Aprotinin and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: there are no benefits even when appropriate amounts of heparin are given

The effect of sivelestat sodium hydrate on severe respiratory failure after thoracic aortic surgery with deep hypothermia

Patients who undergo thoracic aortic surgery with deep hypothermia frequently have postoperative respiratory failure as a complication. Severe lung injury in these patients results in a fatal outcome. A specific neutrophil elastase inhibitor, sivelestat sodium hydrate, is an innovative therapeutic drug for acute lung injury. We evaluated the protective effects of sivelestat sodium hydrate on severe lung injury after thoracic aortic surgery with deep hypothermia. From January 2002 to July 2007, 71 consecutive patients underwent thoracic aortic surgery with deep hypothermia. Of these patients, 22 had postoperative respiratory failure with PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios of less than 150. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group (Group S, n = 10) was administered sivelestat sodium hydrate continuously at 0.2 mg/kg/h until weaning from mechanical ventilation; the second group (Group C, n = 12) was not administered sivelestat sodium hydrate. The groups were comparable with respect to clinical data. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, operation duration, total cardiopulmonary bypass time, circulatory ischemia time, cardiac arrest time, intraoperative blood loss, and total transfusion volume. The improvement of pulmonary function was observed in the both groups, but more marked in Group S by statistical analysis using analysis of variance for repeated measurements. Especially, in the early phase, pulmonary function improvement was more marked in Group S. The duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, and the length of hospital stay were shorter in Group S, but not significantly. Sivelestat sodium hydrate is a specific neutrophil elastase inhibitor that improves pulmonary function in patients with severe postoperative respiratory failure following thoracic aortic surgery with deep hypothermia. The drug may shorten the duration of postoperative ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay.

Aprotinin use in thoracic aortic surgery: Safety and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies of aprotinin use in thoracic aortic surgery, limited in size and design, reported minimal information regarding outcomes other than blood loss and transfusion. The evaluation of impact of aprotinin on surgical outcomes in a large sample is needed.

METHODS

Patients at Yale New Haven Hospital undergoing thoracic aortic surgery (aneurysm repair, dissections, penetrating ulcers, intramural hematomas) between 1995 and 2003 were considered for inclusion. Each patient receiving aprotinin was matched to a control per preoperative profile (age, gender, urgency of surgery, dissection/location of aortic disease). Data (surgical specifics, demographic variables, comorbidities, disease location-related variables, preoperative medications, intraoperative medications, surgical/operative data) were abstracted from the records of successfully matched aprotinin-treated patients and controls (n = 168). Comparison and determination of success of matching were performed using bivariate analyses. Outcome variables were compared using statistical tests for paired data. Supplementary unpaired and regression analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics of groups were similar, although controls had reduced history of aortic disease, but greater intraoperative use of lysine analogs (P < .05). Aprotinin significantly reduced platelet transfusion (P < .05). Paired bivariate analyses showed a tendency toward reduced ventilation time, pulmonary complications, and permanent arrhythmias (P < .05) associated with aprotinin. Supplementary analyses were supportive only for pulmonary complications and permanent arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evaluation substantiates previous reports that aprotinin may be safe to use and likely to improve some outcomes of thoracic aortic surgery. However, further studies for rare safety and efficacy end points are warranted.

Current status of antifibrinolytics in cardiopulmonary bypass and elective deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in many physiologic derangements, including activation of the hemostatic and fibrinolytic pathways. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) adds a further insult to the coagulation systems because it involves more extreme hypothermia and organ ischemia related to blood stasis. The abnormalities induced by CPB disrupt the checks and balances in the hemostatic and fibrinolytic systems, resulting in a pathologic state that leads to excessive bleeding and other perioperative complications. Prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy can attenuate the response to this insult by restoring the delicate balance within these systems, potentially reducing the complication rate and improving patient outcomes.

Aprotinin and deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with or without circulatory arrest for craniotomy

Deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with or without circulatory arrest has been used to facilitate the surgical repair of complex cerebrovascular lesions. The advantages of deep hypothermia have been tempered by the occurrence of coagulopathy that is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study analyzed retrospectively the records of 13 patients who underwent cerebrovascular neurosurgery using deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with or without circulatory arrest during the period 1993 through 1999. All patients received the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin in an effort to avoid the development of a coagulopathy, defined as hemorrhage requiring reoperation. No patients developed postoperative intracranial hemorrhage. There was also no evidence of renal dysfunction, deep venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolism. In conclusion, this study suggests that aprotinin may be beneficial to avoid the coagulopathy that is more likely to occur if deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with or without circulatory arrest is used for craniotomy without adverse effects on renal function or apparent thrombotic complications.

The effects of aprotinin on blood product transfusion associated with thoracic aortic surgery requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of aprotinin on blood product use and postoperative complications in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen patients who underwent elective or urgent thoracic aortic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The total number of units of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets was significantly less in the group that received aprotinin (p = 0.01, 0.04, and 0.01). The intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells and platelets, collection and retransfusion of cell saver, and postoperative transfusion of fresh frozen plasma were also significantly less in the aprotinin group (p = 0.01, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.05). No patient in either group sustained renal dysfunction or a myocardial infarction. Two patients who had not received aprotinin suffered from chronic postoperative seizures, and one patient who had received aprotinin sustained a perioperative stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aprotinin administration significantly decreases blood product transfusion requirements in the setting of thoracic aortic surgery requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and it does not appear to be associated with renal or myocardial dysfunction.

Aprotinin in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Early experience with aprotinin in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) raised alarm about hazards associated with its use. Based on what little is known about possible mechanistic interactions between hypothermia, stasis, and aprotinin, there is no evidence that aprotinin becomes unusually hazardous in DHCA. Excessive mortality and complication rates have only been reported in clinical series in which the adequacy of heparinization is questionable. Benefits associated with use of aprotinin in DHCA have been inconsistently demonstrated. The only prospective, randomized series showed significant reduction in blood loss and transfusion requirements. Use of aprotinin in DHCA should be based on the same considerations applied in other cardiothoracic procedures.