Endovascular AAA repair in patients with renal insufficiency: strategies for reducing adverse renal events

A novel pre-operative risk assessment tool to identify patients at risk of contrast associated acute kidney injury after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with mortality and morbidity. Risk stratification remains a vital component of preoperative evaluation. We sought to generate and validate a pre-procedure CA-AKI risk stratification tool for elective EVAR patients.

METHODS

We queried the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) database for elective EVAR patients and excluded those on dialysis, with a history of renal transplant, death during procedure, and without creatinine measures. Association with CA-AKI (rise in creatinine > 0.5 mg/dL) was tested using mixed effects logistic regression. Variables associated with CA-AKI were used to generate a predictive model via a single classification tree. The variables selected by the classification tree were then validated by fitting a mixed effects logistic regression model into the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) dataset.

RESULTS

Our derivation cohort included 7,043 patients, 3.5% of whom developed CA-AKI. After multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.021, 95% CI 1.004-1.040), female sex (OR 1.393, CI 1.012-1.916), GFR < 30 ml/min (OR 5.068, CI 3.255-7.891), current smoking (OR 1.942, CI 1.067-3.535), COPD (OR 1.402, CI 1.066-1.843), maximum AAA diameter (OR 1.018, CI 1.006-1.029), and presence of iliac artery aneurysm (OR 1.352, CI 1.007-1.816) were associated with increased odds of CA-AKI. Our risk prediction calculator demonstrated that patients with a GFR <30 ml/min, females, and patients with a maximum AAA diameter of > 6.9 cm are at higher risk of CA-AKI after EVAR. Using the VQI dataset (N = 62,986), we found that GFR <30 ml/min (OR 4.668, CI 4.007-5.85), female sex (OR 1.352, CI 1.213-1.507), and maximum AAA diameter > 6.9 cm (OR 1.824, CI 1.212-1.506) were associated with increased risk of CA-AKI after EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, we present a simple and novel risk assessment tool that can be used pre-operatively to identify patients at risk of CA-AKI after EVAR. Patients with a GFR < 30 ml/min, maximum AAA diameter > 6.9 cm, and females who are undergoing EVAR may be at risk for CA-AKI after EVAR. Prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy of our model.

The effect of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Renal Function in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Aim:

The effect of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm has not been clearly defined. The objective of the present article was to provide a contemporary literature review and perform an analysis to determine the effect of EVAR on renal function in the early post-operative period and during follow-up.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies reporting the effect of EVAR on renal function. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed or random-effects models.

Results:

Thirty-two studies reporting on 24846 patients were included. Acute renal failure after EVAR occurred with an estimated frequency of 9% (95%CI: 5-16%; I2=97%). Median follow-up period was 19.5 months (range 1-60 months). The estimated frequency of chronic renal failure during follow-up was 7% (95%CI: 3-17%; I2=98%). Hemodialysis was required in 2% (1-3%; I2=97%) of the cases.

Conclusion:

High-level evidence demonstrating the effect of EVAR on the incidence of acute and chronic renal failure is lacking. Based on the current available data, nearly 10% of patients undergoing EVAR for AAA have an increased risk for renal dysfunction after the procedure. Whether this deterioration may lead to a worse outcome has not been adequately proved.

Anesthetic considerations for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Aneurysm is defined as a localized and permanent dilatation with an increase in normal diameter by more than 50%. It is more common in males and can affect up to 8% of elderly men. Smoking is the greatest risk factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and other risk factors include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of aneurysms, inflammatory vasculitis, and trauma. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair [EVAR] is a common procedure performed for AAA, because of its minimal invasiveness as compared with open surgical repair. Patients undergoing EVAR have a greater incidence of major co-morbidities and should undergo comprehensive preoperative assessment and optimization within the multidisciplinary settings. In majority of cases, EVAR is extremely well-tolerated. The aim of this article is to outline the Anesthetic considerations related to EVAR.

Barriers to Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Past Experience and Implications for Future Device Development

Despite improvements in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices and techniques, significant anatomic constraints still preclude successful EVAR in a large number of patients. The authors sought to identify the current barriers to EVAR and examine their evolution over time. Patients were evaluated for potential endovascular repair by computed tomography angiography (CTA) with or without supplemental conventional arteriograms. The patient population was separated into 2 groups (A and B) based on early and late time periods in the experience with EVAR, corresponding to the availability of various devices. Group A (early) consisted of the Guidant Ancure, Medtronic Talent, and AneuRx devices and comprised patients presenting between April 1997 through June 2000. Group B (late) consisted of the Medtronic AneuRx, Cook Zenith, Edwards Lifepath, Gore Excluder, and Endologix PowerLink devices and comprised patients presenting between July 2000 and December 2003. Patient demographics and anatomic reasons for rejection were recorded in a database for statistical analysis. In total, 547 patients were evaluated (463 men, 84 women). Of these, 346 patients (63%; 312 men, 34 women) were deemed suitable candidates for EVAR and 201 (37%; 151 men, 50 women) were rejected. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of rejection in the early vs the late time period (34% A, 41% B, p= 0.08), but the number of exclusion criteria per patient decreased over time; patients rejected for EVAR had an overall average of 1.6 exclusion criteria (Group A, 1.9; Group B, 1.2). The reasons for rejection did significantly change over time. Specifically, rejection on the basis of inadequate arterial access, presence of extensive iliac artery aneurysms, or an inadequate proximal neck decreased. A disproportionate number of women were excluded throughout the study: Group A, 56% of women compared to 30% of men (p= 0.0003); Group B, 63% of women compared to 36% of men (p= 0.0022). Women were more likely than men to have inadequate arterial access routes. In addition, patients with high operative risk were also more likely to be excluded from EVAR, a finding that persisted over time. Anatomic constraints continue to pose significant challenges to aortic endografting. Progress has been made in that technological advances have conquered some of the previous anatomic challenges, chiefly those of arterial access and treatment of concomitant iliac aneurysm disease. However, the overall rate of rejection for EVAR remains the same. The chief anatomic barriers continue to be the difficult aortic neck and management of branched vascular segments.

Clinical Impact of Chronic Renal Insufficiency on Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become a viable alternative to open repair. A significant proportion of this patient population has chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical outcomes associated with endovascular repair in 342 patients, with and without chronic renal insufficiency, are reported. Perioperative mortality, length of admission, length of intensive care unit admission, and rates of acute renal failure, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, conversion to open surgery, progression to hemodialysis, and incidence of endoleaks were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Endovascular repair demonstrated higher rates of acute renal failure, longer length of stay, and longer intensive care unit admissions in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Patients with severe renal dysfunction demonstrated markedly elevated mortality and morbidity. These results indicate that chronic renal insufficiency is not an absolute contraindication to endovascular repair in patients with moderate renal dysfunction, but patients with severe renal dysfunction perform poorly after aortic reconstruction.

Efficacy Analysis of a Script-based Guide for EVAR Execution: is it Possible to Reduce Patient Exposure to Contrast, Operative Time and Blood Loss even when Advanced Technologies are not Available?

INTRODUCTION

Despite the patient and medical staff exposure to radiation in endovascular aneurysm repair, the benefits of this abdominal aortic aneurysm type of surgical management are justfied by minor recovery time and hospitalization, as well as an option for patients not elected to conventional open repair. In this minimally invasive surgical aproach, time of procedure and radiation doses can be substantial - and the increasing frequency of these procedures and it's complexity have impelled vascular surgeons to face additional and successive risk to occupational radiation exposure. Meticulous study of the computed tomography angiography during the endovascular aneurysm repair preparation allows reduction of unnecessary radiation exposure, as also reduces consecutive image acquisition and contrast use (that may be related to renal overload in susceptible patients). Some studies have proposed strategies to optimize endovascular intervention to reduce contrast use and X-ray exposure. Although they might prove to be effective, they rely on use of additional specific and advanced equipment, available only in major centers. As an alternative to this expensive and restrict technology, it is presented a simpler technique through image manipulation on software OsiriX, aiming to reduce both exposures.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy of the adoption of a study protocol and a script-based guide in preparation for endovascular aneurysm repair through verifying it's impact over the surgical procedure - as referred to intravascular contrast infuse, effects over renal function, blood loss and operatory time.

METHODS

A longitudinal prospective study from March 2014 through March 2015, where 30 performed endovascular aneurysm repair were compared to a historic control group. The planning for endovascular aneurysm repair through the patient's tomographic image manipulation in the prospective group was performed with OsiriX MD software. A script-based guide upon gathering detailed computed tomography angiography images was elaborated by the author and distributed to the performing surgical team for appreciation, instruction and pre operatory judgment. Based upon the script, the C-arm gantry angle was specifically corrected in each case of endovascular aneurysm repair, for image optimization and aneurysm's neck visualization. Arteriography was performed under digital subtraction angiography after catheters were positioned according to predicted level description in the referred guide. Statistical analysis were performed with a significance level of 5% (P value<0.05).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant relationship between the two studied periods and the variables: contrast volume (284.5 vs. 31.8 mL), operative time (207.5 vs. 140.4 min.) and blood loss (798.1 vs. 204.4 mL), revealing that they are considerably larger in the historical control group than in the script guided current group. There was no difference related to the volume of contrast used in the two groups and the occurrence of renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

In the present paper it was possible to demonstrate the impact of the ability to manipulate digital formats of medical images without the need of sophisticated equipment, in adoption of a guide based on the compilation of informations collected with assistance of an accessible software performed on a personal computer. Although we could not prove relation to occurrence of renal impairment, there were direct results on reduction of intravascular contrast use, even as surgical time and blood loss, compared to a previous historical period.

Image fusion performed with noncontrast computed tomography scans during endovascular aneurysm repair

We report two endovascular aneurysm repair procedures achieved under image fusion guidance accomplished with noncontrast injected preoperative computed tomography scans. Such use of this advanced imaging application reduces contrast media injection volume (respectively, 27 and 24 mL throughout the patients' hospital course). No changes in creatinine clearance occurred after the procedures. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging confirmed technical success in both cases.

A Retrospective Analysis of Comparison of General Versus Regional Anaesthesia for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare general anaesthesia (GA) versus regional anaesthesia (RA) for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We analysed the files of 89 patients between August 2010-August 2012 who underwent elective EVAR retrospectively.

RESULTS

We performed RA for 32 patients (36%) and GA for 57 patients (64%). The operations were completed successfully in both groups and did not require conventional surgery. The mean age of the patients was 71.5±7 (range 50-88 years). RA was preferred more than GA in the presence of advanced-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease statistically (p=0.032). The usage of vasodilator drug and atropine was found to be higher in the GA group than the RA group in the intraoperative period (p=0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). The intensive care unit (ICU) was necessary for 5 patients in the RA group (16%) and 13 patients for the GA group (23%) postoperatively (p=0.301). The median ICU stay in the RA group was 2 hours and 4.4 hours in the GA group (p=0.114). The median hospital stay was 2.63±1.91 days in the RA group and 2.04±1.16 days in the GA group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.120). There was no mortality of patients in either group for the peroperative period and the 30-day follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Our present study suggests that patient characteristics are more important than the anaesthetic method on the outcomes of EVAR.

Bicarbonates for the prevention of postoperative renal failure in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized pilot trial

Purpose. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) can contribute to acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm surgery. We evaluated the incidence of AKI together with the evolution of early biomarkers of renal injury in patients receiving bicarbonates or NaCl 0.9%. Methods. This study involved endovascular aortic aneurysm surgery patients. Group A (n = 17) received bicarbonates 3 mL/kg/h for 1 h before the procedure and then 1 mL/kg/h until 6 h after surgery, whereas group B (n = 17) received NaCl 0.9% using the same protocol. Biomarkers of renal injury from urine (interleukin-18 (IL-18), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1)) and blood (NGAL, cystatin C) were measured at baseline and 3, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Results. AKI occurred in 1 patient (2.9%), in the bicarbonates group. IL-18, NAG, NGAL, and KIM-1 significantly rose in both groups after the surgery. There was a greater rise in NGAL and IL-18 after 3 h in the bicarbonates versus NaCl 0.9% group: 1115% versus 240% increase (P = 0.03) and 338% increase versus 1.4% decrease (P = 0.01). Conclusions. Despite significant elevation in biomarkers of renal injury, we demonstrated a low rate of AKI following endovascular aortic surgery.

Stereotactic endovascular aortic navigation with a novel ultrasonic-based three-dimensional localization system

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic procedures have been developed to treat many aortic diseases effectively. However, these procedures are also becoming increasingly complex given the development of branched or fenestrated endografts. Part of the difficulty lies in the limitations of current imaging paradigms. A more intuitive, three-dimensional (3D) mode of intraoperative imaging is desirable to accommodate the future progression of endovascular techniques. This article describes a novel endovascular catheter tracking device that uses ultrasonic signals, not ultrasound imaging. The tracking device displays real-time in vivo location on previously acquired 3D computed tomography (CT) images in an intuitive, endoluminal view. This system was tested in two swine and validated against fluoroscopy and by delivering stent grafts.

METHODS

The ultrasonic-based localization system (ULS) provides real-time location information of a modified endovascular catheter and displays this location on preoperative 3D CT images. The 9F endovascular catheter has a small ultrasonic transmitter attached to its tip to signal its location to the ULS. Subsequent endovascular deployment of an aortic stent was carried out using only the ULS to target the stent placement position in the aorta of Yorkshire swine. System accuracy was measured against concurrent angiography as well as to deployed stents in situ.

RESULTS

We successfully displayed the endovascular catheter tip location in real time along the registered CT aortic images, providing virtual endoluminal tracking. The relative accuracy of the ULS as compared with angiography for catheter movements in the abdominal aorta was found to have a mean error less than 1 mm. The ULS coordinates tracked within the lumen of the aortic image 98% of the time, as defined by the proportion of points within one radius distance of the aortic image centerline. Finally, three aortic stents were deployed using the ULS virtual image display to locate the target position in the aorta for stent deployment. Errors between target position and actual stent position ranged from -5.0 to +7.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of virtual image-guided endovascular aortic navigation using a ULS. This provides a 3D platform for virtual navigation on preoperative CT scan images during endovascular procedures that could assist in stent deployment as well as minimize or eliminate the need for procedural ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast. Future work will focus on miniaturization and refinements in accuracy that will be required to translate this technology into clinical application in endovascular procedures.

Changes in inflammatory response after endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection

This present study aims to investigate the changes in the inflammatory markers after elective endovascular treatment of Type B aortic dissection with aneurysm, as related to different anatomical features of the dissection flap in the paravisceral perfusion. Consecutive patients with type B aortic dissections with elective endovascular stent graft repair were recruited and categorized into different groups. Serial plasma levels of cytokines (Interleukin-1β, -6, -8, -10, TNF-α), chemokines (MCP-1), and serum creatinine were monitored at pre-, peri- and post-operative stages. The length of stent graft employed in each surgery was retrieved and correlated with the change of all studied biochemical parameters. A control group of aortic dissected patients with conventional medication management was recruited for comparing the baseline biochemical parameters. In total, 22 endovascular treated and 16 aortic dissected patients with surveillance were recruited. The endovascular treated patients had comparable baseline levels as the non-surgical patients. There was no immediate or thirty day-mortality, and none of the surgical patients developed post-operative mesenteric ischaemia or clinically significant renal impairment. All surgical patients had detectable pro-inflammatory mediators, but none of the them showed any statistical significant surge in the peri-operative period except IL-1β and IL-6. Similar results were obtained when categorized into different groups. IL-1β and IL-6 showed maximal levels within hours of the endovascular procedure (range, 3.93 to 27.3 higher than baseline; p = 0.001), but returned to baseline 1 day post-operatively. The change of IL-1β and IL-6 at the stent graft deployment was statistically greater in longer stent graft (p>0.05). No significant changes were observed in the serum creatinine levels. In conclusion, elective endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection associated with insignificant changes in inflammatory mediators and creatinine. All levels fell toward basal levels post-operatively suggesting that thoracic endovascular aortic repair is rather less aggressive with insignificant inflammatory modulation.

Comparative analysis of renal function after treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with a suprarenal fixation device as opposed to open surgery

We analyzed the repercussions on renal function between suprarenal endograft fixation and open surgery in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) and determined the influential factors. Between 1999 and 2005, 59 IAAAs were treated with elective OS and 56 with SEF. The serum creatinine (Cr) level and its clearance were determined before the procedure, in the intensive care unit (ICU), on discharge, and after 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. A deterioration in renal function was considered to be a >30% increase in Cr or a Cr >2 mg/dL. A univariate statistical analysis and a logistical regression analysis were carried out to determine the predictive factors for repercussions on renal function. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of renal exacerbation between the groups either on discharge (p = 0.52) or after 1 month (p = 0.483), 6 months (p = 0.451), 12 months (p = 0.457), and 24 months (p = 0.682). The only significant difference was that detected in the ICU (p = 0.033). Diabetes mellitus, time spent in the ICU, postoperative intubation time, intraoperative transfusion, and transfusion in the ICU were factors that influenced the deterioration of renal function in the univariate analysis. The only significant factor in the multivariate analysis was the need for transfusion in the ICU. Exacerbation of renal function occurred in both groups independently of treatment type. In the immediate postoperative period, hemodynamic deterioration is more frequent in the open surgery group. Renal exacerbation tended to disappear in both groups during follow-up.

Suprarenal endograft fixation and medium-term renal function: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Suprarenal fixation is widely used in endovascular aneurysm repair. Numerous small, underpowered studies have concluded that it does not increase the risk of renal impairment compared with infrarenal fixation. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that renal infarction is more common with suprarenal fixation, but the effect on renal function remains unclear.

METHODS

Electronic abstract databases, article reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for series reporting renal function data after suprarenal fixation. There was considerable study heterogeneity with respect to key factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction and length of follow-up. Authors were contacted to obtain individual patient data for a pooled reanalysis using standardized criteria.

RESULTS

Of 46 potentially relevant citations, only 11 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Complete data sets were available for four studies (1065 patients), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for postoperative renal impairment in the suprarenal fixation and infrarenal fixation groups and compared by the log-rank test. Median time free of renal impairment was 38.5 months in the infrarenal fixation group compared with 32.4 months in the suprarenal fixation group (P = .0038). However, to account for significant methodologic differences, further analysis was required using a Weibull regression model fitted in open Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling (BUGS). The pooled hazard ratio for deterioration of renal function after suprarenal fixation was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-10).

CONCLUSION

Currently available data are insufficient to determine the precise effect of suprarenal fixation on medium-term renal function. Conventional Kaplan-Meier analysis of the pooled data set suggested that suprarenal fixation increased the risk of renal dysfunction; however, the effect disappeared when sophisticated statistical modelling was performed to account for study heterogeneity. A randomised controlled trial of suprarenal fixation may resolve this issue.

Complications after endovascular stent-grafting of thoracic aortic diseases

Background

To update our experience with thoracic aortic stent-graft treatment over a 5-year period, with special consideration for the occurrence and management of complications.

Methods

From December 2000 to June 2006, 52 patients with thoracic aortic pathologies underwent endovascular repair; there were 43 males (83%) and 9 females, mean age 63 ± 19 years (range 17–87). Fourteen patients (27%) were treated for degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysm, 12 patients (24%) for penetrating aortic ulcer, 8 patients (15%) for blunt traumatic injury, 7 patients (13%) for acute type B dissection, 6 patients (11%) for a type B dissecting aneurysm; 5 patients (10%) with thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms were excluded from the analyses. Fifteen patients (32%) underwent emergency treatment. Overall, mean EuroSCORE was 9 ± 3 (median 15, range 3–19). All procedures were performed in the theatre under general anesthesia. All complications occurring during hospitalisation were recorded. Follow-up protocol featured CT-A, and chest X-rays 1, 4 and 12 months after intervention, and annually thereafter.

Results

Primary technical success was achieved in all patients; procedures never aborted because of access difficulty. Conversion to standard open repair was never required. Mean duration of the procedure was 119 ± 75 minutes (median 90, range 45–285). Mean blood loss was 254 mL (range 50–1200 mL). The mean length of the aorta covered by the SGs was 192 ± 21 mm (range 100–360). The LSA was over-stented in 17 cases (17/47, 36%). Overall 30-day operative mortality was 6.4% (3/47). Major complications included pneumonia (n = 9), cerebrovascular accidents (n = 4), arrhythmia (n = 4), acute renal failure (n = 3), and colic ischemia (n = 1). Overall, endoleak rate was 14%.

Conclusion

Although this report is a retrospective and not comparative analysis of thoracic aortic repair, the combined minor and major morbidity rate was lower than previous reported to results of either electively and emergency performed conventional repair.

A comparison of renal function between open and endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with baseline chronic renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is rapidly becoming the predominant technique for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from current studies, however, are conflicting on the effect of EVAR on renal function compared with standard open repair. Furthermore, data for open repair in patients with baseline renal insufficiency suggests worse outcomes, including renal function. This analysis compared the effects of open repair vs EVAR on renal function in patients with baseline renal insufficiency.

METHODS

We reviewed our records for patients with preoperative chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine, 1.5 mg/dL) who underwent open repair or EVAR between 1999 and 2004. The same group of vascular surgeons at a single institution performed aneurysm repair on 98 patients: 46 open (37 men, 9 women) and 52 EVAR (50 men, 2 women). Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were compared, as was the development of postoperative renal impairment (increase in serum creatinine >30%).

RESULTS

Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were not statistically different between the open and EVAR groups during any time period studied. Likewise when comparing the magnitude of change in serum creatinine in patients between the postoperative and follow-up times with preoperative values, no significant differences existed between the open and EVAR groups. When the change in serum creatinine over time within each group was compared, however, the open group had a significant increase in serum creatinine postoperatively (2.43 +/- 1.20 vs 2.04 +/- 0.64, P = .012), which returned to baseline during follow-up (1.96 +/- 0.94, P = .504). Although serum creatinine in the EVAR group increased compared with preoperative values of 2.04 +/- 0.55 (postoperative, 2.27 +/- 1.04; follow-up, 2.40 +/- 1.37), this failed to reach statistical significance for the postoperative (P = .092) or follow-up (P = .081) periods. A similar pattern was noted in creatinine clearance. Postoperative renal impairment was noted in 13 open (28%) and 15 EVAR patients (29%) and was not statistically different between groups. Overall, two patients (4.3%) from the open group and four (7.7%) from the EVAR group required hemodialysis; one in the EVAR group required permanent hemodialysis. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .681).

CONCLUSIONS

Open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with pre-existent renal insufficiency can be performed safely with preservation of renal function. In contrast to previous reports, no significant differences existed between open repair and EVAR in postoperative alterations in renal function. Although a significant increase in serum creatinine develops in patients with renal insufficiency postoperatively with open repair, this appears to be transient, and preoperative renal dysfunction alone should not exclude either approach. After EVAR, patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency continue to be at risk for progressive renal dysfunction, and protective measures should be taken to preserve renal function in this patient population.

Transrenal Fixation of Aortic Stent-Grafts: Short- to Midterm Effects on Renal Function—A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the short- to midterm effects of transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on renal function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for English-language literature was performed. Studies with at least 10 patients were included for data analysis. Only studies on transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts that included follow-up results for renal function were included. A log-linear model was used for meta-analysis to compare transrenal fixation with infrarenal fixation.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Because two studies analyzed the same group of patients, one was excluded, for a total of 21 studies. Comparisons between transrenal fixation and infrarenal fixation were found in seven studies. For transrenal versus infrarenal fixation, the combined odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and P value were found to be statistically significant with respect to postprocedural renal infarction only (combined odds ratio, 5.189; 95% confidence interval: 3.198, 8.420; P < .001). No significant difference was found between transrenal and infrarenal fixation with respect to renal dysfunction, renal artery occlusion, or endoleaks (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts seems to be a relatively safe alternative compared with infrarenal fixation in terms of short- to midterm follow-up. Postprocedural renal infarction, however, was significantly higher for transrenal fixation.

Acute renal failure after endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an increasingly used alternative to open surgical repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The effect of EVAR on postprocedure acute renal failure has not been determined. We hypothesized that EVAR would be associated with a lower risk of acute renal failure and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of the 2002 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer inpatient care database in the United States, reflecting discharges from a representative sample of United States hospitals. We identified 6614 discharges with a primary diagnosis of unruptured AAA and a primary procedure code for open AAA repair or EVAR. We excluded 56 patients with end-stage renal disease and 42 patients who underwent concomitant aortorenal bypass. We compared EVAR vs open repair in this cohort. The main outcome measures were acute renal failure and acute renal failure requiring dialysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6516 patient discharges met the inclusion criteria for the study, and postprocedure acute renal failure developed in 439 (6.7%). EVAR was associated with lower odds of acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.53) and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.63). Results were similar when EVAR and open AAA repair were compared within quintiles of the propensity score for the receipt of EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open AAA repair, EVAR is associated with a lower risk of postprocedure acute renal failure.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with suprarenal vs infrarenal fixation: A study of renal effects

OBJECTIVES

Although suprarenal fixation may be of benefit during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), its safety with regards to renal effects remains uncertain. To date, there has been no controlled study of the topic, with most reports relying upon single-center experiences that use heterogeneous patient populations and devices from different manufacturers. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of suprarenal fixation on renal function by comparing homogeneous patient populations receiving EVAR grafts from a single manufacturer that are identical in design and delivery method, except for utilizing either suprarenal (SR) or infrarenal (IR) fixation.

METHODS

During two pivotal US Food and Drug Administration trials, 283 patients underwent EVAR with the Powerlink bifurcated graft. The trials' inclusion and exclusion criteria and grafts were identical except for fixation scheme. Clinical, laboratory, and computed tomographic (CT) data were retrospectively reviewed. A comparison of preoperative, perioperative (1 to 7 days), and postoperative (>7 days) alterations in serum creatinine (SCr), creatinine clearance (CrCl), and blood pressure was performed. Renal adverse events were determined by CT scan and clinical chart review and included renal infarction, renal artery stenosis (either progressive or requiring renal stent placement), and renal artery occlusion.

RESULTS

Both SR and IR groups demonstrated a significant increase in SCr and a decrease in CrCl over time. No significant difference in SCr or CrCl existed between groups during any time period. There were no differences in postoperative renal impairment (IR, 10.2%; SR, 7.6%, P = .634), the need for hemodialysis (IR, 0.7%; SR, 0%, P = 1.00), or systolic and diastolic blood pressure during subsequent follow-up between treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the number of renal adverse events detected by CT between the IR (10, 6.8%) and SR (3, 3.8%) groups (P = .550).

CONCLUSION

Suprarenal fixation does not lead to a significant increase in acute renal events, renal impairment, or alteration in blood pressure compared with infrarenal fixation. Patients undergoing aneurysm repair with devices that use either suprarenal or infrarenal fixation develop progressive renal dysfunction over time. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of suprarenal fixation on renal function and progression of renal artery stenosis.

Outcomes of accessory renal artery occlusion during endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Accessory renal arteries are frequently encountered when patients are evaluated for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Some have considered their presence a contraindication to EVAR in fear of endoleak and the end result of renal function. We sought to determine whether the coverage of accessory renal arteries during EVAR was associated with any adverse sequelae.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the medical records and computed tomographic scans of all patients undergoing EVAR (1998 to 2003) was performed. Note was made of the presence or absence of accessory renal arteries, hypertension, and renal function. Preoperative computed tomographic images were compared with postoperative images to determine the presence of renal infarction. A control group of 26 consecutive patients without accessory renal arteries was used for comparison of the results of EVAR.

RESULTS

EVAR was performed in 550 patients over the study interval. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 1-48 months). The average age was 74 years (range, 57-90 years). Thirty-five patients (6.6%; 32 male and 3 female) were documented to have accessory renal arteries; the average number of accessory arteries was 2 (range, 1-4). Bilateral accessory arteries were present in 13 patients: all but 1 patient (n = 34) had a left-sided accessory renal artery, and 23 had a right-sided accessory renal artery. EVAR was performed with a variety of endografts: AneuRx (n = 10), Talent (n = 7), PowerLink (n = 7), Zenith (n = 5), LifePath (n = 4), and Ancure (n = 2). There were no mortalities. Twelve endoleaks were documented: three type I, eight type II, and one type III. The accessory renal arteries were not implicated in any of the endoleaks, and none of these accessory vessels was embolized before or after EVAR. Seven patients (20%) had renal infarcts associated with EVAR that were noted on follow-up computed tomographic scans. The mean follow-up for patients with segmental infarction was 23 months (range, 8-48 months). Hypertensive status did not change in any patient in whom an accessory renal artery had been covered. The average serum creatinine was 1.08 mg/dL (range, 0.6-1.8 mg/dL) before EVAR in patients with accessory renal arteries covered by an endovascular graft and did not change significantly in response to EVAR. Serum creatinine increased almost twofold in two patients but spontaneously resolved in follow-up. The average preoperative creatinine clearance was 79 mL/min (range, 35-166 mL/min) in patients without an accessory renal artery and was 80 mL/min (range, 35-167 mL/min) after EVAR. The average preoperative creatinine clearance was 67 mL/min (range, 31-137 mL/min) in patients with an accessory renal artery and 68 mL/min (range, 45-83 mL/min) in patients with renal infarcts. None of the patients required temporary or permanent dialysis. There was no difference between control patients and patients with covered accessory renal arteries with respect to hypertensive status, presence of renal infarcts, serum creatinine, or creatinine clearance after EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Occlusion of accessory renal arteries is not associated with clinically significant signs or symptoms, even in patients with mild or moderate renal insufficiency. Sacrifice of accessory renal arteries most commonly does not lead to detectable renal infarction, either clinically or radiographically. When segmental infarction of the kidney does result, it seems to be well tolerated in this group of patients. Accessory renal arteries were not found to contribute to endoleaks and should not be prophylactically embolized.

The impact of aortic endografts on renal function

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact on late postoperative renal function of suprarenal and infrarenal fixation of endografts used to treat infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 277 patients treated from 2000 to 2003 with three different endografts at two clinical centers. Five patients on dialysis for preoperative chronic renal failure were excluded. Group IF of 135 patients treated with an infrarenal device (Medtronic AneuRx) was compared with group SF of 137 patients treated with a suprarenal device (106 Cook Zenith and 31 Medtronic Talent). Renal function was evaluated by calculating preoperative and latest postoperative creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft formula. Patients who developed a >20% decrease in CrCl were considered to have significantly impaired renal function.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, aneurysm size, preoperative risk factors, dose of intra- and postoperative contrast, or baseline CrCl (IF: 69.3 mL/min, SF: 71.7 mL/min, P = .4). Follow-up time of 12.2 months was the same in both groups. CrCl decreased significantly during the follow-up period in both groups (IF: 69.3 mL/min to 61.7 mL/min, P < .01; SF: 71.7 mL/min to 64.9 mL/min, P < .03). Postoperative CrCl (IF: 61.7 mL/min, SF: 64.9 mL/min, P = .3), and the rate of CrCl decrease during the follow-up period (IF: -10.9%, SF: -9.5%, P = .2) was not different between the two groups. The number of patients with a >20% decrease in CrCl was not different between the two groups (IF: n = 35 [25.9%], SF: n = 41 [29.9%], P = .46). However, the magnitude of decrease in CrCl in patients with renal impairment was greater in patients treated with suprarenal fixation endografts (SF: -39%) compared with those treated with infrarenal endografts (IF: -31%, P = .005). This greater degree of renal impairment was not due to identifiable differences in preoperative risk factors, age, or baseline CrCl. No patients in these series required dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless the type of endograft used, there is a 10% decrease in CrCl in the first year after endovascular aneurysm repair. Suprarenal fixation does not seem to increase the likelihood of postoperative renal impairment. Decline in renal function over time after endovascular aortic repair is probably due to multiple factors, and measures known to be effective in protecting kidneys should be considered for these patients. Long-term follow-up with measurement of CrCl, along with renal imaging and regular blood pressure measurements, should be performed to detect possible late renal dysfunction. Prospective studies comparing suprarenal versus infrarenal fixation are needed to confirm those results.

The Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Concurrent Renal Impairment

INTRODUCTION

Patients with concurrent renal impairment and abdominal aortic aneurysms present a significant challenge in terms of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative management. This aim of this review was to determine the risks of surgery in this patient group and determine whether any clear management strategies exist to enhance their clinical management.

METHODS

Systematic review of published literature giving details of the outcome of open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with pre-operative renal impairment. Papers concerning the management of post-operative acute renal failure in patients with normal pre-operative renal function has not been included.

RESULTS

There is little data regarding patients with end-stage renal failure and AAA although these patients appear to have a high peri-operative mortality rate. In contrast, those with renal impairment do not have a significantly higher mortality rate than those with normal renal function, rather they have a higher risk of complications associated with surgery and may require more intensive post-operative organ system support than normal patients. Many have a transient deterioration in renal function in the immediate peri-operative period that will resolve. In the case of patients with ruptured AAA, it is not clear whether pre-operative renal impairment affects mortality.

Midterm outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: A single institution's experience

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed midterm durability of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in octogenarians compared with younger patients.

METHODS

Data for 182 consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR between 1999 and 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-nine patients (27%) were 80 years or older (study group [SG]; mean age, 84 years; range, 80-89 years), and 133 patients (73%) were younger (control group [CG]; mean age, 72 years; range, 53-79 years). Chi2 analysis, Fisher exact test, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used as appropriate to test for intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and multivariate Cox models were used for time-to-event analysis, with P < or =.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 1-43 months). Body weight was higher (P <.001), and elevated plasma lipid levels (59% vs 43%; P =.042) and use of nicotine (47% vs 29%; P =.015) more frequent in the octogenarians. Baseline aneurysm size, procedure-related data, and hospital stay were comparable between groups. Aneurysm-related mortality was 0% in the study group and 0.7% in the control group (P =.740). Systemic complications occurred in 22% (SG) versus 11% (CG) (P =.035), owing to a rise in serum creatinine concentration greater than 30% of baseline in 14% in the octogenarian group (vs 5% in the CG; P =.048). Groin lymphoceles developed in 12% (SG) versus 2% (CG; P =.013). Technical success was 96% (SG) versus 98% (CG; P =.408), and clinical success was 86% versus 90% (P =.269). No aneurysm rupture occurred during follow-up, and aneurysm-related adverse events were comparable between groups. The estimated risk for any type of endoleak (2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.2; P =.023) or type II endoleak (2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.3; P = 0.51) was higher in the study group versus the control group; however, this did not affect secondary procedure rates (SG 16% vs CG 12%; estimated risk, SG vs CG,: 1.5; 95% CI, 0.6-3.6; P = 0.420) or aneurysm remodeling (97.2% combined aneurysm sac stabilization or decrease in both groups; P =.592). Aneurysm enlargement occurred in 2.8% (SG 1 vs CG 4; P =.592).

CONCLUSION

Elective EVAR in octogenarians appears safe and effective over midterm follow-up, with a temporary decrease in renal function (14%) and postoperative lymphoceles (12%) being the most common postoperative adverse events. Advanced chronologic age is not associated with diminished procedural outcome, clinical success, or postoperative survival, compared with younger age. Because of low perioperative mortality and high procedural success, EVAR may be the preferred approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment in selected elderly patients.

Morbidity and mortality associated with renal insufficiency and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 5-year experience

To evaluate the outcome of patients with renal insufficiency undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), data were prospectively collected between 1998 and 2003 on patients undergoing elective repair of their AAA with a stent graft. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with serum creatinine (Crs) concentrations <1.2 (Group A) and those with Crs > or =1.2 mg/dL not requiring hemodialysis (Group B). The outcomes of the procedure for these 2 groups were compared. Different variables that existed between the 2 groups and contributed to mortality included estimated blood loss (EBL), volume of contrast used in the operating room, incidence of diabetes (DM), tobacco use, and history of myocardial infarction (MI). In total, 213 patients underwent elective repair of their AAA with use of a stent graft: 61% who had a Crs <1.2 mg/dL (Group A) and 39% who had a Crs > or =1.2 mg/dL not requiring dialysis (Group B). Among 129 patients with normal renal function there was an 18.6% complication rate and 1.6% mortality rate. Of 83 patients with renal insufficiency not on hemodialysis 30.1% (Fisher's Exact Test = 0.076) had 1 or more complications and there was a 6% (Fisher's Exact Test = 0.166) mortality rate. One patient in Group A (0.8%) progressed to hemodialysis and 5 (6%) patients in Group B progressed to end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (p=0.068). A statistically significant higher proportion of the patients in Group B had a history of MI (p<0.001). There was no difference in the amount of EBL between the 2 groups, but a significantly lower amount of contrast (p<0.05) was used in patients with renal insufficiency.

Prevention of perioperative acute renal failure: what works?

Perioperative acute renal failure (ARF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients undergoing cardiac, vascular and major abdominal surgery and those with pre-operative renal insufficiency are at increased risk for developing post-operative ARF. The aetiologies of perioperative ARF are multi-factorial. However, pre-renal azotaemia and ischaemic acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are the predominant causes. Preventive strategies involve identifying patients at risk, optimizing intravascular volume as well as renal function with perioperative haemodynamic monitoring, and avoiding nephrotoxins. Various pharmacological agents have been used to optimize renal perfusion and tubular function. Unfortunately, none has been shown to be effective in randomized placebo-controlled trials. In this chapter, we discuss the prophylactic use of fluids, vasoactive drugs, diuretics and other agents, as well as modification of surgical techniques to reduce the incidence of perioperative ARF.

Small ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with renal failure: endovascular treatment--a case report

The successful endovascular exclusion of a ruptured 3-cm diameter atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a high-risk patient with renal failure is reported. An 82-year-old man with chronic renal failure and other comorbidities was admitted for acute abdominal pain. Duplex scan and computed tomography showed a ruptured 3-cm diameter atherosclerotic AAA. As a consequence of the patient's high surgical risk combined with signs of rupture, despite the progressively decreasing renal function, an emergency exclusion of the AAA was performed by means of a bifurcated Excluder (W. L. Gore and Associates) endovascular graft. The procedure was performed by minimizing administration of iodinated contrast medium using a guidewire into the lowest renal artery as a marker of proximal deployment. Intravascular ultrasound was used to confirm correct deployment. The postoperative recovery was characterized by acute renal insufficiency and bowel ischemia, which were treated with ultrafiltration and medical therapy, respectively, with complete resolution.

Effect of suprarenal versus infrarenal aortic endograft fixation on renal function and renal artery patency: a comparative study with intermediate follow-up

PURPOSE

Suprarenal fixation of aortic endografts appears to be a safe option in patients with a short or conical proximal aortic neck. However, concern persists regarding the long-term effect on renal function when renal artery ostia are crossed by the uncovered stent. We investigated the effect of suprarenal versus infrarenal endograft fixation on renal function and renal artery patency after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Records of 91 patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with a modular bifurcated stent graft between November 1999 and January 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. Two patients receiving dialysis because of chronic renal failure were excluded. Infrarenal fixation was used in 57 patients (group 1), and suprarenal fixation was used in 32 patients (group 2). In two patients in group 1 a Gianturco Z stent was inserted transrenally because of intraoperative proximal type I endoleak, and data for these patients were excluded from analysis. Follow-up evaluation was performed at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, and included clinical assessment, measurement of serum creatinine concentration (SCr), and computed tomography angiography, per standard protocol. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 1-36 months).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographic data, aneurysm size, or preoperative risk factors. Median SCr was significantly higher in group 2 (suprarenal fixation) than in group 1 (infrarenal fixation) preoperatively (1.2 mg/dL [range, 0.6-2.3 mg/dL] vs 0.9 mg/dL [range, 0.6-1.9 mg/dL], P =.008) and at 1 month postoperatively (1.1 mg/dL [range, 0.8-5.6 mg/dL] vs 1.0 mg/dL [range, 0.6-2.1 mg/dL], P =.045). There was a significant increase in median SCr in both groups at 1 month postoperatively (group 1, 1.0 mg/dL [range, 0.6-2.1 mg/dL], P =.05; group 2, 1.1 mg/dL [range, 0.8-5.6 mg/dL] [mean SCr, 1.35 mg/dL vs 1.15 mg/dL, respectively], P <.05). In group 1 SCr was increased significantly at 6 and 12 months (P <.001), whereas in group 2 SCr also increased at 6 and 12 months, but not significantly. The change in SCr over time was not significantly different between the two groups. In two of 32 patients in group 2, renal artery occlusion developed, associated with perfusion defects in renal parenchyma and persistently elevated SCr. Analysis of renal artery patency did not demonstrate any association between patency and treatment. No patient developed hypertension during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Suprarenal endograft fixation does not lead to significant renal dysfunction, and renal artery occlusion is uncommon within 12 months. A larger study with longer follow-up is essential to determine overall effects on renal function and renal artery patency.

Transrenal fixation of endovascular stent-grafts for infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair: mid-term results

PURPOSE

We evaluated mid-term results of a single-center consecutive series of endovascular stent-grafts implanted for aortic aneurysm repair with transrenal fixation, to determine clinical outcome, aneurysm anatomy, renal artery patency, and renal complications.

METHODS

Modular stent-grafts were placed with transrenal fixation in 37 patients between November 1998 and July 2000. Follow-up evaluation included clinical examination, laboratory evaluation of serum creatine concentration, computed tomographic angiography, and renal duplex scanning.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts as part of a Phase II US Food and Drug Administration study. Two patients subsequently underwent follow-up at institutions closer to their homes, and thus provided clinical information but no long-term renal or aneurysm morphologic data. There were no perioperative deaths. Five patients died during follow-up, at a mean of 9 months, because of myocardial infarction in 4 patients and respiratory failure in 1 patient. Thirty patients, ages 75 +/- 8 years, have been followed up for 28.5 +/- 7.2 months. Aneurysm diameter at follow-up was 5.0 +/- 0.8 cm, compared with 5.7 +/- 0.8 cm preoperatively. In 5 patients, endoleak developed during follow-up: 1 type I leak was treated with an aortic cuff, with temporary stabilization of the aneurysm and correction of the endoleak; 2 type II endoleaks were treated with translumbar coil embolization, and 1 resolved spontaneously; and 1 type III endoleak was treated with a combination of coil embolization and stent-graft extension to cover a graft defect. Preoperatively, serum creatinine concentration was normal in 23 patients, but increased persistently in 2 patients and was abnormal in 7 patients. Postoperatively, creatine concentration increased in 4 patients to greater than 20% of baseline level. Seventeen patients had no evidence of renal artery stenosis, compared with 13 patients with renal artery stenosis. Of 41 normal renal arteries, 90% remained unchanged, 1 became occluded, 3 demonstrated 60% stenosis. Nephrectomy was necessary in 1 patient because of cancer. Of 19 abnormal renal arteries, progression of disease was noted in 3 arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts can be performed with acceptable mid-term outcome with respect to mortality, need for follow-up intervention, and aneurysm exclusion with protection from rupture. Postprocedural stenosis can develop in both normal and abnormal renal arteries. Rate of progression of disease was greater in patients with preprocedural renal dysfunction compared with patients with normal renal arteries. This is merely an observation, and may not be related to transrenal fixation. Long-term follow up is needed.

Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms in patients with renal transplants

Endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm was undertaken in two orthotopic renal transplant recipients with US Food and Drug Administration-approved aortic stents without specific measures taken to protect the transplanted kidney. Renal function remained unchanged in both patients. Follow-up imaging studies showed successful aneurysm exclusion. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment in renal transplant recipients does not appear to place the transplanted kidney at undue ischemic risk and may be the preferred approach in select patients.

Renal dysfunction after vascular surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to focus on the static incidence of renal dysfunction, the lack of evidence of benefit of traditional renoprotective strategies, and newer techniques that may provide an insight into the mechanisms of acute perioperative renal injury associated with vascular surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies that have investigated the long-term results of aortic surgery still report a significant incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction. This finding remains consistent in several reports. However, less invasive techniques such as endovascular repair seem to be associated with reduced inflammation and postoperative renal dysfunction. The possible association between genetic heterogeneity and renal dysfunction in vascular surgical patients is an exciting new area of research.

SUMMARY

Renal dysfunction after major vascular surgery remains a significant problem. New insights into the mechanisms of acute renal injury and less invasive techniques of vascular repair may help reduce the incidence of renal dysfunction in this patient population. The lack of a truly 'renoprotective' agent has hampered our efforts in preventing this major complication of vascular surgery.

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with renal dysfunction or severe contrast allergy: utility of imaging modalities without iodinated contrast

Contrast-enhanced imaging studies are required for preoperative evaluation in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair; however, the use of iodinated contrast agents may not be suitable in patients with renal dysfunction or severe contrast allergy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of imaging modalities without iodinated contrast in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A total of 297 patients underwent endo vascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms during a 6-year period ending in August 2001. Among them, 20 patients (6.2%), who underwent imaging studies without iodinated contrast because of either renal dysfunction or severe contrast allergy formed the basis of this study. Multiple non-iodinated contrast imaging studies were used, including gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), non-contrast computed tomography (CT), gadolinium or carbon dioxide (CO2) aortography, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Hospital records were reviewed to evaluate the imaging study, renal function, perioperative morbidity, and clinical outcome of endo vascular aortic aneurysm repair. From the results of our study we concluded that endovascular aortic aneurysm repair can be performed safely in patients with renal dysfunction or severe contrast allergy utilizing non-iodinated contrast-based imaging modalities. IVUS is a useful intraoperative imaging modality, and postoperative endoleak surveillance can be performed using duplex ultrasound scanning to avoid risk of iodinated contrast exposure.

Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

Wide-ranging predictions have been made about the usefulness of endovascular repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The availability of US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices has removed the restrictions on patient selection, which had been controlled by device trials. This study examined the applicability of endovascular AAA repair and identified the anatomic barriers to successful endovascular AAA repair that should guide future device development.

METHODS

All patients who came to our institution for infrarenal AAA repair between April 1998 and June 2000 were offered evaluation for endovascular repair. Thin-cut spiral computed tomography scans and arteriograms were obtained on all patients, and their anatomic characteristics were prospectively entered into a database. A wide selection of available devices allowed the treatment of diverse AAA anatomic features.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients were examined (264 men, 43 women). Of these, 204 patients (66%; 185 men, 19 women) underwent endovascular repair, and 103 patients (34%, 79 men, 24 women) were rejected. Reasons for exclusion included short aneurysm neck (56, 54%), inadequate access because of small iliac arteries (48, 47%), wide aneurysm neck (41, 40%), presence of bilateral common iliac aneurysms extending to the hypogastric artery (22, 21%), excessive neck angulation (14, 14%), extensive mural thrombus in the aneurysm neck (10, 10%), extreme tortuosity of the iliac arteries (10, 10%), accessory renal arteries originating from the AAA (6, 6%), malignancy discovered during the examination (5, 5%), and death during the examination interval (2, 2%). Rejected patients had an average of 1.9 exclusion criteria (range, 1 to 4). A disproportionate number of women were excluded because of anatomic findings (P = .0009). Although 80% of patients who were at low risk for surgery qualified for endovascular repair, only 49% of our patients who were at high risk for surgery were acceptable candidates (P < .001). Of the 103 patients who were excluded, 34 (33%) underwent open surgical repair, and the remaining 69 (67%) were deemed to be unfit for open surgery. Three patients (1.4%) failed endograft placement because of inadequate vascular access.

CONCLUSION

Most infrarenal AAAs (66%) can be treated with endovascular devices currently available commercially or through US Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical trials. However, patients who are at high risk for surgery and might benefit most from endovascular repair are less likely to qualify for the procedure (49%). Men (70%) are more likely than women (40%) to meet the anatomic criteria for endografting. Difficulties with vascular access and attachment site geometry predominate as reasons for exclusion. Our findings suggest that smaller profile devices, which can negotiate small and tortuous iliac arteries, are needed. Proximal and distal attachment site problems require devices that can accommodate wide and angulated attachment necks and achieve short seal zones.