New pharmacodynamic parameters for antimicrobial agents

ZTW-41, a Potent Indolizinoquinoline-5,12-Dione Derivative Against Drug-Resistant Staphylococci and Enterococci Bacteria

ZTW-41, an indolizinoquinoline-5,12-dione derivative, was investigated for antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In our study, the MIC₉₀s (minimum inhibitory concentrations) of ZTW-41 against MRSA (MRSA, n = 200), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA, n = 100), Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis, n = 32), and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium n = 32) were 0.25, 0.25, 0.125, and 8 μg/mL, respectively, whereas the MBC₉₀s (minimum bactericidal concentrations) were 2, 1, 1, and >32 μg/mL, respectively. ZTW-41 maintained its potency at different pH levels (range 5-9) and in starting inoculum size up to 10⁷ CFU/mL. The presence of human serum (25-75%) increased ZTW-41 MICs by two- to eightfold. Time-kill curves showed that ZTW-41 had bactericidal activity against MRSA, MSSA, and E. faecalis strains within 8 hours, and rebound growth occurred after 8 hours except at higher multiples of the MIC (4 × and 8 × ). In the acute toxicity study, no mortality or signs of toxicity was noted in mice after 14 days of observation at doses <50 mg/kg. ZTW-41 exhibited good selectivity indices (SIs) (SI = IC₅₀/MIC₉₀) ranging from 1.12 to 71.76 against clinical isolates, demonstrating excellent therapeutic selectivity in MRSA, MSSA, and E. faecalis strains. Moreover, the in vivo efficacy (effective dose [ED]₅₀ = 6.59 mg/kg) of ZTW-41 was found comparable with vancomycin. Collectively, our favorable results supported ZTW-41 as a promising investigational candidate for treating drug-resistant bacteria infection.

Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock

Every patient with sepsis and septic shock must be evaluated thoroughly at presentation before the initiation of antibiotic therapy. However, in most situations, an abridged initial assessment focusing on critical diagnostic and management planning elements is sufficient. Intravenous antibiotics should be administered as early as possible, and always within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis and septic shock. Broad-spectrum antibiotics must be selected with one or more agents active against likely bacterial or fungal pathogens and with good penetration into the presumed source. Antimicrobial therapy should be reevaluated daily to optimize efficacy, prevent resistance, avoid toxicity, and minimize costs. Consider combination therapy in Pseudomonas infections, and combination empiric therapy in neutropenic patients. Combination therapy should be continued for no more than 3 to 5 days and de-escalation should occur following availability of susceptibilities. The duration of antibiotic therapy typically is limited to 7 to 10 days; longer duration is considered if response is slow, if there is inadequate surgical source control, or in the case of immunologic deficiencies. Antimicrobial therapy should be stopped if infection is not considered the etiologic factor for a shock state.

Antibiotic dosing in critical illness

Early and effective antibiotic therapy is essential in the management of infection in critical illness. The loading dose is probably the most important dose and is a function of the volume of distribution of the drug and the desired plasma concentration but independent of renal function. Antibiotics are classified in a number of ways that have implications for dosing. Doses of hydrophilic agents such as β-lactams should be increased in the early stages of sepsis as the extravascular space increases. For lipophilic agents such as macrolides, the inflammatory process is less important, although factors such as obesity will affect dosing. Classification can also be based on pharmacodynamic properties. Concentration-dependent antibiotics such as aminoglycosides should be administered by extended interval regimens, which maximize bactericidal effect, minimize nephrotoxicity and allow time between doses for the post-antibiotic effect. The critical factor for time-dependent agents, such as β-lactams, is time above the MIC. Ideally administration of these agents should be continuous, although vascular access availability can restrict infusion time to between 4 and 6 h, which is probably adequate. As well as antibiotic factors, patient factors such as hepatic and renal failure will affect dosing. Hepatic failure will affect antibiotic metabolism, although it is most important in end-stage failure. Renal failure and support will affect drug elimination. Knowledge of these factors is essential. Patient safety and prevention of unnecessary harm is a weighty consideration in critical illness. To ensure effective treatment and minimize adverse effects, therapy should be reviewed daily and adjusted in the light of changes in patient organ function and underlying pathology.

Tobramycin disposition in ICU patients receiving a once daily regimen: population approach and dosage simulations

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT? It is well known that tobramycin given as an once daily dose according to the usual recommendations needs therapeutic drug monitoring by measurement of peak and trough concentrations. In the literature, there are only few published studies on the population pharmacokinetics of once daily tobramycin in critically ill patients. Glomerular filtration rate and bodyweight were identified as covariates contributing to the inter-individual variability in the disposition of aminoglycosides. The study, by Peris-Marti et al. [24], only evaluated the pharmacodynamic effectiveness of a 4 mg kg(-1) dose of tobramycin given once daily in critically ill patients. The authors concluded with a simulation showing that for a theoretical MIC of 1 or 2 mg l(-1) , a 7 mg kg(-1) dose was required.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Our results confirm the high variability of tobramycin disposition in intensive care patients and consequently the possible lack of effectiveness. By using a population pharmacokinetic approach, two explicative covariates (height and Cockcroft creatinine clearance) added to a two-compartment model with proportional error, explained much of the inter-individual variability of tobramycin disposition in the critically ill patient population. In a median ICU patient, simulations were performed at various dosage regimens and peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Drug monitoring is required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the disposition of tobramycin (TOB) in critically ill patients (ICU) by a population pharmacokinetic approach, to determine the covariates involved, and to simulate tobramycin dosage regimens.

METHODS

Forty-nine adult ICU patients received TOB (5 mg kg(-1) ) once daily. NonMem modelling was performed on 32 patients. The 17 other patients were used for the qualification process by normalized prediction distribution error. Then Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with a proportional error best fitted the data. TOB total clearance (CL(TOB) ) was significantly correlated with Cockcroft creatinine clearance (COCK) and height. TOB clearance was 4.8 ± 1.9 l h(-1) (range 1.22-8.95), the volume of distribution of the central compartment was 24.7 ± 3.7 l (range 17.34-32.83) and that of the peripheral compartment and the inter-compartmental clearance were 30.6 l and 4.74 l h(-1) , respectively. Only 29% of the patients presented a target AUC between 80 and 125 mg l(-1) h and 61% were lower than 80 mg l(-1)  h. After considering COCK and height, MCS showed that only 50% of the population could achieve the target AUC for the 375 and 400 mg dosages.

CONCLUSION

Even after taking into account COCK and height, for strains with an MIC ≤ 1 mg l(-1) , MCS doses evidenced that peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Combination therapy in addition to drug monitoring are required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock

This article reviews principles in the rational use of antibiotics in sepsis and septic shock and presents evidence-based recommendations for optimal antibiotic therapy. Every patient with sepsis and septic shock must be evaluated at presentation before the initiation of antibiotic therapy. However, in most situations, an abridged initial assessment focusing on critical diagnostic and management planning elements is sufficient. Intravenous antibiotics should be administered as early as possible, and always within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis and septic shock. Broad-spectrum antibiotics must be selected with one or more agents active against likely bacterial or fungal pathogens and with good penetration into the presumed source. Antimicrobial therapy should be reevaluated daily to optimize efficacy, prevent resistance, avoid toxicity, and minimize costs. Consider combination therapy in Pseudomonas infections, and combination empiric therapy in neutropenic patients. Combination therapy should be continued for no more than 3 to 5 days and deescalation should occur following availability of susceptibilities. The duration of antibiotic therapy typically is limited to 7 to 10 days; longer duration is considered if response is slow, if there is inadequate surgical source control, or in the case of immunologic deficiencies. Antimicrobial therapy should be stopped if infection is not considered the etiologic factor for a shock state.

Ciprofloxacin use in critically ill patients: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches

The objective of this study was to evaluate the properties of ciprofloxacin in intensive care patients using a population approach. Seventy patients received ciprofloxacin. On Day 1, three to eight blood samples were taken over a 12-h period. Peak drug concentration (Cmax) and 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were compared with the French breakpoint defining antibiotic susceptibility. A population pharmacokinetic modelling approach was then carried out. A two-compartment open model with a proportional error model best fitted the data. A relationship between the elimination constant rate and the Cockcroft creatinine clearance was found. Ciprofloxacin clearance was 13.6+/-5.8L/h, the volume of distribution was 62.0+/-10.7 L and the ciprofloxacin half-life was 3.7+/-1.8h. When the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was equal to 1mg/L the inhibitory ratio (IR) was > or = 8 in only 10.8% of cases, and the AUC/MIC ratio (AUIC) was 42.0+/-36. In conclusion, this study highlights that the Cockcroft clearance significantly influences ciprofloxacin elimination. Target plasma concentrations for ciprofloxacin, the IR and AUIC were rarely reached with a standard dosing regimen. In critically ill patients, the observed pharmacokinetic variability is mainly responsible for the overly frequent low concentrations of ciprofloxacin, emphasising the need for therapeutic monitoring.

Increased amikacin dosage requirements in burn patients receiving a once-daily regimen

Altered pharmacokinetics in burn patients may affect antibiotic plasma concentrations. Typical once-daily dosing (ODD) of 15 mg/kg amikacin (AMK) in burn patients does not always produce peak concentrations (C(max)) reaching the therapeutic objective of six to eight times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). We recorded plasma concentrations following administration of 20 mg/kg AMK in burn patients and studied factors affecting pharmacokinetics. Mean C(max) was 48.3+/-10.8 mg/L and the C(max)/MIC ratio was 6+/-1.35. Statistical analysis demonstrated a relationship between C(max) and the area of the burn and Unit Burn Standard, and between AMK clearance and creatinine clearance (Cl(CR)). We conclude that ODD regimens of AMK in patients with burns >15% body surface area and/or with Cl(CR) >120 mL/min could require doses >20 mg/kg to reach adequate C(max). In all cases, patient therapeutic drug monitoring is essential to ensure the safe usage of these dosing recommendations.

A Stochastic Formulation of the Gompertzian Growth Model forin vitro Bactericidal Kinetics: Parameter Estimation and Extinction Probability

Time-kill curves have frequently been employed to study the antimicrobial effects of antibiotics. The relevance of pharmacodynamic modeling to these investigations has been emphasized in many studies of bactericidal kinetics. Stochastic models are needed that take into account the randomness of the mechanisms of both bacterial growth and bacteria-drug interactions. However, most of the models currently used to describe antibiotic activity against microorganisms are deterministic. In this paper we examine a stochastic differential equation representing a stochastic version of a pharmacodynamic model of bacterial growth undergoing random fluctuations, and derive its solution, mean value and covariance structure. An explicit likelihood function is obtained both when the process is observed continuously over a period of time and when data is sampled at time points, as is the custom in these experimental conditions. Some asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood estimators for the model parameters are discussed. The model is applied to analyze in vitro time-kill data and to estimate model parameters; the probability of the bacterial population size dropping below some critical threshold is also evaluated. Finally, the relationship between bacterial extinction probability and the pharmacodynamic parameters estimated is discussed.

Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections

The persistence of high morbidity and mortality from systemic fungal infections despite the availability of novel antifungals points to the need for effective treatment strategies. Treatment of invasive fungal infections is often hampered by drug toxicity, tolerability, and specificity issues, and added complications often arise due to the lack of diagnostic tests and to treatment complexities. Combination therapy has been suggested as a possible approach to improve treatment outcome. In this article, we undertake a historical review of studies of combination therapy and also focus on recent studies involving newly approved antifungal agents. The limitations surrounding antifungal combinations include nonuniform interpretation criteria, inability to predict the likelihood of clinical success, strain variability, and variations in pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals used in combination. The issue of antagonism between polyenes and azoles is beginning to be addressed, but data regarding other drug combinations are not adequate for us to draw definite conclusions. However, recent data have identified potentially useful combinations. Standardization of assay methods and adoption of common interpretive criteria are essential to avoid discrepancies between different in vitro studies. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess whether combination therapy improves survival and treatment outcome in the most seriously debilitated patients afflicted with life-threatening fungal infections.

Selecting antibacterials for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy : pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations

Some infectious diseases require management with parenteral therapy, although the patient may not need hospitalisation. Consequently, the administration of intravenous antimicrobials in a home or infusion clinic setting has now become commonplace. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is considered safe, therapeutically effective and economical. A broad range of infections can be successfully managed with OPAT, although this form of treatment is unnecessary when oral therapy can be used. Many antimicrobials can be employed for OPAT and the choice of agent(s) and regimen should be based upon sound clinical and microbiological evidence. Assessments of cost and convenience should be made subsequent to these primary treatment outcome determinants. When designing an OPAT treatment regimen, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the individual agents should also be considered. Pharmacokinetics (PK) is the study of the time course of absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of drugs (what the body does to the drug). Clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring has been used to overcome the pharmacokinetic variability of antimicrobials and enable individualised dosing regimens that attain desirable antimicrobial serum concentrations. Pharmacodynamics (PD) is the study of the relationship between the serum concentration of a drug and the clinical response observed in a patient (what the drug does to the body). By combining pharmacokinetic properties (peak [C(max)] or trough [C(min)] serum concentrations, half-life, area under the curve) and pharmacodynamic properties (susceptibility results, minimum inhibitory concentrations [MIC] or minimum bactericidal concentrations [MBC], bactericidal or bacteriostatic killing, post-antibiotic effects), unique PK/PD parameters or indices (t > MIC, C(max)/MIC, AUC(24)/MIC) can be defined. Depending on the killing characteristics of a given class of antimicrobials (concentration-dependent or time-dependent), specific PK/PD parameters may predict in vitro bacterial eradication rates and correlate with in vivo microbiologic and clinical cures. An understanding of these principles will enable the clinician to vary dosing schemes and design individualised dosing regimens to achieve optimal PK/PD parameters and potentially improve patient outcomes. This paper will review basic principles of useful PK/PD parameters for various classes of antimicrobials as they may relate to OPAT. In summary, OPAT has become an important treatment option for the management of infectious diseases in the community setting. To optimise treatment course outcomes, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the individual agents should be carefully considered when designing OPAT treatment regimens.