Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A CALGB randomized trial of efficacy, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness

Second-line combination therapies in nonsmall cell lung cancer without known driver mutations

In advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, platinum-based combination chemotherapy is standard treatment in the first-line setting; however, the large majority of patients ultimately progress. For more than a decade, single-agent therapy with docetaxel, pemetrexed or erlotinib has been the standard of care after failure with platinum salts, showing some benefit over best supportive care. Nonetheless, prognosis remains poor and new second-line strategies are urgently needed. Combinations of cytotoxic agents, including rechallenge with platinum salts, do not offer clear benefit over single-agent therapy for the majority of patients. In patients without a known tumoural oncogenic driver mutation, regimens based on combinations of targeted agents have shown promising results; however, a clear role in therapeutic management is yet to be established. Some success has been reported in recent research combining a cytotoxic agent with targeted therapies.In this review, we summarise published data for the various strategies evaluated over the past decade in second-line treatment of NSCLC patients without a known driver mutation. We focus on combination treatments and consider future perspectives, including the need to identify predictive markers to support personalised therapeutic strategies.

Criterion Validity of Medicare Chemotherapy Claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B Breast and Lung Cancer Trial Participants

To determine the accuracy with which Medicare claims data measure chemotherapy use in elderly Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, we performed a criterion validation study. We compared gold-standard clinical trial data for 175 elderly cancer patients treated in two Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) breast and lung cancer trials (i.e., 45 from trial 9344 and 130 from trial 9730) with contemporaneous ambulatory and in-patient Medicare health insurance claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The breast trial participants studied were those elderly enrolled between 1995 and 1997 and treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or this combination with paclitaxel. The lung trial participants studied were those elderly enrolled between 1998 and 2000 and treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin or paclitaxel alone. Comparing CALGB data with Medicare claims, we found the crude sensitivity for chemotherapy administration was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88% to 96%). Individual chemotherapy agents had similarly high sensitivities, ranging from 81% (95% CI = 70% to 89%) for carboplatin to 91% (95% CI = 79% to 98%) for cyclophosphamide. Agent-specific specificities were 100%. CMS data reliably captured repeat administration of chemotherapy to within one cycle. Administrative Medicare claims data appear to be a valid source of information for chemotherapy administered to elderly Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

Phase II Study of Carboplatin–Paclitaxel Combination Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

More than 30% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) arise in patients aged > or =70 years. The efficacy and safety of carboplatin-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in a phase II trial.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients aged > or =70 years (median, 76; range, 70-83) with chemotherapy-naive advanced NSCLC were enrolled between January 2001 and July 2003. Additional criteria included the presence of measurable lesions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients received carboplatin at an area under the curve of 5 mg/ml/min and paclitaxel at 180 mg/m(2) on the first day of consecutive 3 week periods.

RESULTS

The patients included four with stage IIIB, 19 with stage IV and two with recurrent disease. The median number of treatment cycles was three (range, 1-4). One complete response and six partial responses, yielding an objective response rate of 28%, were obtained. The median survival time was 12.3 months and the 1-year survival rate was 52%. Hematological toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included leukopenia (40%), neutropenia (68%) and anemia (4%). Non-hematological toxicities of grade 3 included arthralgia-myalgia (16%) and neuropathy (12%). The objective response rate for patients aged > or =75 years (n = 15) was 26%, and no evidence of excessive toxicity in these patients was apparent compared with those aged <75 years.

CONCLUSION

The combination carboplatin-paclitaxel at these doses is a feasible treatment option with a favorable toxicity profile for fit elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 86% of patients with lung cancer. The two most powerful predictors of long-term outcome in patients with NSCLC are the stage and performance status (PS) at diagnosis. Although the cure rates of patients with resected stage I and II NSCLC are 50% and 40%, respectively, only 20% of patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation for locally advanced NSCLC are cured of their illness. Patients with metastatic NSCLC do not have curative potential with available therapies. Outcome for patients with NSCLC and poor PS is dismal. Patients with localized disease and poor PS are treated with radiation therapy. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC are treated with sequential chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy. The suggested treatment options for patients with metastatic disease and poor PS are single-agent chemotherapy or supportive care.

Efficacy of modified regimen with attenuated doses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination chemotherapy in elderly and/or weak patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted this study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combination regimen of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC aged 65 years or older and/or in those with an ECOG performance status (PS) 2.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable pathologically-proven NSCLC and of either age >or=65 or ECOG PS 2 were eligible. Patients received modified regimen with attenuated doses of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) i.v. for 3 h D1) and carboplatin (AUC=5, D1) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Nineteen patients were aged 65 or older (54%) and 26 patients (74%) were ECOG PS 2. The objective response rate was 40% with 14 partial responses. The median time to progression was 22 weeks. Grade 3 leucopenia occurred in 1 cycle and one case of neutropenic fever.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified regimen with attenuated doses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC aged 65 years or older and/or in those with ECOG PS 2.

The case for the introduction of new chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the wake of the findings of The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE)

After years of nihilism towards the use of chemotherapy for non small cell lung cancer in the UK it would appear that we have now reached the point where the use of chemotherapy to relieve symptoms, maintain quality of life, and prolong life, are now accepted for informed patients with good performance status willing to accept short-term toxicities. The use of the new agents vinorelbine, gemcitabine and paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin are all active regimens which offer small but real advantages over standard UK triple therapies (MVP, MIC) in terms of resource use, toxicity profiles and response rates. Overall survival could be increased by as much as 10% at one year on indirect comparisons. The use of docetaxel as second line therapy now offers lung cancer patients a second bite of the cherry, and should overall also prolong survival. It is only in embracing these small gains that we can currently make progress in the treatment of NSCLC.