Effects of short- and long-acting calcium channel blockers on the relationship between blood pressure and physical activity

The Effects of Physical Activity and Autonomic Nerve Tone on the Daily Fluctuation of Blood Pressure

The effects of daily activity and autonomic nerve tone on the fluctuation of ambulatory blood pressure were studied in hypertensive patients. The autonomic nerve tone was measured by frequency domain analysis of the RR interval. Physical activity was evaluated by a walk count, converted to a walk rate (WR), recorded using a digital Holter ECG fitted with an accelerometer, with simultaneous monitoring of blood pressure (Bp). Average values of the WR, H and L/H components were calculated for the 15 min. period just prior to Bp monitoring. The relationship between the average WR, H and L/H values and the Bp was determined by a linear regression analysis. Hypertension was classified into three types, autonomic nerve dominant (AN), exercise dominant (EX), and irregular (IR), based on a high correlation coefficient between Bp and either H or L/H (AN type), between Bp and WR (EX type), or no significant correlation between Bp and any of the parameters (IR type). Of the thirty hypertensive patients studied 11 were classified as AN, 12 as EX, and 7 as IR. Patients of the EX type had significantly lower Bp than patients in the other two classes. Furthermore, all of the IR type patients showed non-dipper type hypertension, suggesting that the Bp regulation mechanisms were impaired. The results suggest the significance of simultaneous monitoring of physical activity and autonomic nerve function at the time of Bp monitoring.

Effects of calcium antagonists in hypertensive patients with renal dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, parallel trial comparing benidipine and nifedipine

BACKGROUND

Although calcium antagonists, derived from dihydropyridine (DHP), are important agents in achieving control in a majority of patients with high blood pressure and renal disease, there are no comparative data regarding their inhibitory effects on the progression of renal dysfunction in Japan.

METHODS

Benidipine and nifedipine retard both calcium antagonists derived from DHP and were compared in terms of their inhibitory effect on the progression of renal dysfunction in hypertensive patients. The primary end-points were defined as 1.5 times the serum creatinine value at baseline, progression to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) necessitating dialysis or renal transplantation, and death.

RESULTS

During the study period, a significant decline in blood pressure was observed in the two groups, with no significant difference between them. The worsening of nephropathy was significantly inhibited in the benidipine group as compared with the nifedipine retard group (log-rank test: P = 0.014, Wilcoxon's test: P = 0.022). Among the subjects who reached a primary end-point, one (33%) in the benidipine group and five (50%) in the nifedipine retard group were placed on haemodialysis within 1 year.

CONCLUSION

It appears that benidipine inhibits the progression of hypertensive renal diseases more effectively than nifedipine retard.

Different coronary blood flow increase in left ventricular hypertrophy due to hypertension compared to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at elevated heart rate

Coronary vasodilator reserve (CVR) is reduced in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, it is not clear whether there is any difference between the coronary blood flow increase in LVH caused by hypertension (HTH) and that caused by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) when the heart rate increases. In this study, 16 subjects with HTH, 10 subjects with HCM, and 10 subjects with normotension (NT) were investigated. Average peak velocities at rest, at pacing, and at dilatation were measured using a Doppler catheter placed at the left descending coronary artery to calculate coronary blood flow (CBF) and CVR. CVR at rest was identical in the HTH and HCM groups, and in both cases was lower than the resting CVR in NT subjects. There were significant differences in the CVR values at a pacing rate of 120 beats/min among the groups. These values were lowest in HCM, highest in NT, and intermediary in HTH subjects. And the percent increase in CBF in HCM at that pacing rate was higher than that in HTH (p < 0.05) or NT (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the percent increase in CBF at this pacing rate between the HTH and NT groups. The effects of elevated heart rate on the percent increase in CBF were different between the HTH and HCM groups. We conclude that cardiac hypertrophy has qualitatively different effects on coronary circulation depending on whether patients have HTH or HCM.

Impact of circadian amplitude and chronotherapy: relevance to prevention and treatment of stroke

The long-acting calcium antagonist nifedipine reduces the incidence of stroke in Eastern Asia, as shown by the Shanghai Trial Of Nifedipine in the Elderly (STONE) and the Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) trials. Recent trials in Japan have shown that benidipine may be more efficient than the former drug in preventing strokes in the elderly. Benidipine, commonly prescribed in Japan for a definite depressor effect, reportedly without causing remarkable fluctuations in blood pressure (BP), is investigated herein from a chronobiological viewpoint. Eighteen subjects (nine women and nine men, 39 to 87 years of age) with essential hypertension (office and ambulatory systolic, S/diastolic, D BP values above 160/95 mm Hg and 130/80 mm Hg, respectively) were enrolled in this investigation. Ambulatory BP was monitored at 30-min intervals for at least 24 h (ABPM-630, Colin Medical) before and after 4 weeks of crossover treatment with nifedipine tablets (twice daily, 20 mg/d) and benidipine (once daily, 4 mg/d, in the morning). The results indicate that: 1) benidipine and nifedipine reduce 24-h daytime (10:00-20:00) and nighttime (00:00-06:00) averages of SBP and DBP (P < 0.001); 2) the circadian double amplitude of BP is decreased after treatment with benidipine (from 28.6 to 21.1 mm Hg SBP and from 19.7 to 15.2 mm Hg DBP; P< 0.05), while the day-night difference in SBP is increased after treatment with nifedipine (18.6 vs 27.9 mm Hg, P< 0.01); and 3) the increase in the day-night difference of heart rate (HR) is significant after treatment with benidipine (13.6 vs 18.8 beats per minute, bpm; P< 0.05), but not with nifedipine. We have previously evaluated the usefulness of the circadian amplitude of BP as a prognostic tool of cardiovascular outcome, and found that an excessive circadian SBP or DBP amplitude was associated with an increased risk of vascular disease. The fact that benidipine reduces the circadian BP amplitude may be one reason for the superiority of this treatment over nifedipine in preventing an adverse outcome. A reduced heart rate variability (HRV) also predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with overt cardiovascular disease and in hypertensive subjects. The fact that benidipine increases the day-night difference in HR may be another reason for the positive effects of this treatment.