Place actuelle du cyclophosphamide dans le syndrome néphrotique idiopathique de l'enfant

[Cyclophosphamide in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: Outcome and outlook]

INTRODUCTION

Cyclophosphamide (CYP) has been used for over 40 years in patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (NSSS) presenting frequent relapses (NSRF) or steroid dependence (NSSD). However, the long-term success of treatment with cyclophosphamide is difficult to predict. The objectives of this study are to determine long-term outcomes of cyclophosphamide and identify the factors associated with sustained remission.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the data from 50 patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, treated by oral cyclophosphamide and followed at service of pediatric for more than 8 years for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and related factors for survival without relapse were evaluated by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median age at the time of diagnosis was 4.3 years, and median follow-up time was 1.7 years with the median of 8 years at the first use of CYC. Patients had received a median cumulative dose of 168mg/kg. At the end of follow-up, 38% of patients entered into remission after using CYC while 62% failed to respond and further relapses then occur. The median time of stopping corticosteroid therapy was three month. The survival without relapse was respectively 56% (28 patients), 52% (26 patients), 48% (24 patients), and 38% (19 patients), at 6 months, one year, two years and more than two years. In univariate analysis, the survival without relapse was related to the age at the moment of starting the therapy par CYC (the median was 5 months for an age < 8 years and 41 months for an age≥8 years; P=0.049), the type of nephrotic syndrome [36 months for SNRF, 4 months for NSSD and nephrothic syndrome steroid resistant (NSSR); P=0.068], and the histological lesion (6 months for diffuse mesangial proliferation, 2 months for segmental glomerulosclerosis; P=0.009). The age at the moment of diagnosis, the sex and the cumulative dose of CYC did not have significant influence.

CONCLUSION

The results presented in this study suggest the use of oral cyclophosphamide for short period remain second line effective therapy. Further well-designed trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of other steroid-sparing agents.