[Three-dimensional CT study of the carpus under pronation-supination constraints]

Assessment of Forearm Rotational Control Using 4 Upper Extremity Immobilization Constructs

BACKGROUND

Forearm immobilization techniques are commonly used to manage distal radius, scaphoid, and metacarpal fractures. The purpose of our study was to compare the degree of rotational immobilization provided by a sugar-tong splint (STS), short arm cast (SAC), Munster cast (MC), and long arm cast (LAC) at the level of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), carpus, and metacarpals.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric upper extremity specimens were mounted to a custom jig with the ulnohumeral joint fixated in 90° of flexion. Supination and pronation were unrestricted. K-wires were placed in the distal radius, scaphoid, and metacarpals using fluoroscopic guidance to measure the total arc of rotation referenced to the ulnar ex-fix pin. Baseline measurements followed by sequential immobilization with well-molded STS, SAC, MC, and LAC were obtained with 1.25, 2.5, and 3.75 ft-lb of supination and pronation force directed through the metacarpal K-wire. Each condition was tested 3 times. Digital photographs were taken perpendicular to the ulnar axis to analyze the total arc of motion.

RESULTS

The most effective constructs from least to greatest allowed rotational arcs were LAC, MC, SAC, and STS. Above-elbow constructs (MC, LAC) demonstrated superior immobilization compared with below-elbow constructs (SAC) ( P < .001). Circumferential constructs (SAC, MC, LAC) were superior to the noncircumferential construct (STS) ( P < .001). There were no significant differences between the MC and LAC in all conditions tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Both circumferential and proximally extended immobilization independently improved rotational control of the wrist. However, extending immobilization proximal to the epicondyles did not confer additional stability.

A novel method to replicate the kinematics of the carpus using a six degree-of-freedom robot

Understanding the kinematics of the carpus is essential to the understanding and treatment of wrist pathologies. However, many of the previous techniques presented are limited by non-functional motion or the interpolation of points from static images at different postures. We present a method that has the capability of replicating the kinematics of the wrist during activities of daily living using a unique mechanical testing system. To quantify the kinematics of the carpal bones, we used bone pin-mounted markers and optical motion capture methods. In this paper, we present a hammering motion as an example of an activity of daily living. However, the method can be applied to a wide variety of movements. Our method showed good accuracy (1.0-2.6°) of in vivo movement reproduction in our ex vivo model. Most carpal motion during wrist flexion-extension occurs at the radiocarpal level while in ulnar deviation the motion is more equally shared between radiocarpal and midcarpal joints, and in radial deviation the motion happens mainly at the midcarpal joint. For all rotations, there was more rotation of the midcarpal row relative to the lunate than relative to the scaphoid or triquetrum. For the functional motion studied (hammering), there was more midcarpal motion in wrist extension compared to pure wrist extension while radioulnar deviation patterns were similar to those observed in pure wrist radioulnar deviation. Finally, it was found that for the amplitudes studied the amount of carpal rotations was proportional to global wrist rotations.

Patterns of subchondral bone mineralization in the distal radioulnar joint

PURPOSE

Studies have shown that it is possible to derive direct knowledge about the actual mechanical conditions of the wrist by analyzing the subchondral mineralization. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the distribution of the subchondral bone mineralization of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) noninvasively in living subjects by using computed tomography (CT) osteoabsorptiometry to gain new information about the long-term loading conditions.

METHODS

Twenty-two wrist joints were investigated in 11 healthy young subjects by means of CT osteoabsorptiometry. The CT scans of the DRUJ were taken in the axial plane in neutral position of the forearm and in both maximum pronation and supination. The CT datasets of 1.5-mm sections were obtained and then transferred to an image-analyzing system. The subchondral bone plate in each section was isolated, reconstructed in 3 dimensions, and converted into a false color series.

RESULTS

The maximum subchondral bone density in the sigmoid notch of the radius was found along the distal border in all wrists. It was located dorsally in 10 wrists, palmarly in 8 wrists, and centrally in 4 wrists. The maximum bone density on the corresponding articular surface of the ulna was found dorsally in 10 cases, centrally in 8 cases, and palmarly in 4 cases. In 13 cases the maximum bone density was found in direct opposition on radius and ulna in neutral position. A statistically significant difference could not be detected in subjects with an ulna minus variance nor in those with a DRUJ angulation greater than 10 degrees .

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in the sigmoid notch the load is transmitted through either the dorsal or palmar parts of the joint. In contrast the maximum bone density on the side of the ulna was found dorsally and centrally. We conclude that the ulna receives the maximum load in neutral position and supination, whereas because of the dorsopalmar translation of the ulnar head the radius may lead the ulna with either its palmar or dorsal borders during pronosupination. The ligamentous apparatus, the shape of the joint, and the ulna variance, however, may influence load transmission.

How much can carpus rotate axially? An in vivo study

BACKGROUND

Supination and pronation movements occur primarily at the forearm though are possible at the wrist joint too. The axial rotation of the wrist also called the radiometacarpal rotation has been quantified but for its passive range which may never occur during the day-to-day routine activities. It is normally not possible for the wrist joint to rotate axially in an active manner. However, voluntary effort to rotate the forearm while keeping the hand fixed on a custom designed device is able to provide active rotation of the wrist which occurs in a manner similar to that occurring during the daily routine activities.

METHODS

The present study measured axial rotation of the wrist in 20 asymptomatic volunteers who had axial CT done of their wrist with elbow in 10-30 degrees flexion and forearm positioned parallel to the long axis of the table with thumb pointing up towards the roof. The examination was repeated twice while the subject actively tried to supinate and pronate the forearm against the fixed hand and the metacarpals using maximum voluntary effort on a custom designed positioning device.

FINDINGS

The mean radiometacarpal supination and pronation were 17.15 degrees (SD 7.9) and 17.0 degrees (SD 10) respectively. The movement was found to occur predominantly at midcarpal joint with radiocarpal joint contributing only 18% to supination and 31% to pronation.

INTERPRETATION

The radiometacarpal rotation has a crucial bearing in the development of the wrist prostheses. The design of the prostheses should consider accommodating axial movements that occur in the carpus during the activities of daily living.

Kinematics of the wrist using 2D and 3D analysis: biomechanical and clinical deductions

Surgery of the wrist relies on the known notions of biomechanics of the wrist. But these notions are incomplete. For a better understanding of the movements of the wrist, we studied five wrists of healthy volunteers with CT scanning. Each wrist was studied in neutral position, and in the four extreme positions: flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviations. Using oblique reformatted CT sections, we measured the angular displacements in frontal and sagittal views of every carpal bone in the different positions of the wrist. This allowed us to construct a table of intracarpal mobility. By comparing the angle values and the three-dimensional pictures of these wrists, we illustrate some fundamental points regarding intracarpal movement. The dynamics of the wrist are like those of two super-imposed mobile cups with different movements. The proximal row is malleable with flattening and torsion according to the transverse axis and its behavior is like that of an articular meniscus. The distal row, more rigid but deformable, behaves like a T-handle giving attachment to the hand and articulating under the proximal row around the head of the capitate and the proximal pole of the hamate. During radial and ulnar deviations of the wrist, the movement between the two rows is like an inverse pronation-supination shearing. During flexion-extension, the distortion of the two rows allows maximal congruence to be maintained between the different carpal bones.