Epirubicin versus CMF as adjuvant therapy for stage I and II breast cancer: a prospective randomised study

Safety of Epirubicin Adjuvant Chemotherapy in a Breast Cancer Patient with Chronic Renal Failure Undergoing Hemodialytic Treatment

Anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy is very effective in early breast cancer, but there are limited data on the use of epirubicin in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialytic treatment. We report the case of a patient with early breast cancer and chronic renal failure who was treated with adjuvant weekly epirubicin. Treatment was well tolerated. The patient is still alive and relapse free 58 months after surgery. If the patient will be disease free after 5 years, she will be reconsidered for renal transplantation. In conclusion, weekly epirubicin appears to be a safe adjuvant chemotherapy option for early breast cancer patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialytic treatment.

Cytogenetic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-target cells of breast cancer patients

Spontaneous and chemotherapy-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCES) and lymphocyte proliferation rate index (PRI) in cultured peripheral lymphocytes were evaluated in 30 patients with diagnosed breast cancer before and after adjuvant chemotherapy and in 30 healthy women with no known familial history of breast cancer. Before chemotherapy, the breast cancer patients had a significantly increased background level of SCE, and lowered PRI as compared with the healthy women. Marked inter-individual variations were observed in both endpoints among the patients. Significantly elevated frequency of SCE and depressed PRI were recorded in blood samples collected after the first cycle of chemotherapy, with high inter-individual variations in the responses to the chemotherapy. FAC (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) protocol was the most genotoxic of the protocols studied, but also AC (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) and CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) clearly increased SCE. All protocols significantly retarded lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. Our findings indicate that both SCE and PRI may serve as sensitive biomarkers for the routine detection of critical lesions produced by the administration of antineoplastic drugs in the clinical setting, as well as for possible screening of high-risk individuals among patients who have successfully completed chemotherapy. Human & Experimental Toxicology (2007) 26 , 391—399

TOP2A amplification in breast cancer is a predictive marker of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy

Anthracycline is a DNA topoisomerase 2-α (TOP2A) inhibitor and its concomitant over expression with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) was investigated of being predictive for the response to anthracycline-based chemotherapies in breast cancer. 309 early and local advanced breast cancer patients were treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapies in intense dose dense (IDD) (CE, Cyclophosphamide + Epirubicin) or conventional (TE, Paclitaxel + Epirubicin) regimens. HER2 proteins were qualitatively analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of primary tumor core biopsies, and TOP2A gene amplification levels of HER2 over-expressing cases were quantified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Overall pathological complete response rate (pCR) was achieved in 14.3 %. HER2 was over expressed in 80/309 (25.9 %) cases, of which 61/80 cases have been tested for their TOP2A status. Over expression of HER2 was significantly positively correlated with higher pCR rates compared to low HER2 expression (27.5 % vs. 9.6 %, P < 0.001). Concurrent high TOP2A amplification led to a significantly higher pCR rate compared to low or no TOP2A amplification (56.3 % vs. 13.8 %, P = 0.001). HER2 over expression was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate only when TOP2A was also amplified (56.3 % vs. 9.6 %, P < 0.001), but not when it was deleted or normal (13.8 % vs. 9.6 %, P = 0.183) compared to HER2 low-expressing tumors. The interaction between HER2 or TOP2A and anthracycline-based regimen was observed in IDD and conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapies. The TOP2A amplification is related to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity, and TOP2A should be included in future studies in breast cancer as a predictive marker.

Alteration of topoisomerase II-alpha gene in human breast cancer: association with responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Approximately 35% of HER2-amplified breast cancers have coamplification of the topoisomerase II-alpha (TOP2A) gene encoding an enzyme that is a major target of anthracyclines. This study was designed to evaluate whether TOP2A gene alterations may predict incremental responsiveness to anthracyclines in some breast cancers.

METHODS

A total of 4,943 breast cancers were analyzed for alterations in TOP2A and HER2. Primary tumor tissues from patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in a trial of chemotherapy plus/minus trastuzumab were studied for amplification/deletion of TOP2A and HER2 as a test set followed by evaluation of malignancies from two separate, large trials for changes in these same genes as a validation set. Association between these alterations and clinical outcomes was determined.

RESULTS

Test set cases containing HER2 amplification treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) plus trastuzumab, demonstrated longer progression-free survival compared to those treated with AC alone (P = .0002). However, patients treated with AC alone whose tumors contain HER2/TOP2A coamplification experienced a similar improvement in survival (P = .004). Conversely, for patients treated with paclitaxel, HER2/TOP2A coamplification was not associated with improved outcomes. These observations were confirmed in a larger validation set, where HER2/TOP2A coamplification was again associated with longer survival when only anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was used for treatment compared with outcome in HER2-positive cancers lacking TOP2A coamplification.

CONCLUSION

In a study involving nearly 5,000 breast malignancies, both test set and validation set demonstrate that TOP2A coamplification, not HER2 amplification, is the clinically useful predictive marker of an incremental response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Absence of HER2/TOP2A coamplification may indicate a more restricted efficacy advantage for breast cancers than previously thought.

HER-2 and topoisomerase II as predictors of response to chemotherapy

HER2 overexpression or amplification has been shown to be associated with a poor prognostic effect in women with breast cancer. At least eight analyses based on randomized trials have examined the relationship between HER2 and the differential effect of anthracycline compared with non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Only three of these studies were sufficiently powered to show a significant interaction between HER2 and anthracycline- versus non-anthracycline-containing treatments, but because all of the study results tended to be in the same direction, it is not surprising that three recent meta-analyses of published data have suggested that anthracycline-containing regimens provide more benefit than non-anthracycline-containing regimens in women whose tumors are overexpressed or amplified (positive) for HER2. Since topoisomerase II is a known target of the anthracyclines, it has been postulated that this relationship is actually based on the proximity of HER2 to the topoisomerase II alpha gene (TOP2A) in the 17q chromosome. At least four recent studies have suggested that deletion and amplification of the TOP2A gene are associated with poor prognosis and are predictive of greater response to anthracycline-containing than to non-anthracycline-containing regimens. However, in at least one of those studies, HER2 positivity was as or more predictive. Although it has been suggested that HER2 positivity is predictive of better response to higher-dose anthracycline-containing regimens compared with standard anthracycline-containing regimens and to taxane- compared with non-taxane-containing regimens, these relationships have not been robust or consistent. Additional studies will be required to clarify these relationships.

HER2 status and efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines improves disease-free and overall survival compared with non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer. The role of HER2 status as a marker of anthracycline responsiveness has been explored by subset analyses within randomized clinical trials, with inconsistent results. We performed a pooled analysis of the interaction between HER2 status and the efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines based on the published subset data.

METHODS

We searched literature databases to identify randomized trials that compared anthracycline-based with non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer and reported efficacy data according to HER2 status. Log hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free and overall survival were pooled across the studies according to HER2 status by inverse variance weighting. A pooled test for treatment by HER2 status interaction was performed by weighted linear meta-regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Eight studies (with 6564 randomly assigned patients, of whom 5354 had HER2 status information available) were eligible for this analysis. In HER2-positive disease (n = 1536 patients), anthracyclines were superior to non-anthracycline-based regimens in terms of disease-free (pooled HR of relapse = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61 to 0.83; P < .001) and overall (pooled HR of death from any cause = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.85; P < .001) survival. In HER2-negative disease (n = 3818 patients), anthracyclines did not improve disease-free (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.11; P = .75) or overall (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.16; P = .60) survival. The test for treatment by HER2 status interaction yielded statistically significant results: for disease-free survival, the chi-square statistic for interaction was 13.7 (P < .001), and for overall survival, it was 12.6 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The added benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines appear to be confined to women who have HER2 overexpressed or amplified breast tumors.

HER2/neu in systemic therapy for women with breast cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Amplification and/or overexpression of the HER2/neu gene is associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Many studies have suggested that this gene may be associated with the relative efficacy of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy options.

METHODS

A systematic review of the evidence was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting proceedings, and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposia proceedings were all searched to November 2006 for reports of analysis by HER2/neu status of the relative efficacy of the treatment arms in randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Thirty-five trials were identified. A meta-analysis of trials of tamoxifen versus observation found no significant interaction between treatment and HER2/neu status, although one trial not included in the meta-analysis did find interaction. A meta-analysis of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy trials found a significant interaction (difference in disease-free survival log-hazard ratios -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.50 to -0.13; difference in overall survival log-hazard ratios -0.34, 95% confidence interval -0.53 to -0.14). Significant interaction was also found in a meta-analysis of disease-free survival in trials of adjuvant taxane therapy versus non-taxane therapy (difference in disease-free survival log-hazard ratios -0.36, 95% confidence interval -0.68 to -0.04). HER2/neu overexpression and/or amplification was associated with greater efficacy of the anthracycline or taxane regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports the conclusion that the benefit of both anthracycline-based and taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy is associated on HER2/neu status, with patients with HER2/neu-positive cancers benefiting more from these therapies than those with HER2/neu-negative cancers.

HER2 overexpression as a predictive marker in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil with epirubicin in patients with stage I/II breast cancer: long-term results

BACKGROUND

HER2 overexpression/amplification has been reported to be a predictor of prognosis in breast cancer and a potential marker for selecting the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HER2 expression and its interaction with treatment were retrospectively evaluated in 266 of 348 patients in a trial comparing adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil) with weekly epirubicin in stage I/II breast cancer. HER2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the monoclonal antibody CB11. Initially, any cell showing definite membrane staining was counted, and HER2 overexpression was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a dichotomous variable, with a cutoff of > 50% of positively stained cells. Subsequently, the same slides were reanalyzed with the HercepTest.

RESULTS

Of the 266 tumors immunostained for HER2, 34% exhibited nearly homogeneous staining with > 50% positive cells. When the HercepTest was applied, 8% of tumors were IHC 3+ and 8% were IHC 2+. At 8 years, no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed between the treatment arms in patients with low versus high HER2 overexpression, although the number of events is low. The OS was statistically shorter in patients with high HER2 overexpression in the CMF arm, whereas no difference was observed in the epirubicin arm, suggesting that patients whose cancer overexpresses HER2 could benefit more from anthracycline-based therapy.

CONCLUSION

HER2 overexpression was associated with a poorer OS but not a poorer RFS. However, a Cox regression model did not confirm the prognostic role of HER2 for OS.

Evaluation of the Prognostic Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density in Stages I and II Breast Cancer Patients

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) in 228 and 213 specimens, respectively, from stages I and II breast cancer patients (pts) enrolled in a randomized phase III adjuvant chemotherapy trial comparing epirubicin to CMF, while tamoxifen was given to all postmenopausal pts. The expression of VEGF and MVD was assessed on tissue sections formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded by immunohistochemical staining using anti-VEGF antibody of human origin and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chi squared test, log-rank test and Cox's regression model. Sixty four of 228 pts were classified as VEGF positive (28%) with no significant difference in the two treatment arms. In 213 pts evaluated for CD34, 103 pts (48%) were classified as MVD high. No significant association between VEGF and MVD was found, and neither were they correlated with many known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, nodal status, and histological grade. The only significant correlations observed were between VEGF and estrogen receptor (ER) status (p = 0.013) and between MVD and HER2 overexpression (p = 0.023). At a median follow up of 96 months VEGF and MVD were not correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all pts and in pts assigned to one of the two treatment arms. In conclusion, VEGF and MVD retrospectively evaluated, cannot be considered prognostic factors in node negative (N-) high risk and node positive (N+) breast cancer pts treated with two different regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Optimal and Suboptimal Anthracycline-Containing Regimens

We hypothesized that the advantage of adjuvant anthracycline-containing regimens over the conventional CMF combination found by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group overview may depend on the 'additive' or 'substitutive' nature of the administration of anthracycline in the experimental arm. The aim of this study was to explore this hypothesis. By means of computerized and hand searches, we identified 21 published randomized trials comparing early breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapies with and without anthracycline, and divided them into those in which the use of anthracycline was substantially 'additive' or substantially 'substitutive'. The trial results were then judged 'positive' or 'negative' depending on whether they showed statistically significant differences in disease-free or overall survival in favor of the anthracycline-containing regimen. Anthracycline was substantially 'additive' in 14 trials, eight of which were 'positive', and substantially 'substitutive' in seven, all of which were 'negative': this difference is statistically significant (P = 0.018). In conclusion this trial classification, an attempt to test a very simple unifying concept with the aim of explaining the different results of trials involving the administration of anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer, significantly correlated with patient outcome. It therefore seems that anthracycline-containing chemotherapeutic regimens can be considered optimal or suboptimal depending on whether or not they reflect the potential benefit offered by anthracycline administration.