, tissue mobility, tissue quality, and chronicity.

RESULTS

Most of the tears were able to be categorized into 6 morphologic patterns. Of the tears, 3% could not be categorized. Appreciation of various rotator cuff tear patterns guided the positioning of bone and tissue sutures to achieve accurate apposition of tendon fibers. Transverse tears were the smallest and most common tear pattern, whereas tongue-shaped and U-shaped tears were larger patterns of comparable size. U-shaped tears had more retraction and less mobility and were of poorer tissue quality. Transverse tears were easily repaired, whereas U-shaped tears could not be repaired in 38% of cases (5/13).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality and mobility of rotator cuff tissue were correlated with tear pattern, size, retraction, and chronicity. We describe a comprehensive rotator cuff tear classification scheme that encompasses 97% of all tears. Tear type was correlated with tendon retraction, tear size, cuff mobility, and tissue quality. On the basis of this information, the surgeon can anticipate tear patterns, which may improve pattern recognition and facilitate anatomic repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Early outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a matched comparison with mini-open rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the early functional outcome of mini-open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 128 patients with chronic small- and medium-sized rotator cuff tears who underwent mini-open rotator cuff repair (MRCR) (n=63) or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) (n = 65). Data were collected prospectively at baseline 1 to 2 weeks before surgery and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Patients were identified from a prospectively created database based on the dimensions of the size of the tear as determined intraoperatively. Outcome was assessed via physical examination, visual analog scales (VASs), the Simple Shoulder Test, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Changes between baseline and follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

All demographic variables and preoperative baseline parameters of the 2 groups were equivalent. At 3 and 6 months, both MRCR and ARCR showed statistically significant improvement in all patient-derived outcome parameters (P < or = .0001) except for three SF-36 variables. The improvements in the SF-36 bodily pain score at 3 months postoperatively (P = .041) and the VAS pain score at 6 months postoperatively (P = .03) were better for ARCR. All other improvements in patient-derived parameters were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective study we found that the early functional outcomes of MRCR and ARCR of small- and medium-sized rotator cuff tears are nearly equivalent. In light of the purported advantages of ARCR that motivate its popularity, this is an unexpected finding. However, an equally important result of this study was the finding that ARCR was associated with statistically significant improvement in the 3-month SF-36 bodily pain score and 6-month VAS pain score (P = .041 and .03, respectively).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative study.

Multimodality imaging of the postoperative shoulder

Multimodality imaging of the postoperative shoulder includes radiography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR arthrography, computed tomography (CT), CT arthrography, and ultrasound. Target-oriented evaluation of the postoperative shoulder necessitates familiarity with surgical techniques, their typical complications and sources of failure, knowledge of normal and abnormal postoperative findings, awareness of the advantages and weaknesses with the different radiologic techniques, and clinical information on current symptoms and function. This article reviews the most commonly used surgical procedures for treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability, lesions of the labral-bicipital complex, subacromial impingement, and rotator cuff lesions and highlights the significance of imaging findings with a view to detection of recurrent lesions and postoperative complications in a multimodality approach.

Clinical outcome and tendon integrity of arthroscopic versus mini-open supraspinatus tendon repair: a magnetic resonance imaging-controlled matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair produces equally good clinical results compared with open or mini-open repair. However, there are concerns about whether the same repair integrity can be achieved. The purpose of our study was to compare clinical and structural results of arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who had arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (mean follow-up, 25.0 months) were matched for age, gender, and duration of symptoms with nineteen patients who had mini-open repair (mean follow-up, 17.6 months). We compared preoperative and follow-up Constant scores, as well as early range of motion after 6 weeks and 3 months. All patients were examined with the same magnetic resonance imaging system at follow-up to evaluate cuff integrity.

RESULTS

There was no difference in clinical and structural outcome. The overall Constant score improved from 53.8 to 83.9 in the arthroscopic group and from 53.5 to 83.7 in the mini-open group. Early range of motion did not differ significantly at 6 weeks or 3 months postoperatively. The number of retears was 6 (31.6%) in the arthroscopic group and 7 (36.8%) in the mini-open group. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .7358). Although smaller retears had no influence on the clinical result, more retracted retears correlated with lower abduction strength regardless of the repair method.

CONCLUSIONS

In isolated supraspinatus tears arthroscopic rotator cuff repair produces excellent clinical results and equivalent tendon integrity compared with mini-open repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative study.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without subacromial decompression: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate the role of subacromial decompression in the arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears in a prospective randomized clinical study.

METHODS

Arthroscopic cuff repair was performed in 80 patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. They were divided into 2 groups comprising 40 patients each. In group 1 arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed with subacromial decompression. In group 2 the repair was performed without decompression. Rotator cuff tears were repaired via metal suture anchors for tendon-to-bone repair, side-to-side repair, or a combination of the 2 techniques. Results were evaluated by use of the Constant score normalized for age and gender, as well as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Work-DASH self-administered questionnaires. On analyzing the results at 2 years' follow-up, we considered the following independent variables: age; gender; dominance; location, shape, area, retraction, and reducibility of cuff tear; fatty degeneration; involvement of subscapularis tendon; treatment of biceps tendon; rotator cuff repair technique; and type of acromion. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was performed to determine which variables were independently associated with the outcome.

RESULTS

Comparison between the groups did not show significant differences for each variable considered. The overall results for the Constant score were 103.6 points in group 1 and 96.1 points in group 2; those for the DASH score were 18.2 points and 23.1 points, respectively; and those for the Work-DASH score were 23.7 points and 26.2 points, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the following variables significantly and independently influenced the outcome: age; shape, retraction, and reducibility of cuff tear; fatty degeneration; involvement of subscapularis; and repair technique. Subacromial decompression did not influence the outcome significantly for each scoring system considered.

CONCLUSIONS

At short-term follow-up, subacromial decompression did not seem to significantly affect the outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Longer follow-up studies will be necessary to confirm the clinical relevance of these observations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial with no significant difference but narrow confidence intervals.

Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Although arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff are becoming increasingly popular, security of fixation remains a concern. Two-row repairs have been described, but clinical outcome reports have primarily involved open techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

An arthroscopic repair technique that uses 2 rows of fixation produces satisfactory outcome and structural integrity by ultrasonography.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients (52 shoulders) with a full-thickness, but fully reducible, rotator cuff tear who met the inclusion criteria were treated with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of suture anchors. The mean tear size was 2.47 cm (range, 1-4 cm). Patients were evaluated by subjective functional assessment (L'Insalata Shoulder Rating Questionnaire), clinical examination, including measured strength testing, and ultrasonography.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 30 months (minimum of 2 years), functional scores improved from a mean of 42 preoperatively to 93 postoperatively (P < .001). Active range of motion was increased in all measured planes (P < .001). Strength was also increased in elevation (P < .001), external rotation (P < .001), and internal rotation (P = .033). Nine of the 52 shoulders (17%) had evidence of retear or persistent defect on postoperative ultrasonography. There were no differences detected in functional scores between those with an intact repair and those with a defect, but those with an intact repair were stronger in elevation (P = .006) and external rotation (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

An arthroscopic 2-row rotator cuff repair produces excellent functional outcome and repair integrity comparable with previously reported open repairs. Presence of a defect after repair did not appear to affect patient-reported function and return to preinjury activity but did affect measured strength.

The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the initial mechanical strength of 3 rotator cuff repair techniques.

METHODS

A total of 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were prepared, and full-thickness supraspinatus tears were created. Specimens were randomized and placed into 3 groups: (1) transosseous suture technique (group I: TOS, n = 10, 6F/4M), (2) single-row suture anchor fixation (group II: SRSA, n = 10, 6F/4M), and (3) double-row suture anchor fixation (group III: DRSA, n = 10, 6F/4M). Each specimen underwent cyclic load testing from 5 N to 180 N at a rate of 33 mm/sec. The test was stopped when complete failure (repair site gap of 10 mm) or a total of 5,000 cycles was attained.

RESULTS

Group I (TOS) failed at an average of 75.3 +/- 22.49 cycles, and group II (SRSA) at an average of 798.3 +/- 73.28 cycles; group III (DRSA) had no failures because all samples were stopped when 5,000 cycles had been completed. Fixation strength of the DRSA technique proved to be significantly greater than that of SRSA (P < .001), and both suture anchor groups were significantly stronger than the TOS group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Suture anchor repairs were significantly stronger than transosseous repairs. Furthermore, double-row suture anchor fixation was significantly stronger than was single-row repair. Therefore, double-row fixation may be superior to other techniques in that it provides a substantially stronger repair that could lead to improved biologic healing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A high incidence of incomplete healing occurs in rotator cuff repair. Use of double-row fixation may help the clinician to address some deficiencies in current methods by increasing the strength of the repair, potentially leading to improved healing rates.

Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site

There is a high rate of recurrent and residual tears after rotator cuff repair surgery. Recent cadaveric studies have provided surgeons with new knowledge about the anatomy of the supraspinatus tendon insertion. Traditional repair techniques fail to reproduce the area of the supraspinatus insertion, or footprint, on the greater tuberosity anatomically. Double-row suture anchor (DRSA) fixation is a new technique that has been developed to restore the supraspinatus footprint better. In this study, 3-dimensional mapping was used to determine the area of the footprint recreated with 3 different repair methods: a transosseous simple suture technique, fixation with a single row of suture anchors, and DRSA fixation. The DRSA fixation technique consistently reproduced 100% of the original supraspinatus footprint, whereas the single-row suture anchor fixation and transosseous simple suture techniques reproduced only 46% and 71% of the insertion site, respectively. Therefore, the footprint area of the DRSA fixation technique was significantly larger (P < .05) than that of the other 2 techniques. Furthermore, double-row fixation may provide a tendon-bone interface better suited for biologic healing and restoring normal anatomy.

Biomechanical evaluation of the relation between number of suture anchors and strength of the bone-tendon interface in a goat rotator cuff model

PURPOSE

The effect of contact area between tendon and bone on ultimate pullout strength of a repaired tendon is not known. The purpose of this study was to test whether the strength of a healed bone-tendon interface is related to the amount of tendon that is in contact with bone at the time of repair.

METHODS

A total of 20 mature goats underwent bilateral open rotator cuff repair of the infraspinatus tendon. The tendon edge was repaired to bleeding cancellous bone in each case with the use of suture anchors. The tendon was repaired with 2 anchors (contact area A; n = 20) on 1 shoulder and 4 anchors (contact area B; n = 20) on the contralateral shoulder. Ten goats were euthanized at 4 weeks (group 1) and 10 goats at 8 weeks (group 2) postoperatively. Twelve specimens were evaluated with ultrasound in the sagittal and coronal planes in a saline bath before mechanical testing was conducted. Ultimate load to failure was reported for each shoulder. Data were analyzed by means of a paired t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Ultrasound evaluation revealed several instances in groups 1/2 and contact areas A/B in which clear gap formation occurred without scar (collagen) interdigitation at the bone-tendon interface. Failures occurred at the bone-tendon repair site in all specimens during biomechanical testing. The mean load to failure for all specimens in group 1 was 350.7 N; it was 619.4 N for specimens in group 2 (P = .0002). In group 1, specimens with contact area A had a mean load to failure of 317.3 N; specimens with contact area B had a mean load to failure of 375.5 N (P = .15). In group 2, specimens repaired with contact area A had a mean ultimate load to failure of 635.8 N, whereas contact area B specimens had an ultimate failure strength of 688.5 N (P = .45; Wilcoxon signed-rank).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the number of suture anchors and the surface area of the tendon that is in contact with bone at the repair site increased the ultimate load to failure of the repaired tendon at both 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively by less than 10% at both intervals. This was not a statistically significant increase in failure strength in this model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This animal model shows no statistically significant differences in strength at the repair site between a 2-anchor and a 4-anchor rotator cuff repair. This information may have direct clinical applications for the surgical technique employed in the repair of rotator cuffs.