Side-effects of antithrombotic therapy

The effect of microbiome therapy on COVID-19-induced gut dysbiosis: A narrative and systematic review

AIMS

Emerging evidence highlights the role of COVID-19 in instigating gut dysbiosis, with repercussions on disease severity and bidirectional gut-organ communication involving the lung, heart, brain, and liver. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in addressing gut dysbiosis associated with COVID-19, as well as their impact on related disease severity and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically review 27 studies exploring the efficacy of different microbiome-modulating therapies: probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation as potential interventions for COVID-19.

KEY FINDINGS

The probiotics and synbiotics investigated encompassed a spectrum of eight bacterial and fungal genera, namely Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Bacillus, Saccharomyces, and Kluyveromyces. Noteworthy prebiotics employed in these studies included chestnut tannin, galactooligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharide, and resistant dextrin. The majority of the investigated biotics exhibited positive effects on COVID-19 patients, manifesting in symptom alleviation, inflammation reduction, and notable decreases in mortality rates. Five studies reported death rates, showing an average mortality ranging from 0 % to 11 % in the intervention groups, as compared to 3 % to 30 % in the control groups. Specifically, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics demonstrated efficacy in diminishing the duration and severity of symptoms while significantly accelerating viral and symptomatic remission. FMT emerged as a particularly effective strategy, successfully restoring gut microbiota and ameliorating gastrointestinal disorders.

SIGNIFICANCE

The insights gleaned from this review significantly contribute to our broader comprehension of the therapeutic potential of biotics in addressing COVID-19-related gut dysbiosis and mitigating secondary multi-organ complications.

Intracranial traumatic and non-traumatic haemorrhagic complications of warfarin treatment

An increased referral of patients with anticoagulation related haemorrhages necessitated an analysis of causes and outcome of these complications in a patient group that reflected Swedish therapeutic traditions of anticoagulation treatment. Prospectively, all patients from Stockholm evaluated for warfarin related intracranial haemorrhage occurring during 1987 were analysed and their 6 month outcome recorded. Sixty-eight patients were included. The results of intracranial haemorrhagic complications were catastrophic with a 77% mortality rate. Their incidence was much higher than expected. Forty-one patients had non-traumatic intracerebral haematomas, 1 had a non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage and 26 had traumatic injuries. In the 42 patients with non-traumatic haemorrhages, the indications for anticoagulation were cerebral ischaemic events in a majority (27/42). The remaining 15 patients had different indications for anticoagulation. They also had an increased frequency of hypertension (p < 0.05). In the 26 patients with traumatic haematomas, only 6/26 patients had previous cerebral ischaemic injuries (p < 0.01). Valvular heart prosthesis was their most common indication (11/26) for anticoagulation. Caution in instituting anticoagulation therapy in patients with hypertension or cerebrovascular disease, which is an important indication for anticoagulation in Sweden, is mandatory. Adherence to strict treatment regimens and their continuous reevaluation may help to avoid complications. The finding of more patients than expected with haemorrhagic complications is not compatible with the risk evaluations used to justify anticoagulation therapy in the patient groups studied. Clinical practice must have changed with time, showing that risk evaluations from controlled trials or retrospectively collected clinical data from selected patients are not necessarily applicable for long-term clinical practice.

Recombinant hirudin: a specific thrombin inhibiting anticoagulant for hemodialysis

The first experience with hirudin as an alternative anticoagulant for heparin in hemodialysis is reported. Recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) was administered in 20 patients as a bolus before dialysis with low flux polysulfone dialyzers (PS400), the dosage being adapted stepwise from patient to patient by 0.02 mg/kg to the occurrence of clotting or bleeding. Four different administration schedules were studied. The first three schedules (0.02 mg/kg, N = 1; 0.04 mg/kg, N = 1; 0.06 mg/kg, N = 4) were discontinued because of clotting. The 0.08 mg/kg schedule was maintained without clotting event in 14 patients. Bleeding was not observed. Plasma hirudin averaged 503.9 +/- 214.0 and 527.7 +/- 217.1 ng/ml after two and four hours of dialysis, and decreased during an interdialytic interval of 44 hours to 223.2 +/- 86.2 ng/ml. Modified antithrombin III (P < 0.05) and activated partial thromboplastin times were lower (P < 0.01) under hirudin compared to heparin; these coagulation parameters were closer to normal during hirudin treatment. The patients developing clotting could be distinguished from those without clotting by the registration of the activated clotting times (9.2 +/- 3.0 vs. 18.7 +/- 3.2 min after 2 hr, P < 0.01; 8.1 +/- 3.0 vs. 16.2 +/- 3.8 min after 4 hr of dialysis, P < 0.05); cut-off value below which clotting is to be expected was 12 min). It is concluded that administration of hirudin as a bolus before the start of dialysis, at a dosage of 0.08 mg/kg, is not complicated by clotting or by bleeding. Coagulation tendency can optimally be monitored by the registration of the activated clotting time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)