Assisted Reproduction of Pretreatment with Laparoscopic “Core-pulling” Salpingectomy for Patients with Hydrosalpinx before in vitro Fertilization Embryo Transfer

Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To determine the effect of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Dynamed plus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases were searched from their inception to December 2020 to identify relevant studies, including cross-sectional studies, retrospective studies, and randomized controlled trials. Studies that compared anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and/or antral follicle count (AFC) between the control and salpingectomy groups or before and after surgery were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included in the systematic review. Meta-analyses were performed on 16 studies in which data were presented as mean ± SD values. A meta-analysis comparing AMH levels before and after surgery in the same patients showed no significant decrease in all cases, irrespective of whether it was unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy. There was no significant decrease in the AFC in the meta-analysis comparing levels before and after bilateral salpingectomy, either. In contrast, in the case-controlled study the salpingectomy group had significantly lower levels of AMH in all meta-analyses of unilateral and bilateral surgery (mean difference: -0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55, -0.07), only unilateral cases (mean difference: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.50, -0.06), and only bilateral cases (mean difference: -0.71, 95% CI: -1.19, -0.23). The salpingectomy group that included unilateral and bilateral cases had significantly lower AFC compared with no-surgery controls (mean difference: -1.31, 95% CI: -2.13, -0.48).

CONCLUSION

Although not conclusive, it does appear that patients who underwent salpingectomy (either unilateral or bilateral) have a decreased ovarian reserve.

Laparoscopic “Core-Pulling” Salpingectomy: A Novel and Minimally Invasive Modified Salpingectomy

The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic “core-pulling” salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy. Laparoscopic core-pulling salpingectomy is a novel and minimally invasive salpingectomy variant, whose technical details are described here. In this retrospective study, 154 patients with tubal pregnancy underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy. In total, 76 and 78 patients underwent laparoscopic core-pulling salpingectomy (LCPS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic salpingectomy (MPLS), respectively. Then, clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, and operative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Surgery was successful in all 154 patients, and no significant differences were found between the LCPS and MPLS groups in clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, and operative outcomes. These findings indicated that LCPS is feasible and constitute a practical alternative to conventional salpingectomy.

High miscarriage rate in women treated with Essure® for hydrosalpinx before embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Essure® has been tested as an alternative treatment for hydrosalpinx before embryo transfer (ET) in women undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. However, the persistence of a foreign body inside the uterine cavity might have a negative impact on the outcome of pregnancy. The present systematic review aimed at identifying, appraising and summarizing the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of using Essure prior to ET for women with hydrosalpinx.

METHODS

We searched for studies in PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov and the reference lists of eligible studies. All studies including at least 10 women with hydrosalpinx who received Essure, any other intervention or no treatment prior to ET were considered eligible. Study selection, data extraction and evaluation of the risk of bias were performed independently by two authors. Study outcomes were miscarriage per clinical pregnancy, singleton preterm birth per singleton live birth and live birth/ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy per ET. The pooled results for each outcome and intervention were summarized as proportions with their respective 95% CIs, using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our electronic search of databases was performed on 7 November 2015, and 26 studies with 43 study arms were considered eligible: eight study arms evaluating Essure; seven assessing tubal aspiration; seven appraising effects of no treatment; 12 evaluating salpingectomy; two assessing tubal division; and seven evaluating tubal occlusion. When compared with women who had no intervention, women with Essure had a higher clinical pregnancy rate per ET (36% (95% CI, 0-43%) vs 13% (95% CI, 9-17%)). When compared with women who had other interventions, women with Essure had a higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy (38% (95% CI, 27-49%) vs 15% (95% CI, 10-19%)).

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that, although Essure prior to ET in women with hydrosalpinx improves the chance of achieving a clinical pregnancy compared with no intervention, it is associated with a higher rate of miscarriage when compared with the other interventions. Although this evidence is based on observational studies, we believe that salpingectomy should be the first option for women who are eligible for videolaparoscopy. However, it is still premature to make recommendations for women who are not eligible for surgery, and randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify which is the best treatment alternative in such a scenario. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.