The emergence of competency standards for specialist critical care nurses

Implementation and utilisation of Australian critical care practice standards: What do we know?

BACKGROUND

The Australian College of Critical Care Nurses published the third edition of practice standards (PSs) for specialist critical care nurses in 2015. Higher-education providers currently use these standards to inform critical care curricula; however, how critical care nurses perceive and use PSs in clinical practice is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore critical care nurses' perceptions about the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses PS for specialty critical care nursing, to understand how the PSs are used in clinical practice, and what opportunities exist to support their implementation.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative descriptive design was used. A purposive sampling strategy was used, with 12 critical care specialist nurses consenting to participate in semistructured interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed thematically using an inductive coding approach.

FINDINGS

Three main themes were identified: (i) lack of awareness of the PS; (ii) minimal to no utilisation of the PS in clinical practice and the challenges contributing to this; and (iii) improving the implementation and utilisation of the PS in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant lack of awareness and utilisation of the PS in clinical practice. To overcome this, increasing recognition, endorsement, and valuation of the PSs to stakeholders at an individual, health service, and legislative level are suggested. Further research is required to establish relevance of the PS in clinical practice and understand how clinicians use the PS to promote and develop critical care nursing.

The development of competency frameworks in healthcare professions: a scoping review

Competency frameworks serve various roles including outlining characteristics of a competent workforce, facilitating mobility, and analysing or assessing expertise. Given these roles and their relevance in the health professions, we sought to understand the methods and strategies used in the development of existing competency frameworks. We applied the Arksey and O'Malley framework to undertake this scoping review. We searched six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, and ERIC) and three grey literature sources (greylit.org, Trove and Google Scholar) using keywords related to competency frameworks. We screened studies for inclusion by title and abstract, and we included studies of any type that described the development of a competency framework in a healthcare profession. Two reviewers independently extracted data including study characteristics. Data synthesis was both quantitative and qualitative. Among 5710 citations, we selected 190 for analysis. The majority of studies were conducted in medicine and nursing professions. Literature reviews and group techniques were conducted in 116 studies each (61%), and 85 (45%) outlined some form of stakeholder deliberation. We observed a significant degree of diversity in methodological strategies, inconsistent adherence to existing guidance on the selection of methods, who was involved, and based on the variation we observed in timeframes, combination, function, application and reporting of methods and strategies, there is no apparent gold standard or standardised approach to competency framework development. We observed significant variation within the conduct and reporting of the competency framework development process. While some variation can be expected given the differences across and within professions, our results suggest there is some difficulty in determining whether methods were fit-for-purpose, and therefore in making determinations regarding the appropriateness of the development process. This uncertainty may unwillingly create and legitimise uncertain or artificial outcomes. There is a need for improved guidance in the process for developing and reporting competency frameworks.

Developing a competency framework for critical care to match patient need

The competency framework developed by the critical care education group of the London Standing Conference aims to serve every grade and level of practitioner. It is neither time specific nor static. The patient is the central focus of the framework and the elements of competence reflect patient need at any critical care level [Comprehensive Critical Care: A Review of Adult Critical Care Services, The Stationary Office, London]. A group of expert nurses have developed the competency framework, with widespread consultation and collaboration. This approach intended to develop consistency for critical care education and practice. It is envisaged that this will reduce pockets of repeated activity, which places huge demands on limited resources. The critical care competency framework was developed using the method of functional analysis. A plan for the future has been identified, including continued collaboration and consultation with Trusts and Higher Educational Institutions and the development of an online manual to support the competency framework.

KEY POINTS

1. Critical care delivery has been under close scrutiny and a number of key contemporary drivers have led to the development of this competency framework. 2. The development of a consistent pan-London approach to critical care education has been identified. 3. The patient is the focus of critical care delivery and therefore patient need is central to the critical care competency framework. 4. Wider collaboration is needed with other agencies and groups to prevent the repetition of work already carried out.

From ward-based critical care to educational curriculum 1: a literature review

There has been recent recognition in the literature, and a longer standing awareness amongst clinicians, that critically ill patients are to be found outside of intensive care units. These patients are not always well managed and some have concluded that their care is 'suboptimal' [Br. Med. J. 316 (1998) 1853] and that they die of preventable clinical problems [Extremes of Age: the 1999 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (1999) NCEPOD]. Whilst the cause of this situation in the NHS probably involves a complex interplay of factors including failures in management, policy and the evidence/information base for practice, education failures have also been blamed. In response the government has mandated formal critical care education for ward nurses [Comprehensive Critical Care: a Review of Adult Critical Care Services (2000) Department of Health]. In this two-part paper, the literature around education for ward-based critical care is examined (Part 1) prior to a report of the findings (Part 2) of a case study exploring the everyday practices, context and culture of an acute surgical ward where seriously ill patients were cared for prior to the introduction of a critical care outreach service (Part 2). Implications for practice, education and future research are discussed.

Revealing higher levels of nursing practice

The following discussion describes the early findings of a doctoral study, due for completion in 2001. The findings represent data collected in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and the UK, from nurses deemed to be engaged in advanced nursing practice. The paper will review the need for the study and provide a brief overview of the methodology employed. The current status of the findings, utilizing open coding, is presented. Major categories identified thus far are enhancing patient stay, improving patient outcome, promoting the role, trustworthiness, tenacity and survival in the role. The categories identified clarify current understanding of the concept, advanced nursing practice.

Specialist education and practice in nursing: an Australian perspective

In this paper, we argue that specialist nurses occupy a strategic position in the Australian health care system and will continue to do so in the future. From a careful consideration of the literature describing past, present and future nursing practice and education, we conclude that specialist nurses with appropriate skills gained through lifelong learning and experience are the nurses to lead and foster the future practice of nursing. The role of current nurse educators is to provide time-sensitive education programmes that will facilitate the development of such skills.