Topotecan preceded by oxaliplatin using a 3 week schedule: a phase I study in advanced cancer patients

A phase I study of rebeccamycin analog in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors

Rebeccamycin analog (RA) is an antitumor antibiotic with both topoisomerase I and II inhibiting activity. Topoisomerase inhibitors have demonstrated synergy with platinum agents. We performed a phase I trial of combination RA with oxaliplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. RA was administered as a 1-hour infusion daily on days 1-5 with oxaliplatin administered on day 5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. A total of 17 patients were enrolled. The MTD for RA was 80 mg/m(2)/d for five days along with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 5. Myelosuppression was a common occurrence but was mild except in one instance. Dose limiting toxicities included atrial fibrillation and hypophosphatemia. There was evidence of antitumor activity including 3 partial responses in patients with esophageal, gallbladder and hepato-cellular carcinoma; 5 additional patients had stable disease. Thus, the combination of RA and oxaliplatin is both tolerable and has evidence of clinical activity, but given the lack of significant activity for single agent RA across a variety of disease sites, it is unlikely to proceed to phase II development.

Tolerance and activity of oxaliplatin with protracted topotecan infusion in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer. A phase I study

BACKGROUND

Topotecan 14-day infusion combined with cisplatin was highly active in ovarian cancer, but too myelosuppressive. We therefore sought to evaluate the feasibility of substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin to improve safety.

METHODS

Ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer patients, pretreated with at least one prior platinum-containing regimen, performance status (PS) 0-1, without prior pelvic radiation were eligible. Topotecan was continuously infused days 1-15; oxaliplatin was given days 1 and 15; cycles were repeated every 28 days. Five dose levels were explored: topotecan (mg/m2/day)/oxaliplatin (mg/m2) doses: (1) 0.2/65; (2) 0.2/75; (3) 0.2/85; (4) 0.3/85; (5) 0.4/85.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (20 ovarian, 1 tubal, and 2 peritoneal) were entered: median age 56 years (range, 37-77); PS: 0=12 and 1=11; histology: papillary serous 7, serous 4, adenocarcinoma 8, poorly differentiated 2. Median of 4 cycles were delivered. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 of 7 patients at level 5 (with fever at levels 4 and 5), without grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were mild and reversible (mainly gastrointestinal), except one grade 3 neuropathy and one oxaliplatin-related grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. Six objective responses (five of them complete) were documented among 22 patients spanning several dose levels.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan continuous infusion, combined with oxaliplatin, was associated with no grade 4 hematologic toxicity and evidence of activity. The recommended phase II dose is topotecan 0.4 mg/m2/day continuous infusion d1-15 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. A phase II evaluation as second-line treatment for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer recurrences is ongoing.

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin and topotecan in recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Oxaliplatin and topotecan have demonstrated activity as single agents against recurrent platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer, as well as synergy in vitro. This was a dose-finding study of combination therapy with weekly topotecan and alternating-week oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, a performance status of 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. On days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) via intravenous infusion. On days 1, 8, and 15, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous topotecan (2.0-4.0 mg/m2). Five dose levels were planned with a minimum cohort of 3 patients at each level.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled and received a total of 50 cycles of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and 3.0 mg/m2 of topotecan, and grade 3 neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Four of nine (44%) evaluable patients had stable disease or a partial response to the drug combination as assessed by cancer antigen-125 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A 28-day schedule of oxaliplatin and topotecan is safe and well tolerated. Because of the in vitro synergy observed between topoisomerase I inhibitors and platinum derivatives and the tolerability reported in the current study, this regimen warrants further investigation.

Combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in urothelial cancer patients with severe renal or cardiac comorbidities

Clinical trials in urothelial cancer exclude a large population of patients. An observational study evaluated the behavior of frail patients not eligible for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens. Urothelial cancer patients requiring chemotherapy with either chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min), and/or performance status (PS) > or =2 and/or cardiac dysfunction were prospectively observed. The treatment associated gemcitabine 1200 mg/m and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m, bimonthly (GO). Over 2 years, 31 of 45 (69%) patients with urothelial cancer requiring chemotherapy were not eligible for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Sixteen (52%) had a PS > or =2, 23 (74%) had creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, and 20 (65%) had an underlying cardiopathy. A total of 178 cycles of GO were administered (median 6 per patient, range 2-12). No aggravation of renal or cardiac status was noted. Acute grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 16 and 13% of patients, respectively, with one febrile neutropenia. The median progression-free and overall survival values were 4.2 and 9.5 months, respectively. The majority of urothelial cancer patients have severe renal or cardiac comorbidities, and we conclude that in this subset of patients the combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is well tolerated, and its clinical activity warrants further evaluation.

A review of oxaliplatin and its clinical use in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of death from malignant diseases in the Western world. Worldwide, approximately 50% of patients who present with colorectal cancer will develop metastatic disease and eventually die from this malignancy. Recently, significant advances have been made in the medical treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with the introduction of novel cytotoxic drugs, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Based on the results of recent Phase III trials, combination regimens of infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) have emerged as a new standard of care in the palliative and adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. The addition of biological agents targeting angiogenesis or oncogenes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to FOLFOX will conceivably further enhance the activity of treatment regimens. Making use of all available active therapeutic options in the course of disease has significantly improved median overall survival of metastatic colorectal cancer into a chronic disease, with implications for treatment strategies and pharmacoeconomic considerations.

Platinated DNA adducts enhance poisoning of DNA topoisomerase I by camptothecin

Camptothecins constitute a novel class of chemotherapeutics that selectively target DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) by reversibly stabilizing a covalent enzyme-DNA intermediate. This cytotoxic mechanism contrasts with that of platinum drugs, such as cisplatin, which induce inter- and intrastrand DNA adducts. In vitro combination studies using platinum drugs combined with Top1 poisons, such as topotecan, showed a schedule-dependent synergistic activity, with promising results in the clinic. However, whereas the molecular mechanism of these single agents may be relatively well understood, the mode of action of these chemotherapeutic agents in combination necessitates a more complete understanding. Indeed, we recently reported that a functional homologous recombination pathway is required for cisplatin and topotecan synergy yet represses the synergistic toxicity of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl cytidine in combination with topotecan (van Waardenburg, R. C., de Jong, L. A., van Delft, F., van Eijndhoven, M. A., Bohlander, M., Bjornsti, M. A., Brouwer, J., and Schellens, J. H. (2004) Mol. Cancer Ther. 3, 393-402). Here we provide direct evidence for Pt-1,3-d(GTG) poisoning of Top1 in vitro and demonstrate that persistent Pt-DNA adducts correlate with increased covalent Top1-DNA complexes in vivo. This contrasts with a lack of persistent lesions induced by the alkylating agent bis[chloroethyl]nitrosourea, which exhibits only additive activity with topotecan in a range of cell lines. In human IGROV-1 ovarian cancer cells, the synergistic activity of cisplatin with topotecan requires processive DNA polymerization, whereas overexpression of Top1 enhances yeast cell sensitivity to cisplatin. These results indicate that the cytotoxic activity of cisplatin is due, in part, to poisoning of Top1, which is exacerbated in the presence of topotecan.

Protection against oxaliplatin acute neurosensory toxicity by venlafaxine

Venlafaxine (Effexor; Wyeth Lederlé) has previously shown therapeutic effects for the management of chronic and neuropathic pains. We report here the efficacy of venlafaxine upon acute neurosensory symptoms secondary to oxaliplatin toxicity. A dose of 50 mg of venlafaxine was given orally at the beginning of the oxaliplatin infusion. Patients did not experience any or very low paresthesias, even in the cold. As the results were very dramatic and reproducible, we propose that venlafaxine may be of use in the daily management of oxaliplatin-related neurosensory toxicity.