Peribulbar anesthesia

Clinical Profile, Complications and Trends of Ocular Anaesthesia in a Multi-tier Ophthalmology Network in India: An Eight-Year Experience

INTRODUCTION

To describe the clinical profile, complications and trends of ocular anaesthesia in a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India.

METHODS

This retrospective hospital-based study included 417,622 patients presenting between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients who were administered either topical, local or general anaesthesia for ocular surgery in at least one eye were included as cases. The data were collected using an electronic medical record system.

RESULTS

Among the 417,622 patients, local anaesthesia was administered to 280,638, (67.2%) patients and was the most commonly administered type followed by topical anaesthesia in 84,117 (20.14%) patients. The most common complication encountered in administering local anaesthesia was retrobulbar haemorrhage in 103 (0.037%) patients followed by lid haematoma in 49 (0.017%) patients. Tooth damage occurred in 40 (0.076%) patients followed by delayed recovery in 30 (0.057%) patients during general anaesthesia. The trend of local anaesthesia decreased (83.48% vs 53.36%), whereas the trend of topical anaesthesia increased (8.61% vs 32.42%) over the study period.

CONCLUSION

There is a notable trend towards the adoption of less invasive anaesthetic methods, particularly in common surgeries such as cataract, intravitreal injection, and vitreoretinal surgery. However, despite this trend, a significant proportion of oculoplastic/orbital surgeries, trauma, and strabismus surgeries continue to be performed under general anaesthesia. These observations underscore the ongoing evolution of ocular anaesthesia practices, reflecting advancements in surgical techniques and patient preferences.

TRANSCARUNCULAR DOUBLE INJECTION TECHNIQUE FOR PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA IN VITREORETINAL SURGERY

PURPOSE

Local anesthesia is commonly adopted in vitreoretinal surgery to reach painless and akinesia surgical condition. Currently, peribulbar anesthesia (PBA) and subtenon injection (STN) are the most widely used methods. We propose a transcaruncular double injection peribulbar technique (TRS) and aim to compare it with both standard PBA and STN injections.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients underwent TRS, PBA, or STN. A numerical rating scale was used to assess preoperative, postoperative, and intraoperative pain. Best akinesia score and onset and duration of akinesia were evaluated by two independent graders. The need for supplementary injection was also registered.

RESULTS

TRS group was characterized by a lower intraoperative numerical rating scale variation and absolute numerical rating scale score both at the beginning of surgery ( P 0.046), after 30 minutes ( P 0.032), and at the end of surgery ( P 0.002) compared with the other groups. The TRS group also showed better akinesia score ( P 0.004), fastest onset ( P 0.002), and longer duration ( P 0.042) compared with both PBA and STN. No injection-related complications were reported in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The newly proposed transcaruncular PBA provided superior pain control and akinesia level with no additional adverse events.

Ophthalmic artery resistance index after peribulbar block in the presence of epinephrine

PURPOSE

There are controversies regarding ophthalmic artery (OA) flow after peribulbar block in the presence of epinephrine. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate OA flow via echo-Doppler before and after peribulbar block with lidocaine in the presence or absence of epinephrine.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of I, II or III and were eligible for cataract phacoemulsification surgery were selected. Patients with other eye diseases were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1-peribulbar block with lidocaine and 1/200,000 epinephrine; group 2-peribulbar block with lidocaine in the absence of epinephrine. The resistance index (RI), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) of the OA were evaluated using echo-Doppler before and 10 min after the peribulbar block.

RESULTS

No differences between groups were observed in the RI before the peribulbar block as well regarding the presence of hypertension and the age or gender of the patient. After the peribulbar block, we observed a decrease in the RI in group 1 (p = 0.038, Cohen's d = 0.336) and no difference in the RI in group 2 (p = 0.109, Cohen's d = 0.172). When comparing group 1 and group 2, we observed a decrease in the RI in group 1 (p = 0.028, Cohen's d = 0,583). There was no difference between groups regarding the PSV and EDV after the peribulbar block.

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in RI was observed in the OA after peribulbar block with a vasoconstrictor, an effect that could be a benefit in some ocular surgeries.

Features of a modern retrobulbar anesthetic injection for cataract surgery

No significant complications including retrobulbar orbital hemorrhage after retrobulbar anesthetic block were identified in a retrospective review of 3,415 consecutive cataract surgical cases blocked and performed by one surgeon. The technique for retrobulbar injections using a disposable retrobulbar needle is described in detail. All injections were deliberately retrobulbar, directed toward the inferior temporal muscle cone, and were given immediately prior to cataract surgery by the surgeon.

Needle penetration of the globe during retrobulbar and peribulbar injections

The charts of 23 patients with needle penetration of the globe during retrobulbar or peribulbar injections between January 1980 and May 1990 were reviewed. Possible needle penetration risk factors included high myopia, previous scleral buckling procedures, injection by nonophthalmologists, and poor patient cooperation during the injection. Of the 23 cases of ocular penetration, 16 (70%) were from sharp (22-, 23-, and 25-gauge) needles, and 7 (30%) were from blunt (23- and 25-gauge) needles. Management options depended on the severity of the intraocular injury. Retinal breaks without retinal detachment were treated by laser photocoagulation (four cases) or cryopexy (one case) and were observed in three cases. More advanced complications (retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage) were usually treated by pars plana vitrectomy with or without a scleral buckle (12 of 14 cases). The final visual acuity was 20/400 or better in only 2 of the 14 retinal detachment cases. In cases without retinal detachment, the final visual acuity was 20/50 or better in 7 of 9 cases.