Type B dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch

A review of the surgical management of right-sided aortic arch aneurysms

Aneurysms and dissections of the right-sided aortic arch are rare and published data are limited to a few case reports and small series. The optimal treatment strategy of this entity and the challenges associated with their management are not yet fully investigated and conclusive. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all patients who underwent surgical or endovascular intervention for right aortic arch aneurysms or dissections. The search was limited to the articles published only in English. We focused on presentation and critically assessed different management strategies and outcomes. We identified 74 studies that reported 99 patients undergoing surgical or endovascular intervention for a right aortic arch aneurysm or dissection. The median age was 61 years. The commonest presenting symptoms were chest or back pain and dysphagia. Eighty-eight patients had an aberrant left subclavian artery with only 11 patients having the mirror image variant of a right aortic arch. The commonest pathology was aneurysm arising from a Kommerell's diverticulum occurring in over 50% of the patients. Twenty-eight patients had dissections, 19 of these were Type B and 9 were Type A. Eighty-one patients had elective operations while 18 had emergency procedures. Sixty-seven patients underwent surgical treatment, 20 patients had hybrid surgical and endovascular procedures and 12 had totally endovascular procedure. There were 5 deaths, 4 of which were in patients undergoing emergency surgery and none in the endovascular repair group. Aneurysms and dissections of a right-sided aortic arch are rare. Advances in endovascular treatment and hybrid surgical and endovascular management are making this rare pathology amenable to these approaches and may confer improved outcomes compared with conventional extensive repair techniques.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Involving a Right-sided Aortic Arch and Kommerell's Diverticulum: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch (RAA) associated with Kommerell's diverticulum is extremely rare and remains a complicated entity for surgical therapy because of its anatomical characteristics. Fewer than 40 cases have been reported in the English language literature to date.

METHODS

We reported a case of 69-year-old male patient who presented with acute type B aortic dissection involving an RAA associated with Kommerell's diverticulum, a stent-graft was accurately deployed and embolization of the left subclavian artery. In addition, a review of the literature was performed to examine its clinical presentation and the efficacy of management strategies.

RESULTS

One year follow-up showed positive aortic remodeling with exclusion of Kommerell's diverticulum and thrombosis of the false lumen.

CONCLUSIONS

An aortic dissection involving an RAA associated with Kommerell's diverticulum is an extremely rare condition. Endovascular therapy is technically feasible when the dissection involves this unusual vascular malformation.

Endovascular repair with the chimney technique for Stanford type B aortic dissection involving right-sided arch with mirror image branching

PURPOSE

To report endovascular repair with the chimney technique of type B aortic dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch (RAA).

CASE REPORTS

Two hypertensive men aged 48 and 42 years with symptoms of aortic dissection resistant to medical therapy underwent emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the chimney technique to extend the proximal landing zones. Both patients had right-sided arches with mirror image branching. One patient required a bare metal chimney stent to maintain perfusion to the right subclavian artery, while the other patient had a chimney stent to revascularize the right common carotid artery. Short-term follow-up (1 year and 1 month, respectively) showed that there was positive aortic remodeling, and the chimney stents were patent.

CONCLUSION

Chimney TEVAR seems safe and effective for Stanford type B dissection in patients having RAA with mirror image branching and no sufficient proximal fixation zone.

Endovascular stenting for type B dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch

Endovascular stent-graft repair is emerging as the treatment of choice for complicated type B aortic dissection. In this report we describe a patient who presented with type B aortic dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch (RAA), a rare congenital vascular anomaly. The initial aggressive medical treatment proved unsuccessful due to false aneurysm expansion. Given the greater complexity of conventional surgical repair and the limited experience with this rare malformation, endovascular repair was preferred and successfully performed. We report the first case of endovascular repair of type B dissection involving RAA, confirming that endovascular treatment is technically feasible also when the dissection involves this unusual vascular malformation.

Dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm associated with an isolated right-sided aortic arch

Although a right-sided aortic arch is not a rare anomaly, an aortic dissection involving an isolated right-sided aortic arch is extremely rare and remains a complicated entity for surgical therapy because of its anatomical characteristics. Previous reports that we have identified in English literature include only six surgical cases of aortic dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch. We report on a 75-year-old female who had a chronic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm following type B aortic dissection in a right-sided aortic arch. Graft replacement including reconstruction of Adamkiewicz artery and a celiac trunk was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful except for a prolonged ventilatory support. This case seems to be the first successful case of extended graft replacement for this pathology.