Acute hemodynamic responses to electroconvulsive therapy are not related to the duration of seizure activity

Does Lidocaine Shorten Seizure Duration in Electroconvulsive Therapy?

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective short-term treatment for schizophrenia and depression, amongst other disorders. Lidocaine is typically added to reduce pain from intravenous propofol injection. However, depending on the dose used in the ECT setting, it can shorten seizure duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine dose on seizure duration.

METHODS

This retrospective, naturalistic cohort study included 169 patients treated with ECT. We examined 4714 ECT sessions with propofol or propofol plus lidocaine. Ictal quality was manually rated by visual inspection. The main outcome of this study was the relation of lidocaine with seizure duration after controlling for socio-demographic, ECT, and other anesthetic variables.

RESULTS

There was a significant negative association between lidocaine usage and seizure duration. Multivariate analyses showed that seizure duration was shortened by an average of 3.21 s in sessions with lidocaine. Moreover, in this subgroup, there was a significant negative dose-dependent association between lidocaine dose and seizure length. Complementarily, a significant positive association between preictal BIS and seizure length was found in the subgroup of sessions where preictal was used.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide additional evidence highlighting the importance of caution regarding lidocaine dosing due to the effect on seizure length in the ECT setting. It is advisable for clinicians to exercise caution when administering lidocaine regarding its dosing and seizure length in ECT settings. Future investigation is needed to assess causal relationships by studying certain vulnerable groups or employing other charge calculation techniques, such as the titration method.

Anesthetic care for electroconvulsive therapy

Counselling and medication are often thought of as the only interventions for psychiatric disorders, but electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has also been applied in clinical practice for over 80 years. ECT refers to the application of an electric stimulus through the patient’s scalp to treat psychiatric disorders such as treatment-resistant depression, catatonia, and schizophrenia. It is a safe, effective, and evidence-based therapy performed under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation. An appropriate level of anesthesia is essential for safe and successful ECT; however, little is known about this because of the limited interest from anesthesiologists. As the incidence of ECT increases, more anesthesiologists will be required to better understand the physiological changes, complications, and pharmacological actions of anesthetics and adjuvant drugs. Therefore, this review focuses on the fundamental physiological changes, management, and pharmacological actions associated with various drugs, such as anesthetics and neuromuscular blocking agents, as well as the comorbidities, indications, contraindications, and complications of using these agents as part of an ECT procedure through a literature review and our own experiences.

Outcome of four pretreatment regimes on hemodynamics during electroconvulsive therapy: A double-blind randomized controlled crossover trial

Context:

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is associated with tachycardia and hypertension.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to compare two doses of dexmedetomidine, esmolol, and lignocaine with respect to hemodynamics, seizure duration, emergence agitation (EA), and recovery profile.

Methodology:

Thirty patients undergoing ECT were assigned to each of the following pretreatment regimes over the course of five ECT sessions in a randomized crossover design: Group D1 (dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg), Group D0.5 (dexmedetomidine0.5 μg/kg), Group E (esmolol 1 mg/kg), Group L (lignocaine 1 mg/kg), and Group C (saline as placebo) before induction. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), seizure duration, EA, and time to discharge were evaluated.

Results:

Groups D1, D0.5, and esmolol had significantly reduced response of HR, MAP compared to lignocaine and control groups at 1, 3, 5 min after ECT (P < 0.05). Motor seizure duration was comparable in all groups except Group L (P = 0.000). Peak HR was significantly decreased in all groups compared to control. Total propofol requirement was reduced in D1 (P = 0.000) and D0.5 (P = 0.001) when compared to control. Time to spontaneous breathing was comparable in all the groups (P > 0.05). Time to eye opening and time to discharge were comparable in all groups (P > 0.05) except Group D1 (P = 0.001). EA score was least in Group D1 (P = 0.000).

Conclusion:

Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg, 0.5 μg/kg, and esmolol produced significant amelioration of cardiovascular response to ECT without affecting seizure duration, results being best with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. However, the latter has the shortcoming of delayed recovery.

Differential heart rate response to magnetic seizure therapy (MST) relative to electroconvulsive therapy: a nonhuman primate model

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for severe depression; however, the induced therapeutic seizure acts on the autonomic nervous system and results in significant cardiac effects. This is an important consideration particularly in the elderly. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is in development as a less invasive alternative, but its effects on cardiac function have not been studied. We sought to model those effects in nonhuman primates to inform the development of safer neurostimulation interventions. Twenty four rhesus monkeys were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of daily treatment with electroconvulsive stimulation (ECS), magnetic seizure therapy (MST) or anesthesia-alone sham. Digitally acquired ECG and an automated R-wave and inter-R interval (IRI) sampling were used to measure intervention effects on heart rate (HR). Significant differences between experimental conditions were found in the HR as evidenced by changes in the immediate post-stimulus, ictal and postictal epochs. Immediate post-stimulus bradycardia was seen with ECS but not with MST. ECS induced significantly more tachycardia than MST or sham in both the ictal and postictal periods. MST resulted in a small, but statistically significant increase in HR during the postictal period relative to baseline. HR was found to increase by 25% and 8% in the ECS and MST conditions, respectively. MST resulted in significantly less marked sympathetic and parasympathetic response than did ECS. This differential physiological response is consistent with MST having a more superficial cortical site of action with less impact on deeper brain structures implicated in cardiac control relative to ECT. The clinical relevance of the topographical seizure spread of MST and its associated effects on the autonomic nervous system remain to be determined in human clinical trials.

Anästhesiologische Aspekte bei Elektrokrampftherapie

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used in the therapy of severe psychiatric disorders. The treatment, in which a generalized epileptic seizure is provoked by electrical stimulation of the brain, is performed under anaesthesia and muscle relaxation. Considering careful previous clinical examination and anaesthesiological and internal contraindications, ECT is a safe form of treatment. The following review is intended to familiarize with ECT and to provide advice for the anaesthesiological management.

Effects of landiolol on hemodynamic response and seizure duration during electroconvulsive therapy

PURPOSE

This study was done to evaluate the effect of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, on the hemodynamic response and the duration of seizure activity during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

METHODS

We designed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Fourteen psychiatric patients participated. Landiolol (0.1 mg x kg(-1) or 0.2 mg x kg(-1)) or saline (placebo) was administered IV 1 min before the induction of anesthesia. Unconsciousness was induced with propofol 1.0 mg x kg(-1) IV, and muscle paralysis was produced with succinylcholine 0.6 mg x kg(-1) IV. Subsequently, electrical stimulus was administered to elicit a seizure, and the duration of the motor seizure activity was noted.

RESULTS

The heart rate (HR) and rate-pressure product (RPP) before ECT were significantly decreased in the 0.2 mg x kg(-1) landiolol group compared with these parameters in the placebo and 0.1 mg x kg(-1) landiolol groups. Both the 0.1 mg x kg(-1) and 0.2 mg x kg(-1) doses significantly attenuated the degree of tachycardia and RPP after ECT in comparison with the placebo group. Pretreatment with 0.2 mg x kg(-1) landiolol resulted in a significantly shorter duration of motor seizure than that in the placebo group (21 +/- 13 s vs 27 +/- 12 s).

CONCLUSION

As the landiolol dose of 0.2 mg x kg(-1) caused shorter seizure duration, and because the hemodynamic effects after ECT of the 0.1 mg x kg(-1) and 0.2 mg x kg(-1) doses were similar, it was concluded that a 0.1 mg x kg(-1) landiolol bolus was the appropriate dose pretreatment before ECT.

Guide to anaesthetic selection for electroconvulsive therapy

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used in the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders. It involves the induction of a seizure for therapeutic purposes by the administration of a variable-frequency electrical stimulus via electrodes applied to the scalp. The original application of ECT in non-anaesthetised patients resulted in many traumatic effects and was replaced, in the early 1960s, with a modified ECT regimen that used anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. This remains the worldwide standard today. The development of modern ECT devices, with improved impulse modes, has also reduced the incidence of post-interventional cognitive adverse effects. The variety of centrally-acting co-medications administered and the cardiovascular effects occurring during the procedure make patients receiving ECT a challenge for the anaesthetist. The efficacy of ECT depends on the production of adequate seizures; however, the anaesthetic agents commonly used during ECT suppress the generation of convulsions. Therefore, the efficacy of ECT requires knowledge of anaesthetic precepts, understanding of the interaction between anaesthetic drugs and seizure activity, and awareness of the physiological effects of ECT as well as the treatment of those effects. Successful and safe ECT depends on the correct choice of anaesthetic drugs for the individual patient, which have to be chosen with respect to the individual concomitant medication and pre-existing diseases. This review provides information for the optimal selection, set-up and practice of anaesthetic drug treatment in ECT.

Assessment of the cardiovascular effects of electroconvulsive therapy in individuals older than 50 years

To evaluate the impact of electroconvulsive therapy on arterial blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability, and the occurrence of ischemia or arrhythmias, 38 (18 men) depressive patients free from systemic diseases, 50 to 83 years old (mean: 64.7 +/- 8.6) underwent electroconvulsive therapy. All patients were studied with simultaneous 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and Holter monitoring, starting 18 h before and continuing for 3 h after electroconvulsive therapy. Blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability, arrhythmias, and ischemic episodes were recorded. Before each session of electroconvulsive therapy, blood pressure and heart rate were in the normal range; supraventricular ectopic beats occurred in all patients and ventricular ectopic beats in 27/38; 2 patients had non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. After shock, systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure increased 29, 25, and 24% (P < 0.001), respectively, and returned to baseline values within 1 h. Maximum, mean and minimum heart rate increased 56, 52, and 49% (P < 0.001), respectively, followed by a significant decrease within 5 min; heart rate gradually increased again thereafter and remained elevated for 1 h. Analysis of heart rate variability showed increased sympathetic activity during shock with a decrease in both sympathetic and parasympathetic drive afterwards. No serious adverse effects occurred; electroconvulsive therapy did not trigger any malignant arrhythmias or ischemia. In middle-aged and elderly people free from systemic diseases, electroconvulsive therapy caused transitory increases in blood pressure and heart rate and a decrease in heart rate variability but these changes were not associated with serious adverse clinical events.

Etomidate versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy in patients with schizophrenia

Among drugs used for the anesthesia of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), propofol reduces seizure duration to a greater degree than etomidate. The perceived difference between the 2 anesthetics is smaller in patients with schizophrenia than in patients who suffer depression. In this study, propofol and etomidate were compared during the ECT of patients with schizophrenia, on the basis of their impact on seizure activity and on seizure-induced hemodynamic reactions. Schizophrenics (n = 34) who were treated with ECT participated in this randomized crossover study. Propofol (1 mg/kg) and etomidate (0.2 mg/kg) were used alternately. The 2 drugs were compared on the basis of EEG- and EMG-registered seizure duration, mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse frequency, energy index, and postictal suppression. We also analyzed the number of necessary restimulations. In case of anesthesia with etomidate, both EEG- (61.29 +/- 22.4 s, 47.9 +/- 21.3 s P = 0.014) and EMG- (46.3 +/- 23.8 s, 33.6 +/- 15.9 s P = 0.006) registered seizure durations were significantly longer than in case of propofol. When using propofol, the increase in MAP was significantly lower than when etomidate was used (8.1 +/- 10.2 mm Hg, 18.3 +/- 11.2 mm Hg, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences found in the postseizure increase in pulse frequency, in postictal suppression, or in the energy index, nor did the numbers of necessary restimulations differ significantly. Propofol was found to reduce seizure duration to a significantly greater extent than etomidate. At the same time, in electrophysiological parameters that show a correlation with clinical efficacy, there was no significant difference found between the 2 anesthetics. However, the seizure-induced increase in MAP was reduced by propofol to a significantly greater degree than by etomidate.

The effects of intravenous lignocaine on haemodynamics and seizure duration during electroconvulsive therapy

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is commonly associated with acute hyperdynamic cardiovascular responses, and we hypothesize that intravenous lignocaine can blunt this response. We have measured the effect of lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg i.v. on heart rate and mean arterial pressure during electroconvulsive therapy. Furthermore, we also assessed seizure duration using both the cuff method and two-lead electroencephalography. We studied 25 patients using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study design. Patients in the control group were given intravenous saline 0.075 ml/kg, and those in the lignocaine group were given intravenous lignocaine 2% 1.5 mg/kg, and this treatment was conducted one minute before intravenous propofol 1.5 mg/kg to induce unconsciousness. Succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg was then administered intravenously and electrical stimulation was administered after fasciculation. Measurements were taken at the baseline, prior to succinycholine, prior to electroconvulsive therapy and at the peak response after electroconvulsive therapy. Intravenous lignocaine significantly reduced the increases in heart rate after electroconvulsive therapy, as compared with the placebo. The use of intravenous lignocaine was, however, associated with a remarkably shortened seizure duration. Due to the reduction in seizure duration, routine administration of intravenous lignocaine may not be advisable since it may interfere with the psychotherapeutic efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy. However, intravenous lignocaine medication for electroconvulsive therapy is potentially useful for reducing tachycardia in high-risk patients and reducing the severity of propofol injection pain in comparison with a placebo.

Is oral clonidine effective in modifying the acute hemodynamic response during electroconvulsive therapy?

Clonidine decreases the stress-induced sympathoadrenal responses to painful stimuli and improves hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia. Because acute hypertensive responses are often observed immediately after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), we designed a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to assess the effects of four different oral doses of clonidine (0.05-0.3 mg per os) on the acute hemodynamic response to ECT. Anesthesia was induced with methohexital 1 mg/kg followed by succinylcholine, 1.3 mg/kg i.v. A total of 110 treatments were evaluated in 22 patients. Noninvasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) values, duration of motor and electroencephalographic (EEG) seizure activity, and recovery times were recorded. Clonidine produced a dose-related decrease in MAP before and after ECT. Although clonidine 0.2-0.3 mg per os decreased the peak MAP value after ECT, the changes in MAP from the prestimulation values were similar in all treatment groups. Clonidine produced no significant changes in HR, duration of motor and EEG seizure activity, or recovery times after anesthesia. These data suggest that clonidine decreases the peak MAP value after ECT by decreasing MAP immediately before the ECT stimulus.

IMPLICATIONS

Oral clonidine (0.2-0.3 mg) decreases the acute hypertensive response after electroconvulsive therapy; however, this antihypertensive effect was achieved by decreasing the blood pressure before the electrical stimulus.