Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement for variceal bleeding: predictors of mortality

Predictors and Outcomes of Post-transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Liver Failure in Patients with Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) liver failure (PTLF) is a serious complication of TIPS procedure with poor patient prognosis. This study tried to investigate the incidence of PTLF following elective TIPS procedure and evaluated possible predictive factors for the same.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective TIPS placement between 2012 and 2022 and was conducted to determine development of PTLF (≥ 3-fold bilirubin and/or ≥ 2-fold INR elevation from the baseline) within 30 days following TIPS procedure. Medical record review was done and factors predicting development of PTLF and the 90-day transplant-free survival was determined.

RESULTS

Thirty of 352 (8.5%) patients developed PTLF within 30 days of TIPS (mean age 54.2 ± 9.8 years, 83% male). The etiology of cirrhosis was related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 50%, alcohol in 33.3%, and hepatitis B/C virus infection in 16.7% of the patients. The mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score was 9.5 ± 1.2 and mean model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score was 14.6 ± 4.5 at the time of admission in patients who developed PTLF. The indication for TIPS was recurrent variceal bleed in 50% (15 of 30) and refractory ascites in 46.7% (14 of 30) patients with PTLF. Multivariate analysis identified prior HE (OR 6.1; CI 2.57-14.5, p < 0.0001) and higher baseline CTP score (OR 1.47; CI 1.07-2.04; p = 0.018) as predictors of PTLF. PTLF was associated with significantly lower 90-day transplant-free survival, as compared to patients without PTLF (40% versus 96%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Almost 10% of patients with cirrhosis develop post-TIPS liver failure and is associated with significant early mortality and morbidity. Higher baseline CTP score and prior HE were identified as predictors for PTLF.

Emergent rescue transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt within 8 h improves survival in patients with refractory variceal bleed

BACKGROUND

Transjugular-intrahepatic portosystemic-shunt (TIPS) and SX-Ella stent Danis (DE stent) are available rescue therapies for refractory variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Any delay in appropriate therapy is associated with high mortality. Determining the best timing for rescue TIPS is crucial and largely unknown.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with refractory variceal bleed (n = 121) who underwent rescue TIPS within 24-h (n = 66) were included. Their early rebleed (upto 42 days) rate, 6-week and 1-year survival were compared with matched patients who underwent rescue DE stent (n = 55). Outcomes based on timing of TIPS (within 8-h/8-24 h) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients who received rescue DE stent were sicker with higher MELD score (27.6 ± 8.3 vs. 22.3 ± 7.9; p = 0.001), active bleeding at endoscopy (54.5% vs. 34.8%; p = 0.03) compared to TIPS-group. After propensity score matching, adjusting for MELD-Na score and non-bleed complications, DE patients (n = 34) had higher mortality at 6-week (17/34; 50%) and 1-year (29/34; 85.3%) compared to TIPS-group (20.6% and 38.2%, respectively; both p < 0.02), with higher rebleeding rate (10/34; 29.4% vs. 1/34; 2.9%, p = 0.003). Rescue TIPS placed within 8-h compared with 8-24 h had lower 6-week (48.6% vs. 12.9%; p = 0.003) and 1-year mortality (62.9% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.001) despite comparable rebleed rates (2/31; 6.5% vs. 2/35;5.7%; p = 0.90). Post-TIPS Portal pressure gradient at 6-weeks and 1-year was comparable between survivors and non-survivors. Active bleeding at endoscopy [HR = 11.8; 95% CI 2.96-47.53], presence of AKI [HR = 5.8; 95% CI 1.92-17.41], MELD-Na > 24 [HR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.17], mean arterial pressure > 64.5 mmHg [HR = 0.8; 95% CI 0.75-0.92] independently predicted 6-week mortality in rescue TIPS-group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rescue TIPS placement preferably within 8-h of refractory variceal bleed improves short- and long-term survival. It provides better outcome than DE stent for control of bleeding and prevention of rebleeding, even in patients with high MELD-Na score.

Novel CABIN score outperforms other prognostic models in predicting in-hospital mortality after salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is now established as the salvage procedure of choice in patients who have uncontrolled or severe recurrent variceal bleeding despite optimal medical and endoscopic treatment.

AIM

To analysis compared the performance of eight risk scores to predict in-hospital mortality after salvage TIPS (sTIPS) placement in patients with uncontrolled variceal bleeding after failed medical treatment and endoscopic intervention.

METHODS

Baseline risk scores for the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Bonn TIPS early mortality (BOTEM), Child-Pugh, Emory, FIPS, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), MELD-Na, and a novel 5 category CABIN score incorporating Creatinine, Albumin, Bilirubin, INR and Na, were calculated before sTIPS. Concordance (C) statistics for predictive accuracy of in-hospital mortality of the eight scores were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (29 men, 5 women), median age 52 years (range 31-80) received sTIPS for uncontrolled (11) or refractory (23) bleeding between August 1991 and November 2020. Salvage TIPS controlled bleeding in 32 (94%) patients with recurrence in one. Ten (29%) patients died in hospital. All scoring systems had a significant association with in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) on multivariate analysis. Based on in-hospital survival AUROC, the CABIN (0.967), APACHE II (0.948) and Emory (0.942) scores had the best capability predicting mortality compared to FIPS (0.892), BOTEM (0.877), MELD Na (0.865), Child-Pugh (0.802) and MELD (0.792).

CONCLUSION

The novel CABIN score had the best prediction capability with statistical superiority over seven other risk scores. Despite sTIPS, hospital mortality remains high and can be predicted by CABIN category B or C or CABIN scores > 10. Survival was 100% in CABIN A patients while mortality was 75% for CABIN B, 87.5% for CABIN C, and 83% for CABIN scores > 10.

Coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration for the treatment of duodenal varix

Duodenal variceal bleeding is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Endoscopic therapy is usually the initial treatment option for bleeding duodenal varices, but it is not always feasible or successful. We present a technique of coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration in a patient with duodenal varices originating from the inferior pancreaticoduodenal vein and draining into the right ovarian vein.

Mortality and complications in patients with portal hypertension who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) - 12 years experience

CONTEXT

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the non-surgical treatment option with low level of morbi-mortality and possibility of accomplishment in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction which aims at decompressing the portal system treating or reducing the portal hypertension complications.

OBJECTIVE

Outline the profile analyze global and early mortality, and the complications presented by cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS for treatment of digestive hemorrhage by portal hypertension.

METHOD

Retrospective study based on the data bank of cirrhotic patients' medical reports, who underwent TIPS for digestive hemorrhage by portal hypertension treatment who did not respond to clinical endoscopic treatment, and were assisted from 1998 to 2010 in the Liver Transplant Service at a university hospital. The study was approved by the Committee of Ethics and Research.

RESULTS

The sample was comprised of 72 (84.7%) patients, being 57 (79.2%) males, average age 47.7 years (age range from 16 to 85 years and SD = 13), 21 (29.2%) patients presented liver disease as cause excessive intake of alcoholic drinks; 21 (29.2%) contamination by hepatitis virus, 16 (22.2%) excessive alcohol intake associated with virus and 14 (19.4%) patients presented other causes. As for initial classification, 14 (20%) had Child-Pugh A, 33 (47.1%) Child-Pugh B and 23 (32.9%) Child-Pugh C. Initial MELD was obtained in 68 patients being 37 (54.4%) higher than 15 points while 31 (45.6%) had up to 15 points. Early death occurred in 19 (26.4%). Global mortality occurred in 41 (60.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality is directly related to clinical factors of patients, being Child-Pugh and MELD classifications predictors of mortality, with more impact in patients with Child-Pugh class C and MELD > 15. The complications found were similar to those described in the literature, although the dysfunction by stent stenosis (26.4%) was lower than in the most of the studies and the encephalopathy incidence (58.3%) was higher. Probably, the high incidence of encephalopathy is explained by the low incidence of stenosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in patients with hepatic malignancy

Since its first clinical application in 1988, the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has emerged as a safe and effective means of managing patients with morbid portal hypertension. Despite the considerable body of literature on TIPS, portal decompression in patients with malignancy has not been sufficiently examined. These patients typically experience sequelae of portal hypertension that requires palliation. The purpose of this article is to review the reported experience with TIPS in patients with malignancy.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-related complications and practical solutions

Despite the clinical complexity of patients with severe liver disease and the technical demands associated with the creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), the major complication rate of this procedure is less than 5%. Delayed recognition and treatment of complications related to TIPS can have life-threatening consequences. This article provides an overview of the spectrum of periprocedural and delayed complications related to the performance of TIPS and offers the reader pearls for both avoiding and managing those complications.

The evaluation of the patient undergoing an elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure

In its early stages, the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was utilized as a lifesaving procedure to treat uncontrollable esophageal variceal bleeding. Most of the initial cases were performed in an emergency situation in the worst possible conditions. The experience gained over the past 15 years has established TIPS as an important therapeutic option in the management of patients with complications of portal hypertension such as variceal bleeding or refractory ascites who do not respond to medical therapy. In current medical practice, 80 to 90% of TIPS procedures are performed in an elective or semielective fashion and only a small percentage of cases are now performed on an emergency basis. The experience gained has demonstrated that certain patients do not benefit from a TIPS procedure and furthermore, their baseline condition may even worsen after a TIPS. This article reviews the most important aspects of the clinical evaluation of patients undergoing an elective TIPS procedure.

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

The creation of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt via a transjugular approach (TIPS) is an interventional radiological procedure used to treat the complications of portal hypertension. TIPS insertion is principally indicated to prevent or arrest variceal bleeding when medical or endoscopic treatments fail, and in the management refractory ascites. This review discusses the development and execution of the technique, with focus on its clinical efficacy. Patient selection, imaging surveillance, revision techniques, and complications are also discussed.

TIPS para o controle das complicações da hipertensão portal: eficácia, fatores prognósticos associados e variações técnicas

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia do TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) para tratar as complicações clínicas em pacientes com hipertensão portal. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Quarenta e quatro pacientes, sendo 30 do sexo masculino e 14 do feminino e com idade média de 52 anos foram analisados. A indicação para realização de TIPS foi hemorragia gastrintestinal em 28 e ascite refratária em 16. Houve 7 pacientes Child-Pugh A, 24 Child-Pugh B e 11 Child-Pugh C. RESULTADOS: O TIPS foi realizado com sucesso em todos os pacientes (100%), verificando-se queda do gradiente pressórico porto-sistêmico médio de 49,69% (de 18,98 mmHg para 9,55 mmHg). Comprovou-se melhora clínica em 35 pacientes (79,55%). A mortalidade pós-operatóriaia foi de 13,64%, sendo mais incidente nos pacientes Child-Pugh C (45,45%). Os fatores mais relevantes de mau prognóstico foram o aumento da bilirrubina e do nível de creatinina. A sobrevida média de pacientes Child-Pugh A foi de 11,5 meses, nos Child-Pugh B foi de 10,97 meses e nos Child-Pugh C foi de apenas 5,9 meses. Foram observadas complicações em nove casos (20,44%). CONCLUSÃO: O TIPS é eficiente para reduzir a pressão portal. As complicações e a morbi-mortalidade relacionadas com o procedimento podem ser consideradas aceitáveis. A mortalidade foi influenciada por alguns fatores clínicos, tais como classe Child-Pugh C e elevação dos níveis séricos de bilirrubina e creatinina.

Two-stage transjugular intrahepatic porta-systemic shunt for patients with cirrhosis and a high risk of portal-systemic encephalopathy patients as a bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation: a preliminary report

AIM

Placement of a transjugular intrahepatic porta-systemic shunt (TIPS) is a therapeutic option for the management of bleeding esophageal varices. However, the procedure is associated with an increased risk of portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE). In this study, a two-stage modification of the standard TIPS technique was introduced for the management of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with a high risk of PSE before liver transplantation.

METHODS

The modified procedure was applied to four patients with cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and ascites. Two had a history of encephalopathy after variceal bleeding; the other two were encephalopathic at the time of the first stage of the modified procedure. In the first stage, a 6-mm diameter intrahepatic shunt was created using a Palmaz-Schatz stent. One month later, in the second stage, the lumen of the shunt was expanded to a diameter of 10 mm.

RESULTS

Both stages of this TIPS procedure were undertaken without any associated adverse events. In particular, neither stage was followed by a deterioration of neurologic status. From completion of the second stage to undertaking orthotopic liver transplantation (a period of 2 to 6 months), no rebleeding from esophageal varices occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A two-stage TIPS procedure to reduce portal hypertension enables a more gradual adaptation to post-TIPS hemodynamic and metabolic changes than occurs after creation of a conventional TIPS. A two-stage TIPS procedure may be the method of choice for treating bleeding from esophageal varices in patients who have a high risk of developing PSE and give them a chance for liver transplantation.

Role of emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) is a highly effective treatment for bleeding esophageal varices, with control of the bleeding in over 90% of the patients. TIPS is recommended as "rescue" treatment if primary hemostasis cannot be obtained with endoscopic and pharmacological therapy, or if uncontrollable early rebleeding occurs within 48 hours. TIPS is also a very effective technique for patients presenting with severe refractory bleeding gastric and ectopic varices, cases where endoscopic techniques are less effective. Emergency TIPS should be considered early in patients with refractory variceal bleeding once medical treatment and sclerotherapy fail, before the clinical condition worsens. Every effort should be made to stabilize the patient before TIPS, including the use of tamponade tubes and aggressive correction of coagulopathy. Patients with acute variceal bleeding with a Child-Pugh score > 12, Apache score II > 18 points, hemodynamically unstable, receiving vasopressors and coagulopathy, and/or bilirrubin > 6 mg/dL have a high risk of early death after TIPS. Expedite liver transplantation after emergency TIPS should be considered for high-risk patients.

MELD score as a predictor of early death in patients undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures

PURPOSE

To Evaluate the MELD score as a predictor of 30-day mortality in patients undergoing elective TIPS procedures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, IRB-approved study. The medical records of all patients who underwent a TIPS procedure between May 1, 1999 and June 1, 2003 in a single institution were reviewed. Patients who underwent elective TIPS were selected. Elective TIPS was performed in 119 patients with a mean age of 55.1 (+/- 9.6) years. The MELD and Child-Pugh scores before TIPS, etiology of cirrhosis, portosystemic gradients before and after TIPS, procedure time, and procedural complications were obtained from the medical records. The MELD and Child-Pugh scores before TIPS were compared between the survivor group (SG) and the early death (EDG) group. The early death rate was calculated for MELD score subgroups (1-10, 11-17, 18-24, and >24). Data were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, chi-square test and independent-sample t-test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 100%. The early death rate was 10.9% (13/119). The mean MELD scores before TIPS were 19.4 (+/- 5.9) (EDG) and 14 (+/- 4.2) (SG) (p = 0.025). The early death rate was highest in the pre-TIPS MELD > 24 subgroup. The Child-Pugh scores were 9.0 (+/- 1.6) (SG) and 9.8 +/- 1.06 (EDG) (p = 0.08). The mean portosystemic gradients before TIPS were 20.5 (+/- 7.7) mmHg (EDG) and 22.7 (+/- 7.3) (SG) (p > 1) and the mean portosystemic gradients after TIPS were 6.5 (+/- 3.5) (EDG) and 6.9 (+/- 2.4) (SG) (p > 1). The mean procedural times were 95.6 (+/- 8.4) min (EDG) and 89.2 (+/- 7.5) min (SG) (p > 1). No early death was attributed to a fatal complication during TIPS.

CONCLUSION

The MELD score is useful in identifying patients at a higher risk of early death after an elective TIPS. On th basis of our results, we do not endorse elective TIPS in patients with MELD scores > 24.

Endovascular obliteration of bleeding duodenal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis

The purpose of this paper is to describe our experience with endovascular obliteration of duodenal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Balloon-occluded transvenous retrograde and percutaneous transhepatic anterograde embolizations were performed for duodenal varices in five patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and decreased liver function. All patients had undergone previous endoscopic treatments that failed to stop bleeding and were poor surgical candidates. Temporary balloon occlusion catheters were used to achieve accumulation of an ethanolamine oleate-iopamidol mixture inside the varices. Elimination of the varices was successful in all patients. Retrograde transvenous obliteration via efferent veins to the inferior vena cava was enough to achieve adequate sclerosant accumulation in three patients. A combined anterograde-retrograde embolization was used in one patient with balloon occlusion of afferent and efferent veins. Transhepatic embolization through the afferent vein was performed in one patient under balloon occlusion of both efferent and afferent veins. There was complete variceal thrombosis and no bleeding was observed at follow-up. No major complications were recorded. Endovascular obliteration of duodenal varices is a feasible and safe alternative procedure for managing patients with portal hypertension and hemorrhage from this source.

Selection Criteria for Patients Undergoing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedures: Current Status

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has a well-established role in the management of patients with complications of portal hypertension such as variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. Several clinical variables have been described to be associated with a poor prognosis after a TIPS procedure, including the presence of uncontrollable ascites, the number of sclerotherapy sessions to control a bleeding episode, the use of drugs for hemodynamic support, the use of balloon tamponade to control bleeding, the need for an emergency TIPS procedure, the need for mechanical ventilation, prothrombin time, increased serum creatinine, increased serum bilirubin, encephalopathy, and sepsis. In addition, several scoring systems have been developed and applied to patients undergoing TIPS procedures in an attempt to improve patient selection criteria for this invasive procedure. This article reviews the most important scoring systems that have been developed and applied to patients undergoing emergency or elective TIPS procedures, with particular emphasis on the prognostic index designed for patients undergoing emergency TIPS procedures and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score designed for patients undergoing elective TIPS procedures. The most practical application of these scoring systems is probably that, with the information provided, the operator is able to discuss with referring physicians, patients, and family members the expected outcomes of this challenging procedure.

Comparison of MELD and Child-Pugh scores to predict survival after chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the value of the Child-Pugh and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores to predict patient survival rates after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients underwent 169 TACE sessions. Child-Pugh and MELD values were calculated before initial treatment. Survival length was tracked from the date of the first TACE procedure. Transplant recipients were censored from the study at the time of surgery. Child-Pugh and MELD scores as well as bilirubin and albumin levels and International Normalized Ratio were placed in high and low categories defined by their respective medians. Patient survival was compared at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months, and patterns were tested with chi2 or Fisher exact tests. Survival over the entire period was examined with Kaplan-Meier analysis and differences were tested with log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Mean and median survival times for all patients were 24 and 17 months, respectively. Sixteen patients were censored for transplantation at a mean of 12.9 months. MELD and Child-Pugh scores correlated well with each other (r = 0.68). Child-Pugh score (r = -0.35, P = .04) correlated more strongly with 12-month survival than did MELD score (r = -0.26, P = .12). After high/low score category division, a significantly greater survival difference was predicted by Child-Pugh score (27.2 months vs 10.3 months; P = .03) versus MELD score (27.5 months vs 15.8 months; P = .19). An albumin level greater than 3.4 g/dL was also associated with significantly improved survival (29.3 months vs 10.1 months; P = .0032). Survival differences between high-risk and low-risk groups at the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month intervals were significant for low Child-Pugh scores and for albumin levels greater than 3.4 g/dL. Statistical significance was not approached at any of the time lengths with MELD scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Child-Pugh score correlates better than MELD score to overall patient survival and is a better predictor than MELD score of survival at specific time points. Of the components of the Child-Pugh and MELD systems, albumin level is the most useful predictor of survival.

Results of a Retrospective Multicenter Trial of the Viatorr Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene– covered Stent-Graft for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

PURPOSE

To report the results of a multicenter experience with the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in which patency and clinical outcome were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with portal hypertension, with a mean age of 52 years (range, 22-86 years), underwent implantation of the Viatorr TIPS stent-graft at one of three hospital centers. The indications for TIPS creation were variceal bleeding (n = 81) and refractory ascites (n = 19). Twenty patients had Child-Pugh class A disease, 46 had class B disease, and 34 had class C disease. Eighty-seven patients underwent de novo TIPS placements, with 13 treated for recurrent TIPS stenosis. Sixty-two patients were available for follow-up portal venography and portosystemic pressure gradient (PSG) measurement commencing 6 months after Viatorr stent-graft placement.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. TIPS creation resulted in an immediate decrease in mean PSG (+/-SD) from 21 mm Hg +/- 6 to 7 mm Hg +/- 3. Acute repeat intervention (within 30 days) was required for portal vein thrombosis (n = 1), continued bleeding (n = 3), and encephalopathy (n = 1). The all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 12%. Two patients developed acute severe refractory encephalopathy, which led to death in one case. New or worsening encephalopathy was identified in 14% of patients. The incidence of recurrent bleeding was 8%. The cumulative survival rate at 1 year was 65%. Sixty-two patients available for venographic follow-up had a mean PSG of 9 mm Hg +/- 5 at a mean interval of 343 days (range, 56-967 days). There were four stent-graft occlusions (6%) and seven hemodynamically significant stenoses (11%), four within the stent-graft and three in the non-stent-implanted hepatic vein. The primary patency rate at 1 year by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective multicenter experience with the Viatorr stent-graft confirms the preliminary findings of other investigators of good technical results and improved patency compared with bare stents. Early mortality and symptomatic recurrence rates are low by historical standards. The theoretical increase in TIPS-related encephalopathy was not demonstrated. Longer-term follow-up will be required to determine whether the additional cost of the Viatorr stent-graft will be offset by reduced surveillance and repeat intervention.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: experience in the oncology setting

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement has emerged as an effective and minimally invasive method of treating portal hypertension and its associated complications. To the authors' knowledge there is limited documentation of its use for percutaneous shunting in patients with hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies. The current study reports the authors' experience with TIPS in the oncology setting.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with cancer underwent TIPS procedures. Nineteen patients had a history of hepatic malignancy. All medical records and imaging studies were reviewed retrospectively. The indication for TIPS, the presence of malignancy, procedural details, complications, survival, and treatment success were assessed.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was accomplished in 37 of 38 patients (97%) without technical procedure-related complications. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 15 of 34 patients (44%), with 3 patients requiring shunt reduction. Premature shunt occlusion (< 30 days) occurred in 3 patients (8%). Recurrent hemorrhage occurred in 1 of 19 patients (5%), and ascites and hepatic hydrothorax resolved or improved subjectively in 9 of 12 patients (75%). Shunts traversed malignancy in 9 patients, and varying degrees of portal compromise were encountered in 12 patients (32%). The overall 30-day and 90-day survival rates were 84% and 60%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in 90-day survival rates for patients who had ascites and hepatic hydrothorax indications (27%) compared with patients who had variceal and portal gastropathy indications (84%; P = 0.0075). In addition, the 90-day survival rate was significantly lower in patients who had primary hepatic malignancies (36%) compared with the remainder of the study population (74%; P = 0.0077), and it was significantly lower in patients who had model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores > or = 12 (P = 0.0020).

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS was performed safely for patients with cancer without increasing rates of procedure-related complications. However, some patients subgroups, such at those with malignancy and ascites, primary hepatic malignancy, or MELD scores > or = 12, had the lowest 90-day survival rates.

Survival after elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: prediction with model for end-stage liver disease score

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to predict survival in a diverse group of patients who underwent elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in two tertiary care institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent elective TIPS creation in two institutions between May 1, 1999, and June 1, 2002, were selected. Patients who underwent emergency TIPS creation were excluded. One hundred sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The MELD score was computed and compared with the survival rate. Survival curves were estimated with Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates and were compared with the log-rank test. Accuracy of the model was evaluated with the c statistic.

RESULTS

The survival rate for all patients was 88.4% at 30 days, 78.1% at 3 months, and 71.8% at 6 months. Significantly lower survival rates were found in patients with MELD scores of 18 or more in comparison to those with MELD scores of 17 or less (P =.001). The c statistic for prediction of 3-month survival on the basis of the MELD score was 0.76. The early (30-day) death rate for this series was 11.4%. There was a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate between patients with MELD scores of 17 or less and those with scores of 18 or more (P =.001). Patients who underwent TIPS creation for the management of refractory ascites had a significantly lower survival rate in comparison to that for the management of variceal bleeding (P =.001).

CONCLUSION

Results confirm that after elective TIPS creation, patients with a MELD score of 18 or more have a significantly lower 3-month survival rate than do those with a MELD score of 17 or less.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts through hepatic neoplasms

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) were successfully placed through hepatic malignancy, without technical complication, in nine patients. A mean follow-up of 229 days (range, 53-391 days) was available in six patients. Ascites improved in three patients and variceal hemorrhage did not recur in another three patients. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in three patients. Three acute shunt occlusions and two deaths occurred within 30 days of TIPS placement. Shunts that traverse malignancy can be created safely without increased technical complication. Although there is a high rate of acute shunt occlusion, hepatic neoplasm alone should not be a contraindication for TIPS placement.

Evaluation of a model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing elective TIPS procedures

PURPOSE

To validate a previously published model to predict the probability of patient death within 3 months after an elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure. The model is implemented with use of a nomogram or a formula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent an elective TIPS procedure between May 1, 1999, and May 1, 2001, were selected. Patients who underwent emergency TIPS creation and patients with serum creatinine levels greater than 3.0 mg/dL were excluded. A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (ethanol-induced cirrhosis; n = 23) and group B (non-ethanol-induced cirrhosis; n = 49). The model was applied and the predicted probability of death was compared to actual patient survival. A high risk score (R > or = 1.8) is associated with a high risk of death within 3 months after TIPS creation. Survival curves were estimated with use of Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates and were compared with use of the log-rank test. The model's accuracy was evaluated with use of the c-statistic. P values lower than.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 98.7%. The 3-month survival rate for the whole group was 79.7%. The predicted mortality rate was higher than the observed mortality rate. The c-statistic was 0.65 for the formula and 0.66 for the nomogram. Patients with a risk score of at least 1.8 had a 3-month survival rate of 54.6% and patients with a risk score lower than 1.8 had a 3-month survival rate of 84.9% (P =.037).

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that, after an elective TIPS procedure, patients with risk scores of at least 1.8 have a significantly lower 3-month survival rate than patients with risk scores lower than 1.8.

Safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for the treatment of hepatic hydrothorax

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for hepatic hydrothorax (HHyd).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients underwent TIPS creation for HHyd. A prospective TIPS database and medical records were reviewed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded as complete (symptom/effusion resolution), partial (improved symptoms/effusion), or none. Data patterns were examined with chi(2) tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Patients included 12 women and nine men, with a mean age of 56 years, all with Child class B (n = 7) or C (n = 14) disease. The technical success rate was 100%. Mean follow-up was 223 days. Twenty-nine percent (six of 21) died within 30 days of TIPS creation, 10% (two of 21) underwent transplantation within 30 days, and 62% (13 of 21) survived beyond 30 days. Data were incomplete in two patients. Clinical response was classified as complete in 63% (12 of 19), partial in 11% (two of 19), and none in 26% (five of 19). Radiographic response was classified as complete in 30% (six of 20), partial in 50% (10 of 20), and none in 20% (four of 20). Nonresponders had multisystem organ failure, and all but one died within 30 days. However, of the 13 patients surviving longer than 30 days, 10 (77%) had a complete clinical response.

CONCLUSION

TIPS is a relatively safe and effective method of controlling HHyd. The majority of patients experienced improvement or resolution of clinical symptoms with a variable reduction in the quantity of pleural fluid. There was a tendency among nonresponders to die within 30 days.

Hepatic perfusion before and after the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: impact on survival

PURPOSE

This study correlates transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) mortality with flow patterns in the cirrhotic liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven TIPS patients and 10 control subjects were used for this study. The authors evaluated hepatic perfusion with venous injections of Tc-99m pertechnetate before and after TIPS. Hepatic time-activity curves were analyzed for type and amount of liver perfusion. These parameters were correlated with survival for a mean follow-up of 18 months.

RESULTS

The mean arterial contribution to liver blood flow was 25.4% in the normal control patients, 39.9% in patients prior to TIPS, and increased to 48.3% after TIPS. Although the proportion of arterial supply to the cirrhotic liver varied widely, TIPS mortality did not correlate with the preprocedure hepatic artery/portal venous perfusion ratio. However, patients with both an "arterialized" flow pattern and low total hepatic perfusion had higher mortality, with a mean survival of 2 months compared to patients with a more favorable perfusion profile (mean survival, 28.4 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of arterial perfusion to the liver before TIPS did not affect survival. However, patients with a combination of reduced total hepatic perfusion and an arterial flow pattern had poorer survival, suggesting that both the quantity and quality of hepatic perfusion predicts TIPS outcome.

The first decade of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): state of the art

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional treatment resulting in decompression of the portal system by creation of a side-to-side portosystemic anastomosis. Since its introduction 10 years ago, more than 500 publications have appeared demonstrating rapid acceptance and increasing clinical use. This review summarizes the present knowledge of technical aspects and complications, follow-up of patients, and indications. With respect to the technique, the TIPS procedure is probably one of the most difficult interventions and, therefore, technical success and complications clearly depend on the skills of the operator. Thus, the number and kind of complications reported in this review do not necessarily relate to the procedural complications of an experienced center. The follow-up of the TIPS patient has to assess shunt patency, liver function and hepatic encephalopathy. Shunt patency can best be monitored by duplex-sonography. Routine radiological revision seems not to be helpful and does not improve results, i.e., rebleeding and survival. Short term patency may be improved by anticoagulation, while such a treatment does not influence long-term patency. With respect to the indications of TIPS, much is known about treatment of variceal bleeding. The nine randomized studies that are available to date show that survival is comparable between patients receiving TIPS or endoscopic treatment. The second group of patients is the group with refractory ascites and related complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. It has been demonstrated that TIPS improves these complications, but randomized studies are still lacking. In addition, TIPS has been applied successfully to patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, before liver transplantation, and for the treatment of ectopic portal hypertensive bleeding.