Morphology of the ventricular septal defect in two types of interrupted aortic arch

Long-term Outcomes After Interrupted Aortic Arch Repair

BACKGROUND

Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is associated with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and DiGeorge syndrome. High-risk infantile surgery is required to address IAA, with limited data available on long-term outcomes. We used the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium, a multicenter US-based registry for pediatric cardiac interventions, to assess long-term outcomes after IAA repair by patient characteristics and surgical approach.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing IAA repair between 1982 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine associations with postdischarge deaths tracked by matching with the US National Death Index.

RESULTS

Of 390 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 309 (79.2%) survived to discharge. During a median follow-up of 23.6 years, 30-year survival reached 80.7% for patients surviving hospital discharge after initial IAA repair. Adjusted analysis revealed higher risk of death for type B vs type A (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.32; 95% CI, 1.48-7.44), staged repair (aHR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.14-5.50), and LVOTO interventions during initial hospitalization (aHR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.83-9.27) but not for LVOTO without need for interventions or presence of DiGeorge syndrome. There was a trend toward improved in-hospital and long-term survival over time during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged repair, type B IAA, and need for LVOTO intervention during initial hospitalization for repair are associated with high risk of death out to 30 years. Survival outcomes are improving, but further efforts need to minimize staged approach and risks associated with LVOTO relief procedures.

The Academic Impact of Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society (CHSS) Studies

PURPOSE

We reviewed all 64 articles ever published by The Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society (CHSS) Data Center to estimate the academic impact of these peer-reviewed articles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society has performed research based on 12 Diagnostic Inception Cohorts. The first cohort (Transposition) began enrolling patients on January 1, 1985. We queried PubMed to determine the number of publications that referenced each of the 64 journal articles generated by the datasets of the 12 Diagnostic Inception Cohorts that comprise the CHSS Database. Descriptive summaries of the data were tabulated using mean with standard deviation and median with range.

RESULTS

Sixty-four peer-reviewed papers have been published based on the CHSS Database. Fifty-nine peer-reviewed articles have been published based on the 12 Diagnostic Inception Cohorts, and five additional articles have been published based on Data Science. Excluding the recently established Diagnostic Inception Cohort for patients with Ebstein malformation of tricuspid valve, the number of papers published per cohort ranged from 1 for coarctation to 11 for transposition of the great arteries. The 11 articles generated from the CHSS Transposition Cohort were referenced by a total of 111 articles (median number of references per journal article = 9 [range = 0-22, mean = 10.1]). Overall, individual articles were cited by an average of 11 (mean), and a maximum of 41 PubMed-listed publications. Overall, these 64 peer-reviewed articles based on the CHSS Database were cited 692 times in PubMed-listed publications. The first CHSS peer-reviewed article was published in 1987, and during the 35 years from 1987 to 2022, inclusive, the annual number of CHSS publications has ranged from 0 to 7, with a mean of 1.8 publications per year (median = 1, mode = 1).

CONCLUSION

Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society studies are widely referenced in the pediatric cardiac surgical literature, with over 10 citations per published article. These cohorts provide unique information unavailable in other sources of data. A tool to access this analysis is available at: [https://data-center.chss.org/multimedia/files/2022/CAI.pdf].

Incremental History of the Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society (2014-2018)

The history of the first 41 years of the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society (CHSS) was recorded in 2015 which chronicled the metamorphosis of a small informal meeting into a mature organization with bylaws, officers, committees, funded research, the Kirklin-Ashburn Fellowship, and a vision to become the premier organization of congenital heart surgery in North America. Chief among these transformations was the implementation and development of the CHSS Data Center. Member participation, fellowship education, and significant outcomes research have been the hallmark of the CHSS. This incremental historical review highlights continued CHSS sentinel advances. Fifty-three CHSS Data Center manuscripts have been published. Citation scores (number of literature citations that each manuscript has accrued) have been collated and analyzed by cohort study. The average citation score for all manuscripts was 75.4 ± 76.3 (range: 1-333). The Kirklin/Ashburn Fellowship continues to thrive with academic achievements and generous contributions to the endowment. The World Journal of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery has been adopted as the official organ of the CHSS. A Past President’s Dinner has been inaugurated serving as a senior advisory committee to the Executive Council. Toronto Work Weekends continue. Congenital Heart Surgeons Society growth has accrued to 159 active members and 82 institutional members. Future considerations include the size, content, and duration of the annual meeting; the potential for increased membership; and political penetrance into national cardiothoracic governing organizations regarding committee appointments, executive council representation, and education initiatives. Congenital Heart Surgeons Society has achieved numerous advances during this incremental period.

Linking the congenital heart surgery databases of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society: part 1--rationale and methodology

PURPOSE

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS-CHSD) is the largest Registry in the world of patients who have undergone congenital and pediatric cardiac surgical operations. The Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society Database (CHSS-D) is an Academic Database designed for specialized detailed analyses of specific congenital cardiac malformations and related treatment strategies. The goal of this project was to create a link between the STS-CHSD and the CHSS-D in order to facilitate studies not possible using either individual database alone and to help identify patients who are potentially eligible for enrollment in CHSS studies.

METHODS

Centers were classified on the basis of participation in the STS-CHSD, the CHSS-D, or both. Five matrices, based on CHSS inclusionary criteria and STS-CHSD codes, were created to facilitate the automated identification of patients in the STS-CHSD who meet eligibility criteria for the five active CHSS studies. The matrices were evaluated with a manual adjudication process and were iteratively refined. The sensitivity and specificity of the original matrices and the refined matrices were assessed.

RESULTS

In January 2012, a total of 100 centers participated in the STS-CHSD and 74 centers participated in the CHSS. A total of 70 centers participate in both and 40 of these 70 agreed to participate in this linkage project. The manual adjudication process and the refinement of the matrices resulted in an increase in the sensitivity of the matrices from 93% to 100% and an increase in the specificity of the matrices from 94% to 98%.

CONCLUSION

Matrices were created to facilitate the automated identification of patients potentially eligible for the five active CHSS studies using the STS-CHSD. These matrices have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98%. In addition to facilitating identification of patients potentially eligible for enrollment in CHSS studies, these matrices will allow (1) estimation of the denominator of patients potentially eligible for CHSS studies and (2) comparison of eligible and enrolled patients to potentially eligible and not enrolled patients to assess the generalizability of CHSS studies.

Practical experience with databases for congenital heart disease: a registry versus an academic database

Increasingly, pooled data from multiple institutions are the source of published clinical results. A computerized database program is essential to compile and analyze clinical experience. The scope of data collection defines a database. Two types of databases, the registry and academic, are compared. In a registry database, some of the data are collected on all patients. The resources dedicated to data collection and entry are the practical limit to the extent of information in the database. The agreement on nomenclature for surgical diagnosis and procedure codes of congenital heart disease has paved the way for the development of a multi-institutional registry database. The registry database could provide a standard of care reference for early results after congenital heart surgery. The practical difficulty of data collection is obviated by limiting information to a basic minimum dataset. The academic database, in which all of the data are collected for a defined subset of patients, is designed to investigate a specific population of patients to generate new knowledge. It contains sufficient data to allow sophisticated statistical analysis to clarify the determinants of good and poor outcome, including early, mid- and long-term follow-up information. Multi-institutional pooling of detailed information derived from academic databases will be of increasing importance in generating new knowledge to foster improved therapy for patients with congenital heart disease.