Case 3--1999. Intraoperative coronary thrombosis in association with low-dose aprotinin therapy

The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients undergoing surgical treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction receive antifibrinolytic therapy to limit blood loss. This approach appears counterintuitive to the accepted medical treatment of the same condition--namely, fibrinolysis to limit thrombosis. Despite this concern, no independent, large-scale safety assessment has been undertaken.

METHODS

In this observational study involving 4374 patients undergoing revascularization, we prospectively assessed three agents (aprotinin [1295 patients], aminocaproic acid [883], and tranexamic acid [822]) as compared with no agent (1374 patients) with regard to serious outcomes by propensity and multivariable methods. (Although aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor, here we use the term antifibrinolytic therapy to include all three agents.)

RESULTS

In propensity-adjusted, multivariable logistic regression (C-index, 0.72), use of aprotinin was associated with a doubling in the risk of renal failure requiring dialysis among patients undergoing complex coronary-artery surgery (odds ratio, 2.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.36 to 4.95) or primary surgery (odds ratio, 2.34; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.27 to 4.31). Similarly, use of aprotinin in the latter group was associated with a 55 percent increase in the risk of myocardial infarction or heart failure (P<0.001) and a 181 percent increase in the risk of stroke or encephalopathy (P=0.001). Neither aminocaproic acid nor tranexamic acid was associated with an increased risk of renal, cardiac, or cerebral events. Adjustment according to propensity score for the use of any one of the three agents as compared with no agent yielded nearly identical findings. All the agents reduced blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between aprotinin and serious end-organ damage indicates that continued use is not prudent. In contrast, the less expensive generic medications aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are safe alternatives.

Cardiopulmonary bypass and mitral valve replacement during pregnancy

Gravid patient cardiopulmonary bypass remains a high-risk procedure with regard to fetal preservation. Maternal mortality is similar to that of the nonpregnant female at 1.5-5%. However, fetal mortality remains high at 16-33%, with an average of 19% over the past 25 years, with no correlation to gestational age. Teratogenesis is a major consideration in the first trimester. Variations in the timing of surgical intervention, gestational age, maternal health status, type of procedure, pre- or postorganogenesis, perfusion protocol, and pharmaceutical therapy are all factors that can influence fetomaternal outcome. In this report, we present a literature review along with our experience of a 26-year-old female who developed complications with her pregnancy at approximately 17 weeks gestation, with adverse neurological sequelae. The patient was 152 cm in height and weighed 48 kg, with a calculated body surface area of 1.40 M2. She had no prior history of cardiac disease and, upon admission to our institution, presented with a declining health status in pulmonary edema and was treated medically, with an ultimate requirement for mitral valve replacement. The total cardiopulmonary bypass time was 99 min with an aortic crossclamp time of 83 min. The literature, as expected, is limited to case reports and reviews since a controlled clinical trial during pregnancy is nonexistent, using extracorporeal circulation. This greatly challenges the medical staff in managing such difficult cases, with an incidence of heart disease during pregnancy of 1.2-3.7%.

Intravascular thrombosis and thromboembolism during liver transplantation: antifibrinolytic therapy implicated?

This case report describes a patient who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation and developed extensive hyperacute venous and arterial intravascular thromboses and thromboemboli intraoperatively. The patient was receiving antifibrinolytic therapy with aprotinin. The safety of routine aprotinin therapy in liver transplantation is examined. The value of the thrombelastograph (TEG) as a qualitative assessment of the coagulation system is emphasized.

Avoidance of Bleeding During Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulant and/or Antiplatelet Therapy

Perioperative management of chronically anticoagulated patients and/or patients treated with antiplatelet therapy is a complex medical problem. This review considers the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of commonly used antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs with special emphasis on loss of effects after discontinuation and possible counteracting (or antidote) strategies. These drugs are aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), ticlopidine/clopidogrel, abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, heparin (unfractionated and low-molecular-weight), warfarin and direct thrombin inhibitors. Since the pharmacological mechanisms of some of these drugs are based on irreversible or slowly reversible effects, their pharmacokinetic profiles are not necessarily predictive for their pharmacodynamic profiles. A close and direct relationship between plasma concentrations and effects is seen only for the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors tirofiban and eptifibatide with a fast off-rate for dissociation from the GPIIb/IIIa receptor, and for direct thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and argatroban). For other compounds, drug concentrations in plasma and pharmacodynamic effects are not closely correlated because of, for example, irreversible binding to their target (aspirin, clopidogrel and abciximab), inhibition of the generation of a subset of clotting factors with differing regeneration and degradation rates (coumarins) or sustained binding to the vascular wall (heparins). Surgery in patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy may be categorised as: (i) elective versus urgent; and (ii) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) versus non-CPB. Monotherapy with clopidogrel or aspirin need not be discontinued in elective non-CPB surgery, and temporary discontinuation of warfarin should be accompanied by preoperative intravenous heparin only in selected high-risk patients. Vitamin K as an antidote for warfarin should only be used subcutaneously and solely in urgent/emergency surgery. In elective surgery requiring CPB (coronary artery bypass grafting), it is recommended to discontinue aspirin 7 days preoperatively in patients with a low risk profile. Patients requiring urgent CPB surgery (e.g. after failure of a percutaneous coronary angioplasty with or without coronary stent deployment) are usually pretreated with several antiplatelet agents (e.g. aspirin and clopidogrel, together with a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor) together with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. With judicious planning, urgent/emergency cardiac surgery can be safely performed on these patients. Delaying surgery (e.g. for 12 hours in patients treated with abciximab) should be considered if possible. Standard heparin doses should be given to achieve optimal anticoagulation for CPB. Prophylactic use of aprotinin (intra- and/or postoperatively), aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid should be considered. Early (in the operating theatre prior to chest closure) and judicious use of replacement blood products (platelets) should be commenced when clinically indicated.

Comparison of the effects of a cell saver and low-dose aprotinin on blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing valve surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2 important techniques of blood conservation, use of a cell saver and low-dose aprotinin, in terms of blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty adult patients undergoing elective valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were divided into 3 groups of 20 each. In group 1, aprotinin in the dose of 30,000 KIU/kg was added to the pump prime, with a further dose of 15,000 KIU/kg added at the end of each hour of cardiopulmonary bypass. In group 2, a cell-saver system was used to collect all blood at the operation site for processing in preparation for subsequent reinfusion. Group 3 patients acted as a control group and underwent routine management, which included collection of autologous blood during the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass period. A hemoglobin of <8 g/dL was considered as an indication for bank blood transfusion in the postoperative period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The chest tube drainage was significantly less in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3, with total drainage (median [interquartile range]) amounting to 250 mL [105 to 325 mL] vs. 700 mL [525 to 910 mL] in group 2 and 800 mL [650 to 880 mL] in group 3 (p < 0.001). The patients in groups 1 and 2 required significantly less bank blood (median [interquartile range]) as compared with group 3 (350 mL [0 to 525 mL], 350 mL [0 to 350 mL], and 1050 mL [875 to 1050 mL]; p < 0.001), respectively. Cell saver provided 410 +/- 130 mL of hemoconcentrated blood in group 2. The average preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 11.3 g/dL, and it was around 9 g/dL on the 7th postoperative day. The hemoglobin concentration at various stages during hospitalization in all 3 groups was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aprotinin and a cell saver are effective and comparable methods of blood conservation. Aprotinin helps by decreasing the postoperative drainage, and a cell saver helps by making the patient's own blood available for transfusion.

Update on cardiopulmonary bypass

Investigations into cardiopulmonary bypass continue to refine knowledge and clinical practice. Recent investigations have emphasized neurological complications, introducing the possibility of genetic predisposition as a risk factor. Appropriate flows, pressures, and hematocrit levels during cardiopulmonary bypass continue to create controversy. Whereas previous debate has centered around appropriate temperature management, recent discussions consider the possibility that mild hypothermia after cardiopulmonary bypass might be neuroprotective. Meta-analyses and prospective investigations continue to suggest the virtual equivalence of aprotinin and lysine analogues in reducing bleeding and transfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass. Several recent studies identified the mechanisms and severity of the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass, as well as possible techniques for attenuating inflammation.