Oxytocin Antagonist for Repeated Implantationfailure and Delay of Delivery

Effect of atosiban on in vitro fertilization pregnancy outcome among women with endometriosis in presence or absence of adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of atosiban on in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcome among women with both endometriosis and adenomyosis, and compared it to that of patients with endometriosis but without adenomyosis and that of patients with tubal factor only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

106 infertile women (176 embryo transfers) from a medical center in Taiwan were included in the analysis, where 34 (54), 34 (66), and 38 (56) cases (embryo transfers) were endometriosis without adenomyosis, endometriosis with adenomyosis, and tubal infertility factor only, respectively. Adenomyosis morphologies were classified using an ultrasound-based classification system. The logistic generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze the association between atosiban use and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

The crude pregnancy rates for the endometriosis-only group were significantly higher than those for the endometriosis + adenomyosis group (i.e., biochemical pregnancy: 50.0% versus 29.7%, p = 0.041; ongoing pregnancy: 35.2% versus 16.9%, p = 0.038). Significantly higher chances of biochemical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy among endometriosis patients without adenomyosis versus those with both endometriosis and adenomyosis were found (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 2.981 [1.307, 6.803]; p = 0.009, 2.694 [1.151, 6.304]; p = 0.022). A significant positive association between atosiban use and biochemical pregnancy existed among endometriosis cases without adenomyosis (a 2.43-fold [1.01, 5.89] increase in successful pregnancy; p<0.05), but not for the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor pregnancy outcomes among adenomyosis-affected women were confirmed. The use of atosiban significantly enhanced IVF pregnancy among endometriosis patients without adenomyosis.

Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles

Atosiban was commonly added to improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF). In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of atosiban before transferring the frozen-thawed embryo to RIF patients. This retrospective study was conducted in the Hospital for Reproductive Medicine affiliated to Shandong University from August 2017 to June 2021. A total of 1774 women with a history of RIF undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) were included in this study. All the participants were classified into atosiban or control group: Group A included 677 patients who were administered atosiban intravenously 30 min prior to FET with a dose of 37.5 mg; Group B included 1097 patients who received no atosiban before the transfer. There were no significant differences observed in the live birth rate (LBR) (39.73% vs. 39.02%, P = 0.928) between the two groups. Other secondary outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher preterm birth rates in the control group compared with the atosiban group (0 versus 3.0%, P = 0.024) in the natural FET cycles. Atosiban may not improve pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients in FET cycles. However, the effects of Atosiban on pregnancy outcomes should be assessed in clinical trials with larger sample sizes.

Efficacy of atosiban for repeated embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF) posed a significant challenge in assisted reproduction. Evidence of its therapeutic effectiveness including atosiban used around embryo transfer to improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) remained inconsistent. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes of patients with RIF who received IVF-ET.

METHODS

The research was designed using the PICOS format. A systematic search of four English databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and one Chinse database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted. The time range was from inception to December 10, 2022. Then trials comparing the efficacy of atosiban and control group on pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients who receive IVF-ET were included. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to reduce the influence of heterogeneity between included studies. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). For the analyses, StataMP 17.0 (Stata Corporation, USA) was used.

RESULTS

Two prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one prospective cohort study and four retrospective cohort studies were included. Our results showed that atosiban was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rate (RR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.365-1.735, P < 0.001, I^{2 =} 0.0%). The results of subgroup analysis based on study types (prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, retrospective cohort study and prospective cohort study) showed that in all types of studies, CPR of atosiban group was significantly higher than controlled group. The results of subgroup analysis based upon the diagnostic criteria of number of previous embryo transfer failures showed that the intervention of atosiban improved the CPR whether in participants with 2 previous ET failures or in participants with 3 previous ET failures. Nevertheless, the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, and miscarriages were not significantly different between the case and control groups.

CONCLUSION

For women who are undergoing IVF-ET and have experienced repeated embryo implantation failure, atosiban may be an important factor in enhancing pregnancy outcomes. To confirm this conclusion, more thorough, prospective randomized controlled studies of sizable sample sizes with well design are required.

Efficacy of therapies and interventions for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of the different therapeutic options for repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF) on a subsequent IVF cycle outcome. Twenty-two RCTs and nineteen observational studies were included. Pooling of results showed a beneficial effect of intrauterine PBMC infusion on both CPR (RR 2.18; 95% CI 1.58-3.00; p < 0.00001; OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.22-3.36; p = 0.006) and LBR (RR 2.41; 95% CI 1.40-4.16; p = 0.002; OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.13-12.29; p = 0.03), of subcutaneous G-CSF administration on CPR (RR 2.29; 95% CI 1.58-3.31; p < 0.0001) and of intrauterine PRP infusion on CPR (RR 2.45; 95% CI 1.55-3.86; p = 0.0001). Observational studies also demonstrated a positive effect of IVIG and intrauterine hCG infusion on both CPR and LBR and of atosiban on CPR. Studies investigating intrauterine G-CSF infusion, LMWH, intravenous intralipid, hysteroscopy, blastocyst-stage ET, ZIFT, PGT-A and AH failed to observe an impact on IVF outcome. The quality of the evidence that emerged from RCTs focused on intrauterine PBMC infusion and subcutaneous G-CSF administration was moderate. For all other therapies/interventions it varied from low to very low. In conclusion, intrauterine PBMC infusion and subcutaneous G-CSF administration are the most promising therapeutic options for RIF. However, further well conducted RCTs are necessary before their introduction into clinical practice.

Atosiban and Pregnancy Outcomes Following In Vitro Fertilization Treatment for Infertile Women Requiring One, Two, or More Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

We assessed the effect of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment among infertile women requiring different numbers of embryo transfer (ET) cycles (i.e., one, two, and more than two ET cycles). A longitudinal cohort study was conducted by utilizing the data from the Assisted Reproductive Technology Center in a university tertiary hospital during 2007-2017. Patients receiving IVF treatment with at least one ET cycle were included. Pregnancy outcomes following IVF treatment, including biochemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancies, were investigated. The association between atosiban and IVF pregnancy was assessed using logistic generalized estimating equation models, with adjustment for time-varying clinical characteristics (e.g., maternal age) across multiple ET cycles for an individual. 403 women with 838 ET cycles were included, where 165 patients required one ET cycle, 133 patients required two ET cycles (a total of 266 ET cycles), and 105 patients required more than two ET cycles (a total of 407 ET cycles). Atosiban use was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes among all study infertile women undergoing IVF treatment. However, the results for women requiring more than two ET cycles showed significantly increased pregnancy rates associated with atosiban use (i.e., odds ratios [95% confidence interval] of 4.40 [1.52, 12.73] and 2.85 [1.45, 5.60] for clinical and ongoing pregnancies, respectively). This association was not observed for the women requiring only one or two ET cycles. Atosiban is a potential treatment for enhancing IVF pregnancy, especially among infertile women requiring more than two ET cycles.

Oxytocin antagonism reverses the effects of high oestrogen levels and oxytocin on decidualization and cyclooxygenase activity in endometrial tissues

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the in-vitro effect of oxytocin receptor (OTR) antagonism on parameters of receptivity in human endometrial explants and endometrial stromal cell lines cultured in oestradiol-rich conditions mimicking ovarian stimulation?

DESIGN

Experimental in-vitro study on endometrial tissue explants collected by aspiration biopsy from 30 women undergoing fertility treatment and cultured endometrial tHESC cell line. The study examined the effects of high oestradiol, oxytocin and OTR antagonist on parameters of decidualization (cell viability and prolactin secretion) as well as cyclooxygenase-1/2 (COX-1/2) activity and prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) secretion. Changes in expression of OXTR and COX-2 genes were examined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

RESULTS

In experiments on cultured endometrial cell line, high oestradiol and oxytocin similarly limited the viability of cells. In cultured endometrial explants both also decreased the secretion of prolactin (a marker of decidualization) and augmented endometrial COX-2 activity and formation of PGF_2α. Oxytocin antagonist atosiban was confirmed to reverse the above effects, both in the endometrial line and endometrial explants. Addition of atosiban to cultures acted analogously in experiments employing both oxytocin and high oestradiol.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxytocin antagonist reversed the effects of high oestradiol and oxytocin on parameters related to endometrial receptivity in conditions mimicking ovarian stimulation. This might point to a novel, endometrium-related mechanism to support embryo implantation achieved by the application of oxytocin antagonist prior to embryo transfer.

The Effect of Atosiban on Patients With Difficult Embryo Transfers Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of atosiban on the outcomes of infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with difficult embryo transfers (ETs). This randomized double-blind study enrolled 204 infertile women with difficult ETs during IVF treatment between June 2014 and June 2018. According to a computer-generated randomization list, participants were randomized into placebo (n = 102) and atosiban (n = 102) groups. In atosiban group, atosiban with a total dose of 37.5 mg was administered. All of the patients underwent IVF-ET using cryopreserved embryos. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle and implantation rate per transfer (45.1% and 26.5%) in atosiban group were significantly higher than those of placebo group (15.6% and 9.7%, respectively; P < .05). This study showed that administration of atosiban during ET was extraordinarily effective for patients with difficult transfers.

Serum oxytocin profiles in patients with repeated implantation failure during IVF cycles

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the association between oxytocin (OT) levels and repeated implantation failure (RIF) during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 108 women undergoing IVF-ET treatment at the following time points: gonadotrophin (Gn) administration day (Gn Day 0), hCG administration day (hCG Day 0), ET administration day (ET Day 0), and 5 d after ET (ET Day 5). Serum OT and steroid profiles were measured and compared among three groups: Group A included 38 women with a history of RIF, Group B included 41 women who became pregnant following the first fresh ET, and Group C included 29 women who did not become pregnant following the first fresh ET.

RESULTS

The OT levels of the three groups at different time points were not significantly different. Serum OT levels were significantly higher on hCG Day 0, ET Day 0, and ET Day 5 than on Gn Day 0, and they were significantly correlated with the estradiol concentration on ET Day 0.

CONCLUSIONS

RIF patients do not have elevated serum OT levels during IVF-ET cycles.

The impact of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A meta-analysis

Background

Atosiban is administered to women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, the results of this treatment were controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate whether atosiban improves pregnancy outcomes in the women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods

Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China BioMedicine, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. Meta-analyses were performed to investigate whether atosiban improves pregnancy outcomes in the women undergoing IVF.

Results

Our results showed that atosiban was associated with higher implantation (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.17–2.27; P = 0.004) and clinical pregnancy (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.31–2.57; P < 0.001) rates. However, atosiban showed no significant association with the miscarriage, live birth, multiple pregnancy or ectopic pregnancy rates. When a further subgroup analysis was performed in the women undergoing repeated implantation failure (RIF), implantation (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.45–2.57; P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.70–3.64; P <0.001) and the live birth (OR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.78–4.67; P < 0.001) rates were significantly higher in the case group. Nevertheless, no significant difference was detected in the miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates between the case and control groups.

Conclusion

Atosiban may be more appropriate for women undergoing RIF and play only a limited role in improving pregnancy outcomes in the general population of women undergoing IVF. These conclusions should be verified in large and well-designed studies.

Efficacy of oxytocin antagonist infusion in improving in vitro fertilization outcomes on the day of embryo transfer: A meta-analysis

Objective

Uterine contraction induced by the embryo transfer (ET) process has an adverse effect on embryo implantation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of oxytocin antagonist supplementation on the day of ET on in vitro fertilization outcomes via a meta-analysis.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four online databases (Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) were searched through May 2015 for RCTs that investigated oxytocin antagonist supplementation on the day of ET. Studies were selected according to predefined inclusion criteria and meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3. Only RCTs were included in this study. The main outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy rate, the implantation rate, and the miscarriage rate.

Results

A total of 123 studies were reviewed and assessed for eligibility. Three RCTs, which included 1,020 patients, met the selection criteria. The implantation rate was significantly better in patients who underwent oxytocin antagonist infusion (19.8%) than in the control group (11.3%) (n=681; odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25–2.96). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the clinical pregnancy rate (n=1,020; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.92–2.67) or the miscarriage rate (n=456; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44–1.33).

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis of the currently available literature suggest that the administration of an oxytocin antagonist on the day of ET improves the implantation rate but not the clinical pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate. Additional, large-scale, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Application of atosiban in frozen-thawed cycle patients with different times of embryo transfers

This prospective cohort study aimed to examine the effects of atosiban, given before transfer of frozen-thawed embryo to women with different number of embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Atosiban treatment significantly increased implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in the third and more than three ET groups. However, there were no significant increases in the above parameters in the first and second ET groups. Our study showed that patients those who underwent the third or more than three ET cycles were inclined to higher uterine contractions and serum oxytocin level, thus atosiban treatment starting from the third ET cycle may be effective in improving embryo implantation. This is the first study to evaluate the optimal atosiban treatment window corresponding to the number of ET cycles of the patients.

A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients undergoing IVF treatment

STUDY QUESTION

Does atosiban (oxytocin/vasopressin V1A receptor antagonist), given around embryo transfer improve the live birth rate of women undergoing IVF treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The use of atosiban around embryo transfer did not improve the live birth rate in a general population of IVF patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Uterine contractions in IVF cycles were significantly increased following ovarian stimulation and women with frequent uterine contractions had a lower pregnancy rates. A few observational studies suggested that the use of atosiban around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF). A non-randomized trial of IVF patients also reported higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates after the use of atosiban.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This multi-centre randomized double blind study recruited 800 general subfertile women undergoing IVF treatment between November 2011 and March 2013. Subjects were randomized into the atosiban (n = 400) and placebo (n = 400) groups according to a computer-generated randomization list.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Subjects were recruited and randomized in the three IVF units in Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Ho Chi Minh City. Women in the atosiban group received i.v. atosiban 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg, and the infusion was continued at 18 mg/h for ∼1 h. The dose of atosiban was then reduced to 6 mg/h continued for another 2 h. Those in the placebo group received i.v. normal saline only. The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (39.8 versus 38.0%, P = 0.612, rate ratio 1.051, 95% confidence interval: 0.884-1.251). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy rates and implantation rate per woman. Similar results were found between the groups at different IVF centres, with a repeated cycle, presence of uterine fibroids or a serum estradiol level on the day of hCG above the median level.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Limitations include the transfer of early cleavage embryos, no measurement of uterine contractions, no documentation of adenomyosis and incomplete tracking of congenital abnormalities in newborns.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This randomized double blind study demonstrated that the use of atosiban given around embryo transfer did not improve the live birth rate in a general population of IVF patients; therefore atosiban should be given only in the context of clinical research.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

Centres in Hong Kong and Vietnam received research funding from Ferring, which was not involved in study design, execution, data analysis and manuscript preparation. There are no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01501214.

Atosiban improves implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with repeated implantation failure

This prospective cohort study examined the effects of atosiban on uterine contraction, implantation rate (IR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in women undergoing IVF/embryo transfer. The study enrolled 71 women with repeated implantation failure (RIF; no pregnancies from an average of 4.8 previous embryo transfers with a mean of 12 top-quality embryos) undergoing IVF/embryo transfer using cryopreserved embryos. The total atosiban dose was 36.75 mg. The IR per transfer and CPR per cycle were 13.9% and 43.7%, respectively. Before atosiban, 14% of subjects had a high frequency of uterine contractions (≥ 16 in 4 min). The frequency of uterine contractions was reduced after atosiban. This reduction of uterine contractions in all cycles was significant overall (from 6.0 to 2.6/4 min; P<0.01), in cycles with ≥ 16 uterine contractions/4 min at baseline (from 18.8 to 5.1; P<0.01) and in cycles with <16 uterine contractions/4 min (from 3.9 to 2.2; P<0.01). IR and CPR improved in all subjects, irrespective of baseline uterine contraction frequency. This is the first prospective study showing that atosiban may benefit subjects with RIF undergoing IVF/embryo transfer with cryopreserved embryos. One potential mechanism is the reduction in uterine contractility, but others may also contribute. Many women undergoing IVF/embryo transfer do not achieve the outcome that they wish for. In fact, IVF/embryo transfer repeatedly fails for a subgroup of patients. There are limited options available to help these patients with repeat implantation failure (RIF) to become pregnant. This study looks at one potential new treatment option for women who experience RIF. A drug called atosiban is already being used to delay premature labour by inhibiting contractions of the uterus. In this study, atosiban was given at the time of embryo transfer to women undergoing IVF/embryo transfer. Atosiban reduced the number of uterine contractions in these patients and also increased the implantation and pregnancy rates. The pregnancy rate went from zero to 43.7%. The beneficial effects of atosiban were observed not only in patients who had a high frequency of uterine contractions at baseline but also in those who had a low frequency. These findings suggest that atosiban may have other benefits in addition to its effect on contractions of the uterus. More studies are required to find out exactly how atosiban works and to increase the knowledge of its use in patients with RIF undergoing IVF/embryo transfer.

Use of an oxytocin antagonist in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer for women with repeated implantation failure: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the use of an oxytocin antagonist in improving the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 150 infertile couples with RIF undergoing IVF-ET were divided into three groups. Patients who did not receive atosiban were used as controls (Group 1; n=80). Forty patients received a single bolus dose (6.75mg, 0.9mL/vial) of atosiban before ET (Group 2), and 30 patients received a bolus dose of 6.75mg atosiban followed by infusion at 18mg/hr for 3 hours immediately after ET (Group 3).

RESULTS

A significantly higher implantation rate (30.21%) was noted in Group 2 compared with Groups 1 and 3 (11.8% and 15.9%, respectively; p=0.0006). The clinical pregnancy rate of Group 2 (37.5%) was significantly higher than that of Groups 1 (12.5%) and 3 (20%) (p=0.0057). The live birth rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (35%) than in Groups 1 and 3 (10% and 16.67%, respectively; p=0.0031).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that IVF-ET using lower dosage of atosiban may improve pregnancy outcomes of patients with RIF.