Idarubicin and cyclophosphamide--an active oral chemotherapy regimen for advanced breast cancer

Inhibiting eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis

BACKGROUND

Ribosome biogenesis is a central process in every growing cell. In eukaryotes, it requires more than 250 non-ribosomal assembly factors, most of which are essential. Despite this large repertoire of potential targets, only very few chemical inhibitors of ribosome biogenesis are known so far. Such inhibitors are valuable tools to study this highly dynamic process and elucidate mechanistic details of individual maturation steps. Moreover, ribosome biogenesis is of particular importance for fast proliferating cells, suggesting its inhibition could be a valid strategy for treatment of tumors or infections.

RESULTS

We systematically screened ~ 1000 substances for inhibitory effects on ribosome biogenesis using a microscopy-based screen scoring ribosomal subunit export defects. We identified 128 compounds inhibiting maturation of either the small or the large ribosomal subunit or both. Northern blot analysis demonstrates that these inhibitors cause a broad spectrum of different rRNA processing defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the individual inhibitors affect a wide range of different maturation steps within the ribosome biogenesis pathway. Our results provide for the first time a comprehensive set of inhibitors to study ribosome biogenesis by chemical inhibition of individual maturation steps and establish the process as promising druggable pathway for chemical intervention.

Acceptance of oral chemotherapy in breast cancer patients - a survey study

Background

Oral (p.o.) chemotherapy treatments gained increasing importance in the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Aim of this survey was to evaluate the acceptance of p.o. treatment and patients' individual attitudes towards it.

Methods

A specific 14 item-questionnaire was designed. Patients suffering from breast cancer receiving a newly launched p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy treatment were prospectively evaluated during 4 months of time. 224 questionnaires using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Spearman correlation were evaluated.

Results

Patients' median age was 54 years, 164 received i.v., 60 p.o therapy. 89% with p.o. and 67% with i.v. regimens would choose p.o. over i.v. therapy, if equal efficacy is guaranteed. Significant differences were especially found in terms of personal benefit (55% i.v., 92% p.o.), reduced feeling of being ill due to p.o. treatment (26% i.v., 65% p.o.), better coping with disease due to p.o. therapy (36% i.v., 68% p.o.). Side effects were significantly less often reported under p.o. treatment (19% p.o. vs. 53% i.v.)

Conclusion

P.o. chemotherapy shows a high acceptance in MBC patients under palliative therapy. Compliance can be achieved in particular through a differentiated indication, patient education and competent support along a p.o. treatment.

Effective oral chemotherapy for breast cancer: pillars of strength

Traditionally, anticancer therapy has been dominated by intravenous drug therapy. However, oral agents provide an attractive approach to chemotherapy and use of oral treatments is increasing. We discuss the benefits and challenges of oral chemotherapy from the perspectives of patients, healthcare providers and healthcare funders. Important issues include patient preference, efficacy, compliance, bioavailability, reimbursement, use in special patient populations, financial and staff time savings and flexibility of dosing. We review data for traditional oral agents (e.g. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate), newer oral chemotherapies (e.g. capecitabine), oral formulations of traditionally intravenous agents (e.g. vinorelbine, idarubicin) and new biologic agents under evaluation in breast cancer (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors). Lastly, we review studies of all-oral combination regimens. The wealth of data available and the increasing use of oral agents in breast cancer suggest that many of the concerns and perceptions about oral therapy, including efficacy and bioavailability, have been overcome, and that oral therapy will play a major role in breast cancer management in the future in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings.

Phase II Study of an ‘All-Oral’ Regimen of Capecitabine, Idarubicin and Cyclophosphamide for Metastatic Breast Cancer – Safety, Efficacy and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) generally have a poor prognosis. Many of these patients have a good performance status. A new all-oral regimen (XIC) was evaluated in a phase II trial. The impact of the regimen on the safety and efficacy of the drug, as well as quality of life (QOL) of the patients was assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 2000 to September 2001, informed consent was obtained from 20 heavily pretreated women with MBC. They were placed on a 6-week cycle regimen comprising capecitabine (X; 2,000 mg/m2/day in two divided doses for 2 weeks then 1 week rest), idarubicin (I; 10 mg/m2/day, days 1, 3 and 5) and cyclophosphamide (C; 100 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks then 1 week rest).

RESULTS

Toxicities were generally tolerable. One patient had grade III neutropenia, which was reversible on cessation of treatment. One patient (5%) had a complete response and 4 patients (20%) achieved partial responses, yielding an overall response rate of 25%. Eight patients (40%) had stable disease. Median time to disease progression and median survival time were 13.4 and 23.7 months, respectively. Global and physical EORTC QLQ-30 scores showed no significant decrease in QOL.

CONCLUSION

This is a small-scale study. XIC was generally well tolerated and favoured by the patients. This moderately active and convenient 'all-oral' regimen deserves clinical trials at a wider scale.

CNS Metastases in Breast Cancer

As systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer improves, CNS involvement is becoming a more widespread problem. This article summarizes the current knowledge regarding the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer. When available, studies specific to breast cancer are presented; in studies in which many solid tumors were evaluated together, the proportion of patients with breast cancer is noted. On the basis of data from randomized trials and retrospective series, neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may prolong survival in patients with single brain metastases. The treatment of multiple metastases remains controversial, as does the routine use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after either surgery or SRS. Although it is widely assumed that chemotherapy is of limited benefit, data from case series and case reports suggest otherwise. WBRT, neurosurgery, SRS, and medical therapy each have a role in the treatment of CNS metastases; however, neurologic symptoms frequently are not fully reversible, even with appropriate therapy. Studies specifically targeted toward this group of patients are needed.

Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer

Given both the increase in the mean age of the population of Western countries and the high incidence of breast cancer beyond the age of 65 years, it is evident that breast cancer in older women will be a very common problem for the medical oncologist. Metastatic breast cancer is still not amenable to a cure; therefore quality of life during therapy is an important issue, which until recently has been poorly investigated. Similarly, despite recent advances in breast cancer therapy, physicians have been reluctant to enrol older patients in clinical trials, and there is a lack of data regarding this population. This review focuses on quality-of-life issues during metastatic breast cancer treatment in geriatric patients, comparing the standard therapeutic options and newer approaches. Although first-line endocrine therapy with tamoxifen remains a standard treatment, the newer third-generation aromatase inhibitors provide similar or better efficacy with fewer adverse effects and a better quality of life. It has been a common belief that chemotherapy impairs quality of life, but recent studies in advanced breast cancer have shown that this therapy has a positive effect on quality of life, at least in responders. Consequently, chemotherapy should not be denied to elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer, provided a prior geriatric assessment is performed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio. New chemotherapy strategies, such as the taxanes and orally administered chemotherapy, represent a very attractive alternative for a better quality of life in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.