Modification of the diuretic and natriuretic effects of a dopamine infusion by fluid loading in preoperative cardiac surgical patients

Monitoring Hepatic and Renal Function

Liver disease represents a serious risk factor for patients requiring anesthesia and surgery. Even subclinical liver disease increases perioperative morbidity and mortality. Perioperative renal dysfunction and failure have similar implications. Thus, detection of early hepatic and renal dysfunction and monitoring of their progress is essential. This article discusses methods for monitoring hepatic and renal function in patients who have high risk for liver or renal injury in the perioperative period.

Hemodynamics and renal function during administration of low-dose dopamine in severely ill patients

CONTEXT

Although a large number of studies have been performed regarding the renal and hemodynamic effects of the infusion of low-dose dopamine (LDD) in severely ill patients, there is still controversy on this subject.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of dopamine (2 microg/kg/min) on systemic hemodynamics (lowest mean arterial pressure, MAP, highest heart rate, HR, central venous pressure, CVP), creatinine clearance (CLcr), diuresis and fractional sodium excretion (FENa+).

TYPE OF STUDY

A non-randomized, open, prospective clinical trial.

SETTING

An intensive care unit in a tertiary university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

22 patients with hemodynamic stability admitted to the intensive care unit.

PROCEDURES

Patients were submitted to three two-hour periods: without dopamine (P1), with dopamine (P2) and without dopamine (P3).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

The above mentioned variables were measured during each period. CLcr was assessed based upon the formula U x V/P, where U is urinary creatinine (mg/dl), V is diuresis in ml/min and P is serum creatinine (mg/dl). FENa+ was calculated based upon the formula: urinary sodium (mEq/l) x P/plasma sodium (mEq/l) x U) x 100. Results were presented as mean and standard deviation. The Student t test was used and results were considered significant if p was less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (seven males and five females) were included, with a mean age of 55.45 years. There was no significant variation in MAP, HR, CVP, CLcr or FENa+ with a dopamine dose of 2 microg/kg/min. On the other hand, diuresis significantly increased during P2, from 225.4 to 333.9 ml.

CONCLUSION

Infusion of 2 microg/kg/min of dopamine for 2 hours increases diuresis. At the doses studied, dopamine does not induce significant alterations in MAP, HR, CVP, CLcr and FENa+.

Use of dopamine in acute renal failure: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low-dose dopamine administration reduces the incidence or severity of acute renal failure, need for dialysis, or mortality in patients with critical illness.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

We performed a MEDLINE search of literature published from 1966 to 2000 for studies addressing the use of dopamine in the prevention and/or treatment of renal dysfunction.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted regarding design characteristics, population, intervention, and outcomes. Results of individual randomized clinical trials were pooled using a fixed effects model and a Mantel-Haenszel weighted chi-square analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified a total of 58 studies (n = 2149). Of these, outcome data were reported in 24 studies (n = 1019) and 17 of these were randomized clinical trials (n = 854). Dopamine did not prevent mortality, (relative risk, 0.90 [0.44-1.83]; p =.92), onset of acute renal failure (relative risk, 0.81 [0.55-1.19]; p =.34), or need for dialysis, (relative risk, 0.83 [0.55-1.24]; p =.42). There was sufficient statistical power to exclude any large (>50%) effect of dopamine on the risk of acute renal failure or need for dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low-dose dopamine for the treatment or prevention of acute renal failure cannot be justified on the basis of available evidence and should be eliminated from routine clinical use.

Oliguria in the ICU. Systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment

Perioperative oliguria is common but rarely implies acute renal failure. We should interpret oliguria as a sign of intravascular hypovolemia and treat it as prerenal until proven otherwise. On the other hand, the absence of oliguria does not exclude acute renal failure. The most reliable clinical indicator of progressive renal dysfunction is a serial decline in creatinine clearance estimation, a measure of glomerular filtration rate.

Lack of renoprotective effects of dopamine and furosemide during cardiac surgery

Because development of acute renal failure is one of the most potent predictors of outcome in cardiac surgery patients, the prevention of renal dysfunction is of utmost importance in perioperative care. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of dopamine or furosemide in prevention of renal impairment after cardiac surgery was evaluated. A total of 126 patients with preoperatively normal renal function undergoing elective cardiac surgery received a continuous infusion of either "renal-dose" dopamine (2 microg/kg per min) (group D), furosemide (0.5 microg/kg per min) (group F), or isotonic sodium chloride as placebo (group P), starting at the beginning of surgery and continuing for 48 h or until discharge from the intensive care unit, whichever came first. Renal function parameters and the maximal increase of serum creatinine above baseline value within 48 h (deltaCrea(max)) were determined. The increase in plasma creatinine was twice as high in group F as in groups D and P (P < 0.01). Acute renal injury (defined as deltaCreamax) >0.5 mg/dl) occurred more frequently in group F (six of 41 patients) than in group D (one of 42) and group P (zero of 40) (P < 0.01). (The difference between group D and group P was not significant.) Creatinine clearance was lower in group F (P < 0.05). Two patients in group F required renal replacement therapy. The mean volume of infused fluids, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, serum potassium, and osmolar- and free-water clearance was similar in all groups. It was shown that continuous infusion of dopamine for renal protection was ineffective and was not superior to placebo in preventing postoperative dysfunction after cardiac surgery. In contrast, continuous infusion of furosemide was associated with the highest rate of renal impairment. Thus, renaldose dopamine is ineffective and furosemide is even detrimental in the protection of renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery.

The use of diuretics and dopamine in acute renal failure: a systematic review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of diuretics and dopamine for both the prevention and treatment of renal dysfunction in the acute care setting. STUDY IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION: Studies were identified via MEDLINE, and through bibliographies of primary and review articles. Articles were then screened by the author for studies addressing the use of diuretics or dopamine in the prevention and/or treatment of renal dysfunction. DATA ABSTRACTION AND LITERATURE APPRAISAL: From individual studies, data were abstracted regarding design features, population, intervention and outcomes. Studies were graded by levels according to their design. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies using diuretics and 30 involving dopamine were identified. Level I evidence exists against the use of diuretics for radiocontrast-induced acute tubular necrosis, and loop diuretics given after vascular surgery. There is level II evidence that diuretics do not improve outcome in patients with established acute renal failure. Level II evidence also exists against the use of dopamine in the prevention of acute tubular necrosis in multiple subsets of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of diuretics or dopamine for the prevention of acute renal failure cannot be justified on the basis of available evidence.