Treatment of malignant superior vena cava obstruction: metal stents or radiation therapy

Safety and efficacy of large-bore uncovered stents for treating malignant superior vena cava syndrome

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of large-bore uncovered stents for treating malignant superior vena cava syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 115 patients (89 men, 26 women; mean age 63.2 years; range 21-83 years) who underwent endovascular large-bore (≥18 mm in diameter) uncovered stent placement between August 2015 and July 2022. One patient was lost to follow-up. Therefore, 114 patients were available for follow-up.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in all 115 patients. Minor procedure-related complications occurred in nine (7.8 %) patients. One hundred eight (93.9 %) patients experienced complete or marked symptomatic relief (Kishi score ≤ 2) at a mean of 3 days after procedure. The cumulative stent patency rates were 98.2 %, 95 %, 93.7 %, 91.5 %, 83.5 %, and 83.5 % at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Stent occlusion occurred in ten (8.8 %) of 114 patients at a mean of 215 days (range 1-732 days) due to thrombosis (n = 7) and tumor ingrowth (n = 3). Stent occlusion did not occur in 21 patients who underwent subsequent central venous catheter insertion. The median patient survival time was 159 days (95 % confidence interval 102-216 days). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed adjuvant anticancer treatment (p = 0.001) and tumor response (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular placement of large-bore uncovered stents was a safe and effective treatment for malignant superior vena cava syndrome. Large-bore stent placement can effectively prevent stent occlusion by tumor ingrowth in most cases, and it can provide a sufficient diameter for subsequent insertion of central venous catheters.

Radiofrequency ablation-induced superior vena cava stenosis in a 5-year-old boy with congenital left atrial appendage deformity: a case report and literature review

Superior vena cava (SVC) stenosis is rarely caused by iatrogenic trauma. Herein, the case of a 5-year-old boy who underwent radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia but developed SVC stenosis and related syndromes is reported. Notably, the child exhibited an enlarged left atrial appendage that had partially breached the pericardium. Subsequent interventions involved successful removal of the stenosis, artificial vascular reconstruction, and comprehensive radiofrequency ablation of the entire right atrium, along with ligation of the left atrial appendage under direct vision. As a result, the child experienced relief from symptoms.

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: An Umbrella Review

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a medical emergency that encompasses an array of signs and symptoms due to obstruction of blood flow through the superior vena cava (SVC). It poses a significant healthcare burden due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Its impact on the healthcare system continues to grow due to the increasing incidence of the condition. This incidence trend has been attributed to the growing use of catheters, pacemakers, and defibrillators, although it is a rare complication of these devices. The most common cause of SVCS remains malignancies accounting for up to 60% of the cases. Understanding the pathophysiology of SVCS requires understanding the anatomy, the SVC drains blood from the right and left brachiocephalic veins, which drain the head and the upper extremities accounting for about one-third of the venous blood to the heart. The most common presenting symptoms of SVCS are swelling of the face and hand, chest pain, respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, stridor, cough, hoarseness, and dysphagia), and neurologic manifestations (headaches, confusion, or visual/auditory disturbances). Symptoms generally worsen in a supine position. Diagnosis typically requires imaging, and SVCS can be graded based on classification schemas depending on the severity of symptoms and the location, understanding, and degree of obstruction. Over the past decades, the management modalities of SVCS have evolved to meet the increasing burden of the condition. Here, we present an umbrella review providing an overall assessment of the available information on SVCS, including the various management options, their indications, and a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of these modalities.

Clinical outcomes of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy in the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome caused by small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Currently there is a lack of effective treatment strategies for malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). We aim to investigate the therapeutic effect of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with the Single Needle Cone Puncture method for the ¹²⁵I brachytherapy (SNCP-¹²⁵I) in treating SVCS caused by stage III/IV Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with SCLC who developed SVCS from January 2014 to October 2020 were investigated in this study. Out of these 62 patients, 32 underwent IAC combined with SNCP-¹²⁵I (Group A) and 30 patients received IAC treatment only (Group B). Clinical symptom remission, response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival of these two groups of patients were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The remission rate of symptoms including dyspnea, edema, dysphagia, pectoralgia, and cough of malignant SVCS in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (70.5 and 50.53%, P=0.0004, respectively). The disease control rates (DCR, PR+CR+SD) of Group A and B were 87.5 and 66.7%, respectively (P=0.049). Response rates (RR, PR+CR) of Group A and Group B were 71.9 and 40% (P=0.011). The median overall survival (OS) of Group A was significantly longer than that in Group B which was 18 months compared to 11.75 months (P=0.0360).

CONCLUSIONS

IAC treatment effectively treated malignant SVCS in advanced SCLC patients. IAC combined with SNCP-¹²⁵I in the treatment of malignant SVCS caused by SCLC showed improved clinical outcomes including symptom remission and local tumor control rates than IAC treatment only in treating SCLC-induced malignant SVCS.

Kissing Viabahn VBX stent graft reconstruction of thoracic central veins for management of superior vena cava syndrome

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we evaluated the technical and clinical outcomes of thoracic central vein reconstruction for superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome using kissing Viabahn VBX stent grafts (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ).

METHODS

All adult patients with SVC syndrome who had undergone attempted bilateral brachiocephalic vein-to-SVC reconstruction using kissing VBX stent grafts at an academic hospital between August 2019 and February 2021 were reviewed. The technical results, adverse events, imaging follow-up findings, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patency over time was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (16 women and 12 men; mean age, 52.0 years) constituted the study cohort. Of the 28 patients, 17 (60.7%) had had benign and 11 (39.3%) malignant etiologies. The presenting symptoms included neck swelling (n = 17; 60.7%), bilateral upper extremity swelling (n = 15; 53.6%), dyspnea (n = 7; 25%), unilateral upper extremity swelling (n = 4; 14.3%), and dysphagia (n = 1; 3.6%). SVC reconstruction with VBX stent grafts in a kissing configuration was successfully completed in 27 of the 28 patients (96.4%). Four major adverse events were noted in the benign etiology subgroup (23.5%), including intraprocedural hemopericardium (n = 3) and delayed pneumothorax (n = 1). Of the 28 patients, 27 (96.4%) had experienced resolution of their presenting symptoms. The mean clinical follow-up for the living patients was 358.8 ± 77.2 days (range, 78-645 days). The mean imaging follow-up for the living patients was 272.6 ± 91 days (range, 26-594 days). The primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 71.8%, 88.8%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For the management of SVC syndrome, thoracic central vein reconstruction with kissing VBX stent grafts was feasible with a high rate of symptom resolution and acceptable patency. However, this technique should not be recommended for those with benign SVC syndrome owing to the high risk of cardiac tamponade.

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Etiologies, Manifestations, and Treatments

Superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction, whether from benign or malignant causes, results in a variety of symptoms. It is a potential medical emergency when cerebral or laryngeal edema occurs. Endovascular therapy is the treatment of choice for patients in need of emergent relief of symptoms. This article will provide a review of SVC syndrome with a focus on endovascular treatment techniques.

Literature Review of Percutaneous Stenting for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome (SVCS)

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous stenting for the palliative treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Literature review of retrospective studies was performed regarding direct procedural complications (fatal and non-fatal), clinical effectiveness, and patency rates (primary and secondary) of percutaneous transluminal stenting for the palliative treatment of malignant SVCS. Pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for fatal complications, non-fatal complications, clinical effectiveness, primary patency, and secondary patency. Pooled rates were presented overall and by stent types (Wallstent, Nitinol stents, Steel stents and Stent Graft). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare rates by stent type.

RESULTS

Overall fatal complications rate was 1.46%, 95% CI [0.91 -2.23], non-fatal complications rate was 8.28%, 95% CI [6.91 -9.83], clinical effectiveness was 90.50%, 95% CI [88.86 -91.97], primary patency rate was 86.18%, 95% CI [84.06-88.12], secondary patency rate was 94.05 %, 95% CI [91.82 -95.82]. Primary patency rate of the Wallstent group was 83.38%, 95% CI [79.34 -86.90], and significantly higher for the Nitinol group 94.87%, 95% CI [87.40 -98.60], OR = 3.67, p = 0.01, and for the Stent Graft group 96.10%, 95% CI [89.00 -99.20], OR = 4.92, p = 0.01. Secondary patency rate for the Wallstent group was 93.33%, 95% CI [88.87 -96.40] and significantly lower for the Steel group 77.42%, 95% CI [58.90 -90.41], OR = 0.25, p = 0.01.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous stenting is a safe option for palliative treatment of patients with malignant SVCS with greater than 90% of patients experiencing immediate relief of symptoms, low rates of fatal complications (1.46%) and high patency rates (86.18% primary patency and 94.05% secondary patency).

Application of kissing technique for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Superior vena cava syndrome is a series of symptoms caused by compression of the superior vena cava and its main branches. Endovascular therapy is now widely accepted because it offers rapid, safe and effective relief of clinical symptoms. Few reports have described the application of kissing technique for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome. In this report, we review a series of cases in which superior vena cava syndrome was treated by kissing technique and we share our experience.

METHODS

Our institute treated 22 patients with SVCS by endovascular intervention from November 2016 to June 2021; among them, the kissing technique was used in 10 cases and achieved satisfactory results. This is a retrospective evaluation and analysis of 10 patients with superior vena cava syndrome who were treated by endovascular intervention using the kissing technique from May 2018 to April 2021 in Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Based on literatures, we summarize the diagnosis, treatment, and surgical experience.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the implantation of the kissing stents, and the technical success rate was 100%. The symptoms and signs of intravenous obstruction in all patients were alleviated or disappeared within one to three days after the procedure. During the follow-up period, nine patients remained free from any clinical signs or symptoms, and one patient died one month after the procedure due to the progression of malignant tumors.

CONCLUSION

As a palliative intervention, the kissing technique for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant tumors is safe, rapid, and effective. Successful endovascular therapy can quickly relieve symptoms, improve the patient's quality of life, and provide more opportunities for subsequent anti-tumor treatment.

Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Endovascular stenting has been used to manage superior vena cava syndrome for several decades and has become standard firstline practice. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of endovascular stenting in the management of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED online databases were searched, with studies involving more than ten adult patients included. Studies identified spanned 27 years, from 1993 to 2020. Meta-analyses were performed based on Clopper-Pearson estimation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies were identified, for a total of 2249 patients, of which 2015 had malignant SVCS and 222 benign SVCS. Pooled technical success and clinical success rates were 96.8% (95% CI 96.0-97.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.7-93.8%). Technical success and clinical success rates for studies investigating benign SVCS alone were identical at 88.8% (95% CI 83.0-93.1%). Pooled patency remained above 90% for the first year. Average complication and re-intervention rates were 5.78% (SD = 9.3182) and 9.11% (SD = 11.190).

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in managing SVCS. Further directions of research may include specific outcomes of endovascular stenting in benign SVCS, and the impact of procedural characteristics, such as the use of anticoagulation and type of stent used, on outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of retrospective cohort studies.

Malignant obstruction of the inferior vena cava: clinical experience with the self-expanding Sinus-XL stent system

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical and clinical outcome of Sinus-XL stent placement in patients with malignant obstruction syndrome of the inferior vena cava.

METHODS

Between October 2010 and January 2021, 21 patients with different malignant primary disease causing inferior vena cava obstruction were treated with Sinus-XL stent implantation. Procedural data, technical and clinical outcome parameters were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Technical success was 100%. Analysis of available manometry data revealed a significant reduction of the mean translesional pressure gradient following the procedure (p = 0.008). Reintervention rate was 4.8% (1/21). The available follow-up imaging studies showed primary and primary-assisted stent patency rates of 93% (13/14) and 100% (14/14), respectively. Major complications did not occur. The clinical success regarding lower extremity edema was 82.4% (14/17) for the first and 85.7% (18/21) for the last follow-up. Longer lengths of IVC obstruction were associated with reduced clinical improvement after the procedure (p = 0.025). Improvement of intraprocedural manometry results and lower extremity edema revealed only minor correlation. Ascites and anasarca were not significantly positively affected by the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Sinus-XL stent placement in patients with malignant inferior vena cava obstruction showed high technical success and low complication rates. Regarding the clinical outcome, significant symptom improvement could be achieved in lower extremity edema, whereas ascites and anasarca lacked satisfying symptom relief. Based on our results, this procedure should be considered as a suitable therapy in a palliative care setting for patients with advanced malignant disease.

Percutaneous Endovascular Stent Placement for Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

We assessed the safety as well as the efficacy of self-expanding stent placement for the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), besides identifying the predictable probable factors for the clinical improvement of endovascular stent treatment in SVCS.

METHODS

The study reviewed 112 patients (92 men) with malignant SVCS retrospectively from January 2015 to December 2020.

RESULTS

Out of total 112 patients, 106 stents were successfully placed in 102 patients, however 4 patient's occlusions could not be passed and 6 patient's procedure was abandoned due to intraluminal thrombus as detected in venography. In 92 patients, complete resolution of syndrome was observed within 72 hrs but 10 patients did not to intervention. In 102 patients, procedure-related 8 complications were noted including stent migrations (n = 4), pulmonary embolism (n = 2), and pulmonary edemas (n = 2). Besides after stenting, 3 hemorrhages with anticoagulation therapy were observed with 4 recurrences at 22, 36, 51 and day 58 in 6 months. The pressure gradient across the lesion (≥ 20mmHg) was used as a predictor for clinical efficacy of stent therapy for SVCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular stent insertion is a safe and effective intervention for malignant SVCS, especially for those with pressure gradient across the lesions ≥ 20mmHg.

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome comprises a constellation of clinical signs and symptoms caused by obstruction of blood flow through the SVC. The management of patients with life-threatening SVC syndrome is evolving from radiation therapy to endovascular therapy as the first-line treatment. There is a paucity of data and societal guidelines with regard to the management of SVC syndrome. This paper aims to update the practicing interventionalists with the contemporary and the evolving therapeutic approach to SVC syndrome. In addition, the review will focus on endovascular techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, angioplasty, and stenting, and their associated complications.

Endovascular therapy for superior vena cava syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the obstruction of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. In contemporary practice, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for a majority of these patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess technical success, restenosis, and recurrence of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, we conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to April 14, 2021 for studies on ET for SVC syndrome. Studies included full-length journal articles on the use of ET among adults with SVC syndrome. Case reports or case series with fewer than 20 patients were excluded. We evaluated the endpoints of technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting. The results of this study were calculated using random-effects models.

FINDINGS

We identified 6,012 reports, of which 39 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. A total of 2200 patients received ET for SVC syndrome. The weighted technical success rate was 98.8% (95% CI 98.2-99.3) with low heterogeneity (I²=17.4%, p = 0.185), restenosis rate was 10.5% (95% CI 8.4-12.6) with moderate heterogeneity (I²=53.5%, p<0.001), and recurrence rate was 10.8% (95% CI 8.1-13.5) with high heterogeneity (I²=75.8%, p<0.001). Total complication rate was 8.6% (95% CI 7.3%-9.9%) with a mean complication rate of 7.5% (95% CI 4.7%-10.3%).

INTERPRETATION

Our systematic review revealed high technical success, low restenosis, and low recurrence rates following ET. Collectively, these results support the paradigm of ET as an effective and safe treatment for patients with SVC syndrome.

FUNDING

None.

Single-Setting Superior Vena Cava Biopsy and Stenting Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography as an Additional Tool

BACKGROUND Malignant disease is a common etiology of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). Being a medical emergency, it often requires rapid diagnostic evaluation and therapy. Transcaval biopsy and endovascular stenting in a single-setting has been described, but only in a handful of cases. These cases utilized intra-operative venograms. In this study, we also used intra-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to increase the safety and efficacy of such single-setting procedures. CASE REPORT From January 2017 to July 2019, there were 5 patients with malignant SVCS who underwent single-setting superior vena cava biopsy and endovascular stenting utilizing intra-operative CBCT as an adjunct. Demographic data, clinical presentation, investigation results, procedural details, and patient outcomes were recorded. CBCT was utilized in all cases to optimize sampling of biopsies, visualize subsequent stent positioning, and for early detection of procedure-related complications. Transcaval biopsy was diagnostic in 4 of the 5 patients. Endovascular stents were deployed successfully in all cases, with post-stenting venogram demonstrating relief of prior obstructed segments. One patient had a complication of an apical pneumothorax, with no associated long-term pneumothorax-related morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that single-setting transcaval biopsy and stenting in the context of malignant SVCS is a cost-efficient, safe, and feasible approach. In addition, the additional use of intra-operative CBCT is a useful tool to increase procedure efficacy and safety.

Superior vena cava syndrome

The superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by compression, invasion, and/or thrombosis of the superior vena cava and/or the brachiocephalic veins. Benign SVCS is separated from malignant SVCS. SVCS comprises a broad clinical spectrum reaching from asymptomatic cases to rare life-threatening emergencies with upper airway obstruction and increased intracranial pressure. Symptoms are correlated to the acuity and extent of the venous obstruction and inversely correlated to the development of the venous collateral circuits. Imaging is necessary to determine the exact underlying cause and to guide further interventions. Interventional therapy has widely changed the therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients. This article provides an overview over this complex syndrome and focuses on interventional therapeutic methods and results.

Efficacy of endovascular Z-configuration stenting for malignant versus nonmalignant caval obstruction

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with symptom resolution after endovascular stenting for superior or inferior vena cava syndrome.

METHODS

Eighty-six consecutive vena cava Z-configuration stent placements in 82 patients (53 ± 14 years old) at a single institution were reviewed for patient demographics, comorbidities, and durability of stent patency (also evaluated were persistent or recurrent symptoms, stent occlusion, and need for repeated stenting). Logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with stent patency, and Φ coefficients and analysis of variance were used to compare cases subdivided by lesion location (superior vena cava, inferior vena cava) and the presence or absence of malignant disease.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up was available in 77 of 86 (90%) cases. Technical success with clinical failure (persistent symptoms) occurred in 40% of these cases with a median follow-up of 67 (interquartile range, 14-570) days and mortality rate of 63% during this period. Malignant obstructions had a significantly higher clinical failure rate of 54% compared with 15% for nonmalignant obstructions (Φ = 0.34; P = .002). However, only metastatic disease was independently associated with clinical failure when controlling for demographics, other comorbidities, and differential follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 8.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-24.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Vena cava Z-stenting effectively resolves symptoms in 85% of nonmalignant obstructions compared with only 46% of malignant obstructions. Patients should be counseled accordingly, and those with malignant obstructions may require closer follow-up to evaluate the need for reintervention and goals of care.

Sore throat turned to be a bronchogenic carcinoma with superior vena cava syndrome

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a group of symptoms caused by complete or partial obstruction of the flow of blood through the SVC. The obstruction is, in most cases, caused by the formation of thrombus or infiltration of a tumour through the vessel wall. The result is venous congestion that creates a clinical situation relating to increase in the venous pressure in the upper part of the body. Symptoms commonly associated with vena cava syndrome include cough, dyspnoea, swelling of the neck, face and the upper extremities and dilation of the chest vein collaterals. In this paper, we examine the case of a 50-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with ‘sore throat’ which can be easily misdiagnosed as a case of uncomplicated acute pharyngitis. It was a real challenge to diagnose our patient as SVC syndrome caused by bronchogenic carcinoma.

Treatment of venous stenosis in oncologic patients

Symptomatic obstruction related to malignant involvement of large veins may occur in central veins both in the thoracic and pelvic regions, and in the abdominal region of the body. Both cases represent a therapeutic challenge, and endovascular revascularization, consisting of angioplasty and stent placement, is safe and effective. Superior vena cava stenting has become widespread in the management of occlusive venous disease. The percutaneous placement of large expandable metal stents allows rapid restoration of normal blood flow in the majority of patients, thus improving symptoms. Published data on the diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic cancer-related iliocaval obstructions are limited and mainly consist of case reports and small case series. The present review reports the current state of endovascular treatment for both superior vena cava occlusion and iliac compression syndrome in cancer patients.

Superior vena cava syndrome in a patient with locally advanced lung cancer with good response to definitive chemoradiation: a case report

BACKGROUND

The incidence of superior vena cava syndrome within the United States is roughly 15,000 cases per year. Superior vena cava syndrome is a potentially life-threatening medical condition; however, superior vena cava syndrome is not fatal in the majority of cases. Superior vena cava syndrome encompasses a collection of signs and symptoms resulting from obstruction of the superior vena cava, including swelling of the upper body of the head, neck, arms, and/or breast. It is also associated with cyanosis, plethora, and distended subcutaneous vessels. Lung cancer, including both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, is the most common extrinsic cause of superior vena cava syndrome. Intrinsic disruption of superior vena cava flow can also precipitate superior vena cava syndrome. This case report describes an unusual presentation and potential etiology of superior vena cava syndrome.

CASE PRESENTATION

Our patient was a 51-year-old black woman with locally advanced, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer who had no clinical symptoms of superior vena cava syndrome at the time of diagnosis. However, she did have radiographic evidence of superior vena cava stenosis caused by extrinsic compression from her large right hilar primary tumor. She was treated with definitive chemoradiation, receiving 60 Gy of external beam radiation therapy given concurrently with chemotherapy. Three months after completion of radiotherapy, she developed signs of superior vena cava syndrome, including breast and supraclavicular swelling. She had a chest computed tomography scan showing over 50% reduction in the size of a right hilar mass; however, she had continued radiographic stenosis of the superior vena cava. The distribution of stenosis appeared to be inferior to the caudal extent of pretreatment tumor volume. She had no other radiographic indications for superior vena cava syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, superior vena cava syndrome is the result of extrinsic compression of the superior vena cava by tumor. Our patient's case represents the development of superior vena cava syndrome after an excellent response of tumor with near-complete tumor response. We suspect chemoradiation therapy as a potential etiology for the precipitation of the superior vena cava syndrome, which is currently not well reported in the medical literature.

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome in Conjunction with Pulmonary Vasculature Compromise: A Case Study and Literature Review

Patient: Male, 61

Final Diagnosis: SVC syndrome

Symptoms: Dyspnea

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Oncology

Superior Vena Cava (SVC) Endovascular Reconstruction with Implanted Central Venous Catheter Repositioning for Treatment of Malignant SVC Obstruction

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a group of clinical signs caused by the obstruction or compression of SVC and characterized by edema of the head, neck, and upper extremities, shortness of breath, and headaches. The syndrome may be caused by benign causes but most of the cases are caused by lung or mediastinal malignant tumors. Stenting of SVC has become widely accepted as the palliative treatment for this condition in malignant diseases, as it offers rapid relief of symptoms and improves the quality of life. Preserving previously placed central venous catheters (CVCs) is a major issue in this population. We report the case of a patient with SVC syndrome caused by tumoral obstruction due to central small-cell lung cancer who had right subclavian implanted CVC and a preferential head and neck venous drainage through the left internal jugular and brachiocephalic vein (BCV). We describe a complex procedure of SVC reconstruction with two different objectives: left recanalization and stent placement to ensure head and neck venous drainage and right BCV stenting for CVC repositioning and subsequent replacement. We also review published cases of SVC obstructions stenting with catheter repositioning. The patient experienced quick relief of symptoms after treatment. Chemotherapy was rapidly delivered through the preserved implanted CVC access. A 3-month follow-up computed tomography showed stents patency.

Malignant Venous Obstruction: Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Beyond

Venous obstruction in the cancer population can result in substantial morbidity and, in extreme cases, mortality. While venous obstruction can be caused by both benign and malignant etiologies in this population, the management of malignant venous obstruction as a palliative measure can be somewhat nuanced with respect to nonprocedural and procedural management, both with respect to treatment of the underlying malignancy as well as treatment of venous hypertension, which may be associated with venous thrombosis. Symptom severity, primary malignancy, functional status, and prognosis are all fundamental to the patient workup and dictate both the timing and extent of endovascular intervention. The morbidity and mortality associated with malignant obstructions of central venous structures, specifically the superior vena cava and inferior vena cava, can be significantly improved with endovascular management in appropriately selected patients. Thus, the pertinent literature regarding the clinical presentation, workup, and endovascular management of malignant central venous obstruction syndromes, with directed attention to superior vena cava syndrome and inferior vena cava syndrome, will be reviewed in this article.

Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Is Bilateral Wallstent Placement Superior to Unilateral Placement?

Purpose:

To report our experience with unilateral versus bilateral stent placement in the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

Methods:

The records and films of 84 consecutive patients (69 men; mean age 64±10 years, range 39–79) referred for stent placement in malignant SVCS were reviewed for venous compromise, technical and clinical success, complications, and reocclusions. Wallstents were placed covering the SVC and both (bilateral technique) brachiocephalic veins (BCV) preferentially; unilateral stenting of only one BCV in addition to the SVC was performed based on operator preference or inability to access both sides. Technical success was defined as the ability to stent the SVC and at least one BCV; clinical success was the elimination of SVCS symptoms.

Results:

Technical success was achieved in 83 (99%) patients, using the unilateral technique in 22 and bilateral stenting in 61 patients. The groups did not differ with regard to age, sex, underlying diseases, or location and extent of venous compromise. Immediate clinical success was achieved in 20 (91%) of 22 patients in the unilateral group and 55 (90%) of 61 patients in the bilateral group. Two patients suffered late occlusion in the unilateral group, while in the bilateral group, 8 patients had early occlusion and 9 had late occlusion. Thus, the total occlusion rate was significantly (p<0.05) lower in the unilateral group. There was 1 other complication (pericardial tamponade) in the bilateral group, for a 28% total complication rate, which was significantly higher (p = 0.039) than the 9% in the unilateral group. The 1, 3, 6, and 12-month primary stent patency rates were 90%, 81%, 76%, and 69%, respectively. Patency tended to last longer in the unilateral group, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.11).

Conclusions:

Although bilateral Wallstent placement achieved equal technical and clinical success, it tended to confer shorter-lived patency and caused more complications.

Review of evolving etiologies, implications and treatment strategies for the superior vena cava syndrome

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a relatively common sequela of mediastinal malignancies and may cause significant patient distress. SVCS is a medical emergency if associated with laryngeal or cerebral edema. The etiologies and management of SVCS have evolved over time. Non-malignant SVCS is typically caused by infectious etiologies or by thrombus in the superior vena cava and can be managed with antibiotics or anti-coagulation therapy, respectively. Radiation therapy (RT) has long been a mainstay of treatment of malignant SVCS. Chemotherapy has also been used to manage SVCS. In the past 20 years, percutaneous stenting of the superior vena cava has emerged as a viable option for SVCS symptom palliation. RT and chemotherapy are still the only modalities that can provide curative treatment for underlying malignant etiologies of SVCS. The first experiences with treating SVCS with RT were reported in the 1970’s, and several advances in RT delivery have subsequently occurred. Hypo-fractionated RT has the potential to be a more convenient therapy for patients and may provide equal or superior control of underlying malignancies. RT may be combined with stenting and/or chemotherapy to provide both immediate symptom palliation and long-term disease control. Clinicians should tailor therapy on a case-by-case basis. Multi-disciplinary care will maximize treatment expediency and efficacy.

Endovascular stenting in malignant obstruction of superior vena cava

INTRODUCTION

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is obstruction of blood flow through the SVC. It is a medical emergency and most often manifests in patients with a malignant disease process within the thorax. A patient with SVCS requires immediate diagnostic evaluation and therapy.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 33-years-old woman presented with complaints of dyspnoea and chest pain. Computer tomography revealed a large mass in the anterior mediastinum. This mass compressed surrounding structures. Stenting was indicated for early symptoms of SVCS. The diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) was confirmed with biopsy. The patient's stage II HL has been subsequently treated with six cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), followed by radiotherapy. Presently she is doing well.

DISCUSSION

Although lymphomas are a common cause of SVCS but almost always SVCS is caused by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HL despite its common presentation with mediastinal lymphadenopathy rarely causes SVCS.

CONCLUSION

Lymphomas are a common cause of SVCS in young age. HL may present as SVCS. Pathological confirmation of diagnosis should be done before initiating therapy while dealing with a case of SVCS. SVC stenting is effective and has few complications in patients with SVCS.

WITHDRAWN: Steroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and stents for superior vena caval obstruction in carcinoma of the bronchus

Authors are unable to update this review. New authors are being sought to update it.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Interventional oncology in multidisciplinary cancer treatment in the 21(st) century

Interventional oncology is an evolving branch of interventional radiology, which relies on rapidly evolving, highly sophisticated treatment tools and precise imaging guidance to target and destroy malignant tumours. The development of this field has important potential benefits for patients and the health-care system, but as a new discipline, interventional oncology has not yet fully established its place in the wider field of oncology; its application does not have a comprehensive evidence base, or a clinical or quality-assurance framework within which to operate. In this regard, radiation oncology, a cornerstone of modern cancer care, has a lot of important information to offer to interventional oncologists. A strong collaboration between radiation oncology and interventional oncology, both of which aim to cure or control tumours or to relieve symptoms with as little collateral damage to normal tissue as possible, will have substantial advantages for both disciplines. A close relationship with radiation oncology will help facilitate the development of a robust quality-assurance framework and accumulation of evidence to support the integration of interventional oncology into multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, collaboration between interventional oncology and radiation oncology fields will have great benefits to practitioners, people affected by cancer, and to the wider field of oncology.

Palliative procedures in lung cancer

Palliative care aims to optimize comfort and function when cure is not possible. Image-guided interventions for palliative treatment of lung cancer is aimed at local control of advanced disease in the affected lung, adjacent mediastinal structures, or distant metastatic sites. These procedures include endovascular therapy for superior vena cava syndrome, bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis associated with lung cancer, and ablation of osseous metastasis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, indications of these palliative treatments, procedural techniques, complications, and possible future interventions are discussed in this article.

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Role of the Interventionalist

Superior vena cava syndrome results from the obstruction of blood flow through the superior vena cava and is most often due to thoracic malignancy. However, benign etiologies are on the rise secondary to more frequent use of intravascular devices such as central venous catheters and pacemakers. Although rarely a medical emergency, the symptoms can be alarming, particularly to the patient. Traditionally, superior vena cava syndrome has been managed with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But interventional endovascular techniques have made inroads that offer a safe, rapid, and durable response. In many cases, it may be the only reasonable treatment. Because of this, an approach to endovascular treatment of this condition must be in the armamentarium of the interventional radiologist. This review will provide the reader with an insight into the etiology, pathophysiology, and various management principles of superior vena cava syndrome. The focus will be on understanding the techniques used during various endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stenting, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. Discussion will also be centred on possible complications and current evidence as well as controversies regarding these approaches.

Covered stent placement for the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: is unilateral covered stenting safe and effective?

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of unilateral covered stent placement in patients with malignant superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome.

Materials and Methods

Between October 2008 and November 2012, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent placement for malignant SVC syndrome was performed in 40 consecutive patients (35 men and five women; mean age, 61.4 years; range, 35-81 years). All covered stents were unilaterally placed within the SVC or across the venous confluence when needed to relieve venous obstruction and prevent tumor overgrowth, regardless of patency of contralateral brachiocephalic veins.

Results

Stent placement was technically successful in all patients. There were no major complications. Of the 37 patients symptomatic prior to stent placement, 34 (92%) experienced complete symptomatic relief 1-8 days after stent placement. Of the 29 patients who underwent covered stent placement across the venous confluence, nine patients had patent contralateral brachiocephalic veins prior to stent placement. However, no sign of SVC obstruction or contralateral upper extremity venous thrombosis was observed during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed median patient survival of 163 days. Stent occlusion occurred in four (10%) of 40 patents. Cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 95%, 92%, 86%, and 86%, respectively.

Conclusion

Unilateral covered stent placement appears to be a safe and effective method for treating malignant SVC syndrome, despite the location of SVC occlusion.

Malignant thrombosis of the superior vena cava caused by non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radiation and erlotinib: a case with complete and prolonged response over 3 years

Most cases of superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome resulting from neoplasm, especially from lung cancer, remain a serious challenge to treat. Here, for the first time as far as we are aware, we report the case of a non-small-cell lung cancer patient with a massive SVC malignant thrombosis who was treated with thoracic irradiation and erlotinib. The treatment regimen consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/day and a total dose of 66 Gy/33 fractions delivered to the tumor, malignant thrombosis, and metastasis mediastinal lymph nodes. The malignant thrombosis responded dramatically and the combined regimen was well tolerated. After discharge, the erlotinib was prescribed as maintenance therapy. The patient was followed closely for the next 3 years. During this time, positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans and serum tumor marker screens were undertaken. By 6 months, the primary tumor showed complete response and by 9 months, the SVC thrombosis had disappeared. No sign of relapse has been found to date.

[Effectiveness of endovascular prostheses as initial treatment for superior vena cava syndrome of malignant cause]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by venous return obstruction often originated by an invading mediastinal tumour. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of stents as initial treatment for SVCS of malignant origin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1996 to August 2010, 120 patients with SVCS were referred for percutaneous treatment. Seventy-six were under oncological follow-up cases and in 44 cases the tumour was unknown. A non-concurrent prospective study was made of 113 patients without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, who opted for endovascular treatment as first option.

RESULTS

One hundred and two men and 11 women were treated, mean age 61.18 years old (range 45-85). SVCS causes included lung cancer (100), lung metastases (6), compression by enlarged lymph nodes (6), and an embryonic tumour. One hundred and fifty-five prostheses were implanted. One stent was enough in 75 patients, 2 stents in 34, and 3 in 4. Technical success rate was 98.2%. Symptoms disappeared completely in 97 patients and partially in 13. Complications were stent migration (5), epistaxis (1), and post-procedure groin hematoma (1). Seventy-three asymptomatic patients had a mean survival of 210 days (75% primary permeability and 52.9% secondary permeability).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of stents in malignant SVCS is a safe and effective procedure for venous obstruction, leading to the immediate disappearance of symptoms, allowing the underlying tumour staging, facilitating the establishment of the best treatment and improving life quality.

Malignant superior vena cava syndrome: a comparative cohort study of treatment with covered stents versus uncovered stents

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents and compare them with outcomes of uncovered stents in patients with malignant superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained. Thirty-seven consecutive patients (33 men, four women; mean age, 60.3 years; range, 35-81 years) who underwent ePTFE-covered stent placement for SVC syndrome were enrolled in a prospective study between January 2009 and September 2011. Their data were compared with retrospective data of 36 consecutive patients (31 men, five women; mean age, 62.3 years; range, 41-81 years) who underwent uncovered stent placement for SVC syndrome between January 2005 and December 2008. The causes of malignant SVC syndrome were squamous cell carcinoma (n = 27), adenocarcinoma (n = 25), small cell carcinoma (n = 15), thymic carcinoma (n = 3), invasive thymoma (n = 2), and breast cancer (n = 1). Stent patency and patient survival rates were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in all patients. Complications did not occur in either group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that covered stents had higher cumulative patency (97%, 94%, 94%, and 94% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively) than uncovered stents (97%, 79%, 67%, and 48% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; P = .038). Clinical success rates did not significantly differ (P = .674), nor did patient survival (P = .549). Median survival in the covered stent group was 141 days (95% confidence interval: 81, 201 days) and 100 days in the uncovered stent group (95% confidence interval: 60, 140 days).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular placement of ePTFE-covered stents appeared to be a safe and effective method to treat patients with malignant SVC syndrome and seemed to be superior to uncovered stents in terms of stent patency.

Superior vena cava syndrome in lung cancer

Summary Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) consists of various symptoms and signs due to intrinsic obstruction or extrinsic compression of the superior vena cava. The most common etiology is thoracic malignancy, with lung cancer being the leading cause (80%). It usually presents with edema of the head, neck and arms, often associated with cyanosis, plethora and distended subcutaneous vessels. The diagnosis is commonly made from physical examination and confirmed by imaging, such as CT scan. SVCS is usually not a medical emergency, but can, in rare cases, cause cardiac or airway compromise, or cerebral edema, which may require urgent interventions such as thrombectomy or endovascular stenting. In lung cancer-related SVCS, radiation and/or chemotherapy are the main treatment options, and tissue diagnosis should be obtained before the initiation of definitive treatment if SVCS is the initial presentation. Randomized controlled trials are still lacking for optimal management of SVCS.

Endoluminal treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of interventional treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors. Sixty-one patients with venous vascular complications of malignant tumors were treated from May 2002 to May 2009; 37 men and 24 women with mean age 57.8 years (33-82 years). Lesions included acute deep vein thrombosis (n=18); venous stenosis or occlusion (n=32); tumor embolus in vein (n=11). The interventional therapeutic operations included vena cava filter implantation, trans-catheter thrombolytic therapy, recanalization, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting. The success rate of thrombolysis and stent implantation, the clinical success rate, complications, recurrence rate of the treated region and survival duration were recorded. Eighteen patients accepted filter and thrombolytic therapy with a success rate of 100%; total urokinase dosage was 7.42±1.49 (4.5-10) million units. Symptoms disappeared (n=15), were palliated (n=3) and thrombi were completely dissolved (n=2), almost completely dissolved (n=8, >90%), partially dissolved (n=6, 50-90%) and not dissolved (n=2, <50%). No pulmonary embolism emerged after the operation. Forty-three patients accepted recanalization, PTA and stent therapy with a success rate of 95.3% (41/43). Symptoms disappeared (n=25), were palliated (n=16) and did not change (n=2) 3 days following the operation. There were no severe complications during the procedure. During follow-up, 12 patients again suffered symptoms of venous occlusion and 47 patients died of tumor aggravation without symptom recurrence. As a result, interventional therapy has advantages including smaller injuries, well tolerance, high success rate, quick palliation of symptoms and superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of venous vascular complications for malignant tumors.

Successful treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome using a stent-graft

We report successful outcomes after endovascular placement of a stent graft in a 74- and a 77-year-old men, both of whom had malignant superior vena cava syndrome caused by squamous cell carcinoma. In each patient, successful palliation of the malignant superior vena cava syndrome was achieved by placement of a stent graft. No procedure-related complications were observed. The patients were asymptomatic until their deaths, seven and 14 months after stent graft placement, respectively.

Palliative care in lung cancer

Advancements in the surgical and medical treatment of lung cancer have resulted in more favorable short-term survival outcomes. After initial treatment, lung cancer requires continued surveillance and follow-up for long-term side effects and possible recurrence. The integration of quality palliative care into routine clinical care of patients with lung cancer after surgical intervention is essential in preserving function and optimizing quality of life through survivorship. An interdisciplinary palliative care model can effectively link patients to the appropriate supportive care services in a timely fashion. This article describes the role of palliative care for patients with lung cancer.

The Role of Stenting the Superior Vena Cava Syndrome in Patients With Malignant Disease

Superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction occurs in patients with intrathoracic malignancies. Clinical symptoms can be distressing but presentation is insidious. We investigated the outcome of endovascular management for patients with SVC syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed the case histories of 17 patients (9 men) from January 2003 to June 2009. All patients had malignant disease. There were 24 interventions (2 patients with 2 interventions and 2 patients with 3 interventions). All had SVC stenosis over 90%. All patients were treated with intrathoracic angioplasty and stenting. All procedures were technically successful, and all patients had insertion of 10 to 18 mm diameter stents with symptom resolution in 16 patients. There were 2 occlusions at 1 and 6 weeks and 2 patients with restenosis (3 and 7 months). Endovascular intervention is technically feasible for SVC occlusion, relieves symptoms, and is a useful palliation measure.

Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects about 27 million people in North America and Europe, accounting for up to 413,000 hospitalizations per year with 88,000 hospitalizations involving the lower extremities and 28,000 involving embolectomy or thrombectomy of lower limb arteries. Many patients are asymptomatic and, among symptomatic patients, atypical symptoms are more common than classic claudication. Peripheral arterial disease also correlates strongly with risk of major cardiovascular events, and patients with PAD have a high prevalence of coexistent coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Because the prevalence of PAD increases progressively with age, PAD is a growing clinical problem due to the increasingly aged population in the United States and other developed countries. Until recently, vascular surgical procedures were the only alternative to medical therapy in such patients. Today, endovascular practice, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting, is used far more frequently for all types of lower extremity occlusive lesions, reflecting the continuing advances in imaging techniques, angioplasty equipment, and endovascular expertise. The role of endovascular intervention in the treatment of limb-threatening ischemia is also expanding, and its promise of limb salvage and symptom relief with reduced morbidity and mortality makes percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting an attractive alternative to surgery and, as most endovascular interventions are performed on an outpatient basis, hospital costs are cut considerably. In this monograph we discuss current endovascular intervention for treatment of occlusive PAD, aneurysmal arterial disease, and venous occlusive disease.