Increasing and planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party

Hematopoietic growth factors in lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Most patients affected by lung cancer are treated with chemotherapy, and hence are at risk of myelosuppression. Hematopoietic growth factors have a relevant role in this setting, as they can improve quality of life, reduce the rate of chemotherapy-induced complications and allow the administration of full-dose chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most data of hematologic growth factors in lung cancer come from dated publications or large trials involving different malignancies, thus limiting specific information for lung neoplasms. Nonetheless, most studies consistently identified myeloid growth factors as effective on specific end-points such as the duration and severity of neutropenia, or complications such as hospitalizations and febrile neutropenia; on the other hand, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) consistently improved anemia-specific end-points including hemoglobin values, transfusions rate and fatigue, although some specific safety issues characterized this drug class. The most recent international guidelines address these characteristics and include the main indications for hematologic growth factors in solid neoplasms, including lung cancer.

SUMMARY

Myeloid growth factors and ESAs have a relevant role in selected patients undergoing chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Notably, a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment is required in the specific case of ESAs.

Achieving full-dose, on-schedule administration of ACE chemotherapy every 14 days for the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer

Extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is commonly treated with multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Reducing the time interval between cycles of chemotherapy (dose-dense chemotherapy) may improve outcomes in the treatment of extensive SCLC, as it has in other chemosensitive malignancies. To evaluate the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with extensive SCLC, this study evaluates a dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide (ACE) regimen, supported by the once-per-cycle administration of the hematopoietic growth factor pegfilgrastim. Patients received up to six 14-day cycles of ACE chemotherapy (doxorubicin 40 mg/m,(2) cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m(2), etoposide 120 mg/m(2) on day 1 IV, plus oral etoposide 240 mg/m(2) daily on days 2-3). On day 4 of each cycle, patients received pegfilgrastim 6 mg by subcutaneous injection. Of 30 patients enrolled, 27 started chemotherapy and received pegfilgrastim. Full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy was given to all 22 patients starting cycle 2, and in 107 (88%) of 121 cycles. Eighteen of the 27 patients (67%) received full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy for all 6 cycles. The overall response rate was 17/27 (63%). Nine patients (33%) experienced hematologic toxicities that investigators considered severe or life-threatening. Four patients (15%) had febrile neutropenia. Full-dose, on-schedule dose-dense ACE chemotherapy is feasible with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim support in extensive SCLC.

Standard versus intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in small-cell lung cancer: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Lung Cancer Group Phase III Trial-08923

PURPOSE

To assess the impact on survival of increasing dose-intensity (DI) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated SCLC patients were randomized to standard CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, for five cycles) or intensified CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 55 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 125 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] 5 micro g/kg/d on days 4 to 13 every 2 weeks, for four cycles). Projected cumulative dose was almost identical on the two arms, whereas projected DI was nearly 90% higher on the intensified arm. Two hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The first 163 patients were also randomized (2 x 2 factorial design) to prophylactic antibiotics or placebo to assess their impact on preventing febrile leukopenia (FL). This report focuses on chemotherapy DI results.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 54 months, 216 deaths have occurred. Actually delivered DI on the intensified arm was 70% higher than on the standard arm. Intensified CDE was associated with more grade 4 leukopenia (79% v 50%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (44% v 11%), anorexia, nausea, and mucositis. FL and number of toxic deaths were similar on the two arms. The objective response rate was 79% for the standard arm and 84% for the intensified arm (P =.315). Median survival was 54 weeks and 52 weeks, and the 2-year survival rates were 15% and 18%, respectively (P =.885).

CONCLUSION

A 70% increase of CDE actual DI does not translate into an improved outcome in SCLC patients.

Lenograstim as support for ACE chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer: a phase III, multicenter, randomized study

This phase III study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of lenograstim as support for ACE (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide) chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Patients were randomized to receive up to six 3-week cycles of either ACE alone (n = 139) or ACE with lenograstim support (150 microg/m2/day subcutaneously, days 4-13, n = 141). Compared with the chemotherapy-alone group, the lenograstim support group was more likely to achieve neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count, > or =1.5 x 10(9) cells/l) by day 14 (95.8-100% vs. 14.3-24.1% across the cycles) and less likely to experience at least one infectious episode (36.7 vs. 54.0%; p = 0.004), chemotherapy delay (51.8 vs. 56.2%; NS), or dose reduction (17.3 vs. 27.7%; p = 0.037). Objective response and event-free and overall survival rates were similar. Lenograstim was well tolerated. Lenograstim may allow the interval between cycles of ACE to be reduced to 2 weeks; such dose intensification may lead to more favorable objective response and survival rates.

Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party

PURPOSE

The treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients with good performance status aims to improve survival. Dose-intensification could be a way to achieve improved survival but can be limited by neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary, nonrandomized feasibility studies showed that doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (ACE) could be given every 2 (instead of the usual 3) weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (lenograstim; Chugai-Rh¿one-Poulenc, Tokyo, Japan) support. The present multicenter randomized trial was designed to examine whether such dose-intensification improves survival while maintaining acceptable toxicity levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients were randomized to receive six cycles of ACE either every 3 weeks (control [C] group) or every 2 weeks with G-CSF (G group). The standard dose-intensity of ACE was increased by 50% in group G.

RESULTS

Four hundred and three patients (G group: n = 201; C group: n = 202) were randomized. The received dose-intensity was 34% higher in the G group than in the C group. Complete response rates were 40% for the G group and 28% for the C group (P =.02), and overall rates were 78% for the G group and 79% for the C group. Survival was longer in the G group (hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.99; P =.04), survival rates for the G and C groups being 47% and 39% at 12 months and 13% and 8% at 24 months, respectively. Metastasis-free survival, nonhematologic toxicity, and quality of life were similar in the two groups. In the G group, there was less neutropenia but more thrombocytopenia and more frequent blood and platelet transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the dose-intensity of ACE with G-CSF support improved survival while maintaining acceptable toxicity.

A pilot study of increasing dose intensity of epirubicin and ifosfamide in patients with small cell lung cancer by using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by using recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF). Seventeen previously untreated patients (11 male, 6 female) were treated with ifosfamide (5.0 g/m2) and epirubicin (80 mg/m2) in two successive cohorts. Eight patients received chemotherapy every 2 weeks and r-metHuG-CSF 5 microg/kg given subcutaneously daily for 10 days (cohort A), and nine patients received chemotherapy at 10-day intervals with r-metHuG-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously given daily for 7 days (cohort B). The relative dose intensity compared with the conventional 3-weekly regimen was 1.5 and 2.1 for cohorts A and B, respectively. Neutropenia-associated fever complicated two and five treatment courses in cohorts A and B, respectively. There were five episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were no treatment delays in cohort A and one cycle was delayed in cohort B. One patient from each cohort was withdrawn due to toxicity. Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity, other than alopecia, was not observed. This study confirms that it is feasible to increase the relative dose intensity of ifosfamide and epirubicin in patients with SCLC to 2.1 by using r-metHuG-CSF and shortening the interval between treatment cycles.