Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd (ACCCN). Position statement on intensive care nursing staffing

Assessment of Nurses' Knowledge and Confidence Regarding Tracheostomy Care in a Pediatric Long Term Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Background

The incidence of tracheostomy insertion in pediatric patients has increased over the last few decades. Tracheostomized pediatric patients need daily, meticulous care by qualified nurses to minimize severe, avoidable complications. Adequately trained nurses facilitate patients’ stability, accelerate weaning from the ventilator, and reduce potential tracheostomy dislodgement.

Methods

A cross-sectional, retrospective cohort survey was conducted in September 2021, using an electronic version of a self-questionnaire, to assess nurses’ knowledge and comfort level regarding tracheostomy care of pediatric patients at the International Extended Care Center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Statistical analysis of the accrued data was performed using the SPSS 21.0 software package and a P-value <0.05 calculated by t-Test, was considered significant.

Results

Among 43 nurses included in the study, 14 (32.6%) were very comfortable taking care of tracheostomized patients, 13 (30.2%) were comfortable, and 16 (37.2%) were uncomfortable. Regarding knowledge, three main aspects of tracheostomy care were correctly answered (%) by all the nurses: knowledge of routine tracheal care (55%), tracheal care skills (11.6%), and tracheal emergency care (2.3%). The study showed a significant positive correlation between nurses’ comfort level with tracheal care and academic degree, duration of pediatric experience, completion of more than one life support course, and attendance at the annual local tracheostomy care competency learning program (TCCLP; all P <0.05).

Conclusion

Deficits exist in nurses’ knowledge of tracheostomy care. Improved knowledge garnered through repetitive participation in tracheostomy competency programs and life support courses correlate with greater comfort and more than 5 years of pediatric experience. Nurses’ deficits in emergency care knowledge and skills should be addressed through a structured educational program and a simulation, hands-on based TCCLP course, irrespective of comfort level with tracheostomy care.

Staffing and Organisation of Nursing Care in Cardiac Intensive Care Units in Greece

Purpose: To explore staffing and organisational characteristics of nursing care in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) in Greece. Methodology: An exploratory descriptive survey design with additional cross-sectional comparisons was employed. A specifically developed survey-type questionnaire, addressed to nurse managers, was distributed to all CICUs in Greece. Results: The response rate was 76.2% ( N=32 units). Nursing staff per bed ratios over 24 h (whole-time equivalent) were very low and exhibited a mean of 1.25 (±0.53). The total registered nurse to assistance nurse (RN/AN) ratio was 2.74, but a lot of variability was observed and in many units ANs operated in RNs positions. Only 42% of the nurses had participated at in-service continuing education programs and a systematic training program in cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided in only 12 (37.5%) units. The reported frequencies at which specific technical tasks were performed autonomously by nurses varied substantially and reflected a medium to low level of practice autonomy; the most frequently reported tasks were: peripheral IV line insertion, CPR chest compression, titration of vasoactive drugs and administration of analgesics. Higher percentages of nurses had received in-service training associated with the likelihood of performance of several technical tasks ( P<0.03). Conclusions: Future studies need to explore the effect of these organisational characteristics on patient outcomes. The endorsement of nation-wide standards for nursing staffing and training in CICUs is imperative.

Partnerships in intensive care unit (ICU): a new model of nursing care delivery

AIM

The purpose of this project was to explore an alternate nursing workforce model in major public hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Drivers for this project included improving patient care, facilitating access to intensive care (ICU) beds and managing the changing nursing workforce challenges.

METHODS

Using an exploratory descriptive design completed over two stages, a nursing partnership model with Enrolled Nurses (ENs) and experienced ICU nurses was piloted over a nine month period from May 2006.

FINDINGS

Overall the partnership model was not sustainable. The positive outcomes included an improved focus on standards of patient care, maintaining access to ICU beds, skill enhancement for participating nurses and a general acceptance by staff to pilot alternate models of care in ICU. The challenges identified included managing changing patient acuity and patient allocation, staff turnover, and barriers to effectively transitioning the appointed Enrolled Nurses into this ICU setting.

CONCLUSION

The resources and leadership required to implement the pilot were immense and the requirement did not lessen over time resulting in the pilot being unsustainable after nine months.

Moving on from ‘patient dependency’ and ‘nursing workload’ to managing risk in critical care

The contribution nurses make to the management of critically ill patients is usually appraised through the use of concepts such as 'patient dependency' or 'nursing workload'. These concepts fail to address the knowledge, skills and experience of nurses and consequently fail to acknowledge the risk presented by critically ill patients. This paper describes the development of a tool that attempts to measure risk and the process of risk management undertaken by nurses who coordinate the shifts and lead the nursing team. The results of this pilot study indicated that the tool was valid, but reliability has not yet been demonstrated. Thus the tool requires further refinement and testing. We chose to publish at this time because we feel the paper offers a new way of examining the contribution of nurses working in critical care.

"Realising the potential of critical care nurses": an exploratory study of the factors that affect and comprise the nursing contribution to the recovery of critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

This study seeks to make evident the complexity of issues associated with the delivery of care by nurses to the critically ill. Emphasis had been placed on the results and implications of these for nursing practice. For a more in-depth account, the full report can be accessed on www.lscn.co.uk.

METHOD

Following multi-centre research ethics committee approval, 10 critical care units participated in the 3-month study. Data collection comprised 231 nurse interviews and 51 relative interviews during 33 observation participation periods.

RESULTS

Analysis demonstrated that the context of the critical care unit, in terms of geographical layout, unit activity, case mix and skill mix of nurses, had a major effect on the ability of nurses to contribute to the recovery of the critically ill. The effectiveness of the nursing resource appeared to be a function of knowledge (theoretical and patient related), experience and exposure. Nurses who were unused to a particular environment were not seen to be as effective as those who were. A model was constructed that identified the central tenets upon which nursing care can be optimised or compromised. When nursing care was optimised the difference nurses made potentially decreased risk to patients, enabled timely patient progression and increased the potential for patient recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm that nurses have a significant contribution to make in the recovery of patients who have experienced critical illness. Recommendations are far reaching and include the need to develop a valid and reliable tool which addresses patients' need for nursing in terms of nurses' knowledge and experience, patient dependency and decreasing clinical risk across the continuum of care. Current nursing workload tools and patient:nurse ratios were seen to lack validity because they do not appraise the context in which care is delivered, define all nurses as equal and concentrate on activity rather than the effect nurses can have on the outcome of the critically ill.