Modelling intramolecular electron transfer reactions in cytochromes and in photosynthetic bacteria reaction centres

From model compounds to protein binding: syntheses, characterizations and fluorescence studies of [RuII(bipy)(terpy)L]2+complexes (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine; terpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine; L = imidazole, pyrazole and derivatives, cytochrome c)

Compounds [RuII(bipy)(terpy)L](PF6)2 with bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine, terpy = 2,2':6',2"-terpyridine, L = H2O, imidazole (imi), 4-methylimidazole, 2-methylimidazole, benzimidazole, 4,5-diphenylimidazole, indazole, pyrazole, 3-methylpyrazole have been synthesized and characterized by 1H NMR, ESI-MS and UV/Vis (in CH3CN and H2O). For L = H2O, imidazole, 4,5-diphenylimidazole and indazole the X-ray structures of the complexes have been determined with the crystal packing featuring only few intermolecular C-H...pi or pi-pi interactions due to the separating action of the PF6-anions. Complexes with L = imidazole and 4-methylimidazole exhibit a fluorescence emission with a maximum at 662 and 667 nm, respectively (lambdaexc= 475 nm, solvent CH3CN or H2O). The substitution of the aqua ligand in [Ru(bipy)(terpy)(H2O)]2+ in aqueous solution by imidazole to give [Ru(bipy)(terpy)(imi)]2+ is fastest at a pH of 8.5 (as followed by the increase in emission intensity). Coupling of the [Ru(bipy)(terpy)]2+ fragment to cytochrome c(Yeast iso-1) starting from the Ru-aqua complex was successful at 35 degrees C and pH 7.0 after 5 d under argon in the dark. The [Ru(bipy)(terpy)(cyt c)]-product was characterized by UV/Vis, emission and mass spectrometry. The location where the [Ru(bipy)(terpy)] complex was coupled to the protein was identified as His44 (corresponding to His39 in other numbering schemes) using digestion of the Ru-coupled protein by trypsin and analysis of the tryptic peptides by HPLC-high resolution MS.

Calculation of triplet-triplet energy transfer rates from emission and absorption spectra. The quenching of hemicarcerated triplet biacetyl by aromatic hydrocarbons

The kinetics of triplet-triplet (T-T) energy transfer have been analysed with a view to linking theories of chemical reactions (involving the rupture and formation of bonds) with theories of processes, such as electron transfer or energy transfer, which preserve chemical bonding. As for the latter, our analysis does not support the claim that, of the two rival expressions for T-T energy transfer, both rooted in the golden rule, only one is applicable to electron transfer or T-T transfer. Though the two expressions do reflect different standpoints, the distinction is eroded by the assumption of a delta-function distribution for the vibrational spectrum. It is shown that theories of chemical reactions also furnish estimates of Franck-Condon factors; rates of chemical reactions and chemical processes are both related to the properties (strengths and lengths) of the reactive bonds, but differ in the mode of energy dissipation. The relationship between the rates of reactions and processes presents new possibilities for a unified view of chemical reactivity.