Adjuvant Folfox4 with or without Cetuximab (CTX) in Patients (PTS) with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer (CC): Dfs and OS Results and Subgroup Analyses of the PETACC8 Intergroup Phase III Trial

Postoperative Chemotherapy After Surgical Resection of Metachronous Metastases of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Currently, 6 months of perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is a standard treatment option after radical surgical removal of metachronous metastases in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Data show that ACT improves relapse-free survival in such patients, although no difference in overall survival rate was observed. We perform a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection of metachronous metastases in CRC.

The Real-Life Data of BRAF Mutation on the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: a TOG Study

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer is the third leading diagnosis accounting for nearly 10% of all new cancers worldwide. The distinct features among BRAF mutant colorectal cancers make these tumor groups hard to treat for oncologists. The median overall survival (OS) of these types of cancers is reported to be 9 to 14 months.

METHODS

The study was declared on the Turkish Oncology Study Group Conference and approved. The patients' data was received from the centers who confirmed to participate. The BRAF-mutated patients were included in the study. The demographic features (age, gender, etc.), type of mutation, tumor localizations, histology, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, metastasis patterns chemotherapeutic agents and progression, and death times were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Sixteen patients had concurrent KRAS mutations, while 7 had NRAS mutations. Most of the patients received doublet chemotherapies in combination with anti-VEGF agents in the first and second line of the treatment. There was a significant difference in OS according to the stage which showed a decreased survival in stage IV patients at the time of diagnosis. Concurrent KRAS mutation resulted in increased OS. The median OS was 47 and 24 months favoring the KRAS mutant group. The patients whose primary tumor operated had better survival when compared with other patients. The median OS of the operated group was 47 months, while the non-operated group was 24 months. Liver metastasis was related to worse prognosis at the time of diagnosis in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In our study we found a high concurrent RAS mutation ratio in a BRAF mutant patient group which was different from prior studies. The concurrent mutations resulted in a favorable outcome in terms of OS which is also different from the current knowledge. More prospective studies are needed especially BRAF-mutated patient population and especially with concurrent RAS mutations.

Prognostic Impact of Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair and Mutations in KRAS, and BRAFV600E in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Colon Cancer

While tumor stage remains the key determinant of colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis and treatment, there is considerable stage-independent variability in clinical outcome. Molecular markers hold promise for explaining variations in clinical behavior, and may identify patient subsets with differential efficacy and survival after adjuvant chemotherapy which is standard of care for patients with lymph node-positive, i.e., stage III, colon cancer. An increased understanding of the molecular evolution and progression of CRC has identified two major pathways of tumorigenesis that are characterized by chromosomal instability or microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI is a consequence of deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) that is generally due to epigenetic inactivation of MLH1 in tumors that often carry mutations in oncogenic BRAF^V600E . Activating BRAF^V600E and KRAS mutations are mutually exclusive and in this article, we review the current status of these mutations and MMR status as prognostic biomarkers in stage III colon cancers.

Molecular markers in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance in stage II colon cancer

SUMMARY Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in developed countries. Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for stage III colorectal cancer but its use in stage II is controversial. Several clinicopathological factors have been described to define a high-risk group among stage II colon cancers, which can aid the selection of patients who may benefit from chemotherapy. Local tumor invasion (T4), high histological grade, obstruction and perforation at diagnosis, and number of lymph nodes removed are the most widely accepted factors. Several molecular factors have been also investigated as prognostic candidate biomarkers. DNA ploidy, KRAS and TP53 mutations, thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidine phosphorylase, loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 18q and microsatellite instability have been widely investigated. The aim of this review is to analyze the current evidence and clinical applications of the classical molecular biomarkers as well as new ones such as BRAF, circulating tumor cells, genome expression signatures and DNA methylation.

Adjuvant therapy in patients with stage II and III colon cancer under 70 years of age

SUMMARY Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and its prognosis has improved over recent decades due to sustained efforts of the scientific community. This review focuses on adjuvant therapy across the lifespan of patients under 70 years of age. Here, we discuss the standard management of patients with stage III colon cancer, consisting of fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin combination for 6 months. The specific issues faced by patients with stage II colon cancer, including adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients, are discussed. Finally, we describe the distinctive characteristics of patients with colon cancer under 40 years of age and the prospects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer.

The IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) Collaboration: Prospective Combined Analysis of Phase III Trials Investigating Duration of Adjuvant Therapy with the FOLFOX (FOLFOX4 or Modified FOLFOX6) or XELOX (3 versus 6 months) Regimen for Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: Trial Design and Current Status

The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) collaboration was established to prospectively combine and analyze data from several randomized trials conducted around the world to answer whether a three-month course of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy (FOLFOX4/modified FOLFOX6 or XELOX) is non-inferior to the current standard six-month treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer, with a primary endpoint of three years disease-free survival. The IDEA steering committee comprises two members from each group coordinating an individual trial and two members from a secretariat who coordinate combining of the data and management of the joint analysis. Members of the IDEA agreed to combine the data from their individual trials to enable definitive analysis consisting of at least 10,500 patients. With accrual of 8,797 patients at the end of February 2013, the IDEA is on track to achieve its accrual objective of at least 10,500 patients by the end of 2013.