Atypical Pneumonia

Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated diffuse alveolar haemorrhage: an atypical presentation of a prevalent pathogen

A transgender man in his late teens presented with signs of multisystem disease, including hepatitis, mucositis and bone marrow suppression. He later developed dyspnoea, leucocytosis and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph. He was treated for community-acquired pneumonia. After several days of treatment, he developed hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to bronchoscopy-confirmed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH). The differential diagnosis and workup were extensive, and he was ultimately treated with intravenous steroids and five sessions of plasmapheresis for a presumed autoimmune aetiology. Investigations were remarkable only for elevated IgM and IgG to Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP). This case represents a rare presentation of multisystem disease secondary to MP in adults. Clinicians should consider Mycoplasma infection in cases of multisystem disease and observe for DAH even after initiation of appropriate therapy.

Community-Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae: How Physical and Radiological Examination Contribute to Successful Diagnosis

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is one of the most common causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), particularly in young adults. Vital signs are usually normal except for temperature. On physical examination, general appearance is normal compared with that of typical pneumonia such as pneumococcal pneumonia patients. Mycoplasma sometimes causes ear infections such as otitis media. It is important to distinguish between typical pneumonia and atypical pneumonia such as mycoplasma pneumonia because having the right diagnosis allows for the use of the correct antibiotic to treat CAP while preventing development of drug-resistant bacteria and also decreasing medical cost. The symptoms and diagnosis of mycoplasma pneumonia is multi-fold. Auscultation of patients can demonstrate trace late inspiratory crackles or normal alveolar sounds; however, bilateral polyphonic wheezes can sometimes be heard because of bronchiolitis. With regard to radiological findings, a chest radiogragh often shows bilateral reticulonodular or patchy consolidation in both lower lobes. Pleural effusion is rarely observed in adult cases. Immunocompetent patients tend to reveal more extensive shadowing compared with immunocompromised patients. As serological diagnostic methods are not able to offer 100% reliable diagnosis, integration of physical and radiological examination is crucial to accurately diagnose mycoplasma pneumonia. Herein, I review the typical findings from physical examination and imaging patterns of patients with mycoplasma pneumonia.

The atypical pneumonias: clinical diagnosis and importance

The most common atypical pneumonias are caused by three zoonotic pathogens, Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis), Francisella tularensis (tularemia), and Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), and three nonzoonotic pathogens, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Legionella. These atypical agents, unlike the typical pathogens, often cause extrapulmonary manifestations. Atypical CAPs are systemic infectious diseases with a pulmonary component and may be differentiated clinically from typical CAPs by the pattern of extrapulmonary organ involvement which is characteristic for each atypical CAP. Zoonotic pneumonias may be eliminated from diagnostic consideration with a negative contact history. The commonest clinical problem is to differentiate legionnaire's disease from typical CAP as well as from C. pneumoniae or M. pneumonia infection. Legionella is the most important atypical pathogen in terms of severity. It may be clinically differentiated from typical CAP and other atypical pathogens by the use of a weighted point system of syndromic diagnosis based on the characteristic pattern of extrapulmonary features. Because legionnaire's disease often presents as severe CAP, a presumptive diagnosis of Legionella should prompt specific testing and empirical anti-Legionella therapy such as the Winthrop-University Hospital Infectious Disease Division's weighted point score system. Most atypical pathogens are difficult or dangerous to isolate and a definitive laboratory diagnosis is usually based on indirect, i.e., direct flourescent antibody (DFA), indirect flourescent antibody (IFA). Atypical CAP is virtually always monomicrobial; increased IFA IgG tests indicate past exposure and not concurrent infection. Anti-Legionella antibiotics include macrolides, doxycycline, rifampin, quinolones, and telithromycin. The drugs with the highest level of anti-Legionella activity are quinolones and telithromycin. Therapy is usually continued for 2 weeks if potent anti-Legionella drugs are used. In adults, M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae may exacerbate or cause asthma. The importance of the atypical pneumonias is not related to their frequency (approximately 15% of CAPs), but to difficulties in their diagnosis, and their nonresponsiveness to beta-lactam therapy. Because of the potential role of C. pneumoniae in coronary artery disease and multiple sclerosis (MS), and the role of M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae in causing or exacerbating asthma, atypical CAPs also have public health importance.

Empiric treatment of ambulatory community-acquired pneumonia: always include treatment for atypical agents

There are no data from proper studies to answer whether it is necessary to include antibiotics that are active against atypical pneumonia agents as part of the empiric therapy of CAP. Until such data are available, clinical judgment and severity of the pneumonic illness are the best guides to empiric antimicrobial therapy.

Tularemia and Q fever

The zoonotic infections caused by Francisella tularensis and Coxiella burnetii, tularemia and Q fever, respectively, are two less commonly encountered clinical illnesses that are becoming increasingly recognized as epidemiologically important human diseases. The prevalence of tularemia and Q fever can be positively impacted by increased awareness of the clinical entities that arise from infection by these arthropod-borne organisms. Improved recognition of these clinical syndromes will lead to greater diagnostic accuracy in recognizing these diseases in patients. Ultimately, more stringent measures to prevent infection may be required, through raising public awareness, since current therapeutic regimens for these two diseases are limited, and knowledge of the pathogenesis of these two organisms are still in developing stages.

The emerging role of atypical pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) constitutes a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the bacterium most commonly implicated in CAP, the atypical respiratory pathogens Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella species, and Chlamydia pneumoniae are being isolated with increasing frequency Contrary to previous beliefs, these agents are capable of causing severe as well as mild-to-moderate illness. Moreover, they can affect all age groups. Indeed, atypical pathogens are implicated in up to 40% of CAP cases and commonly occur as copathogens in mixed-infection CAP, an etiology associated with particularly high mortality (up to 25%). Laboratory methods for detecting atypical pathogens are slow, and there is significant overlap between atypical and typical CAP manifestations. For these reasons, accurate prediction of etiology cannot be made purely on clinical or radiologic grounds. Consequently, empiric antimicrobial therapy for atypical pathogens (with agents such as macrolides, fluoroquinolones, in some cases tetracyclines, or the new ketolides) warrants careful consideration and now is recommended for the treatment of CAP.

The role of atypical pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia

The atypical pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia traditionally have included Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella spp. Recent studies documenting their epidemiology and clinical characteristics have shown that these organisms are indistinguishable from the pneumococcus. Furthermore, therapy no longer depends on the specific bacterial cause of community-acquired pneumonia. Etiologic diagnosis is still difficult, although new methods are becoming available. This article focuses on these issues and on why the term atypical is no longer meaningful.

The role of atypical pathogens: Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila in respiratory infection

Infections caused by M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, and Legionella spp. are important causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In the past decade, considerable new information has come to light concerning these organisms. Despite this, debate continues concerning the syndromic approach to CAP and the scientific merit of lumping these pathogens together. Because the etiologic diagnosis of these pathogens is established only in a minority of cases, the true prevalence tends to be underestimated. In clinical practice, these pathogens are often empirically treated. More rapid and cost-effective diagnostic techniques are needed so that the clinical course of patients with these infections can be better characterized.

Atypical pneumonias: therapeutic possibilities

The atypical pneumonia syndrome is characterized by systemic complaints rather than respiratory symptoms. The causative pathogens include Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Legionella and respiratory viruses (influenza, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus). The reported incidence of disease caused by these pathogens in community-acquired pneumonias varies from study to study. As most of these pathogens are intracellular, the antibiotics used in the treatment of atypical pneumonia are those able to penetrate into cells. Empirical antimicrobial therapy consists of macrolides (erythromycin or some of the newer agents such as roxithromycin, azithromycin or clarithromycin) or tetracyclines (e.g. doxycycline). In cases of severe legionellosis and in immunocompromised and critically-ill patients, the macrolides are sometimes given in combination with rifampicin. Promising alternatives are some of the newer fluoroquinolones (e.g. ofloxacin, pefloxacin) in the treatment of legionellosis.