[Antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients with schizophrenia. Coordinated multidisciplinary management (7 cases)]

Interventions and approaches to integrating HIV and mental health services: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The frequency in which HIV and AIDS and mental health problems co-exist, and the complex bi-directional relationship between them, highlights the need for effective care models combining services for HIV and mental health. Here, we present a systematic review that synthesizes the literature on interventions and approaches integrating these services.

METHODS

This review was part of a larger systematic review on integration of services for HIV and non-communicable diseases. Eligible studies included those that described or evaluated an intervention or approach aimed at integrating HIV and mental health care. We searched multiple databases from inception until October 2015, independently screened articles identified for inclusion, conducted data extraction, and assessed evaluative papers for risk of bias.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles were eligible for this review. We identified three models of integration at the meso and micro levels: single-facility integration, multi-facility integration, and integrated care coordinated by a non-physician case manager. Single-site integration enhances multidisciplinary coordination and reduces access barriers for patients. However, the practicality and cost-effectiveness of providing a full continuum of specialized care on-site for patients with complex needs is arguable. Integration based on a collaborative network of specialized agencies may serve those with multiple co-morbidities but fragmented and poorly coordinated care can pose barriers. Integrated care coordinated by a single case manager can enable continuity of care for patients but requires appropriate training and support for case managers. Involving patients as key actors in facilitating integration within their own treatment plan is a promising approach.

CONCLUSION

This review identified much diversity in integration models combining HIV and mental health services, which are shown to have potential in yielding positive patient and service delivery outcomes when implemented within appropriate contexts. Our review revealed a lack of research in low- and middle- income countries, and was limited to most studies being descriptive. Overall, studies that seek to evaluate and compare integration models in terms of long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness are needed, particularly at the health system level and in regions with high HIV and AIDS burden.

Cooccurrences of Putative Endogenous Retrovirus-Associated Diseases

At least 8% of the human genome is composed of endogenous retrovirus (ERV) sequences. ERVs play a role in placental morphogenesis and can sometimes protect the host against exogenous viruses. On the other hand, ERV reactivation has been found to be associated with different diseases, for example, multiple sclerosis (MS), schizophrenia, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Little is known about the cooccurrence of these diseases. If all these diseases are caused by ERV, antiretroviral therapy should perhaps also show some effects in the other diseases. Here, we summarize literature demonstrating that some ERV-associated diseases seem to appear together more often than expected, for example, MS and ALS, MS and T1D, MS and schizophrenia, or ALS and T1D. In contrast, some ERV-associated diseases seem to appear together less frequently than expected, for example, schizophrenia and T1D. Besides, some reports demonstrate amelioration of MS, ALS, or schizophrenia under antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. If such results could be confirmed in larger studies, alternative therapy strategies for ERV-associated diseases like MS and schizophrenia might be possible.

[Adherence intervention for HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment. Implementation and initial assessment]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the implementation and initial results of a specific educational and counseling intervention to examine and improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ARV) in HIV-infected patients.

METHOD

Four patient profiles were defined: 1) discontinuation and 2) failure: patients with virological failure (defined as two consecutive viral loads>200 copies/mL) at ARV discontinuation or under treatment, both seen after the fact; 3) preparation: naive patients seen before starting treatment, and 4) reinforcement: patients in treatment seen for counseling to prevent virological failure. A clinical psychologist, nurse and hospital pharmacist jointly conducted the session. Data collected include standardized information about the characteristics of HIV infection and ARV regimens, and demographic, behavioral, social and cultural indicators. CD4 cell counts and HIV viral loads were recorded at D0, M1, M3, M9 and M12. The effectiveness of the adherence intervention was defined separately for each patient profile based on some combination of taking or restarting an ARV regimen, virological response, and M12 follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients between November 1998 and April 2000. The intervention was defined as effective in 50% and 40% of the discontinuation (n=26) and failure (n=61) patients respectively, 84% of those with preparation profile (n=37) and 93% (14/15) of reinforcement patients. Only undetectable HIV viral load at M3 was significantly associated with the effectiveness of the adherence intervention for all 4 profiles. The preventive interventions (preparation and reinforcement) were less effective in patients from outside Europe (p=0.013).

CONCLUSION

The adherence intervention was more effective in preventing virological failure than in restoring ARV effectiveness among patients who had already experienced virological failure. It should therefore be proposed primarily before starting ARV, to prevent failure in treatment-naive patients, especially those from outside Europe.