Surgical management of gastrointestinal bleeding

Vagotomy and the risk of mental disorders: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate vagotomy, the severance of the vagus nerve, and its association with mental disorders, as gut-brain communication partly mediated by the vagus nerve have been suggested as a risk factor.

METHODS

Nationwide population-based Danish register study of all individuals alive and living in Denmark during the study period 1977-2016 and who had a hospital contact for ulcer with or without vagotomy. Follow-up was until any diagnosis of mental disorders requiring hospital contact, emigration, death, or end of follow-up on December 31, 2016, whichever came first. Data were analyzed using survival analysis and adjusted for sex, age, calendar year, ulcer type, and Charlson comorbidity index score.

RESULTS

During the study period, 113,086 individuals had a hospital contact for ulcer. Of these, 5,408 were exposed to vagotomy where 375 (6.9%) subsequently developed a mental disorder. Vagotomy overall was not associated with mental disorders (HR: 1.10; 95%CI: 0.99-1.23), compared to individuals with ulcer not exposed to vagotomy. However, truncal vagotomy was associated with an increased HR of 1.22 (95%CI: 1.06-1.41) for mental disorders, whereas highly selective vagotomy was not associated with mental disorders (HR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.84-1.15). Truncal vagotomy was also associated with higher risk of mental disorders when compared to highly selective vagotomy (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, vagotomy did not increase the risk of mental disorders; however, truncal vagotomy specifically was associated with a small risk increase in mental disorders, whereas no association was found for highly selective vagotomy. Thus, the vagus nerve does not seem to have a major impact on the development of mental disorders.

Management of Patient with Simultaneous Overt Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation - Priority Endoscopy

Background

The current ERC guidelines are the source of many positive changes, reduction of mortality, length of hospitalization and improvement of prognosis of STEMI patients. However, there is a small group of patients whose slight modification in guidelines would further reduce in-hospital mortality and hospitalization costs. These are patients with concomitant STEMI infarction and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Methods

Two separate methods of treatment were compared in patients with concomitant gastrointestinal bleeding and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The first – traditional approach, in the line with the ESC guidelines, the second innovative, with priority for endoscopy.

Results

Despite the innovative approach, the patient with endoscopy before PCI was discharged without complication. A patient who has undergone coronary intervention and who has been started on typical antiplatelet therapy prior to gastroenterological diagnosis has died due to massive bleeding.

Conclusion

For ethical reasons and in connection with the cardiological guidelines of the management of ACS, a study of patients with ASC a high risk of intestinal bleeding, in which endoscopy will have priority, and only later PCI, will probably never be performed. Although, as the described case shows, despite exceeding the 90 minutes time to implement PCI (<120 minutes) in logistic terms such behavior is completely feasible.

Clinical approach to the patient with acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a very common condition at all ages, with high rates of morbidity and mortality, especially in case of acute presentation. The optimal management of acute GIB requires a timely overview of vital signs and clinical presentation to stabilize the patient if necessary and set up the most adequate diagnostic and therapeutic approach, based on the suspected etiology. Endoscopy plays a major role both in diagnosis and treatment of acute GIB, as allows the application of several hemostasis techniques during the diagnostic session, which should preferably be performed within 24 hours from the acute event. The hemostasis technique should be chosen based on type, etiology of the bleeding and the operator preference and expertise. Nevertheless, several challenging cases need the cooperation of radiology especially in the diagnostic phase, and even in the therapeutic phase for those bleedings in which medical and endoscopic techniques have failed. Imaging diagnostic techniques include mainly CT angiography, scintigraphy with labeled erythrocytes and arteriography. This last technique plays also a therapeutic role in case arterial embolization is needed. Only those patients in which the previous techniques have failed, both in diagnosis and treatment, are candidates for emergency surgery.

A novel scoring system for prediction of esophageal varices in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with advanced systemic illness or critically ill patients may present with upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) bleeding which may need endoscopic intervention; however, this may expose them to unnecessary endoscopy. The aim was to validate a novel scoring system for risk stratification for urgency of GIT endoscopy in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This is an observational study conducted from January 2013 to January 2016 to analyze 300 patients with critical medical conditions and presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Meticulous clinical, laboratory, and sonographic evaluations were performed to calculate Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) and variceal metric score for risk stratification and prediction of the presence of esophageal varices (OV). Finally, this score was applied on a validation group (n=100).

RESULTS

The use of GBS and variceal metric scores in critically ill patients revealed that patients who showed a low risk score value for OV (0-4 points) and GBS <2 can be treated conservatively and discharged safely without urgent endoscopy. In patients with a low risk for varices but GBS >2, none of them had OV on endoscopy. In patients with intermediate risk score value for OV (5-8 points) and with GBS >2, 33.33% of them had varices on endoscopy. In patients with high risk score value for varices (9-13) and GBS >2, endoscopy revealed varices in 94.4% of them. Finally, in patients with very high risk score for varices (14-17), endoscopy revealed varices in 100% of them.

CONCLUSION

GBS and variceal metric score were highly efficacious in identifying critically ill patients who will benefit from therapeutic endoscopic intervention.

Surgical management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

PURPOSE

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is any form of bleeding distal to the Ligament of Treitz. In most cases, acute LGIB is self-limited and resolves spontaneously with conservative management.

METHODS

Only a minority of approximately 10% is admitted to hospital with signs of massive bleeding and shock requiring resuscitation, urgent evaluation and treatment.

RESULTS

Over the past decade, there has been a progressive decrease in upper GI events and a significant increase in lower GI events. Overall, mortality has also decreased, but in-hospital fatality due to upper or lower GI complications have remained constant. The problem is that LGIB can arise from a number of sources and may be a significant cause of hospitalisation and mortality in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After initial resuscitation, the diagnosis and treatment of LGIB remains a challenge for acute care surgeons, whereby the identification of the source of bleeding is of utmost importance.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is an important worldwide cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. The incidence of LGIB increases with age and corresponds to the increased incidence of specific gastrointestinal diseases that have worldwide regional variation, co-morbid diseases and polypharmacy. The evaluation and treatment of patients is adjusted to the rate and severity of hemorrhage and the clinical status of the patient and may be complicated by the presence of visual, auditory and cognitive impairment due to age and co-morbid disease. Bleeding may be chronic and mild or severe and life threatening, requiring endoscopic, radiologic or surgical intervention. Colonoscopy provides the best method for evaluation and treatment of patients with LGIB. There will be a successful outcome of LGIB in the majority of elderly patients with appropriate evaluation and management.

Surgical treatment concepts for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To this day, the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring transfusion varies among different hospitals. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate our own data on the group of patients presented and to outline our diagnostic and therapeutic regime taking into account the literature of the past 30 years.

METHODS

Following prospective data collection on 63 patients of a university hospital (40 male, 23 female patients) who received surgical intervention for acute lower intestinal hemorrhage requiring transfusion, we retrospectively analyzed the data. After a medical history had been taken, all patients underwent clinical examination, including digital palpation; 62 patients underwent procto-rectoscopy, 38 gastroscopy and colonoscopy, 52 patients colonoscopy only, and 45 patients gastroscopy only. Angiography was applied in 14 cases and scintigraphy in 20 cases.

RESULTS

Diagnostic procedures to localize hemorrhage were successful in 61 cases, 41 of which through endoscopy, 12 through angiography, and eight through scintigraphy. Of our group of patients, 32 suffered from a bleeding colonic diverticulum, eight from angiodysplasia, and five from bleeding small bowel diverticula. Five patients had inflammatory bowel disease and three neoplasia. Among the surgical interventions, segmental resections were performed most frequently (15 sigmoidectomies, 11 small bowel segmental resections, 11 left hemicolectomies, seven right hemicolectomies, one proctectomy). Subtotal colectomies were carried out in ten cases. The complication rate for this group of critically ill, negatively selected patients was 60.3% and the mortality rate was 15.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination and stabilization of the patient is directly followed by diagnostic localization. Today, we primarily rely on nonsurgical control of hemorrhage by endoscopy or angiography; the indication for surgery is mainly limited to peracute, uncontrollable, and recurrent forms. In the case of surgery, intestinal segmental resection is recommended after identification of the lesion; if the localization of colonic hemorrhage is uncertain, subtotal resection is the method of choice. For stable patients with unverifiable small-bowel hemorrhage we recommend regular re-evaluation.

Surgery for obscure lower gastrointestinal bleeding in India

Western patients with obscure lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OLGIH) are usually 60 years or older, bleed from colonic diverticulosis or angiodysplasia, and need localizing investigations. In India, patients are younger, the causes of bleeding different, and health resources scarce. We followed a policy of early surgical exploration operation and excision of the bleeding source or, if this was not identified, did a right hemicolectomy. The outcome of this strategy was evaluated. Between 1996 and 2003, we managed 62 patients with OLGIH. Localizing investigations such as enteroclysis, radioisotope scanning, angiography, and peroperative enteroscopy were infrequently performed. Fifty patients underwent surgery, emergency (35 pts) or elective (15 pts), and comprised the study group. At operation the lesion was localized in 33 (66%) patients (jejunum in 9 and terminal ileum or cecum in 24) and was resected. In 17 patients no lesion was found and they had a right hemicolectomy. The 30-day mortality was six patients (12%) and included persistent bleeding (three), liver failure (one), and chest infection (one). Five (10%) patients rebled after operation at a mean follow-up of 31 months. Cirrhosis (P=0.003) as a comorbid illness was the only significant factor for rebleed in the right hemicolectomy group. Advanced age (>60 years; P=0.08) might be another risk factor in a larger study. In conclusion, patients with obscure OLGIH in India should have an early operation. If a lesion is not detected, a right hemicolectomy may be done. In this group those with cirrhosis have a higher chance of rebleed, as well as, perhaps, elderly patients.

[A surgical approach to acute intestinal bleeding]

The estimated incidence of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is 20/100,000 patients per year. Of these cases, 70-80% are minor or stop spontaneously and do not present as emergency hospital admissions. Colonoscopy and angiography detect 80-90% of major LGIB, and subsequent endoscopic intervention or embolisation can control approximately 70%. Emergency surgical intervention is required in haemodynamically unstable patients with persistent bleeding. The surgical treatment of choice is directed to resecting the bleeding bowel segment. Subtotal colectomy is performed in patients with colonic bleeding that can not exactly be localized. Segmental colon resection is often associated with rebleeding and not recommended in this situation. Primary anastomosis can usually be performed; elderly patients in reduced condition, however, are candidates for stoma. In case of persistent or recurrent bleeding and differentiation between intestinal and colonic bleeding fails, loop ileostomy may be performed. If the bleeding appears to originate from somewhere in the small bowel, an additional loop jejunostomy may be performed for specification. The mortality from acute LIGB is approximately 5% but increases with emergency surgery. Risk factors are age, comorbidity, and shock on admission.

Comparative Analysis of Vagotomy and Drainage Versus Vagotomy and Resection Procedures for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease: Results of 907 Patients from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine postoperative outcomes and risk factors for morbidity and mortality in patients requiring surgery for bleeding peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Vagotomy and drainage procedures are technically simpler but are usually associated with higher ulcer recurrence rates. In contrast, vagotomy and resection approaches offer lower ulcer recurrences but represent much more challenging operations and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

Data collected through the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 1991 to 2001 were submitted for stepwise logistic regression analysis for prediction of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, rebleeding, and postoperative length of stay. The study population included all patients operated on for bleeding PUD within an 11-year period.

RESULTS

The 30-day morbidity, mortality, and rebleeding rates were comparable between surgical groups. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, presence of ascites, coma, diabetes, functional status, hemiplegia, and history of steroid use were predictors of postoperative death. Risk factors for rebleeding included dependent functional status, history of congestive heart failure, smoking, steroid use, and preoperative transfusions. Having a resective procedure, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, hemiplegia, history of COPD, and requiring ventilator-assisted respirations before surgery were positively associated with increased length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences were observed in 30-day mortality, morbidity, or rebleeding rates between surgical groups. Having a resective procedure was a predictor of prolonged postoperative stay. Dependent status and chronic use of steroids were predictors of both rebleeding and postoperative mortality.

Embolization for major lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage: five-year experience

The management of major lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage has changed dramatically in the last 15 years. Innovations in coaxial catheter technology have allowed the interventional radiologist to reach the small peripheral mesenteric arteries and perform superselective embolization with a variety of agents. The present large series represents the 5-year experience of this technique at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, in a patient cohort with a high number of comorbidities. Technical success was achieved in 96% of cases. The clinical symptoms of mesenteric ischaemia developed in four patients after embolization and were managed conservatively in two. The procedure-related mortality was low when compared with the published complication rates for emergency surgery, in this clinical setting.

111Indium-labelled red-cell scintigraphy to detect intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding from synchronous small- and large-bowel adenocarcinomas

A 70-year-old woman presented with symptoms of profound anaemia and evidence of intermittent gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, abdominal computerised tomography, sulphur colloid scintigraphy and selective mesenteric angiography were non-diagnostic. An indium-labelled red-cell scan was performed, which suggested bleeding from the ileum at 36 h. At laparotomy, a primary small-bowel adenocarcinoma was resected. Six weeks later, she was again anaemic. Repeat colonoscopy showed a synchronous primary colonic adenocarcinoma, which had been masked by intraluminal blood during the original indium scan. The lesion was impalpable, even after full mobilisation of the colon. A right hemicolectomy was performed. Indium has a longer half-life (67 h) than the more commonly used technetium isotope (18 h). This allows serial imaging for up to 5 days, which may increase diagnostic efficiency in intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinicians should be aware that persisting activity from intraluminal blood may mask synchronous lesions.

Benign rectal ulcer: an underground cause of inpatient lower gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Although it is uncommon, significant bleeding per rectum presents one of the most difficult emergency problems. Bleeding from a rectal ulcer is not well recognized as a cause of such bleeding.

METHODS

From July 2000 through December 2000, 195 consecutive patients with significant blood loss per rectum were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight cases in whom significant gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding occurred following prior hospitalization were identified. Sources of bleeding were gastroduodenal in 38 cases (79%) and colorectal in 10 cases (21%). The causes of inpatient colorectal bleeding were benign rectal ulcer (n = 4), ischemic colitis (n = 3), neoplasia (n = 2), and diversion colitis (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis for inpatients who develop new inpatient GI bleeding differs from that of patients who develop outpatient GI bleeding. Careful examination of the rectum following rectal instrumentation is critical. In addition to the standard resuscitative measures, the identification and treatment of rectal ulcers in this group of patients is of paramount importance. The treatment options for bleeding rectal ulcer include conservative therapy, cauterization, embolization, banding, and local excision.

Cost implications of administering intravenous proton pump inhibitors to all patients presenting to the emergency department with peptic ulcer bleeding

OBJECTIVES

Administering proton pump inhibitors (PPI) intravenously (iv) after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers reduces the incidence of rebleeding, the need for operative procedures, and hospitalizations. We assessed the cost implications of iv PPI initiated in all patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with signs of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding.

METHODS

From a third-party payer perspective with a time horizon of 60 days, we built a decision analytic model comparing standard endoscopic therapy to a strategy in which all patients presenting to the ED with UGI bleeding would start iv PPI before endoscopy. After endoscopy, only those with peptic ulcers would be kept on iv PPI added to standard therapy. Probabilities of health events were extracted from published literature. Resource utilization profiles and costs (iv PPI, hospital stay for medical and operative procedures, and professional fees) were based on Medicare reimbursement data from a large hospital in Alabama. All costs were expressed in 2000 US dollars. Uncertainty was investigated through one-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analyses using Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

In a hypothetical group of 1000 individuals, routine use of iv PPI prevented 40 rebleeds, 9 surgical procedures, and 223 hospital days, and led to incremental savings of dollars 920 per subject. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the strategy of using iv PPI was likely to be dominant even when accounting for uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, routine administration of iv PPI to all persons presenting with UGI bleeding represents good value for money and merits consideration as standard hospital policy.

[Acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Diagnosis and management]

In most cases (80%), acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding stops spontaneously, but rebleeding is frequent (25%). The intensity and quality of the bleeding--hematochezia, melena, or occult bleeding--determines the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy (endoscopic evaluation of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, mesenteric angiography, scintigraphy, enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy) and its urgency. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding can mostly be treated conservatively or by endoscopic interventions (injection therapy, clip application, coagulation and ligation methods). Severe hemorrhage can render colonoscopy and the identification of the bleeding source technically difficult. Emergency operations are only indicated when patients with severe hemorrhage cannot be stabilized by interventional endoscopy or angiography with selective embolization.

Acute Lower Gastroenteric Bleeding Retrospective Analysis (The ALGEBRA Study): An Analysis of the Triage, Management and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Many algorithms have been developed for patients with acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (ALGIH). Their clinical usefulness is not readily apparent. It is important first to observe patterns in admission, triage, and management to formulate hypotheses as to how outcomes might be affected. We reviewed patient charts with the diagnosis of gastrointestinal hemorrhage from June 1998 to January 2001. Patients with ALGIH were entered into a database. We defined patients as having ALGIH if presentation included melena or hematochezia. Patients with hematemesis, bloody nasogastric aspirate, or occult fecal blood were excluded. Observations were made on 420 patients. Seventy-six per cent of patients were admitted to the medical service. Lower endoscopy was the first diagnostic method in 33 per cent. Medical management comprised 52 per cent of first management strategies. Surgeons used angiography (3% vs 1%) or surgery (25% vs 5%) more than other services. Fourteen per cent of patients managed with endoscopy, 16 per cent medically, 17 per cent with surgery, and 67 per cent with interventional radiology required two or more subsequent packed red blood cell transfusions. Mean admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 9.2 whereas that for those with mortality was 13.5. We conclude that the construction of a database will allow for formation and testing of hypotheses in managing ALGIH.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly

Gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly individuals is a frequent cause of consultation with a physician and of hospital admissions. Co-morbidity and greater medication use in this steadily growing patient group influence the clinical course and adversely affect outcome. Clinical presentation is often predictable and guides subsequent patient management. Due to a surprising lack of prospective controlled data in the area of gastrointestinal bleeding, the selection of diagnostic and therapeutic manoeuvres often depends more on local expertise and availability than on an algorithmic approach. Advances in endoscopic, medical, radiological and surgical treatment modalities offer promising new diagnostic and therapeutic tools, particularly in concerted applications. Outcome studies on the appropriate sequence and linking of these modalities are urgently needed. This chapter will address clinical presentation, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of both upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Nonvariceal Origin in the ICU Setting

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGI) is a common medical emergency in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although it can be caused by a number of gastrointestinal disorders, its management usually follows a few simple management rules. Prior to endoscopy, the key to management is to resuscitate the patient, to determine the need for airway protection, and to assess the need for transfusions according to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. During endoscopy, the key to management is to recognize the cause of the bleeding and to achieve hemostasis. Following endoscopy, the key to management is to determine the need for medical therapy and to determine a proper disposition for the patient given his potential risk for rebleeding. Stress-related erosions syndrome (SRES) is a disease that usually develops in the ICU setting and is known to be associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. Although it is approached in the same fashion as other causes of UGI bleeding, patients tend to do better if they are recognized early and treated prophylactically. Criteria for proper patient selection and the recommended prophylactic therapy are reviewed.

Lower intestinal bleeding

Lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding is a frequent cause of physician consultations and hospital admissions. Clinical presentation is predictable and significantly influences subsequent patient management. Controversy surrounding diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding results from a surprising lack of prospective controlled data. Thus, selection of diagnostic and therapeutic manoeuvres often depends more on local expertise and availability than on an algorithm approach. Advances in endoscopic, radiological and surgical equipment and techniques offer promising new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, particularly in concerted applications. Outcome studies on the appropriate sequence and linking of these modalities are urgently needed. The present chapter will address clinical presentation, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding.