Randomized Trials of Induction Chemotherapy: A Critical Review

Capecitabine for treating head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

With an increasing incidence, over half a million cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) are diagnosed annually worldwide. Various chemotherapeutic agents are utilized to achieve adequate locoregional control. Cisplatin, fluorouracil (FU), and taxanes are often used to treat HNC but these regimens have shown high toxicity and poor patient compliance. Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug that is preferentially converted to FU in tumor cells in comparison to normal cells.

AREA COVERED

In this review, the authors evaluate the role of capecitabine in radical and palliative settings either alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs in the management of HNC. In addition, metabolic conversion, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity profile of capecitabine are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Various phase II trials conducted on capecitabine in the management of recurrent HNC have shown comparable results and tolerable toxic effects especially in pre-treated fragile patients. Capecitabine, used in induction or concurrent settings in the radical management of locoregionally advanced HNC, have also shown promising results. Randomized trials are needed to validate the role of capecitabine in the management of HNC.

Prevention and management of treatment-induced pharyngo-oesophageal stricture

Pharyngo-oesophageal stricture (PES) is a serious complication that occurs in up to a third of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. This entity is under-reported and as a result, our understanding of the pathophysiology and prevention of this complication is restricted. This Review presents the knowledge so far on radiation-related and non-radiation-related risk factors for PES, including tumour stage and subsite, patient age, and comorbidities. The interventions to decrease this toxicity are discussed, including early detection of PES, initiation of an oral diet, and protection of swallowing structures from high-dose radiation. We discuss various treatment options, including swallowing exercises and manoeuvres, endoscopic dilatations, and for advanced cases, oesophageal reconstruction. Study of the subset of patients who develop this toxicity and early recognition and intervention of this pathological change in future trials will help to optimise treatment of these patients.

Clinical trial design limitations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article reviews the randomized trials contributing to the establishment of current standards for the treatment of head and neck cancer. It provides critical analysis of their methodology in order to facilitate future trial design.

RECENT FINDINGS

From a prognosis perspective, head and neck cancers are a heterogeneous group of diseases. Following a number of randomized clinical trials evaluating the role of chemotherapy in the induction, concomitant and adjuvant settings, there has been considerable improvement in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers during the last decade. It is, however, difficult to interpret and compare the results optimally and to build on efficient trial designs as most of the trials included patients with different levels of essential prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

All key randomized trials will be reviewed according to eligibility criteria, subgroup issues, trial power and historical controls. Methodological interpretation and possible plans for the next generation of clinical trials will be presented.

Long-term survival in locally advanced oral cavity cancer: an analysis of patients treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to be extremely active in head and neck cancer but has failed to give a statistically significant improvement in survival.

METHODS

From 1981 to 1994, 33 operable patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer received cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed in high-risk patients.

RESULTS

The overall clinical and pathologic complete response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 48% and 30%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 7.0 years (range, 0.3-15.3+ years), the 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 54.5% and 39.5%, and the disease-specific median survival was 6.6 years for all patients (8.3 and 2.3 years for stages III and IV, respectively). The univariate analysis showed a positive relationship between survival and male sex (p = .05), pathologic (p = .02), and clinical (p = .03) complete response. The Cox proportional hazard regression model confirmed the independent prognostic value of the clinical response with a 4.67 (95% CI, 1.70-12.86) hazard ratio. A second primary tumor occurred in six patients (18%), with a median of occurrence of 9 years (range, 7-11 years).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the prolonged survival expectancy largely exceeding 5 years for selected patients with stage IV and for most with stage III locally advanced oral cavity cancer achieving a clinical and/or pathologic complete response to chemotherapy.

Phase I and initial phase II results from a trial investigating weekly docetaxel and carboplatin given neoadjuvantly and then concurrently with concomitant boost radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The current Phase I/II study assessed induction docetaxel/carboplatin given weekly for 4 weeks, followed by weekly docetaxel/carboplatin and concomitant boost radiotherapy (CB-XRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty patients with Stage III or IV (M0) disease of the oropharynx, supraglottic larynx, or hypopharynx were enrolled. Patients initially received docetaxel 20 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2 weekly x 4. Patients with stable (SD) or responding disease subsequently received dose-escalated docetaxel (10-20 mg/m2 in sequential patient cohorts) and carboplatin AUC 1 weekly x 5 with CB-XRT (1.8 gray [Gy] every day x 15 days, followed by 1.8/1.5 Gy twice per day x 13 days).

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable, and 15 patients (5 patients with Stage III disease, 10 patients with Stage IV disease) completed all planned therapy. The target docetaxel dose level of 20 mg/m(2) weekly with radiotherapy was achieved with no dose-limiting toxicities. The most frequent maximum toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were Grade 3 mucositis, dysphagia, and/or pain. Primary site responses after induction included 4 patients with partial responses, 11 patients with SD, and 5 patients with disease progression. Fifteen patients (75%) continued to receive chemoradiotherapy, with 14 patients attaining a complete response (CR). Overall, a clinicopathologic neck CR after chemoradiotherapy was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. One patient had persistent primary disease and underwent salvage surgery, whereas another died of unrelated causes before neck assessment. Thirteen patients remain free of any disease event, with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 3-29 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen was feasible, safe, and particularly well tolerated. Early Phase II outcomes revealed promising activity in patients completing all treatment. Initial induction response results suggested that further investigation of this regimen with more aggressive induction therapy is warranted.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil before concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck versus concomitant chemoradiotherapy: a phase II feasibility study

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CHT-RT) compared with the same CHT-RT regimen alone in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We treated 24 patients (20 men and 4 women) who had Stage III-IVM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, or hypopharynx. The median patient age was 59 years (range, 41-73 years). The stage distribution was as follows: Stage II, 1 patient; Stage III, 6 patients; and Stage IV, 17; 18 patients had a performance status of 0 and 6 had a performance status of 1. None had undergone previous CHT or RT. Group 1 underwent three cycles of CHT (carboplatin area under the curve 1.5 on Days 1-4 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)/d continuous infusion for 96 h) starting on Days 1, 22, and 43 during RT (one daily fraction, 66-70 Gy within 33-35 fractions). Group 2 underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant TPF (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/d continuous infusion for 96 h) followed by the same CHT-RT regimen.

RESULTS

After the first 16 patients, 8 in Group 1 and 8 in Group 2, the concomitant CHT-RT schedule was modified. The limiting toxicity observed during concomitant CHT-RT was similar in Groups 1 and 2, independent of neoadjuvant TPF administration. An excess of G3-G4 mucositis and other relevant toxicity that did not allowing completion of CHT-RT without interruption occurred in 44% of the patients. A reduction of at least one cycle of concurrent CHT was required in 31% of patients. On the basis of these data, the next 8 patients (Group 3) received three cycles of neoadjuvant TPF followed by two cycles only of CHT (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1-4 and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/d continuous infusion for 96 h) (PF) during Weeks 1 and 6 of the planned 7 weeks of RT. In Group 3, 25% of the patients developed World Health Organization G3-G4 mucositis. No World Health Organization hematologic G3-G4 toxicity was seen. RT interruption was required for 2 patients (25%). In 1 patient (12%), one cycle of CHT was omitted. During neoadjuvant TPF (Groups 2 and 3), the principal toxicities were G3-G4 neutropenia (37.5%) and G2 mucositis (44%). At the end of therapy, the CR rate was 62.5% for CHT-RT alone (Group 1) and 80% for neoadjuvant TPF followed by CHT-RT (Groups 2 and 3).

CONCLUSION

Three cycles of neoadjuvant TPF followed by two cycles of PF during RT are feasible without limiting toxicity. Three cycles of TPF were well tolerated and did not compromise subsequent concomitant CHT-RT. A randomized multicenter Phase III study has been started with the aim of comparing two cycles of PF during RT as standard treatment vs. the experimental arm with three cycles of neoadjuvant TPF followed by two cycles of PF during RT.

The expanding role of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has evolved greatly in the last two decades, owing to the integration of chemotherapy, advances in radiotherapeutic techniques, and organ-preserving surgery. Several randomized trials have established new standards of care that should be adopted. Current efforts are building on these earlier trials in order to improve survival and quality of life. Coincident with this, investigators are developing molecularly targeted approaches that hold promise for the future. This review will focus on current therapy for locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic SCCHN and discuss controversies and directions for future research.

Chemotherapy in the Management of Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Organ Transplant Recipients: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

BACKGROUND

The use of chemotherapy in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) with advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains relatively unexplored in dermatology. Advances in the use of chemotherapy in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) may be applicable to this increasingly common disease.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether recent advances in the role of chemotherapy in the management of HNSCC and cutaneous SCC offer insights into treatment strategies for metastatic cutaneous SCC.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature pertaining to treatment of advanced and metastatic HNSCC and cutaneous SCC, with particular attention to the role of chemotherapy. In addition, specialists in the fields of cutaneous oncology and dermatologic surgery, head and neck surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology were consulted for expert multidisciplinary advice.

RESULTS

Specific roles for chemotherapy in the management of advanced and cutaneous HNSCC are discussed and summarized. In addition, we propose theoretical analogies in the treatment of advanced and metastatic cutaneous SCC in OTRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The head and neck surgery and oncology literature is rich with experience in locoregionally advanced and metastatic HNSCC, and adaptation of management concepts may prove feasible in the management of OTRs with advanced and metastatic cutaneous SCC.

Induction paclitaxel, carboplatin, and infusional 5-FU followed by concurrent radiation therapy and weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of a novel combined-modality treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, community-based phase 11 study, 123 previously untreated patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck received 6 weeks of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent high-dose radiation therapy and weekly chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy included paclitaxel (200 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion) on days 1 and 22, carboplatin (AUC 6.0 i.v.) on days 1 and 22, and 5-fluorouracil (225 mg/m2 per day, 24-hour continuous i.v. infusion) on days 1-43. After 1 week without therapy, radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days weekly, to a total dose of 68.4 Gy, was administered to the primary site and the bilateral cervical lymph nodes. During radiation therapy, patients also received six weekly doses of paclitaxel (50 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion) and carboplatin (AUC 1.0 i.v). After completion of therapy, patients were restaged with computed tomographic and endoscopic examination; patients in complete remission were followed up without further treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients (74% with stage IV disease) entered this trial, and 111 patients (90%) completed the entire treatment course. Seventy of 116 evaluable patients (60%; 95% Cl, 51%-69%)had a clinical complete response to treatment. After a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-and 3-year actuarial survivals were 66% and 51%, respectively. Local toxicity was moderately severe during combined-modality therapy; however, xerostomia has been the only frequent chronic toxicity of this program.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel combined-modality treatment program, containing paclitaxel and avoiding the use of cisplatin, is feasible, is highly active, and can be administered with acceptable toxicity in a community-based setting. Aggressive nutritional support should be considered in patients receiving this regimen, to improve acute palliation and to maximize the delivery of combined-modality therapy. Further evaluation of this treatment program is warranted. Incorporation of various novel biologic agents, particularly the epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists, may further improve efficacy.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation-induced regression of advanced cervical lymphadenopathy in head and neck cancer as a predictor of outcome

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation (ICCR)-induced advanced neck disease regression could predict outcome, especially the need for complete neck dissection in patients with N2-3 stage IV head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

A retrospective study of 339 patients evaluated for treatment of stage IV HNC during the years 1988 to 1997 revealed 36 individuals with N2-3 cervical lymphadenopathy who were treated with ICCR. Responses to treatment, patterns of failure, and survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Primary and regional tumor regressions were complete in 21 patients (58%), partial in 9 (25%), and absent in 6 (17%); the corresponding local failure rates were 5%, 44%, and 33% (P < 0.02). The regional failure rates were 24%, 89%, and 83%, respectively (P < 0.001); distant failure rates were 10%, 0%, and 0% (P > 0.99). The estimated 2-year survival rates for complete and partial/nonresponders were 57% and 20%, respectively (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced regional metastases of HNC who respond completely to ICCR have an excellent chance for survival. However, such ICCR-induced complete regression of regional tumor cannot reliably predict ultimate neck disease control.

Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer using the histoculture drug response assay

BACKGROUND

Chemoresponse is a significant outcome predictor in patients with head and neck cancer, regardless of the treatment modality used. The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) has been shown to be a reliable method for in vitro chemoresponse assessment. In this study, we have correlated the HDRA assessment with survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHOD

Tumor specimens from 41 of 42 patients undergoing treatment for HNSCC were successfully evaluated by the HDRA. Tumor tissue was histocultured on Gelfoam sponges gel in 24-well plates, followed by treatment with cisplatin (15 microg/mL) or 5-fluorouracil (40 microg/mL) in triplicate. A control group received no drug treatment. After completion of drug treatment, the relative cell survival in the tumors was determined using the MTT assay. The inhibition rate (IR) for each drug was calculated relative to the control for each case, and sensitivity was defined as a tumor IR of greater than 30%. Treatment was based on established protocols for the location and stage of the tumor and included surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Survival comparisons were performed using the generalized Wilcoxon test for the comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Resistance to 5-fluorouracil was present in 13 cases (32%), to cisplatinum in 13 cases (32%), and to both agents in 11 cases (27%). The 2-year cause-specific survival was significantly greater for patients sensitive to 5-fluorouracil (85% vs 64%; p =.04), cisplatinum (86% vs 64%; p =.05), or both agents (85% vs 63%; p =.01). The association between HDRA assessment of chemoresponse and clinical outcome remained significant even after controlling for the effects of TNM stage and the presence of recurrent cancer at presentation by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemosensitivity determined by the HDRA seems to be a strong predictor of survival in patients with advanced HNSCC and should be considered further.

Phase I/II trial of outpatient docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (opTPFL) as induction for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

The purpose of this study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel in an outpatient docetaxel (T), cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (F), and leucovorin (L) (opTPFL) regimen and to obtain preliminary assessment of opTPFL efficacy. Thirty-four patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with opTPFL. Docetaxel was escalated from 60 to 95 mg/m(2) in combination with 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin intravenous bolus, and 2,800 mg/m(2) 5-FU continuous infusion and 2,000 mg/m(2) leucovorin continuous infusion with prophylactic growth factors and antibiotics. Patients who achieved a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response to three cycles received definitive twice-daily radiation therapy. A total of 97 cycles were administered to 34 patients. The major acute toxicities were neutropenia and mucositis. The MTD of docetaxel was 90 mg/m(2) . Seventy-seven of 97 cycles of were administered on an outpatient basis. The overall clinical response rate to opTPFL was 94%, with 44% CRs and 50% PRs. The MTD of opTPFL is 90 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Outpatient administration of opTPFL is tolerable, feasible, and does not alter the ability to administer definitive radiation therapy on schedule.

Pilot trial of concomitant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and split-course radiotherapy for very advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

PURPOSE

The combination of chemotherapy and irradiation is considered the standard of care for the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). Paclitaxel has shown a single-agent activity in SCCHN. Besides, this drug is a promising radiosensitizer for some human solid tumors. This is a phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of paclitaxel administered concurrently with split-course radiotherapy in advanced unresectable SCCHN. Methods and Materials Thirty-one patients with advanced SCCHN were enrolled in this trial. Radiotherapy consisted of 66 to 70 Gy delivered over 8 to 10 weeks to the primary tumor and lymphatic drainage, with a fractionation scheme of 1.8 to 2 Gy/field/d. After the initial five patients were treated, a 1-week treatment break was introduced. Paclitaxel was administered weekly in a 1-hour intravenous infusion at a projected dosage of 45 mg/m(2)/wk.

RESULTS

The complete and partial response rates, based on a 4-week postradiation evaluation were 43.3% and 40%, respectively, with an overall response rate of 83.3%. Median survival was 49.4 weeks, and 1-year survival was 48%. Freedom from local progression was 65.6% at 1 year. Thirty-six percent and 20% of the patients are alive and disease free at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Grade 3/4 of acute toxicity consisted mostly of mucositis, cutaneous reaction, and weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel concurrent with radiotherapy seems to be active in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In the regimen selected for this trial, toxicity was significant and led to a prolongation of treatment time.

Combined interferon-alfa, 13-cis-retinoic acid, and alpha-tocopherol in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: novel bioadjuvant phase II trial

PURPOSE

Retinoids and interferons (IFNs) have single-agent and synergistic combined effects in modulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in vitro and clinical activity in vivo in the head and neck and other sites. Alpha-tocopherol has chemopreventive activity in the head and neck and may decrease 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cRA) toxicity. We designed the present phase II adjuvant trial to prevent recurrence or second primary tumors (SPTs) using 13-cRA, IFN-alpha, and alpha-tocopherol in locally advanced-stage head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After definitive local treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, or both, patients with locally advanced SCCHN were treated with 13-cRA (50 mg/m(2)/d, orally, daily), IFN-alpha (3 x 10(6) IU/m(2), subcutaneous injection, three times a week), and alpha-tocopherol (1,200 IU/d, orally, daily) for 12 months, with a dose modification. Screening for recurrence or SPTs was performed every 3 months.

RESULTS

Tumors of 11 (24%) of the 45 treated patients were stage III, and 34 (76%) were stage IV. Thirty-eight (86%) of 44 patients completed the full 12-month treatment (doses modified as needed). Toxicity generally was consistent with previous IFN and 13-cRA reports and included mild to moderate mucocutaneous and flu-like symptoms; occasional significant fatigue (grade 3 in 7% of patients), mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia in 30% of patients who continued treatment along with antilipid therapy, and mild hematologic side effects. Six patients did not complete the planned treatment because of intolerable toxicity or social problems. At a median 24-months of follow-up, our clinical end point rates were 9% for local/regional recurrence (four patients), 5% for local/regional recurrence and distant metastases (two patients), and 2% for SPT (one patient), which was acute promyelocytic leukemia (ie, not of the upper aerodigestive tract). Median 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival were 98% and 91%, respectively, and of disease-free survival were 91% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The novel biologic agent combination of IFN-alpha, 13-cRA, and alpha-tocopherol was generally well tolerated and promising as adjuvant therapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. We are currently conducting a phase III randomized study of this combination (v no treatment) to confirm these phase II study results.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to hyperfractionation (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT) offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT given alone in locally advanced (stages III and IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty patients were randomized to receive either Hfx RT alone to a tumor dose of 77 Gy in 70 fractions in 35 treatment days over 7 weeks (group I, n = 65) or the same Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose (6 mg/m(2)) daily CDDP (group II, n = 65).

RESULTS

Hfx RT/chemotherapy offered significantly higher survival rates than Hfx RT alone (68% v 49% at 2 years and 46% v 25% at 5 years; P =.0075). It also offered higher progression-free survival (46% v 25% at 5 years; P =.0068), higher locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (50% v 36% at 5 years; P =.041), and higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (86% v 57% at 5 years; P =.0013). However, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of either acute or late high-grade RT-induced toxicity. Hematologic high-grade toxicity was more frequent in group II patients.

CONCLUSION

As compared with Hfx RT alone, Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CDDP offered a survival advantage, as well as improved LRPFS and DMFS.

Radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin in management of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas

Radiation therapy in combination with chemotherapy in the management of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas is evaluated in an attempt to improve locoregional response, reduce locoregional failure and reduce systemic failure. The current study was designed to investigate radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin in this context. From 1992 through 1997, 70 patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas were treated with radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin. External beam radiation dose was 60 Gy for T1, T2 and T3 tumors, 70 Gy for T4 tumors and 70 Gy for metastatic cervical lymph nodes. An intracavitary brachytherapy boost (10 Gy) was applied for T1, T2 and T3 tumors. Cisplatin (30 mg/m2) was administered weekly during external beam radiation therapy. Locoregional complete response was achieved in 63 patients, locoregional failure was observed in 4 patients and systemic failure was observed in 15. N-stage predicted systemic failure. Overall survival, locoregional failure-free survival and systemic failure-free survival were 63%, 79% and 75%, respectively, at three years. Grade 3 acute skin toxicity was observed in 2 patients, Grade 3 acute mucous membrane toxicity was observed in 6 and Grade 3 acute hematological toxicity was observed in 2 patients. Despite improved locoregional response, reduced locoregional failure and improved survival with radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin, systemic failure remains prevalent for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas.

p53 gene status as a predictor of tumor response to induction chemotherapy of patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

PURPOSE

To determine whether p53 gene status predicts tumor responses to platinum- and fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tumor responses of 105 patients were measured at the primary tumor site. Objective response and major response were defined by a 50% and 80% reduction in tumor size, respectively. All coding parts of p53 gene were directly sequenced. p53 expression in tumor cells was determined by immunohistochemistry. Human papillomavirus infection was detected by polymerase chain reaction. Odd ratios were adjusted by stepwise logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

p53 mutations, p53 expression, and tumor stage were sufficient to explain the variation in tumor responses to chemotherapy in multivariate models. p53 mutation was the only variable to significantly predict objective response (odds ratio, 0. 23; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.57; P =.002) and was the strongest predictor of major response (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.74; P =.006). p53 expression (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.98) and tumor stage (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.96) also predicted major response. Specific mutations (contact mutations) accounted for much of the reduction in the risk of major response associated with overall mutations. In complementary analyses, p53 expression was weakly predictive of major response in the subgroup with wild-type p53, and p53 mutations also predicted histologic response.

CONCLUSION

p53 gene mutations are strongly associated with a poor risk of both objective and major responses to chemotherapy. Contact mutations are associated with the lowest risk of major response to chemotherapy.

Medical oncology in the management of head and neck cancers

General approaches and therapeutic goals of medical oncology for head and neck cancer are presented. The effectiveness of chemotherapy for the treatment of different stages of head and neck cancer in specific anatomic sites is discussed, as well as complications associated with chemotherapy, and approaches to the prevention and management of these stages. Systemic side effects that may occur with specific therapeutic agents are presented in a tabular format. Future directions and evolving approaches to head and neck cancer therapy are summarized.

Phase I trial of retinoic acid and cis-platinum for advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck based on experimental evidence of drug synergism

OBJECTIVE

Cis-platinum and 13-cis-retinoic acid have received much attention in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Even though they have different mechanisms of action, little information is available on their interaction. This paper reviews experimental evidence for retinoic acid-cis-platinum synergy and presents toxicity data from patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell cancer participating in a phase I trial combining 13-cis-retinoic acid and cis-platinum.

METHODS

Patients were given 13-cis-retinoic acid orally daily for 7 days before and daily during high-dose (150 mg/m2 per week for 4 weeks) intraarterial cis-platinum treatment with concurrent radiation. Toxicity was scored with use of the cancer and leukemia group B scale.

RESULTS

In the phase I clinical trial, 15 patients were treated to determine a maximum tolerated dosage for 13-cis-retinoic acid of 20 mg/day. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was dose limiting in 3 of 8 patients treated with 40 mg/day and in 1 patient treated with 60 mg/day. There were no deaths caused by toxicity; 12 of the 15 patients received all four weekly doses and the remaining 3 received three doses. Of 10 patients with fully evaluable data, all achieved a complete response at the primary site and 9 had a complete response in the neck. One patient had persistent neck disease after chemoradiation, and this tumor was removed with neck dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

13-Cis-retinoic acid and cis-platinum are strongly synergistic against head and neck squamous cell cancer in vitro. Pretreatment with retinoic acid results in stronger synergy than concurrent drug exposure alone. Preliminary clinical experience with combined retinoic acid and cis-platinum in a design that parallels the in vitro study indicates that toxicity is acceptable with 13-cis-retinoic acid dosages of 20 mg/day in a high-dose-intensity intraarterial chemoradiation regimen.

The role of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

We studied the effect of cytoreductive chemotherapy in head and neck cancer and analyzed it in terms of efficacy, remission rates, and duration, as well effect on survival. Single-agent chemotherapy, which formerly was used as a palliative therapy in recurrent and metastatic disease, had little affect on survival. More recently, multi-agent chemotherapy trials have shown significantly higher response rates, but this success has not translated into an added survival benefit. These findings led to the introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy into the induction (neoadjuvant) clinical setting. In these clinical circumstances, better objective response rates were found, particularly in the previously untreated patient. Although this therapy has resulted in better control of local disease, the impact on survival is not yet clear. Adjuvant chemotherapy is most useful in patients who have a high risk of relapse. Therapy appears to decrease its incidence, particularly at distant sites. Finally, chemoradiation trials have shown that this treatment provides a survival advantage, but at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity.

Preoperative simultaneous chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx

Combined chemoradiotherapy (CT/RT) treatments appear to yield better results for advanced tumours of the head and neck than do conventional therapies. In the present study, CT/RT was used preoperatively in unresectable tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Forty patients were entered prospectively into a phase II study. Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-day infusion of fluorouracil (FU), and the addition of simultaneous radiotherapy (30 Gy) from the second to third cycles. Patients with resectable residual disease or complete clinical response underwent surgery. All patients later received a second phase of irradiation (30 Gy) and two cycles of chemotherapy only in responders. During the first phase of treatment, 22 (55%) patients presented mucositis grades III-IV. Mean weight loss was 7%. Twelve patients were admitted for parenteral nutrition. Thirty-six (90%) patients obtained clinical response, which was complete in 15 (37%). Thirty-two of the 40 underwent surgery. The percentage of pathologic complete responses (PCR) was 35% (14 patients). With a median follow-up of 21 months, the median survival of patients was 23 months, and 19 (47%) of them are disease-free. A high PCR rate was attained with this treatment regimen. Toxicity was significant, but tolerable with adequate support measures.

Intensive short cause chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We designed a protocol with the goal of improving the disease free and overall survival of patients with previously untreated Stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NP(C)). The regimen consisted of intensive induction chemotherapy followed shortly thereafter by radiation therapy.

METHODS

Between March 1986 and March 1992, 27 patients with T3-4, N2-3, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx were treated with 2 cycles of chemotherapy, using cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 intravenously, on Day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1000 mg/m2 per day continuous infusion, on Days 2-5. The second cycle was given on Day 16 and was followed by radiotherapy (RT), 70 Gray, given on Day 31.

RESULTS

The objective response rate to chemotherapy was 93%, with a 37% complete response (CR) rate and a 56% partial response (PR) rate. The overall CR rate after RT was 85%. With a median follow-up of 60 months, the overall actuarial survival rate was 66%. Patients who had a CR after chemotherapy had a superior survival probability (100%). Toxicity was tolerable, without lethal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy given in an intensive schedule and followed shortly thereafter by radical RT can improve the CR rate and survival of patients with locally advanced NPC, with tolerable toxicity.

Concurrent radiotherapy and continuous ambulatory infusion 5-fluorouracil in advanced head and neck cancer

Patients with locally advanced stage 3 or 4 recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 or 300 mg/m2/day by prolonged ambulatory infusion concomitantly with radiotherapy (60-66 Gy) to the primary site and neck nodes in 30-33 fractions at five fractions per week, boosting to smaller volumes after 60 Gy. Of 39 patients, the complete response rate was 82% (95% CI: 67-93%). The estimated percentage without failure at 2 years was 59% (S.E. 8%) and at 4 years was 50% (S.E. 8%). Estimated head and neck cancer specific survival was 64% (S.E. 8%) at 2 years and 52% (S.E. 8%) at 4 years. Acute toxicities included moist desquamation in 49% and dry desquamation in 28%, confluent mucositis in 56% and patchy mucositis in 44%. Late effects, more than 6 months after completing treatment, assessed in 35 patients, included severe salivary dysfunction in 3 patients and moderate in 21, severe osteonecrosis in 4 patients and moderate toxicity in subcutaneous tissues in 13, skin in 3 and mucosa in 2 patients. It is feasible to give continuous 5-FU concurrently with radiotherapy in locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer, albeit with increased toxicity. The response rate and survival obtained in this trial justify further investigation of the combined treatment in a randomised trial.

Chemotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: the future is now

In 1996, there is an established role for chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Patients with recurrent disease will be offered combination chemotherapy. In this setting, investigations of new drugs or combinations and the pursuit of concomitant chemo-reirradiation are of interest. In patients with locoregionally advanced disease, induction chemotherapy can be used with the goal of larynx preservation. In addition, a role for chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer appears to be emerging with increased survival as therapeutic goal. The combination of cisplatin and 5-FU does not need to be tested further, however, a more definitive evaluation of a biochemically modulated PF regimen might be of interest. Furthermore, induction chemotherapy represents an ideal investigational tool in which to further evaluate the activity of several new drugs in head and neck cancer patients. Finally, concomitant chemoradiotherapy has resulted in increased survival in several randomized clinical studies. Given the poor outcome of standard radiotherapy in patients with unresectable disease, we favor the administration of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in this group of patients as a standard therapy. In our opinion, the use of radiation therapy alone in this group of patients should be restricted to patients with poor performance status or other high medical risks that render the administration of chemotherapy unadvisable. Finally, given the high incidence of second malignancies and general medical complications in cured head and neck cancer patients, studies of chemoprevention and good preventive medical care by a medical oncologist should be made available to all patients.

Split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy and concomitant cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

The feasibility and activity of an intensive chemoradiotherapeutic scheme for patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancers were tested in a single institution Phase II pilot study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1990 and February 1992, 40 patients were entered into this trial. The treatment protocol consisted of split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (SHART), 1.6 Gy per fraction given twice per day to a total dose of 64-67.2 Gy for a total of 6 weeks with a 2-week gap, and cisplatin (20 mg/sqm/Days 1 to 5, in continuous perfusion) concomitantly.

RESULTS

All of the 40 patients are evaluable for response and survival. Toxicity was significant, but tolerable. A complete tumor response to this treatment was achieved by 37 patients (92.5%). With a minimal follow-up of 22 months (median 30 months) there have been 16 local relapses and 19 patients have died, 2 without tumor. The projected 2- and 3-year overall survival rates are 64% (confidence interval (CI) 95%, 49-79%) and 47%, respectively. The 2-year local control probability has been 56% (CI 95%, 39-73%).

CONCLUSION

This treatment obtains a high rate of complete responses with increased acute toxicity but tolerable late effects. Preliminary results are encouraging for laryngeal neoplasms. A longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact of this treatment on patient survival.

Pre versus post-operative radiotherapy of resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The literature on pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) vs. post-operative RT in patients with advanced, resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is reviewed and the theoretical arguments for and against the two different modalities discussed. It was possible to identify eleven reports published during the last four decades (1965-91) evaluating different aspects of pre- vs. post-operative RT given at comparable dose levels. Two reports were of prospective, randomised clinical studies and nine of retrospective comparisons. Together, the eleven studies comprised 1,358 patients (326 in prospective studies). The bulk of the evidence clearly suggests post-operative loco-regional control to be superior to pre-operative RT. However, this seems to be offset by the subsequent development of distant metastases or metachronous tumours.

Concurrent cis-platinum and radiation with or without surgery for advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of concurrent cis-platinum and radiation in patients with advanced head and neck cancer and to determine if patients responding to the preoperative regimens may be cured without radical surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and one patients with potentially operable Stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy fractions and continuous infusion cis-platinum 20 mg/m2 over 24 h on days 1 through 4 and 22 through 25 of the radiation schedule. Three to 4 weeks later, radical surgery of the primary site and neck dissections for patients presenting with cervical adenopathy was undertaken or if a complete response had been achieved, continued with radiation to 72 Gy with another course of concurrent continuous infusion cis-platinum.

RESULT

Complete and partial responses were achieved in 92% of the primary sites and 95% of the nodes. Over 80% of the patients were rendered tumor free at surgery after only the initial course of chemotherapy and radiation. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities from chemotherapy and radiation. Ninety-five percent of the patients who initiated treatment completed it. With a median follow-up of 41 months for all patients, 49% of the patients have survived disease free up to 9 years, independent of whether or not their primary tumors were resected or were treated definitively by further chemotherapy sensitized radiation. The disease-specific survival is 78% after 3 years with no local failures thereafter.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that continuous infusion cis-platinum administered concurrently with radiotherapy can improve survival in advanced head and neck cancer. Patients responding to the preoperative regimen may be cured without radical surgery, which can be reserved for salvage.

Evidence-based recommendations against neoadjuvant chemotherapy for routine management of patients with squamous cell head and neck cancer

The objective of this study was to determine appropriate recommendations for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC). Published reports of randomized trials of neoadjuvant versus standard therapy in patients with stage III and stage IV HNC were identified by literature search. The overall trial results were analyzed using three pooling techniques: vote count, weighted median survival, and meta-analysis of published survival data. Excluded from analysis were articles on intra-arterial therapy, studies without a standard treatment control arm, studies that included adjuvant therapy, and abstracts. Twelve studies were evaluable for vote count, 11 for weighted median survival analysis, and 10 for quantitative meta-analysis. By vote count there was no observed survival difference in 7 trials, a trend favoring control in 3, a statistically significant difference favoring control in 1, and a trend favoring neoadjuvant therapy in 1. The weighted median survival was 20.9 months for control versus 20.0 months for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with consistent trends for resectable and nonresectable disease and for chemotherapy combinations versus single agents. The common odds ratios for deaths at 12, 24, and 36 months were 1.12, 1.27, and 1.11, respectively, all in favor of control treatment. Data generated using rigorous methodological standards indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy should not be offered to patients with locally advanced HNC if improved survival is the outcome of interest. It is premature to recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy to preserve organ function, although patients should be aware of this option and the limitations of the current data.

Cisplatin and radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

This manuscript traces the results of combined modality head and neck cancer trials, with reference to survival and rates of local-regional control and distant metastases, that have led to current Phase III trials testing concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The toxicity, local control rates, and survival results of pilot trials and small randomized trials using concomitant cisplatin based chemotherapy and radiotherapy are reviewed.

RESULTS

Enhanced mucosal toxicity and myelosuppression occur which affect patient compliance and tolerance of planned chemotherapy, but do not appear to affect delivery of standard fractionation radiotherapy. The encouraging results of single agent cisplatin and radiotherapy trials and those using cisplatin-5-FU and split course radiotherapy have led to the activation of three randomized Head and Neck Intergroup trials. These trials are for Stage III & IV carcinoma of the nasopharynx, Stage III & IV resectable carcinoma of the larynx (organ preservation) and Stage III & IV unresectable carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx.

CONCLUSION

The three Intergroup study designs should allow for a definitive evaluation of concomitant treatment.

Chemotherapy of head and neck cancer

Numerous studies have shown cisplatin-based chemotherapy to be effective in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most frequently used combination regimen, but neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, and renal toxicity limit repeated dosing (for long-term treatment of responding patients) and dose intensification. In studies to date, the analogue carboplatin appears to have activity similar to cisplatin, the advantage of no significant neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, or renal toxicity, and less emetic potential. Two randomized trials have shown cisplatin/5-FU and carboplatin/5-FU superior in terms of response rate compared to single-agent therapy. Treatment with combinations of carboplatin/methotrexate and carboplatin/cisplatin is feasible, but myelosuppression is dose-limiting. As an induction regimen, carboplatin/5-FU yields response rates similar to cisplatin/5-FU. Overall, carboplatin has a more favorable toxicity profile for treating head and neck cancer patients who often have multiple medical problems when presenting for palliation of cancer. Reversible myelosuppression is dose-limiting. However, the availability of hematopoietic growth factors may allow investigators to safely intensify dosing, particularly in combined-modality curative treatment regimens for the newly diagnosed patient.