Relation between sodium-lithium countertransport and hypertriglyceridemia in type V hyperlipidemia

Clinical response and metabolic effects of lithium in 323 mood disorder patients

BACKGROUND

Lithium is the mainstay for the maintenance treatment of mood disorders (MD), but its efficacy needs to be weighed against its side effects profile. Here, we assessed retrospectively the clinical response to long-term lithium treatment, as well as the rate of associated metabolic side effects.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from patients treated with lithium for at least 12 months at the Lucio Bini Center for Mood Disorders in Cagliari, Italy. Clinical response was determined as the difference in number of mood episodes and percent of illness time before and during lithium treatment. Symptomatic values of metabolic parameters (plasma levels of glucose, cholesterol, urea nitrogen [BUN], creatinine, TSH, white blood cells [WBC]), and Body Mass Index (BMI) were determined.

RESULTS

We studied 323 MD patients (60.2% women). The percent of illness time was significantly reduced for both depressive (F = 4.94, p<0.0001), and manic (F = 3.95, p < 0.0001) episodes, whereas the rates of episodes/year were significantly reduced for mania (F = 2.01, p = 0.02), but not for depression (F = 1.54, p = 0.06). Rates of MD patients with symptomatic values of metabolic parameters were 14.3% for WBC ≥10,000/µl, 26.9% for glucose levels ≥100 mg/dl, 54.2% for cholesterol levels ≥200 mg/dl, 7.5% for BUN ≥50 mg/dl, 21.9% for creatinine levels ≥1.2 mg/dl, and 20.9% for TSH levels ≥3.50 mU/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term lithium treatment was clinically effective, but the rates of metabolic effects were substantial although some of them were also associated with older age. Lithium-treated patients should receive accurate clinical monitoring to decrease the impact of long-term side effects.

Sodium-lithium countertransport activity in healthy, dyslipidemic, and hypertensive individuals

The aim of our study was to investigate the role of dyslipidemia on red blood cell sodium-lithium countertransport activity in healthy and hypertensive individuals. A total of 128 Caucasian individuals, aged 20 to 60 years old, were divided into 4 groups: dyslipidemic/ hypertensive, dyslipidemic/normotensive, normolipidemic/hypertensive, and normolipidemic/ normotensive (controls). Sodium-lithium countertransport activity was determined based on the Canessa et al method. Sodium-lithium countertransport activity was significantly higher in all patient groups compared with controls (P < .001) and similar in the 3 patient groups. Sodium-lithium countertransport activity was significantly and positively associated with triglyceride levels (P < .001), body mass index (P < .001), total cholesterol levels (P = .001), and systolic (P = .001) and diastolic blood pressure (P = .001). In multivariate regression analysis, triglycerides made the largest contribution to sodium-lithium countertransport variation among the variables tested (R(2) = 0.273). Our results suggest that dyslipidemia affects sodium-lithium countertransport activity independently of essential hypertension and even to a greater extent than hypertension.

Lipid lowering: another method of reducing blood pressure?

Modern management of cardiovascular risk depends on assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension and hyperlipidaemia are synergistic risk factors for cardiovascular events. Both show a degree of cross-correlation through sharing mechanisms of pathogenesis including insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction. This article reviews the common pathways leading to dyslipidaemia and hypertension and the effects diet and lipid-lowering drug therapies have had on correcting blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. Both statins and fibrates have shown a capability to lower blood pressure by up to 8/5 and 15/10 mmHg respectively, in some small-scale clinical trials and have effects on arterial wall structure and hence pulse wave velocity. This blood pressure action may account for some of the clinical effects of lipid-lowering drugs on cardiovascular risk. Thus, lipid lowering may provide an additional method of correcting hypertension in some high-risk patients. However, data from large-scale intervention trials are either absent or ambiguous. Definitive large-scale trials to investigate the antihypertensive effects of lipid-lowering drugs are required, although end point studies examining the interaction of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs to determine optimum combinations are already under way.