Low-dose heparin appears safe and can eliminate protamine use for carotid endarterectomy

Using protamine can significantly reduce the incidence of bleeding complications after carotid endarterectomy without increasing the risk of ischemic cerebral events

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists regarding the use of protamine sulfate (PS) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), chiefly because of conflicting experiences reporting both less bleeding and a higher stroke risk. The goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that reversing heparin with PS after CEA significantly reduces the incidence of bleeding complications without increasing the risk of postoperative stroke.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2012 all consecutive patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia at our institution received 5,000 U of heparin prior to carotid clamping, which was partially (half-dose) reversed with PS 25 mg immediately after declamping (group I). Heparinization had never been reversed with PS in earlier CEAs performed from 1998 to 2009 at the same institution (group II). All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by a neurologist, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all group I patients to exclude any silent cerebral infarction. End points of the study were bleeding complications, perioperative (30-day) stroke, and death.

RESULTS

Overall, 219 CEAs (201 patients) were performed in group I, and 1,458 CEAs (1,294 patients) in group II. Demographics, risk factors, and preoperative antiplatelet medication were comparable in the two groups. The incidence of adverse events (group I vs group II) was as follows: stroke (0 vs 0.5 % [8/1,458], p = 0.27); death (0 vs 0 %); neck bleeding (0 vs 8.2 % [120/1,458], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study demonstrate that (1) partially neutralizing heparin with PS after CEA can significantly reduce the risk of bleeding complications, and (2) there is no association between the administration of PS and the incidence of postoperative stroke.

Carotid Endarterectomy: Experience in 5425 Cases

From 1992 to December 2002, 3967 patients (2619 males; 1348 females) with a mean age of 68.4A years (range 32-92) underwent 5425 carotid endarterectomy (CE) procedures at our institute. Neurological history was positive for stroke in 1130 cases (21%) and for transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 2121 cases (39%). In 2174 cases (40%) patients were neurologically asymptomatic or presented nonspecific symptoms. Our current clinical protocol has been designed to optimize resources and reduce complications. Some of the major features, along with the respective percentages in this series, are as follows. Duplex scanning was performed at a validated laboratory as the principal preoperative exam (86.9%). Locoregional anesthesia and neurological monitoring were performed during carotid cross-clamping (96.3%). Selective shunting was carried out with a Javid shunt (10.7%). The choice of surgical technique was made according to carotid anatomy and cerebral tolerance of cross-clamping. Those used were a standard technique (now abandoned, 12.1%), synthetic patching (46.4%), and eversion endarterectomy (41.5%). Intraoperative completion arteriography was routinely performed for eversion endarterectomy and only in dubious cases with other techniques. The option of staying in an postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) was available (selective use, 2%). In uncomplicated cases, early discharge (after 1.5 postoperative days) was considered safe. The overall perioperative mortality was 0.37% (20/5425). Causes of death were myocardial infarction in seven cases, ischemic stroke in six cases, hemorrhagic stroke in five cases, respiratory failure caused by cervical hematoma in one case, and wound infection in one case. Perioperative neurological morbidity was 1.31% (71/5425); there were 43 major and 28 minor strokes. In conclusion, CE is effective for stroke prevention when there is significant symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, as low mortality and morbidity may be achieved in an experienced center. At our institute, the reduction of costs did not have negative consequences on the quality of the surgical care.