Palliative radiotherapy for bronchial carcinoma: science or art?

A palliative accelerated irradiation regimen (PAIR) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

In order to avoid overtreatment in advanced NSCLC we developed a palliative accelerated irradiation regimen (PAIR) applying a total dose of 32 Gy in 10 days with two daily fractions of 2 Gy. This paper reports on a 1-year pilot study carried out in preparation of a randomised trial. Data for the 34 patients receiving PAIR were compared to 179 conventionally irradiated historical controls selected from a pre-existing database according to identical inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis showed that PAIR patients had a significantly longer survival than controls (P = 0.0029). Median survival was 11.8 and 5.8 months, respectively, while 1-year survival was 45.6% vs. 21.2%. Compared to the subgroup of controls who had received the full planned dose of 60 Gy (n = 104) PAIR patients showed no significant difference in survival. In order to adjust for possible imbalances we used a comprehensive blinded prognostic rating design creating one score value per patient out of several known prognostic factors. After adjustment for the resulting prognostic score by means of the Cox proportional hazards model PAIR patients still showed significantly longer survival. We conclude that in advanced NSCLC survival after a palliative short-term regimen appears to be at least equivalent to that following conventional high-dose irradiation.

Hypofractionated irradiation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

A policy of palliative intent thoracic irradiation was prospectively evaluated in 38 consecutive patients referred for treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer at a single institution. A target dose of 1700 cGy in two fractions 1 week apart was delivered. Characteristics of the treatment group revealed most (87%; 33/38) to be of good-excellent performance status with minimal weight loss before irradiation. Although three patients (8%) had initial metastatic disease, all had symptoms referable to the thorax with cough (71%), dyspnoea (55%), haemoptysis (39%), and chest wall pain (34%) being dominant. Following treatment, the relative risk of maintaining complete response with regard to each of these symptoms was 0.91, 0.40, 0.92 and 0.78, respectively. Overall 70% of patients maintained complete symptomatic response to time of death or last review. Uncorrected median survival was 35 weeks and was comparable to best international end-results for either palliative intent or curative intent radiation schedules. We conclude that the radiation regimen employed is safe, efficacious and eminently resource conscious. Recognition of patient groups who overwhelmingly derive no benefit from conventional fractionation schedules will streamline access to radiotherapy services of patients suitable for radical treatment.

A study of acute side-effects related to palliative radiotherapy treatment of lung cancer

Two recent studies carried out by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party have suggested that large fraction radiotherapy to the chest in either 10-Gy single fraction or 17-Gy two-fraction doses, 1 week apart, is safe and effective for patients who require palliation for bronchogenic cancer. The Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, participated in the original MRC trial and anecdotal reports of acute chest pains, fevers, sweats and rigors in some patients during the first 24-hour period after radiotherapy treatment were noted. These acute side-effects were not monitored during the Medical Research Council trials. It was felt that this area warranted further evaluation in order to identify the incidence of such acute side-effects and to what extent they caused a reduction in the patients' remaining quality of life. A pilot study of 10 patients confirmed the manifestation of the side-effects reported anecdotally in the MRC trial. It was on this basis that the study was extended, with a further 51 patients being invited to participate over a 4-month period. The findings indicate a significant incidence of adverse side-effects in patients receiving large fraction radiotherapy to the chest in either 10-Gy single fraction or 17-Gy two-fraction doses, but that these are transient and do not cause unacceptable disruption to the patients over an extended period.

A Medical Research Council (MRC) randomised trial of palliative radiotherapy with two fractions or a single fraction in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party

Two policies of palliative thoracic radiotherapy for NSCLC have been compared in a randomised multicentre controlled trial aimed at simplifying the palliative treatment of patients with poor performance status. A total of 235 patients were entered. They had inoperable, microscopically confirmed disease, too advanced for 'curative' radiotherapy. Their main symptoms were related to the primary intrathoracic tumour even if metastases were present, and they had a poor performance status. Patients were allocated at random to regimens of either 17 Gy given in two fractions of 8.5 Gy 1 week apart (F2 regimen, 117 patients), or a single fraction of 10 Gy (F1 regimen, 118 patients). Two patients (one in each group) were excluded from all analyses because they were found to have had previously treated malignant disease and had been admitted in error. On admission, 95% of the 233 eligible patients had cough, 47% haemoptysis, 59% chest pain, 64% anorexia, and 16% dysphagia. As assessed by the clinicians, these symptoms were palliated in high proportions of patients, ranging in the F2 group from 48% for cough to 75% for haemoptysis, and in the F1 group from 55% for anorexia to 72% for haemoptysis and chest pain. For all five symptoms the median duration of palliation was 50% or more of survival. All these results were similar in the two treatment groups. In contrast, on daily assessment by the patients using a diary card, those treated with the F2 regimen experienced substantially more dysphagia, which was recorded in 56% of the patients compared with 23% in the F1 group (difference 33%: 95% confidence interval 17-48%). The median survival from randomisation was 100 days in the F2 group and 122 days in the F1 group. The F1 regimen, as it requires only a single attendance for treatment, is recommended as a palliative regimen for patients with inoperable NSCLC and a poor performance status.