Excimer laser correction of myopic astigmatism

Pain Control Following Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Codeine Versus Oxycodone for the Management of Postoperative Pain

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of oral codeine plus acetaminophen versus oxycodone plus acetaminophen for severe pain control following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This single-center trial randomized 200 patients to receive codeine 30 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg (codeine group) or oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg (oxycodone group)every 4 hours as needed for severe pain for 4 days following PRK. Patients recorded postoperative pain, tablet consumption, and tetracaine use. Patients were monitored at postoperative 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months for visual acuity and follow-up. Study outcomes were mean postoperative pain, treatment and tetracaine use, and visual acuity.

RESULTS

Analysis of 197 patients who completed the trial (97 codeine group and 100 oxycodone group) showed mean pain scores were lower in the codeine group throughout the intervention period. Mean pain scores were higher in the oxycodone group than the codeine group on postoperative days 2 and 4 (P = .017 and P = .034, respectively). The oxycodone group consumed more tablets than the codeine group, with a difference on postoperative day 2 (P = .019), and used a greater number of tetracaine drops (P = .015). Repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant improvement in visual acuity in both groups with no difference in visual outcomes (P = .81).

CONCLUSIONS

Codeine/acetaminophen is as effective and safe as oxycodone/acetaminophen for pain control following PRK, with no clinical difference in overall pain control and long-term visual outcomes. This implies that treating postoperative pain after PRK with a Schedule III opioid (codeine) is effective and potentially decreases the risk of misuse by a higher regulated Schedule II opioid (oxycodone), lowering the potential for abuse and dependence. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):582-589.].

Assessment of Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To define the factors that affect patient's self-assessed postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PRK in 2016 were evaluated. Anonymized data collected included patient gender, age, and season at the time of surgery, ablation depth, surgeon status (attending vs. resident), topical tetracaine use, and subjective pain scores at postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 7. Average pain scores and amount of pain medication taken were analyzed for each of the previously mentioned variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 231 patients who underwent PRK were analyzed. The mean pain score and SD were 0.78 ± 1.87 on POD 1 and 0.03 ± 0.37 by POD 7. Patients who used topical tetracaine reported significantly higher pain on POD 1 and 7 compared with patients who did not use tetracaine (P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). No significant differences in pain scores were seen based on surgeon status, ablation depth, gender, and season. Patients who used topical tetracaine took a higher amount of oral pain medication (9.44 ± 6.01) compared with those who did not (7.02 ± 4.71) (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain was significantly elevated in patients who used tetracaine on POD 1 and POD 7. These patients were also more likely to take oral pain medication than those who did not use topical tetracaine. Surgeon status, season, gender, and ablation depth showed no significant differences in subjective pain scores. Oral pain medication should be evaluated to assess efficacy and safety in inhibiting ocular pain after PRK.

Compound Myopic Astigmatism Correction using a Mask In-the-Rail Excimer Laser Delivery System. Preliminary Results

PURPOSE

The latest development in the erodible mask technology is an excimer laser containing the mask in the laser optical pathway. This paper reports the results of the first human series of consecutive treatments performed for the correction of compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

We have treated 83 eyes. Spherical equivalent attempted correction ranged between -1.75 and -11.75 D (mean -7.07+/- 2.45 D), astigmatic attempted correction ranged between -1.00 and -5.00 D (mean -2.42+/- 1.02 D). The sphere correction was made by diaphragm using a multi-zone software with three ablation zones: 100% of the total attempted correction for the central 5.0 mm zone, 70% for the second 6.0 mm zone, 30% for the outer 6.5 mm zone. Cylinder correction was made sequentially after myopic correction using the appropriate mask.

RESULTS

One month after treatment, mean refractive error was + 1.07 +/- 1.24 D (range + 4.50/-1.75 D) for spherical equivalent, and -0.49 +/- 0.57 D (range + 0.75/-2.00 D) for astigmatism. Forty-eight eyes (57.8%) had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. At six months, mean refractive error was +0.42 +/- 0.97 D (range + 3.75/-1.00 D) for spherical equivalent, and -0.44 +/- 0.51 D (range +0.25/-3.00 D) for astigmatism. Vector analysis showed that 57 eyes (68.7%) had 5 or less degrees rotation. Seventy-two (86.7%) and 54 eyes (65.1%) had uncorrected visual acuity equal or better than 20/40 and 20/25 respectively. One eye (1.2%) showed a best corrected visual acuity loss of more than one line, but 8 eyes (9.6%) had a gain of more than one line. One-year results on a smaller series (33 eyes) overlap with the six-month results.

CONCLUSIONS

The mask in-the-rail excimer laser delivery system appears to be effective and predictable in the correction of compound myopic astigmatism. We observed no significant regression of the astigmatic correction over time. Longer follow-up on larger series is necessary to draw final conclusions.

Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy (Prk) in Myopic Astigmatism

To assess the visual and refractive results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Excimer laser PRK was performed using an Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 laser in 46 myopic astigmatic eyes. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was -1.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 7 eyes (15.2%); -2.50 D. (+/- 0.50 in 14 eyes (30.5%); -3.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 13 eyes (28.3%); -4.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 8 eyes (17.4%); and -5.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 4 eyes (8.6%). Mean preoperative cylinder was -3.50 D. (+/- 2.50). Mean preoperative sphere was -4.50 D. (+/- 2.25). Pre and post-operative visual acuity, refraction, keratometer readings, corneal topography, intraocular pressure, and slit lamp findings were recorded.

RESULTS

By one year of follow-up, postoperative cylinder was between +0.50 and -0.50 D. in 31 eyes (67.4%); between -0.50 and -1.50 D. in 11 eyes (23.9%); between -1.50 and -2.50 D. in 4 eyes (8.7%). Mean post-operative cylinder was -1.21 D. (+/- 1.70). Mean postoperative sphere was -1.09 D. (+/- 1.25). Myopic and astigmatic improvement was achieved in each patient (100%). Topography analysis showed 69.4% were within 0.5 mm, 96.8% within 1 mm, 97.8% within 1.5 mm of centration; 55% of the patients achieved uncorrected visual acuity of 10/10 (Snellen). One patient (2.2%) lost one line of best corrected vision due to decentration and change of axis.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results of myopic astigmatic excimer laser PRK procedures compare favorably in efficiency and safety with reports of PRK for myopia.

LASIK versus photorefractive keratectomy for high myopic (> 3 diopter) astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and vector analysis indices of LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of high cylinder of greater than 3 diopters (D) in myopic eyes.

METHODS

The efficacy, safety, and predictability of LASIK or PRK performed in 114 consecutive randomly selected myopic eyes with an astigmatism of greater than 3 D were retrospectively analyzed at the 2- to 6-month follow-up visits. Vector analysis of the cylindrical correction was compared between the treatment groups.

RESULTS

A total of 57 eyes receiving PRK and 57 eyes receiving LASIK of 114 refractive surgery candidates were enrolled in the study. No statistically significant difference in efficacy [efficacy index = 0.76 (±0.32) for PRK vs 0.74 (±0.19) for LASIK (P = .82)], safety [safety index = 1.10 (±0.26) for PRK vs 1.01 (±0.17) for LASIK (P = .121)], or predictability [achieved astigmatism < 1 D in 39% of PRK- and 54% of LASIK-treated eyes, and < 2 D in 88% of PRK- and 89% of LASIK-treated eyes (P = .218)] was demonstrated. Using Alpins vector analysis, the surgically induced astigmatism and difference vector were not significantly different between the surgery methods, whereas the correction index showed a slight and significant advantage of LASIK over PRK (1.25 for PRK and 1.06 for LASIK, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK and PRK are comparably safe, effective, and predictable procedures for excimer laser correction of high astigmatism of greater than 3 D in myopic eyes. Predictability of the correction of the cylindrical component is lower than that of the spherical equivalent.

Long-term results of excimer laser procedure to correct astigmatic refractive errors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, stability, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) as treatment of astigmatism.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Ninety-four eyes of 52 patients, treated with PRK for compound myopic astigmatism, compound hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism were studied during a 36-month period. Main outcome measures were uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity (UCVA, BCVA), refraction, and corneal transparency. Astigmatism correction was analyzed by a power vector method.

RESULTS

In myopic astigmatism group (42 eyes), postoperative UCVA was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes, 20/25 or better in 38 eyes out of 42 (90.5%), and 20/20 or better in 25/42 eyes (59.5%). No eye lost lines of the BCVA, 40/42 (95.2%) eyes had refraction within ± 1D and 37/42 (88.1%) within ± 0.50 D. In the hyperopic astigmatism group (28 eyes), the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes, 20/25 or better in 26/28 eyes (92.8%), and 20/20 or better in 24/28 eyes (85.7%); 1/28 eyes (3.6%) lost 1 line of the BCVA, 23/28 eyes (82.1%) were within ± 1D, and 21/28 (75%) were within ± 0.50D. In the mixed astigmatism group (24 eyes), the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes, 20/25 or better in 22/24 eyes (91.7%) and 20/20 in 15/24 (62.5%) eyes. No eye lost lines of BCVA, 23/24 eyes (95.8%) were within 1.0 D, and 20/24 eyes (83.3%) were within 0.50 D of defocus refraction. Power vector analysis showed a significant reduction of blurring strength in all examined groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PRK is a safe and effective procedure for correction of all types of astigmatism, with good stability and efficacy at 3-year follow-up.

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided refractive laser treatment: metaanalysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations.

SETTING

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Metaanalysis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trails. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised and data extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using metaanalytical methods. Comparison between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations was measured as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean difference and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

RESULTS

Eight trials involving 955 eyes were included. After wavefront-guided LASIK, the pooled OR of achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P=.72), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ± 0.50 diopter of intended target (predictability) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.60-1.75; P=.92), and the weighted mean difference in induced HOAs was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.01; P=.04). No study reported loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaanalysis showed no clear evidence of a benefit of wavefront-guided over non-wavefront-guided ablations. However, there was a lack of standardized reporting of UDVA better than 20/20, which might mask an advantage in wavefront-guided treatment. With high preexisting HOAs, wavefront-guided has advantages over non-wavefront-guided treatment.

Wavefront-guided LASIK for Myopia Using the LADAR CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue

PURPOSE

To evaluate the objective and subjective visual outcomes and refractive results of wavefront-guided LASIK with LADAR CustomCornea and VISX CustomVue.

METHODS

This prospective randomized single-institution multisurgeon study comprised 100 eyes of 58 patients (50 eyes on each laser platform). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and manifest refraction were measured postoperatively at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Contrast sensitivity, higher order aberrations measurement, and a subjective vision questionnaire were performed preoperatively and at 3 months.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the CustomCornea group had a mean manifest sphere of -3.58 +/- 1.61 diopters (D) (range: -0.50 to -7.25 D), cylinder of +0.64 +/- 0.45 D (range: 0 to +1.75 D), and manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -3.26 +/- 1.56 D. The CustomVue group had a manifest sphere of -4.00 +/- 1.69 D (range: -1.50 to -7.50 D), cylinder of +0.60 +/- 0.52 D (range: 0 to +2.00 D), and MRSE of -3.70 +/- 1.64 D. At 3 months, 94% of CustomCornea eyes and 84% of CustomVue eyes had UCVA > or = 20/20 (P = .20). Twenty-four percent of CustomVue eyes and 22% of CustomCornea eyes gained 1 line of BSCVA. In both groups, 96% of eyes were within 0.50 D of emmetropia. Mean CustomCornea glare contrast sensitivity improved (P = .04) whereas more eyes improved than worsened in both groups. Spherical aberration and total higher order aberrations increased, and trefoil decreased in both groups. A decrease in coma was noted in 70% of CustomCornea eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK with both platforms is safe, effective, and delivers excellent visual results. CustomCornea improves contrast sensitivity under glare conditions.

Zyoptix wavefront-guided versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in low and moderate myopia: randomized controlled 6-month study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the refractive and aberrometric outcome of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared to standard PRK in myopic patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. The study group consisted of 28 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -2.25+/-0.76 diopters (D) (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with wavefront-guided PRK using the Zywave ablation profile and the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z excimer laser (Zyoptix system) and the control group included 28 eyes with a SE of -2.35+/-1.01 D (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with standard PRK (PlanoScan ablation) using the same laser. A Zywave aberrometer was used to analyze and calculate the root-mean-square (RMS) of total high order aberrations (HOA) and Zernike coefficients of third and fourth order before and after (over a 6-month follow-up period) surgery in both groups. Preoperative and postoperative SE, un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated in all cases.

RESULTS

There was a high correlation between achieved and intended correction. The differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant for UCVA, BCVA, or SE cycloplegic refraction . Postoperatively the RMS value of high order aberrations was raised in both groups. At 6-month control, on average it increased by a factor of 1.17 in the Zyoptix PRK group and 1.54 in the PlanoScan PRK group (p=0.22). In the Zyoptix group there was a decrease of coma aberration, while in the PlanoScan group this third order aberration increased. The difference between postoperative and preoperative values between the two groups was statistically significant for coma aberration (p=0.013). No statistically significant difference was observed for spherical-like aberration between the two groups. In the study group eyes with a low amount of preoperative aberrations (HOA RMS lower than the median value; <0.28 microm) showed an increase of HOA RMS while eyes with RMS higher than 0.28 microm showed a decrease (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is as safe and efficacious for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism as PlanoScan PRK. Moreover this technique induces a smaller increase of third order coma aberration compared to standard PRK. The use of Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is particularly indicated in eyes with higher preoperative RMS values.

Photorefractive keratectomy with aspheric profile of ablation versus conventional photorefractive keratectomy for myopia correction

PURPOSE

To analyze ocular wavefront error and corneal asphericity (Q) in patients treated with aspheric profile photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared with patients having conventional PRK to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism and to evaluate the effect of postoperative corneal shape on visual performance.

SETTING

Eye Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.

METHODS

Fifty eyes were treated with aspheric profile PRK using the MEL 80 flying-spot excimer laser, and 24 eyes were treated with standard PRK using the MEL 70 flying-spot excimer laser.

RESULTS

Postoperative wavefront error increased in both groups. Six months after surgery, there was a smaller increase in root mean square (RMS) of total higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration (59% and 106%, respectively) in the aspheric profile PRK group than in the conventional PRK group (94% and 136%, respectively) (P<.01). The aspheric profile PRK group showed more prolate corneal asphericities (mean Q of 0.15 +/- 0.26) than the conventional group (mean Q of 0.45 +/- 0.26) (P<.001), with increasing oblateness for higher attempted corrections. A higher percentage of patients with better low-contrast uncorrected visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity was observed in the aspheric PRK group than in the conventional PRK group (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspheric profile and conventional PRK were safe and efficient for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Moreover, aspheric profile PRK induced a smaller increment of total wavefront error, was related to a smaller increase in spherical aberration, and better maintained the physiology of the corneal surface than conventional treatment.

Post-LASIK corneal flap displacement following penetrating keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy

OBJECTIVE

To report 3 patients who experienced late flap dislocation after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes that had undergone prior penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for bullous keratopathy.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 2 referral corneal and refractive surgery practices, case reports, and literature review.

RESULTS

Three patients (mean age 58.3 years, 2 male, 1 female), all status post-corneal transplant for bullous keratopathy, had residual myopic astigmatism and underwent LASIK for correction of their significant anisometropia. Flap dislocation occurred at a mean of 7 days (range 3 to 14 days) following the LASIK procedure. All patients had peripheral corneal edema in their recipient bed. All 3 patients required an additional surgical procedure for visual rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Flap displacement may occur following LASIK in patients who have undergone PKP for bullous keratopathy. The endothelial pump function, which is vital to maintaining flap adherence, may be compromised in these patients. We suggest that patients with a history of PKP and endothelial compromise who undergo LASIK wear protective shields for a longer than normal period and be followed closely to reduce the risk of flap slippage.

Analysis of the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASEK for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 excimer laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Stanford University Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprised 102 eyes that had LASEK for myopia using the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle- corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and complications were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. Vector analysis was performed on eyes that received astigmatic correction.

RESULTS

The mean spherical equivalent was -7.03 diopters (D) +/- 2.61 (SD) preoperatively, +0.19 +/- 0.64 D at 3 months, +0.23 +/- 0.82 D at 6 months, and +0.03 +/- 0.63 D at 12 months (P<.001). At 3, 6, and 12 months, the UCVA was 20/20 or better in 66%, 67%, and 83% of eyes, respectively, and 20/40 or better in 98%, 99%, and 100%; 74%, 70%, and 83%, respectively, were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia, and 89%, 86%, and 97%, respectively, were within +/-1.0 D. No eye lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 10.0%, 8.7%, and 0% of eyes, respectively, had trace corneal haze. Vector analysis found a success rate of approximately 78% to 80% in achieving the astigmatic surgical correction at the 3 postoperative visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Further studies are needed to determine the role of LASEK in the refractive surgery spectrum.

Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy With Adjunctive Topical Mitomycin C for Refractive Error After Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

To present a case of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with adjunctive topical mitomycin C (MMC) in an anisometropic hyperopic patient after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus.

METHODS

Interventional case report, chart review, and literature review.

RESULTS

A 43-year-old man with a refraction of +7.00 -4.75 x 125 in the right eye underwent PRK 10 months after PKP for keratoconus. The patient had sutures removed for 3 months and was intolerant of contact lenses. After photoablation, 0.02% MMC was applied to the corneal stromal bed. The patient was followed up daily until the epithelium closed and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of the use of MMC to prevent postoperative haze after PRK for PKP in an eye with keratoconus. MMC (0.02%) applied topically to the cornea immediately after PRK is safe and effective to treat a hyperopic refractive error after PKP and prevent postoperative corneal haze formation without the risks of performing a lamellar flap into an ectatic corneal bed.

Bilateral Comparison of Wavefront-guided Versus Conventional Laser in situ Keratomileusis With Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix

PURPOSE

One aim of corneal refractive surgery is to correct defocus and astigmatism. In the process of correcting lower order aberrations, higher order ocular aberrations increase. To evaluate the effectiveness of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in reducing the increase of higher order aberration, we compared aberrational change after LASIK with conventional and wavefront-guided customized ablation.

METHODS

Our study included 48 eyes of 24 patients. We performed conventional LASIK in one eye (Group 1) and wavefront-guided customized ablation in the other eye (Group 2). Ocular aberration was measured with the Zywave, a type of Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. We then compared low and high order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, corneal topography, and manifest refraction preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 3 months.

RESULTS

Uncorrected visual acuity improved to more than 20/20 in two eyes in the conventional ablation group and in five eyes in the customized ablation group. In the conventional ablation group, Root-mean-square for higher order (RMS(H)) was 0.215 preoperatively, 0.465 (216.3%) at 1 month, and 0.418 (194.4%) at 3 months. In the customized ablation group, RMS(H) was 0.207 preoperatively, 0.380 (183.6%) at 1 month, and 0.371 (179.2%) at 3 months after LASIK. Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the customized ablation group was higher than that in the conventional ablation group, but this change was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided customized ablation reduced the increase of high order aberrations resulting from LASIK. In terms of visual acuity, patient preference, and mesopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront-guided customized ablation produced slightly-but not statistically significant-better results.

Photorefractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism with the MEL-70 G-Scan excimer laser

PURPOSE

To assess the safety, efficacy, predictability and stability of photorefractive keratectomy in compound myopic astigmatism with a moderate and high cylinder component.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was done in 42 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism with the spherocylindrical algorithm of the MEL-70 excimer laser, with wide ablation zones.

RESULTS

Spherical equivalent refraction changed from -4.19 +/- 1.65D to -0.05 +/- 0.31D, refractive cylinder from -2.01 +/- 0.71D to -0.09 +/- 0.20D and mean sphere from -3.22 +/- 1.76D to -0.02 +/- 0.26D. Mean uncorrected visual acuity rose from 0.12 +/- 0.17 to 0.91 +/- 0.10. No eye lost lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 and the efficacy index 0.98. Six months from the treatment all eyes were within +/- 1D, 8.9% of eyes were within 0.50D and 44% were plano of target refraction. Refractive and topographical stability were achieved between one and three months after treatment. Transient haze was observed between one and three months after PRK.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy with the MEL-70 excimer laser to correct myopic astigmatism was a safe and effective procedure with good stability at six months' follow-up. Refractive and visual outcome confirmed that excellent predictability can be expected.

Corneal astigmatic change after photorefractive keratectomy and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 70 eyes were treated for myopia and 70 eyes were treated for myopic astigmatism. Refraction, corneal topography, slitlamp findings, and visual acuity in the 2 groups at 1, 3, and 6 months were evaluated and compared. Vector analysis was performed to determine the SIA in both groups.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the PRK and PARK groups was -6.06 diopters (D) and -7.18 D, respectively. At 6 months, the mean reduction in astigmatism in the PARK group was 61.0%. Predictability was within +/-1.0 D in 85.2% of eyes in the PRK group and 62.5% in the PARK group. An uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 91.8% and 83.9% of eyes, respectively. The mean SIA was 0.64 D in the PRK group, with a general with-the-rule axis shift. The results of vector analysis were more favorable when calculated from refractive values than from Sim-K corneal topography values. The mean astigmatism correction index and index of success calculated from refractive data were 0.75 and 0.38 in the PARK group. The mean magnitude and angle of error were 0.22 +/- 0.52 D and -2.13 +/- 24.41 degrees, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy and PARK were effective and safe procedures for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. However, SIA occurred with spherical myopic treatments. This small SIA may be a confounding factor in low astigmatic treatments.

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 69 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopia and 74 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopic astigmatism. The excimer laser keratectomy was performed using a Summit Apex Plus machine. Refraction, visual acuity, and computerized corneal videokeratography data from the preoperative and postoperative examinations were collected. The astigmatic change was calculated by the Alpins vector analysis method.

RESULTS

The preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the myopia and myopic astigmatism groups was -8.08 diopters (D) and -9.73 D, respectively. At 6 months, the spherical equivalent and residual corneal astigmatism were -0.25 D and 0.85 D, respectively, in the myopia group and -0.71 D and 0.82 D, respectively, in the myopic astigmatism group. In the myopia group, 88% of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the intended myopia correction and in the myopic astigmatism group, 85% were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted spherical equivalent and 90% were within +/-1.0 D of the intended astigmatism correction. The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94.1% of eyes in the myopia group and 92.5% of eyes in the myopic astigmatism group. The SIA magnitude was 0.66 D with the axis randomly distributed in the myopia group. The mean astigmatism correction index was 0.97, the mean magnitude of error was 0.13 D +/- 0.62 (SD), and the mean angle of error was -3.70 +/- 13.73 degrees in the myopic astigmatism group.

CONCLUSION

Laser in situ keratomileusis had similar predictability, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. The astigmatism correction was effective, but the results suggest that subjective astigmatism of less than 1.0 D need not be treated with the Summit Apex Plus laser.

Customized ablation for asymmetrical corneal astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) cases in which a customized ablation assisted by corneal topography was performed.

SETTING

Instituto de la Visión, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

METHODS

The study group comprised 23 cases with asymmetrical corneas; 17 had myopia and 6, hyperopia. Visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), and cylinder vectorial change measurements, along with keratometry and corneal topography, were performed in all cases preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

In the myopic cases, the mean preoperative SE was -4.92 diopters (D) +/- 2.46 (SD); it was -0.38 +/- 0.66 D after a mean follow-up of 4.41 +/- 2.32 months. In the hyperopic cases, the preoperative SE was +3.54 +/- 1.57 D; it was +0.33 +/- 0.50 D after a mean follow-up of 3.42 +/- 3.23 months. Cylinder vectorial change, visual acuity, and the number of visual acuity lines gained or lost were also evaluated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although some features of our algorithm for corneal-topography-assisted customized ablations should be modified, the results of our treatment of cases with asymmetrical astigmatism were encouraging.

Outcome of corneal and laser astigmatic axis alignment in photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the refractive results of laser astigmatic treatment in eyes in which the astigmatic axes of the eye and laser are aligned by limbal marking at the 6 o'clock position and in eyes that are not marked.

SETTING

University Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 143 eyes that had photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy with the VISX Star excimer laser. The eyes were divided into marked (G1) and unmarked (G2) groups. Based on the preoperative astigmatism, each group was subdivided into low astigmatism (</=1.00 diopter [D]) and high astigmatism (>/=1.25 D). Early postoperative manifest refractions (1.0 to 2.5 months) were analyzed. The Alpins vector analysis method was used to calculate the target induced astigmatism, surgically induced astigmatism, difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME), angle of error (AE), and index of success (IS).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in DV, ME, and IS. When the subgroups were analyzed, the DV and ME were comparable; the IS in the G1 high astigmatism subgroup was significantly better than that in the G2 high astigmatism subgroup (0.22 +/- 0.08 and 0.29 +/- 0.04, respectively; P <.0001). There was comparable scatter of AE values; 30% and 36% in G1 and G2, respectively, had an AE of 0. Similar scatter was observed in the subgroups. Of the eyes that had an AE of 0, 90% and 43% in the high astigmatism subgroups of G1 and G2, respectively (P <.05), had full correction of astigmatism.

CONCLUSION

Limbal marking and subsequent eye and laser astigmatic axis alignment improved the refractive outcome of laser astigmatic treatment of >/=1.25 D. A preliminary report of an ongoing prospective randomized study of eyes that had laser in situ keratomileusis is included.

Photorefractive keratectomy for post-penetrating keratoplasty myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE

To determine the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

SETTING

Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 16 eyes of 16 patients with postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism who were unable to wear glasses due to anisometropia and were contact lens intolerant. They were examined for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and corneal transplant integrity before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up after PRK was 26.0 months +/- 15.7 (SD) (range 12 to 63 months). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of -4.47 +/- 1.39 diopters (D) was -3.39 +/- 1.84 D (P >.05) at the last postoperative visit and the mean preoperative cylinder of -5.62 +/- 2.88 D was -3.23 +/- 1.70 D (P <.05); refractive regression correlated with the amount of ablation performed. The BSCVA decreased in 3 eyes (18.8%), and the UCVA decreased in 2 (12.5%). Six eyes (37.5%) had grade 2 to 3 haze, which resolved spontaneously in 4 eyes within a relatively long time but caused a decrease in BSCVA in 2 (12.5%). Two of the eyes (12.5%) had a rejection episode after PRK and were successfully treated with topical steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy to correct postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism appears to be less effective and less predictable than PRK for naturally occurring myopia and astigmatism. Corneal haze and refractive regression are more prevalent, and patient satisfaction is not good.

Photorefractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of photorefractive keratectomy for the treatment of primary compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 93 eyes from 56 patients with a mean spherical equivalent of -4.98 +/- 1.80 diopters (range, -1.75 to -8.5) underwent photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser using erodible mask technology and were followed for 2 years. Primary outcome measures included an assessment of astigmatic correction through vector analysis, manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity, corneal clarity, and the presence of adverse symptoms.

RESULTS

Eighty-five eyes (91.4%) were available for analysis at 6 months. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced 85% (mean, -0.75 +/- 0.85 diopter) and the target-induced astigmatism was reduced 70% (mean, 0.98 +/- 1.88 diopters). Forty-eight eyes (56%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or greater, whereas 70 eyes (82%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or greater. Twenty-four eyes (26% ) required re-treatment because of undercorrection of the spherical equivalent and astigmatic components after the 6-month follow-up. Fifty-nine of the remaining eyes were available at the 24-month visit. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced to -0.39 +/- 0.72 diopter (91.8%). The target-induced astigmatism was reduced 64% from 1.74 diopters. Forty-one eyes (81.3%) were within +/-1.0 diopter of attempted spherical equivalent correction. Stability within a spherical equivalent of +/-0.5 diopter occurred after the first postoperative month. Fifty-six eyes (94.9%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or greater, whereas 34 eyes (57.6 %) demonstrated an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or greater. One eye (1.7%) lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser is a safe and effective method of reducing compound myopic astigmatism. However, higher re-treatment rates may result from significant undercorrections because of current laser algorithms and variability in the mean angle of error.

Results of Photorefractive Keratectomy in Keratoconus Suspects at 4 Years

PURPOSE

We studied the long-term results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in keratoconus suspects detected by videokeratography (TMS).

METHODS

Bilateral inferior corneal steepening was detected in 6 candidates for PRK presenting with moderate myopia or astigmatism. Mean follow-up was 44.5 +/- 4.4 months (range, 38 to 54 mo). Mean spherical equivalent refraction was -5.18 +/- 1.60 D (mean sphere, -4.73 D; mean cyclinder, -0.92 D) which was stable for at least the preceding year. The quantitative measurement of inferior corneal steepening (I-S value) was greater than +1.60 (mean, 1.83 +/- 0.11) in all eyes. An Aesculap Meditec Mel 60 excimer laser was used for the PRK procedures and mean follow-up was 44.5 months. Postoperative pachymetric measurements were also performed in 6 eyes.

RESULTS

Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 8 eyes (66.6%) and 20/32 or better in all eyes with a mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction of -0.70 +/- 0.74 D (mean sphere, -0.63 D; mean cyclinder, -0.39 D). Five eyes (41.6%) were within +/- 0.50 D spherical equivalent refraction. Inferior steepening was associated with thinning of the inferior cornea which was statistically significantly thinner than the superior thickness (Student's t-test, P < .05). There were no wound healing problems or any sign that the excimer laser adversely affected the cornea during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy seems to be a safe procedure for reducing or eliminating myopia or astigmatism in keratoconus suspect eyes-most probably forme fruste keratoconus-with a stable refraction, but this may be different in eyes with early keratoconus, known to be a progressive disease.

Photoastigmatic Refractive Keratectomy in Myopes

PURPOSE

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) was studied in a multi-center clinical trial. The Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was evaluated for its effect on refraction, visual acuity, and safety measures as part of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated study.

METHODS

Eight U.S. centers enrolled adults with eyes having refractive astigmatism up to 4.00 D and a myopic spherical equivalent refraction up to -8.00 D. Results are reported for 749 eyes of 486 patients with at least 6 months follow-up. The rectangular beam scanning Nidek EC-5000 used a 5.5-mm-diameter treatment zone, a 7.0-mm-diameter peripheral blend zone, and a 40 Hz pulse rate for surface treatment of myopic astigmatism. Nomogram corrections to machine settings were required to achieve the desired results.

RESULTS

Preoperative average spherical equivalent refraction of -4.90+/-1.74 D was reduced to -0.02+/-0.79 D at 6 months. Refractive stability was established at 3 months. Over 62% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of desired correction at 6 months, with over 86% within +/-1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity improved by an average of 10 Snellen lines; over 64% of eyes saw 20/20 or better uncorrected and over 93% saw 20/40 or better uncorrected at 6 and 12 months. PARK treatment effectively reduced astigmatism with little average axis error or magnitude error. Corneal haze and safety concerns were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser provided significant reduction of myopia and astigmatism, with minimal complications.

Excimer ablation design and elliptical transition zones

PURPOSE

To describe the rationale behind elliptical and other transition designs used with the excimer laser.

SETTING

Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

METHODS

Ablation zone designs were analyzed for the number of transition points for myopia and hyperopia. The advantages and disadvantages of elliptical transition zones are demonstrated graphically, with an emphasis on smooth ablation zone design to maximize the optics and biologic tolerance by the eye.

RESULTS

The use of an individualized elliptical transition maximizes a circular effective optical zone and can enhance the smoothness of the transition zone while minimizing excessive tissue removal.

CONCLUSION

Elliptical transition zones may improve the optics and biologic tolerance of excimer laser treatments.

One year clinical results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of excimer laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) to correct compound myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Departments of Ophthalmology, Robert Debré Hospital and Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism treated with a Nidek EC 5000 excimer laser. The refractive results were measured at 1 year, and the cylindrical component was analyzed by the Alpins method. Mean preoperative myopia was -4.50 diopters (D) (range -0.75 to -4.00 D) and mean preoperative cylinder, -1.64 D (range -0.75 to -4.00 D).

RESULTS

At 1 year, the spherical equivalent was -0.47 D (range +1.00 to -3.00 D) and residual subjective astigmatism, -0.40 (range -0.25 to -1.50 D). Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was obtained in 22 of the 27 eyes; 21 eyes were within +/- 1.0 D of emmetropia. Vector analysis showed a mean coefficient adjustment of 1.50 D +/- 0.53 (SD), a mean axis shift of 2.64 +/- 12.10 degrees, and a mean magnitude of error of 0.45 +/- 0.56 D. Haze was absent in 22 eyes and grade 1+ in 5 eyes. Five eyes gained 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and 3 lost 1 line. No patient lost more than 1 line.

CONCLUSION

Excimer laser PARK successfully corrected low and moderate myopia combined with up to 4.0 D of astigmatism with a low mean angle of error. To increase the accuracy of toric ablation, specific algorithms for the cylinder component are needed.

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct refractive errors after keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive myopia, astigmatism, or both after keratoplasty.

SETTING

Eye Clinic Day Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

Twenty-two eyes that had previously had corneal transplantation were studied. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the Chiron automated microkeratome and the VISX Twenty-Twenty B excimer laser.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up after LASIK was 10.09 months +/- 3.87 (SD). The spherical equivalent refraction dropped from -4.55 +/- 3.66 D before LASIK to -0.67 +/- 1.24 D after surgery. At the last examination, 72.7% of patients had a refractive error within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia and 54.5% had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 54.0%. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 8 cases, improved in 9, and decreased in 5. Significant endothelial cell loss, keratoplasty wound dehiscence, and other serious complications did not develop in any eye.

CONCLUSION

The correction of refractive error with LASIK in postkeratoplasty patients proved to be safe, effective, and predictable. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the method's clinical value.

Photorefractive keratectomy for astigmatism greater than -2.00 diopters in eyes with low, high, or extreme myopia

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) in correcting astigmatism of more than -2.00 diopters (D) in eyes with low, high, and extreme myopia.

SETTING

Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients (110 eyes) whose spherical error ranged from -3.00 to -13.00 D and cylinder ranged from -2.00 to -5.50 D had PARK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser; follow-up was 6 months. All cases of myopic astigmatism were treated using the elliptical method and multizone ablation technique. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: low myopia, less than 6.00 D (n = 47); high myopia, from 6.25 to 10.00 D (n = 43); extreme myopia, over 10.25 D (n = 20). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate the astigmatic change.

RESULTS

By vector analysis, the success rate of astigmatic correction was more predictable in the low and high myopia groups than in the extreme myopia group (P < .05). There was little improvement in astigmatism in the extreme myopia group.

CONCLUSION

Using PARK to correct astigmatism greater than -2.00 D in eyes with myopia less than -10.00 D tended to result in undercorrection; astigmatic correction in eyes with myopia over 10.25 D was minimal.

Refractive versus Corneal Changes After Photorefracive Keratectomy for Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To define measures of assessing success and subsequent ways to improve excimer laser treatment of astigmatism.

METHODS

We studied 97 eyes of 79 patients, followed for 12 months, that underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia and astigmatism with a VISX 20/20 excimer laser. Preoperative spherical equivalent refraction at the corneal plane was between -1.00 and -15.00 D. Mean preoperative refractive astigmatism at the spectacle plan was -2.17 +/- 1.05 D (range, -1.25 to -6.00 D), which is -1.81 +/- 0.86 D (range -1.04 to -4.97 D) when calculated at the corneal plane. All patients were examined before and after surgery; examination included refraction, keratometry, and topography measurement.

RESULTS

The success in treatment of astigmatism appeared measurably less than the treatment of sphere when analogous indices were used for assessment. Success in astigmatism surgery improved, as measured by all parameters, after an additional 20% was applied to astigmatism treatment magnitude indicated by the VISX computer algorithm. The sequential modes of treatment undercorrected astigmatism magnitude to a greater extent than elliptical, but equivalent success rates were present in view of the greater astigmatic changes attempted using the sequential mode. The elliptical mode tended to produce a greater undercorrection of associated sphere (p = 0.313). Results measured by refraction showed a larger change than those measured by topography and keratometry.

CONCLUSION

During PRK with the VISX 20/20 laser, adjustment for undercorrection of astigmatism treatment achieves a fuller correction of astigmatism. When measuring astigmatic changes, results are different when comparing refractive astigmatism changes with corneal astigmatism changes measured by keratometry and topography.

Evaluation of axis alignment system for correction of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of in situ axis alignment for the treatment of myopic astigmatism with an excimer laser.

METHODS

In this prospective clinical trial, 71 eyes with stable astigmatism of -1.00 to -6.00 diopters (D) with or without stable myopia of up to 10.00 D were randomized to receive excimer treatment of their astigmatic component aligned to the axis determined by subjective refraction (control group) or to have the alignment verified and altered is necessary by in situ alignment (axis alignment group). A VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser was used for the treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months.

RESULTS

In 85% of eyes in the axis alignment group, the axis of cylinder was different from that calculated by routine refraction. Pretreatment mean cylinder was -1.81 D +/- 0.91 (SD) in the axis alignment group and -1.75 +/- 0.60 D in the control group. At 6 months, an undercorrection of cylinder was seen in both groups; the mean residual cylinder was -0.70 +2- 0.56 D in the axis alignment group and -0.59 +/- 0.50 D in the control group. More than 80% of all eyes were within +/- 1.00 D of plano and achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better. A loss of two or more lines of best corrected visual acuity was recorded in three eyes.

CONCLUSION

The in situ alignment technique did not produce better results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy than the routine axis alignment technique.

Results of Photorefractive Keratectomy for Low, Moderate, and High Myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the predictability, safety, and stability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patient groups with low, moderate, and high myopia. The astigmatic component of these corrections was also evaluated.

METHODS

In 110 patients, 110 consecutive eyes were operated with a VISX 20/20 excimer laser using standard settings and a 6 mm ablation zone for PRK. The eyes were divided into three groups. In low myopia group (N = 52) the intended correction ranged from -1.50 to -6.00 D (mean -4.28 +/- 1.29 D), in the moderate myopia group (N = 34) from -6.10 to -8.00 D (mean -7.05 +/- 0.70 D), and in the high myopia group (N = 24) from -8.10 to -11.50 D (mean -9.40 +/- 1.13 D). Twenty-seven eyes had 0.75 D of preoperative myopic astigmatism. All patients were followed for 12 months and 36% (N = 40) were available for the 24-month follow-up examination.

RESULTS

At 12 months the spherical equivalent manifest refraction was within 0.50 D of intended refraction in 58% (N = 30) of eyes in the low myopia group, 50% (N = 17) in the moderate myopia group, and 29% (N = 7) in the high myopia group. Eighty-seven percent (N = 45) in low, 79% (N = 27) in moderate, and 67% (N = 16) in the high myopia group were within 1.00 D of intended refraction. At 12 months, 88% (N = 46) of the eyes with low myopia, 68% (N = 23) with moderate myopia, and 68% (N = 16) with high myopia achieved uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, while 6% (N = 16) of the eyes lost and 4% (N = 4) gained two or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better at 12 months was achieved by 58% (N = 30) of low myopes, 26% (N = 9) of moderate myopes, and 33% (N = 8) of high myopes; 20/25 or better by 71% (N = 37) of low myopes, 39% (N = 13) of moderate myopes, and 42% (N = 10) of high myopes. Overcorrection (> 0.25 D) was detected at 12 months in 31% (N = 16) with low, 38% (N = 13) with moderate, and 67% (N = 16) with high baseline myopia, with statistically significant differences between the low and high myopia groups.

CONCLUSION

In all groups, the safety of PRK was satisfactory, without major complications; in the high myopia group where corrections exceeded 8.0 D (mean -9.40 +/- 1.13 D) the procedure was only slightly more unpredictable than in low and moderate myopia at 1 year.

Excimer laser correction of astigmatism with multipass/multizone treatment. The Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of excimer laser correction of myopic astigmatism by multipass/multizone photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK).

SETTING

Tertiary referral ophthalmic hospital with an associated private laser facility.

METHODS

This study comprised a consecutive series of 332 eyes of 289 patients who were followed for 6 months. All patients were 18 years or older, had stable myopic astigmatism (up to a -19.0 diopters [D] spherical equivalent [SE] at the spectacle plane), and had a best corrected visual acuity of at least 20/60 in both eyes. All eyes were treated with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser. The correction was divided between ablation zones using a multipass/multizone treatment paradigm based on the amount of myopia and astigmatism. Patients were examined 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Analysis of the mean percentage of spherical correction across the range of myopic preoperative SEs treated demonstrated 90% correction for most amounts of myopic astigmatism. Eyes with low myopia (mean preoperative SE < or = -5.0 D) treated with < or = -1.0 diopter cylinder (DC) of astigmatism achieved a mean percentage of spherical correction of 91% versus 93% in eyes with high myopia (> -5.0 D mean preoperative SE). Eyes with low myopia treated with > -1.0 DC of astigmatism achieved a mean percentage spherical correction of 90% versus 89% in eyes with high myopia. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. Patients with high relative cylinder (> 80% of total sphere treated) achieved comparable results. Analysis of the astigmatic component of the treatment, independent of the spherical result, showed a trend toward overcorrection in the high myopia group with less than -1.0 DC and a mean astigmatic correction of 89 and 98%, respectively, in the low and high myopic astigmatism groups. The mean angle of error was +2.0 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Multipass/multizone PARK for myopic astigmatism demonstrated a high degree of predictability and stability with desirable results for low and high levels of astigmatism across the range of myopic astigmatism treated by surface ablation.

Laser in situ keratomileusis assisted by corneal topography

PURPOSE

To assess whether laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) assisted by corneal topography can successfully treat corneal irregularities or irregular astigmatism in patients with previous ocular surgery or ocular trauma.

SETTING

University Eye Hospital, Klinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

METHODS

In a prospective clinical study, LASIK was performed in 23 eyes of 22 patients. Reasons for surgery were irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty or penetrating injury or corneal irregularity after previous excimer laser surgery. Excimer ablation was based on preoperative corneal topography data (Corneal Analysis System, EyeSys Technologies) using a proprietary algorithm (Topographic Assist LASIK, Chiron Vision). Follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/80 and mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 20/35. Uncorrected visual acuity improved in all but two cases. Postoperatively, mean UCVA increased to 20/50; mean BSCVA was unchanged. No eye lost two or more lines of BSCVA. Postoperative topography showed less corneal irregularity in 81.3% of eyes; full correction was achieved in 19.4%. Four eyes (19.4%) needed re-treatment for undercorrection and three eyes (14.3%) for regression.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results indicate that the concept of topographic-assisted LASIK is feasible. However, most eyes were undercorrected and had regression. One reason might be that corneal topography underestimated corneal irregularity, causing significant undercorrection.

Treatment of myopic astigmatism with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser

PURPOSE

To assess the results of surface sequential toric photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser using an erodible mask.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed on consecutive eyes having surface sequential toric PRK over a 4 month treatment period. Attempted astigmatism correction varied from 70 to 100%, depending on the power and axis of the cylinder. The myopic correction was adjusted so the combined treatment aim was emmetropia. Refraction, manual keratometry, corneal haze, and visual acuity data from preoperative and follow-up visits over 12 months were divided into various groups based on the preoperative refraction and analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine eyes from 48 patients had sequential toric PRK. Preoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent at glasses plane (SEGP) was -4.88 diopters (D) +/- 3.20 (SD) and the mean refractive cylinder, 2.02 +/- 1.04 D. The mean attempted cylinder correction was 1.87 D. At 12 months the mean SEGP was -0.02 +/- 0.67 D, which was not statistically significant from plano. The mean refractive cylinder was 0.84 +/- 0.84 D, which was statistically significantly different from zero cylinder power. There was a statistically significant correlation between the preoperative and the 12 month postoperative refractive cylinder powers. At 12 months, 34 of 43 eyes (79.1%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better. While 2 eyes in one patient (4.7%) lost two lines of best corrected visual acuity, with a final acuity of 6/12 in each, no patient lost more than two lines.

CONCLUSION

The manifest refraction cylinder power is not fully corrected with the current treatment algorithms; however, surface sequential toric PRK using an erodible mask is capable of treating compound myopic astigmatism with moderate success.

Predictability of excimer laser treatment of myopia and astigmatism by the VISX Twenty-Twenty. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

BACKGROUND

To determine the predictability of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct myopia, astigmatism, or both between -1.00 and -19.00 diopters (D).

SETTING

Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

METHODS

This study comprised 1218 consecutive eyes treated with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser and followed prospectively for 12 months. Low myopia was treated with one ablation zone (6.0 mm), high myopia with two ablation zones (5.0 and 6.0 mm), and extreme myopia with three ablation zones (4.5, 5.0, and 6.0 mm). Maximum spherical treatment was 15.00 D at the corneal plane. Data were analyzed to determine the predictability of the postoperative outcomes by preoperative refraction.

RESULTS

Nine hundred eighty eyes (80.5%) were available for the 12 month follow-up. The predictability of refraction and uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities progressively decreased with increasing myopia, although a comparable percentage of spherical correction was achieved at each diopter of myopia. The likelihood of losing lines of best corrected visual acuity and corneal haze increased with increasing myopia.

CONCLUSION

These data can be used to counsel patients of likely outcomes of excimer laser PRK to correct myopia.

Three Multizone Photorefractive Keratectomy Algorithms for Myopia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and complications of three different excimer laser algorithms for multizone photorefractive and photoastigmatic keratectomy.

METHODS

Three different software algorithms were applied to treat myopia and myopic astigmatism with the VISX 20/20 excimer laser. Each algorithm had a maximum ablation zone of 6 mm but differed in the number of zones employed, the proportion of the total treatment allocated to each ablation zone, and the treatment of astigmatism. The Melbourne multizone technique equally divided myopia correction into a maximum of three ablation zones. The Pop multizone technique biased myopia treatment into the smaller diameter zones to a maximum of six ablation zones, with one central island pretreatment. The Alpins multizone technique equally divided myopia treatment through all zones up to a maximum of six, with one central island pretreatment.

RESULTS

A total of 585 patients (780 eyes) were treated and 625 eyes (80%) were followed for more than 6 months. The mean baseline spherical equivalent refractive error was -5.63 D (-1.00 to -19.50 D). Between 71 and 79% of eyes were treated for astigmatism. There was no statistically significant differences in baseline refractive error or other characteristics among the three groups. At 6 months, the Alpins multizone algorithm had more eyes with a refractive error within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia (p = 0.01) and more within +/- 2.00 D of emmetropia (p < 0.01). This new algorithm produced more eyes with an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better at 6 months (p < 0.01). When multiple logistic regression was used to correct for any differences in baseline myopia among the three groups, this algorithm also had a higher odds ratio for achieving 20/20 or better uncorrected visual acuity (OR = 1.58).

CONCLUSION

At 6 months, all three algorithms were effective in the reduction of myopia. Significantly better visual acuity and refractive results were achieved with the Alpins multizone algorithm that spread the total treatment over a larger number of ablation zones, with an equal number of diopters of treatment in each zone.

Laser intrastromal keratomileusis for high myopia and myopic astigmatism

BACKGROUND

Laser intrastromal keratomileusis (LASIK) is an evolving technique which enables high degrees of myopia (> 8.0 dioptres) and myopic astigmatism to be corrected. This paper describes initial experience with this procedure. It also details the methodology, the results, the problems encountered, and discusses retreatment procedures.

METHODS

51 eyes (48 primary cases and three retreatments) underwent LASIK for simple myopia or compound myopic astigmatism. After the keratotomy was fashioned with a Chiron corneal shaper, the ablation was performed with either a Summit or Meditec excimer laser. The actual preoperative astigmatism ranged from -0.5 D to -6.0 D (in the astigmatic myopic LASIK (AML) series), while the range of preoperative myopia in the combined myopic LASIK (ML) and AML series was -8.0 D to -37.0 D. Of the ML cases, group 1 (-8.0 to 15.0 D (dioptres)), group 2 (> -15.0 to -20.0 D), and group 3 (> -20.0 D) had mean preoperative myopia values (spherical equivalent) of -11.26 D, -16.84 D and -27.78 D. The same groupings (1, 2, and 3) for the AML cases had respective values of -9.702, -17.4, and -23.08. In the AML series the mean preoperative astigmatism was -2.109 D. Follow up ranged from 8 to 27 months (mean 15.8 months). Six of the cases required retreatment.

RESULTS

There was a reduction in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (of 1 Snellen line) in seven of the primary cases (14.5%) (three in the ML group and four in the AML group), and in one of the retreatment cases. The BCVA improved in 28 cases (58%) in the primary treatment group. The mean correction attempted (spherical equivalent) for the ML groups 1, 2, and 3 was 10.51 D, -14.5 D, and -27.78 D, versus a mean correction achieved of -9.445 D, -15.625 D, and -21.571 D. Similarly, for the AML groups, attempted correction values were -9.702 D, -17.4 D, and -23.08 D, while the values achieved were -6.95 D, -51.425 D, and -15.708 D. Regression was minimal and stabilisation of the refractive result was achieved in all groups, except group 3 of the ML series, by the 3 month examination period. The mean postoperative astigmatism in the AML series was -0.531 D. Vector analysis of the AML series showed that the mean surgically induced astigmatism was +0.93 D. The most common complication encountered was undercorrection, which occurred in 35 cases-23 cases in the ML group and 12 cases in the AML series. Twenty eight per cent of the ML cases, and 25% of the AML cases were within plus or minus 1.5 D of the attempted refraction.

CONCLUSION

For the correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism, LASIK results in less postoperative pain and relatively little subepithelial haze compared with high myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Furthermore, a stable refraction and reasonably predictable outcome occurs much earlier. High myopia up to -37.0 D can be corrected, albeit with some limitations at the extremes of myopia-in terms of the amount of myopia correctable; this represents a limitation of the technique. Retreatment is a technically straightforward and effective way to treat undercorrection. Undercorrection, the main complication seen in our series, should become less common when the ablation algorithms are further refined.

Effect of Variations in Surgical Technique and Patient Management on Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To describe variation in surgical and patient management and to assess their effect on 12-month outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

The following variations in surgical/patient management related to PRK were observed and assessed: treatment based on cycloplegic refraction, administration of anesthesia, marking of visual axis, diameter of zone marker, method of epithelial removal, use of intraoperative artificial tears, type of fixation during surgery, replacement of epithelium after surgery, use of a bandage contact lens or two pressure patches, and use of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs after surgery. The outcomes assessed were spherical equivalent manifest refraction, spectacle-corrected visual acuity and uncorrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

One year clinical outcomes were assessed prospectively for a group of 645 eyes that underwent PRK or photoastigmatic keratectomy. Spherical equivalent refraction and uncorrected visual acuity were better with decreasing amounts of preoperative myopia (both F > 30.0, both p = 0.0001). Although some surgical variations produced statistically significantly better uncorrected visual acuity on univariate analyses, none of the variations in the techniques assessed were found to be statistically significantly related to clinical outcomes after controlling for preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (all F < 2.5, all p > 0.10). None of the surgical variations were associated with loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity (all p > 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of PRK were not significantly affected by minor variations in clinical and surgical practice.

Undercorrection after excimer laser refractive surgery. Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

The incidence and correlations of undercorrection were studied for 1 year after excimer laser surgery for myopia or myuopic astigmatism.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 645 eyes of 440 patients were studied. Eyes were examined preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The parameters evaluated were visual acuity, refraction, and corneal clarity.

RESULTS

Following excimer laser surgery, undercorrection of > or = -1.00 diopters gradually increased from 10% at 1 month to 40% at 12 months. Increasing degree of preoperative myopia was significantly associated with increasing occurrence of undercorrection at 3 months (chi 2 = 17.3, P < .001), 6 months (chi 2 = 53.6, P < .001), and 12 months (chi 2 = 64.8, P < .001). Undercorrection was more common in eyes that had had photorefractive keratectomy than in those that had had photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.60). At 1 year, a loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity was recorded in 38% of undercorrected patients. Loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity was more common in patients undercorrected by -1.00 diopter or more (odds ratio, 8.8; 95% confidence interval, 5.4 to 14.6). No relationship was seen between corneal haze and loss of best-corrected visual acuity. Undercorrection was not associated with age, gender, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bandage contact lens wear, or corneal haze. Patients with lower degrees of myopia reached a stable refraction more quickly. At 6 months, 71% were within +/- 0.5 diopter of 1-year refraction. Of 17 patients with undercorrection who were treated with topical corticosteroids, only one patient showed a permanent beneficial change.

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of undercorrection is more common in patients with severe myopia and when simultaneous astigmatic corrections are undertaken.

Excimer photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia and astigmatism with the Coherent-Schwind Keratom

PURPOSE

To summarize the initial results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in 114 eyes of 89 patients using the Coherent-Schwind system and assess its safety, efficacy, and predictability.

SETTING

Hospital San Jose de Monterrey-ITESM, Mexico.

METHODS

The Coherent-Schwind Keratom excimer laser was used to correct low myopia (manifest spherical equivalent from -1.00 to -6.00 diopters [D], with manifest cylinder of -1.00 D or less) or myopic astigmatism (manifest spherical equivalent from -2.75 to -6.75 D, with manifest cylinder from -1.00 to -4.50 D) with standard settings. Ablation zone diameters were from 5.9 to 6.3 mm (low myopia) and 5.9 to 8.2 mm (astigmatism) with a repetition rate of 12 Hz. Follow-up was from 1 month (low myopia, n = 71; astigmatism, n = 35) to 6 months (low myopia, n = 36; astigmatism, n = 17).

RESULTS

Six months after PRK, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94% of the low myopia eyes (n = 36) and 77% of the astigmatism eyes (n = 17). Intended correction was within 1.00 D of the target spherical equivalent in 81 and 88% of eyes, respectively. No eyes in the low myopia group lost two lines of best corrected visual acuity, although 12% in the astigmatism group did.

CONCLUSION

The Coherent-Schwind excimer laser appears to be effective in the treatment of low myopia and astigmatism, with results comparable to those of other laser systems after 6 months of follow-up. Further study of best corrected visual acuity loss after treatment of compound myopic astigmatism with this laser is warranted.

Photorefractive Keratectomy for Hyperopic and Mixed Astigmatism

BACKGROUND

The correction of astigmatism with photorefractive keratectomy has been recommended in simple and myopic astigmatism. Therefore in this study the excimer laser was used to correct compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism.

METHODS

We present a prospective clinical study of photorefractive keratectomy in 30 eyes of 24 patients with compound hyperopic astigmatism with a mean spherical equivalent of +4.30 D and mean astigmatism of 2.33 D (group I) and in 17 eyes of 15 patients with mixed astigmatism with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of +0.46 D and mean astigmatism of 4.75 D (group II). The excimer laser used in this study was an MEL 60 (Aesculap-Meditec). In both groups an 18-month follow-up study was performed.

RESULTS

In the compound hyperopic astigmatism group after 18 months, 14 of 17 treated eyes (82.3%) were within +/-1.00 D, and 11 (64.7%) were within 60.50 D of the intended correction. In the mixed astigmatism group after 18 months, 10 of 11 eyes (90.9%) were within +/-1.00 D, 8 eyes (72.7%) were within +/-0.50 D of the intended correction. In regard to the stability the 1 year regression of spherical equivalent in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group is 0.78 D and in the mixed astigmatism group 0.37 D. At 18 months, spectacle corrected visual acuity in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group was unchanged or improved in 14 eyes (87.5%); 2 eyes (12.5%) had lost one line. In the mixed astigmatism group at 18 months, spectacle corrected visual acuity was unchanged or improved in 9 eyes (81.8 %); 2 eyes (18.1%) lost one line. Preoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity was 20/100 in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group and the mixed astigmatism group. At 18 months, 14 eyes (93.3%) in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better; 4 (26.6%) eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. In the mixed astigmatism group, 9 (81.8%) eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better; 4 (36.3%) eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better.

CONCLUSION

Photorefractive keratectomy is an efficient and relatively safe procedure for reducing or eliminating compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism up to 6.00 D.

Astigmatic change 1 year after excimer laser treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SETTING

Royal Victorian Ear and Eye Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

METHODS

This study comprised 333 PARK patients and 155 PRK patients treated with a VISX 20/20 excimer laser and followed prospectively for 12 months. Vector analysis of the change in astigmatism was used to calculate the SIA in the PRK group and the percentage of astigmatism corrected in the PARK group.

RESULTS

Among patients with low cylinders astigmatic correction varied greatly, particularly in those treated for large amounts of myopia. The spherical PRK treatments yielded a mean induced postoperative astigmatism of 0.47 diopter. There was a linear relationship between this inadvertent SIA and increasing myopia.

CONCLUSION

Excimer laser surgery for myopia creates a low degree of random, unpredictable SIA that may be the result of irregular epithelial thickening during postoperative healing. This creates a background noise of astigmatic change upon which the targeted astigmatic correction is superimposed.