Peut-on utiliser une valeur fixe du rapport VEMS/CV comme seuil diagnostique de l’obstruction bronchique ?

Feasibility of spirometry in primary care to screen for COPD: a pilot study

Background

COPD is a frequent but underdiagnosed disease whose diagnosis relies on the spirometric demonstration of bronchial obstruction. Spirometry use by general practitioners could represent the first line in COPD diagnosis.

Objective

Because duration of spirometry is retarding its development in primary care, we decided to measure the time it requires in the primary-care context in France.

Methods

Ten volunteer general practitioners were trained during two 3-hour theoretical and practical continuing education sessions. Then, from October 2013 to May 2014, they included patients without any known respiratory disease but at risk of developing COPD (age: ≥40 years, smoker: ≥20 pack-years). The duration of spirometry and its quality were evaluated according to the following acceptability criteria: 1) expiration ≥6 seconds or reaching a plateau; 2) good start with an early peak flow, curve peaked on top and not flat; 3) no artifacts; and 4) reproducibility criteria, ie, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity differences between the two best spirometry curves ≤0.15 L. Quality of the spirograms was defined as optimal when all the criteria were met and acceptable when all the criteria were satisfied except the reproducibility criterion, otherwise, it was unacceptable.

Results

For the 152 patients included, the 142 assessable spirometries lasted for 15.2±5.9 minutes. Acceptability criteria 1–3, respectively, were satisfied for 90.1%, 89.4%, and 91.5% of patients and reproducibility criterion 4 for 56.3%. Quality was considered optimal for 58.5% of the curves and acceptable for 30.2%.

Conclusion

The duration of spirometry renders it poorly compatible with the current primary-care practice in France other than for dedicated consultations. Moreover, the quality of spirometry needs to be improved.

[Early detection of COPD in occupational medicine in the Alpes-Maritimes]

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated a standardized procedure aiming at early detection of COPD in a consecutive population of employees visiting occupational medicine.

METHODS

A total of 2818 employees were included by 22 occupational physicians in 5 centers. Respiratory symptoms, smoking status, occupational exposures and socioprofessional categories were collected. Subjects with at least one symptom and/or risk factor underwent spirometry.

RESULTS

In this population aged 39±12 years, 2603 patients were free of known asthma or COPD. The presence of at least one symptom was observed in 23.6 % of employees and was significantly associated with smoking status, occupational exposure to organic dust, gas fumes and vapors, and agriculture (P<0.0001). Airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.70) was detected in 1.7 % of 1605 employees who underwent spirometry. With the inclusion of known COPD subjects (n=22), the prevalence reached 2.38 %. COPD was significantly associated with smoking intensity. Information on subsequent diagnosis was obtained in only two cases. The quality of spirometry was inadequate in 30 % of cases. Thirty-three percent of detected COPD subjects did not report any respiratory symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The strategy used in this study (specific questionnaire plus spirometry) allowed detection of a few cases of previously undiagnosed COPD. Occupational physicians need specific training in spirometry and a better follow-up of care pathways is required to obtain diagnostic confirmation.