Doppler flow wire evaluation of renal artery blood flow before and after PTA: initial results

Correlation between noninvasive and endovascular Doppler in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A pilot study

Considerable interest exists in using endovascular techniques for assessing the renal circulation. The vasomotor response of the renal circulation in patients with hypertension and severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis was evaluated. Sixteen patients (5 men and 11 women) with a mean age of 73.2+/-7.1 years (range, 59-82 years) underwent noninvasive renal duplex ultrasonography and endovascular flow wire evaluation. The flow wire was positioned in the main renal artery distal to the stenosis and used to examine the reactivity of the renal circulation in response to intra-arterial papaverine before and after percutaneous revascularization. Resistive index was computed as (MPV - EDV)/MPV, where MPV is the maximum peak velocity and EDV is the end-diastolic velocity. Renal flow reserve was defined as the ratio of peak hyperemic response to baseline flow. Intervention was technically successful in 18/18 arteries. Heart rate (69+/-11 vs. 65+/-10 beats/min; P=NS) and systolic blood pressure (168+/-19 vs. 163+/-24 mm Hg; P=NS) remained constant following injection of intrarenal papaverine, while diastolic blood pressure decreased (77+/-13 vs. 65+/-11 mm Hg; P<0.006). Papaverine injection resulted in significant increases in average peak velocity (APV; 148% of baseline; P=0.0003), MPV (146% of baseline; P=0.001), and EDV (161% of baseline; P=0.0026), but had no effect on the endovascular resistive index (0.81+/-0.12 vs. 0.84+/-0.08; P=NS). Renal artery stenting produced no effect on APV or EDV, but a small increase in MPV (123% of baseline; P<0.05). In contrast, renal stenting resulted in a significant increase in the endovascular resistive index (0.77+/-012 vs. 0.84+/-0.08; P=0.003), pulsatility index (1.84+/-0.61 vs. 2.23+/-0.70; P<0.014), and renal flow reserve (1.49+/-0.44 vs. 1.86+/-0.73; P<0.0071). A correlation was found between the noninvasive and endovascular measures diastolic/systolic ratio (r=0.73; P<0.0009) and resistive index (r=0.63; P<0.0053). Patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis have preserved vasomotor response to papaverine, as well as marked increases in renal flow and resistive index following successful renal artery stenting. Endovascular flow wire measurements are safe, easy to perform, and correlate well with noninvasive Doppler measurements.

Relative rates of blood flow reduction during transcatheter arterial embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres or polyvinyl alcohol: quantitative comparison in a swine model

PURPOSE

To determine whether two commonly used embolic agents have differing rates of blood flow reduction during transcatheter embolization of the renal arteries in an animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The renal arteries of 10 pigs were embolized with either polyvinyl alcohol (300-500 or 500-700- micro m) or tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (300-500 or 700-900- micro m). Equivalent unit doses of each agent were suspended in 40 mL of fluid and injected in 1-mL aliquots for 20 mL and then in 5-mL aliquots for 20 mL. Blood flow was measured after each aliquot with an intraarterial Doppler flow wire placed through the embolization catheter.

RESULTS

Renal arterial blood flow was most rapidly and reliably decreased by 300-500- and 700-900- micro m microspheres, both of which had achieved >90% reduction from baseline flow after the injection of 6 mL of suspension. An equivalent reduction in flow required 25 mL of 300-500- micro m PVA suspension and 30 mL of 500-700- micro m PVA suspension. The reduction in blood flow with microspheres was significantly greater (P <.05) than that with PVA between 5 and 19 mL of suspension delivered. Differences between larger and smaller particle sizes of the same agent were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Tris-acryl gelatin microspheres reduced renal blood flow more quickly and reliably than did PVA. The type of agent used in embolization had a greater impact on the rate of flow reduction than did particle size in the range of sizes tested.

Continuous measurements of renal perfusion in pigs by means of intravascular Doppler

BACKGROUND

Changes in renal blood flow are considered to play a significant role in the induction and maintenance of kidney failure, but are difficult to monitor with currently available techniques. The objective was to validate renal flow measurements with Doppler guidewires and to apply this technique to assess dose and time dependency of the renal vascular effects of norepinephrine (NE).

METHODS

In 10 anesthetized pigs, flow velocity in renal arteries (FVart) and veins (FVvein) and volumetric renal blood flow (VBF) were measured before and after intravenous bolus application of incremental doses of NE (2 to 200 microg).

RESULTS

FVart curves exactly reflected the changes in VBF. Beat-to-beat analysis revealed a strong linear correlation over a mean VBF range of less than 0.05 to 0.35 L/min (median correlation coefficient with FVart, r = 0.998), and significant but less close relationships were also found between VBF and FVvein. Ten seconds after the administration of 200 microg NE, FVart dropped from 71 to 6 cm/sec and was 90% reversible after 48 seconds. Similarly, the renal vascular resistance temporarily rose from 988 to 13711 mm Hg. min/L. In contrast, NE-induced increases in systemic vascular resistance were on average a maximum of 1.5-fold but persisted for more than 60 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler flow measurements in the renal artery provide an excellent surrogate of volumetric blood flow, which may be useful for continuous monitoring of renal hemodynamics. The renal vasculature is more sensitive when compared with the systemic vasculature, but also appears to evoke more efficient counter-regulatory mechanisms in response to NE.

Renal artery vasomotion: in vivo assessment in the pig with intravascular Doppler

Intravascular Doppler is widely used for experimental studies in the coronary circulation. We designed this study to assess baseline bloodflow and arteriolar resistance in the porcine renal circulation and to study the vasomotor responses of vasoactive drugs. In anesthesized piglets (n = 15), renal arterial diameter was measured with quantitative angiography and blood flow velocity with a Doppler wire (Cardiometrics). Bloodflow and resistances were calculated at baseline and after injection of vasoactive drugs (isosorbide dinitrate, papaverine). This allowed us to determine the renal bloodflow reserve (the capacity of the kidney to augment basal bloodflow). Injection of isosorbide dinitrate was associated with an increase in average peak velocity of 64% (P < 0.01) and a small (from 4.5 to 4.74, P < 0.01) but significant increase in renal artery diameter, resulting in an increase in bloodflow of 82% (P < 0.01) and a decrease in arteriolar resistance of 46% (P < 0.01). Bloodflow returned to baseline (4.76 +/- 1.48 mL/s) approximately 5 min after isosorbide injection. Average Peak Velocity increased almost twofold after papaverine injection (60 +/- 10 to 108 +/- 24 cm/sec, P < 0.01). There was a significant (P < 0.01) increase in arterial bloodflow of 96% in the right and 79% in the left renal artery after injection of papaverine with a corresponding significant (P < 0.01) decrease in arteriolar resistance of 49% in the right and 44% in the left renal artery. Using a combination of quantitative angiography and intravascular Doppler allows easy measurement of baseline renal blood flow and of the effects of vasodilator drugs on bloodflow and resistance. The results show that a vasodilatator reserve exists in the renal circulation but is less marked than that reported in the coronary circulation.