Cancer pain education among family physicians

Synthesis of Existent Oncology Curricula for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review With a Global Equity Lens

PURPOSE

Global increases in cancer, coupled with a shortage of cancer specialists, has led to an increasing role for primary care providers (PCP) in cancer care. This review aimed to examine all extant cancer curricula for PCPs and to analyze the motivations for curriculum development.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception to October 13, 2021, with no language restrictions. The initial search yielded 11,162 articles and 10,902 articles underwent title and abstract review. After full-text review, 139 articles were included. Numeric and thematic analyses were conducted and education programs were evaluated using Bloom's taxonomy.

RESULTS

Most curricula were developed in high-income countries (HICs), with 58% in the United States. Cancer-specific curricula focused on HIC priority cancers, such as skin/melanoma, and did not represent the global cancer burden. Most (80%) curricula were developed for staff physicians and 73% focused on cancer screening. More than half (57%) of programs were delivered in person, with a shift toward online delivery over time. Less than half (46%) of programs were codeveloped with PCPs and 34% did not involve PCPs in the program design and development. Curricula were primarily developed to improve cancer knowledge, and 72 studies assessed multiple outcome measures. No studies included the top two levels of Bloom's taxonomy of learning (evaluating; creating).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first review to assess the current state of cancer curricula for PCPs with a global focus. This review shows that extant curricula are primarily developed in HICs, do not represent the global cancer burden, and focus on cancer screening. This review lays a foundation to advance the cocreation of curricula that are aligned to the global cancer burden.

Factors Associated with Palliative Care Knowledge among Internal Medicine House Staff

Purpose

To assess knowledge and associated factors in palliative care.

Methods

Self-administered survey of 88 internal medicine house officers in 1996.

Results

Twenty-one interns and 36 residents completed the survey for a response rate of 65%. Most house officers reported 1–5 hours of prior formal training in palliative care, 1–5 hours in pain management, and 6–20 hours in ethics. The mean knowledge score was 75% correct (SD=8); pain management scores were lowest (70%). Overall, interns had a significantly lower mean score than residents (70% vs. 77%; p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, only the year of residency was significantly associated with knowledge score; prior formal training in palliative care, pain management, or ethics was not. One third of house officers rated themselves as “not at all” or “only slightly” at ease in caring for a dying patient. These self-ratings were not associated with prior training or knowledge, but were higher in residents compared to interns.

Conclusions

Palliative care knowledge and ease with dying patients were higher in later years of residency but were not associated with prior formal palliative care training. These data highlight the continued need to evaluate and improve training in palliative care and pain management.

Safety concerns with long-term opioid use

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of opioid therapy must be balanced by any adverse effects. In recent years, prescription opioids have been increasingly prescribed, but have also been associated with increased abuse, overdose and death.

AREAS COVERED

This review will categorize the common risks of opioid administration. Recognized adverse effects of opioid therapy include constipation, tolerance, endocrinopathies, sleep disorders, cognitive effects, respiratory depression, overdose and addiction. Studies have shown that there is increased risk of overdose and death with higher daily opioid doses, particularly above a morphine equivalent oral daily dose of 100 milligrams. Extended-release/long acting (ER/LA) opioid formulations may be beneficial for the compliant patient, yet may expose a higher risk for abuse if used inappropriately since each tablet carries a larger dose of medication.

EXPERT OPINION

Prospective, controlled one-year trials are needed to establish the efficacy and safety profile of chronic opioid therapy. In addition to the well known side effects of chronic opioid therapy, the influence and serious effect of opioids on sleep and central sleep apnea is only recently being investigated. The lowest possible daily opioid must be used to manage chronic pain, and all clinicians should be cautious in the use of daily morphine equivalent doses above 50-100 milligrams.

Transformation of acute cancer pain to chronic cancer pain syndromes

For many cancer survivors, disease-related long-term morbidities and the application of advanced cancer treatments have resulted in the development of a chronic pain state. This brief review explores the relationship between what is known about the treatment of active cancer pain syndromes-both continuous pain and breakthrough pain-and persisting pain syndromes in cancer survivors. We also posit that because there is evidence to suggest that poorly treated acute pain can lead to protracted pain conditions, acute pain should be recognized and treated promptly, both for short- and long-term gain. In the short term, better acute pain treatment can improve functionality and psychological well-being, whereas in the long term, mounting evidence suggests that it could prevent of future chronic pain.

Cancer breakthrough pain in the presence of cancer-related chronic pain: fact versus perceptions of health-care providers and patients

Cancer breakthrough pain is a flare in pain that "breaks through" well-controlled persistent cancer pain. Although the condition is highly prevalent, the concept of cancer breakthrough pain is not well understood and is therefore underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this review is to examine the roles the health-care practitioner and patient/family caregiver play in the undertreatment of breakthrough pain. A lack of technical knowledge about pain management and pain assessment, attitudes about opioid addiction, and regulatory guidelines influence the manner in which opioids are prescribed. Patients harbor a variety of fears and misconceptions, such as opioid addiction, tolerance, side effects, and the meaning of pain, which can create a barrier to effective communication with their health-care provider regarding their cancer pain management and specifically their breakthrough pain. Identifying these issues gives health-care professionals and patients an opportunity to develop strategies that can improve the treatment of cancer breakthrough pain.

Implications of IASP Core Curriculum for Pre-Registration Physiotherapy Education

There are concerns about the effectiveness of health professionals when they are working with people who have pain.Health professionals have reported a lack of confidence when working with people with complex pain conditions.Review of pain education in health professional training may improve clinical practice.The International Association for the Study of Pain curricula can be useful in developing pain education initiatives.The up-dated IASP core curriculum appears to be a useful resource for curriculum designers of pre-registration physiotherapy programmes, while the IASP discipline-specific curriculum is in need of revision.

No relief in sight: postgraduate training in pain management

This study investigated training in pain management in postgraduate medical education programs. A mail survey of program directors was conducted, evaluating the format of training in pain management and the self-assessed adequacy of the training. The response rate was 70%, with 188 total respondents. It included all programs in a large Midwestern state, representing most specialties. Just over half of all programs offered any formal training in pain management, and even fewer required it. Less than one quarter required a clinical component to such training. Nonetheless, an overwhelming majority of program directors (85%) rated their training as adequate or excellent. Improvements are clearly needed in postgraduate training in pain management, and external incentives, such as requirements in the accreditation process, will be needed.

The impact of conducting a regional palliative care clinical study

End-of-life care must be informed by methodologically rigorous, high-quality research, but well-documented barriers make the conduct of palliative care clinical trials difficult. With careful consideration to study design and procedures, these barriers are surmountable. This paper discusses the approach used in a large scale, randomised, controlled trial of service-based interventions in a regional palliative care service in South Australia, and the impact of this trial on palliative care research more broadly, the changes to the service in which it was conducted, and on health policy beyond palliative care. The Palliative Care Trial evaluated three interventions in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomised design: case conferences, general practitioner education, and patient education. Main outcomes were performance status, pain intensity, and resource utilisation. A total of 461 patients were enrolled in the study. Pre-study planning and piloting is crucial, and accurately estimated withdrawal and death rates in the study. Other study design elements that facilitated this research included assessment of three interventions at one time, a dedicated recruitment role, a single clinical triage point, embedding data collection into routine clinical assessments, and meaningful outcome measures. Recruitment and retention of participants is possible if barriers are systematically identified and addressed. This study challenged and developed the research culture within our clinical team and subsequently translated into further research.

Systematic review of educational interventions in palliative care for primary care physicians

BACKGROUND

A literature review of educational interventions in palliative care (PC) for primary care physicians (PCP) was performed, to evaluate its impact in changing professional practice.

METHODS

Studies undertaking any educational intervention in PC by PCP, published between 1966 and February 2005, identified through Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Trials, Educational Resources Information Centre, Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education, Spanish Medical Index, using a combined text word and MESH heading search strategy.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included with 1653 physicians. Educative methods were: role model training, small group discussions, and distribution of guidelines. Quality of the studies was low. Opioids prescription improved in two studies. Discrepancies were shown between the perception of PCP in symptom management, determined through questionnaires, and the data concerning opioids prescription. Knowledge improved in all studies. Some benefit of multifaceted approach was stated. Carers were satisfied, in general, with the PCP care, but dissatisfied with patients' pain control.

CONCLUSION

PC education for PCP is poorly studied. Adequate research designs are necessary in future studies with objective outcomes and patient opinion.

Equipping medical students to manage cancer pain: a comparison of three educational methods

A Cancer Pain Structured Clinical Instruction Module (SCIM), with skills stations incorporating actual cancer patients, has been developed to enhance cancer pain education among our medical students. The Cancer Pain SCIM has not been compared with more traditional cancer pain education, thus the purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and durability of three educational methods for teaching cancer pain management to medical students compared with a control group. Four consecutive rotations of 32 third-year medical students participated in one of four cancer pain educational strategies: 1) control group with no formal cancer pain education, 2) CD-ROM self-instruction module on cancer pain, 3) a 2-hour Cancer Pain SCIM plus the CD-ROM information, and 4) Cancer Pain SCIM, plus CD-ROM, plus a structured home-hospice patient visit. The effectiveness of the educational interventions was assessed at 4 months post-instruction using a 4-component Cancer Pain Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The main findings of this educational study are that: 1) all three educational groups performed better on the Cancer Pain OSCE at 4 months than the control group (P<0.05); 2) medical students receiving structured education on cancer pain management significantly out-performed students at 4 months compared with control or traditional instructional formats; 3) students receiving the Cancer Pain SCIM plus home visit performed highest on the pain management, physical exam, and communication stations of the OSCE; and 4) the SCIM format of education shows durability as assessed at 4 months post-instruction. The Cancer Pain SCIM has a unique potential to substantially improve the quality of cancer pain education.

Rapid improvement in pain management: the Veterans Health Administration and the institute for healthcare improvement collaborative

BACKGROUND

Poor pain management persists in health care. Although common practice errors in pain management have been identified and standards and guidelines for pain management have been published, improvement has been modest. With the goal of rapid improvement in pain management, a joint Collaborative (Veterans Health Administration and Institute for Healthcare Improvement) was conducted from May 2000 to January 2001.

OBJECTIVE

To improve delivery of pain management to VHA patients and to compare team process and patient report data on key goals from selected study units.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed for outcome and process measures. Measures included changes in percentage of patients with (1) moderate to severe pain, (2) documentation of a pain assessment, (3) documentation of a pain care plan, and (4) documentation that the patient received pain education.

RESULTS

Seventy teams from 22 Veteran's Integrated Service Networks throughout the U.S. participated. Moderate or severe pain on study units dropped from 24% to 17%; pain assessment increased from 75% to 85%; pain care plans for patients with at least mild pain increased from 58% to 78%; and number of patients provided with pain educational materials increased from 35% to 62%.

DISCUSSION

Significant progress toward the target goals was reported during the Collaborative period. This improvement needs to be viewed in the context of a VHA system-wide effort to improve pain management. Data suggest that a program of team formation, goal identification, testing and adaptation of recommended system changes, sharing and feedback of process and outcome information can produce significant change in pain management in a major health care organization.

Palliative medicine in a United States cancer center: a prospective study

PURPOSE

(a) To report the medical complexity of cancer and noncancer patients receiving palliative medicine (PM) consultation at a tertiary medical center and (b) to describe the consult recommendations madefor this group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective data collection was performed on all consultations (cancer, n = 175; noncancer, n = 35) done by first author (JDC) as a PM fellow at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between July 1998 and April 1999. A computer database was used to query for demographics, complexity of medical problems, current medications, mortality, symptoms, nursing problems, and consult recommendations.

RESULTS

A median of three (range, 0-12) acute medical problems and three (range, 0-16) chronic medical problems were identified for each patient. Patients were taking a median of six medications (range, 0-20). They had a median of five symptoms (range, 0-13) with pain (73 percent) being most common, followed by weakness (40 percent) and shortness of breath (40 percent). Cancer patients were twice as likely to have more than five symptoms (48 percent versus 23 percent) (chi-square = 0.006). The most common nursing problems were ambulation or fall risk (15 percent) and skin integrity (11 percent). A median of five (range, 1-11) management recommendations were made as part of each consultation. These included medication changes in 81 percent, nonmedication changes in 53 percent, andfollow-up services in 100 percent. The median survivalfrom the time of consultation for the known dead was 29 days with 65 percent living more than 14 days.

CONCLUSION

Multiple recommendations were made with most patients surviving long enough potentially to benefit. Consultation in palliative medicine is a sophisticated intervention involving considerable acuity and complexity of care.

Implementing cancer pain education for medical students

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot a cancer pain education course for medical students, using a structured home hospice visit.

DESCRIPTION OF STUDY

A 1-hour home hospice visit was presented to 57 senior medical students. The content and objective criteria for the structured home hospice visit were developed by a multidisciplinary group of experts. During a 1-hour interview, students completed a cancer pain history, performed a focused physical examination, and received feedback and teaching regarding the essentials of cancer pain management from the hospice nurse. All students and hospice patients completed a multi-item evaluation questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree) regarding the structured home hospice visit.

RESULTS

Most students agreed strongly that the home hospice visit was a positive experience (mean +/- SD 4.8 +/- 0.44) that helped them to understand the management of cancer pain (mean 4.7 +/- 0.46) and opioid-related side effects (mean 4.5 +/- 0.57). Most patients enjoyed visiting with the students (mean 4.90 +/- 0.30), agreed that the visit was not tiring (mean 4.81 +/- 0.51), and felt that they benefited from participating (mean 4.76 +/- 0.54).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The authors concluded the following: 1) that medical students benefited from learning about cancer pain assessment and management through the use of a structured home hospice visit; 2) that a structured home hospice visit helped the students to learn the basics of cancer pain management; 3) that patients enjoyed their role as teacher for medical students; and 4) that senior hospice nurses provided excellent instruction for medical students in the management of cancer pain.

Cancer pain management skills among medical students: the development of a Cancer Pain Objective Structured Clinical Examination

Recent surveys suggest that most physicians have inadequate knowledge to assess and manage cancer pain; however, the important domain of clinical performance has not yet been clearly evaluated. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has become a widely- used and accepted method to evaluate the clinical abilities of medical students. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a Cancer Pain OSCE for medical students evaluating their clinical competence in the area of cancer pain management. A four-component Cancer Pain OSCE was developed and presented to 34 third-year medical students during a sixteen-week combined medicine/surgery clerkship. The content of the objective criteria for each component of the OSCE was developed by a multidisciplinary group of pain experts. The OSCE was designed to assess the students' cancer pain management skills of pain history-taking, focused physical examination, analgesic management of cancer pain, and communication of opioid analgesia myths. Actual cancer survivors were used in the five-minute individual stations. The students were asked to complete a cancer pain history, physical examination, manage cancer pain using analgesics, and communicate with a family member regarding opioid myths. Clinical performance was evaluated using pre-defined checklists. Results showed the student's average performance for the history component was the highest of all four components of the examination. Out of 34 points possible on this clinical skills item, students on average (SD) scored 24.5 (5.2), or 72%. For the short-answer analgesic management component of the Cancer Pain OSCE, the overall score was 32%. Most students managed cancer pain with opioids, however, very few prescribed regular opioid use, and the use of adjuvant analgesics was uncommon. Student performance on the focused cancer pain physical examination was, in general, poor. On average students scored 61% on the musculoskeletal system, but only 31% on both the neurological and lymphathic examination. The overall percent score for the cancer pain OSCE was 48%. We conclude that the Cancer Pain OSCE is a useful performance-based tool to test individual skills in the essential components of cancer pain assessment and management. Of the four components of the Cancer Pain OSCE, medical students performed best on the cancer pain history and performed poorly on the cancer pain physical examination. Information gained from this study will provide a foundation on which future small-group medical student structured teaching will be based.

An international survey of undergraduate medical education in palliative medicine

A 9-item mail survey dealing with availability and characteristics of undergraduate medical education programs in palliative medicine was sent to all medical schools in Canada (16) and the United Kingdom (UK) (30), and 129 randomly selected medical schools in the United States (US) and Western Europe. The overall response rate was 117/175 (67%). The highest percentage of mandatory (required by the university) rotations in palliative medicine was in the UK medical schools (14/22, 64%). Considerably lower numbers were obtained from the other countries: US; 4/37, 11%, Canada; 2/14, 14%, and Western Europe; 8/43, 19% (P = 0.001). Elective rotations in palliative medicine were more readily available in the UK; 18/22, 82% and Canada; 10/14, 71%, compared with the US; 23/37, 62%, and Western Europe; 13/43, 30% (P=0.001). Seventy-two percent (13/18) of UK, 70% (7/10) of Canadian, 59% (16/27) of US, and 9/30 (30%) of Western European medical schools provide educational reading material in palliative medicine (P = 0.014). Case-based learning in small groups and small group discussion were favored by the UK, 14/22 (63%) and 17/22 (77%), respectively, and Canadian medical schools, 8/14 (57%) and 8/14 (57%), respectively (P = 0.176). The number of universities with academic faculty positions for palliative medicine and the median number of positions for the countries were as follows-Canada 8/13 (62%) and 2; UK 12/22 (55%) and 1; US 5/36 (14%) and 1; and Western Europe 9/24 (21%) and 1, respectively (P = 0.001). Besides the UK, mandatory (required) rotations in undergraduate palliative medicine education are lacking in Canadian, US, and Western European medical schools. The median number of 1 academic faculty member per responding medical school is discouraging. In order for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education in palliative medicine to improve, the number of both educational programs and faculty members will need to be increased.

Cancer pain education: the use of a structured clinical instruction module to enhance learning among medical students

The Structured Clinical Instruction Module (SCIM) is an educational format developed for the teaching of clinical and interpersonal skills. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot-test a SCIM to enhance medical students' learning and understanding about cancer pain assessment and management. The Cancer Pain SCIM was presented to 34 third-year medical students. Eight instructors and six standardized patients (five cancer patients) participated in the course. All participants evaluated the course using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Students self-assessed their clinical skills before and after the course using a five-point scale (1 = not competent; 5 = very competent). Students agreed [mean (S.D.)] very strongly that the SCIM was a valuable educational experience [4.4 (0.56)] and that it was beneficial to use actual cancer patients in the SCIM [4.5 (0.63)]. Students believed their skills in the assessment and management of cancer pain significantly improved after the course. The SCIM is a valuable and novel instructional format to teach essential skills in the assessment and management of cancer pain to medical students.

Cancer pain assessment and management recommendations by hospice nurses. University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

Pain is often the most prevalent symptom among cancer patients referred to hospice or palliative care programs. This study was designed to use performance-based testing to evaluate the skills of hospice nurses in assessing the severe pain of a cancer patient and the pain management recommendations they would present to the patient's primary care physician. Twenty-seven hospice nurses (ranging in experience from 1 month to 10 years) were presented with the same standardized patient with cancer pain. In Part A (7 minutes), one of the investigators checked for predetermined behaviors as the nurses performed the clinical pain assessment. In Part B (7 minutes), the nurses answered questions regarding their recommendations for pain management for the patient seen in Part A. In the admission pain assessment, hospice nurses did well in assessing pain intensity (85%), pain location (70%), and pain-relieving factors (59%). However, only 48% of the nurses adequately assessed the pain onset, and only 44% adequately assessed other symptoms the patient might be experiencing. In Part B, 96% of the nurses recommended opioids, 96% recommended the oral route of administration, and 82% recommended regular dosing of the opioids. Fifty-six percent of nurses included a breakthrough medication in their analgesic recommendations. All of the hospice nurses treated the patient's fear of addiction in an appropriate manner, and 93% of the nurses recommended increasing the patient's opioid dosage to treat the persisting pain problem. There were no significant differences among nurses with regard to length of time as a hospice nurse or hospice certification on any of the items in either Part A or Part B. Most practicing hospice nurses were judged to be competent in the assessment and management of the severe pain of the standardized cancer patient, although some deficits were noted. Regular oral opioids were the analgesics of choice. Co-analgesics were rarely recommended.

Medical student knowledge of morphine for the management of cancer pain

Inadequate training of physicians contributes to the undertreatment of cancer pain. To address these concerns, the University of Kentucky has introduced a 4-week course for final-year medical students that teaches the principles of clinical pharmacology and pain management. The purposes of this study are to assess the knowledge deficits of final-year medical students about the use of morphine for cancer pain and to assess the efficacy of a short course on cancer pain management. Eighty-six final-year medical students completed a 22-item questionnaire assessing their knowledge and attitudes toward the use of morphine for cancer pain. Students indicated their agreement with each statement on a four-point scale (one, strongly disagree; four, strongly agree). All students then completed a compulsory short course on pain management. The course content included a 1-hr lecture on chronic nonmalignant pain, a 1-hr lecture on acute pain management, and a 1-hr lecture on cancer pain management. In addition, students completed small-group, problem-based learning modules on several aspects of pain management. After the course, all students completed the same 22-item survey. The alpha reliability score of the pretest instrument was 0.55, and the posttest reliability was 0.86. Upon course completion, students agreed most strongly (mean +/- SEM) that morphine should be given on a regular schedule for cancer pain (3.41 +/- 0.08), that cancer pain management frequently requires co-analgesics (3.36 +/- 0.06), and that patients with good pain relief function better than those with continuing pain (3.39 +/- 0.08). A comparison of pretest and posttest means on specific items suggested that the greatest amount of learning took place in the following content areas: morphine is a good oral analgesic; increases in cancer pain should be treated by increasing the morphine dose; respiratory depression is not a concern for cancer pain patients; and morphine can be used over a wide range of doses. The regular use of morphine was recognized as the treatment drug of choice for cancer pain. The students showed improved knowledge scores on ten of the 22 items on the posttest survey. A significant increase in learning occurred on six knowledge and attitude items. On only one item (nausea as a side effect of morphine) did the knowledge scores decrease on the posttest. A significant minority (40%) of senior medical students had deficits in knowledge about the use of morphine for cancer pain. The risk of addiction, respiratory depression, and tolerance were misunderstood by a significant minority (25%) of students.

Knowledge and attitudes of health-care providers toward cancer pain management: a comparison of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in the state of New Hampshire

The knowledge and attitudes toward cancer pain management of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in the state of New Hampshire were examined through the use of a statewide survey. Many of the providers who completed the survey, and thus indicated that they treated patients with cancer pain on a regular basis, were not pain or oncology specialists. Most of these providers were quite well informed about the fundamentals of cancer pain management. Approximately 90% of providers in all three groups were not concerned about addiction among cancer patients. Yet, there was a small percentage of providers who responded in less than optimal ways to items dealing with opioid pharmacology, pain assessment, and the importance of pain relief. Comparison of responses among provider groups indicated that nurses were the most knowledgeable and pharmacists the least knowledgeable about pain assessment. Physicians were the most knowledgeable regarding opioid pharmacology but seemed the least committed to providing optimal pain relief. Further analysis identified a small group of physicians that included a disproportionately high percentage of family practitioners and surgeons who consistently responded in less than optimal ways to items dealing with the importance of pain relief. The results of this study indicate a continuing need for broad-based educational programs in cancer pain management and for new initiatives focused on practitioners who see relatively few cancer patients and may have difficulty accessing traditional educational programs.