Radioisotopic implantation for carcinoma of the prostate: does it work better than it used to?

Shape analysis of the prostate: establishing imaging specifications for the design of a transurethral imaging device for prostate brachytherapy guidance

PURPOSE

To examine specific prostate and urethra dimensions and prostate shape to facilitate the design of a transurethral ultrasonographic imaging device.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Computed tomographic (CT) data sets were retrospectively evaluated from 191 patients who underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy at our institution. The prostate, rectum, urethra, and bladder were each segmented with imaging software. Collected data and calculations included prostate volume at specific distances from the urethra and rectum, distances from seeds to urethra (SU), distances from seeds to rectum (SR), prostate length, and curvilinear prostatic urethra length.

RESULTS

The CT-based, postimplant mean prostate volume was 49cm(3) (range, 22-106cm(3)). Mean prostate length was 4.5cm (range, 3.1-6.0cm). The mean curvilinear length of the prostatic urethra was 4.5cm. The mean (standard deviation) prostatic urethra bend was 29.0° (12.2°). The mean surface distance from the prostate to the urethra was 2.9cm and from the prostate to the rectum w as 4.6cm (p<0.001, paired t test). The mean SU distance was 1.6cm, and the mean SR distance was 2.3cm (p<0.001). In the largest prostate, the mean SU distance was 3.9cm and the mean SR distance was 6.0cm.

CONCLUSIONS

A urethral imaging device for prostate brachytherapy and other minimally invasive prostate therapies should ideally have a 6-cm imaging field of view to image all the prostates in this series in a single image. The mean distance from the SU in permanent prostate brachytherapy is less than 70% of the mean SR distance.

Bicalutamide alone prior to brachytherapy achieves cytoreduction that is similar to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues with less patient-reported morbidity

OBJECTIVES

To compare the impact of bicalutamide (B) vs. luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues (LHRHa) on prostate volume, patient-reported side effects, and postimplant urinary toxicity in the setting of interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

METHODS

Between May 1998 and January 2004, 81 patients received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for cytoreduction prior to interstitial brachytherapy alone. Fifty-six patients received LHRHa and 25 patients received B. Prostate volumes were measured prospectively prior to initiating therapy, and then intraoperatively at the time of implant by a single, blinded ultrasonographer. Patient-reported quality of life data were obtained prospectively, and postimplant urinary toxicity (catheter dependency and need for surgical intervention) was recorded during follow-up. Median follow-up was 53 (range 23-78) months.

RESULTS

The median percentage prostate volume reductions of 26% for B and 32% for LHRHa were not statistically different (P = 0.61). Decrements in libido (92% vs. 44%, P < 0.001) and erectile function (79% vs. 20%) were reported in more respondents treated with LHRHa than B. The incidence of recatheterization (28% vs. 24%, P = 0.34), and the need for subsequent surgical intervention (11% vs. 4%, P = 0.16) were similar for patients treated with LHRHa and B.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of prostate downsizing with B is similar to that achieved with LHRHa. B was associated with fewer patient-reported sexual side effects and similar urinary morbidity. A randomized trial is needed to establish whether LHRHa or B should be the standard of care for prostate downsizing before interstitial brachytherapy.

Variability of prostate brachytherapy preimplant dosimetry: A multi-institutional analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a multi-institutional comparison of prostate brachytherapy pre-implant dosimetry of Pd-103 and I-125.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eight experienced brachytherapists submitted Pd-103 and I-125 monotherapeutic and boost pre-implant dosimetry plans for central review. All 32 plans were calculated using the same transrectal ultrasound volumetric study. Seeds of any strength were acceptable, but were restricted to Theraseed Model 200 (Theragenics Inc., Buford, GA) and Oncura Oncoseed Model 6711 (Oncura, Plymouth Meeting, PA). The dosimetric analysis included evaluation of target volume, target to prostate ratio, target length, number of needles, seed activity, number of seeds, total activity, total activity divided by treatment planning volume, the use of extracapsular seeds, and average treatment margins (defined as the perpendicular distance between the prostate capsule and the 100% isodose line). Prostate coverage was defined in terms of V(100)/V(150)/V(200)/V(300) and D(100)/D(90)/D(50), whereas urethral dosimetry consisted of UV(100)/UV(150)/UV(200) and UD(90)/UD(50).

RESULTS

The mean planning target volume to prostate volume ratio varied dramatically (mean 1.29, range 0.99-1.76) with the target length ranging from 3.5 to 4.5 cm. Although the prostate V(100) was >95% in all cases, the V(150) ranged from 29.9% to 92.1% and the V(200) from 6.72% to 52.5%. The urethral V(100) was 100% in all cases with six of the eight brachytherapists limiting the UV(150) to <3%. However, the median urethral dose varied by up to 50%. Treatment margins also varied significantly (average 3.98 mm, range 0.32-7.68 mm). All brachytherapists used extracapsular seeds with five implanting >25% of the seeds in extracapsular locations (range 6.4-58.2%). In addition, significant variability existed in the number of needles, number of seeds, and seed strength.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the substantial variability that exists regarding target volume, seed strength, dose homogeneity, treatment margins, and extracapsular seed placement, although prostate brachytherapy prescription doses are uniform. The standardization of pre-implant dosimetry is essential for meaningful multi-institutional comparisons of biochemical outcomes and morbidity.

The importance of urethra visualization for preplanned permanent prostate implants

PURPOSE

To assess the potential consequences of using a surrogate urethra on urethral dose estimates in preplanned 125I prostate implants.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For n=220 patients, the A-P and L-R extents of prostate and urethra contours were measured in transrectal ultrasound images. Treatment plans were then developed for 6 patients, of which 5 had atypical urethral positions. For each patient, three plan variations were made using the visualized and two different surrogate urethra contours.

RESULTS

The urethra typically remains fixed in the L-R direction and extends slightly below midgland, but may veer off-center and can come within 0.5 cm of the posterior surface of the prostate. Use of a surrogate urethra can potentially result in up to 30% of the urethra receiving doses exceeding a planned limit of 1.5 x 145 Gy over a contiguous length of 2.0 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

The urethra should be visualized for preplanning purposes, because unintended urethral doses arising from the use of a surrogate urethra can approach levels associated with late urinary morbidity. Visualization is also essential in the postimplant setting for accurate collection of dose-toxicity data.

Prostate cancer brachytherapy: is real-time ultrasound-based dosimetry predictive of subsequent CT-based dose distribution calculation? a study of 450 patients by the Institut Curie/Hospital Cochin (Paris) Group

PURPOSE

Real-time ultrasound (US)-based dosimetry performed during (125)I loose seed implantation provides the radiation oncologist with an estimation of the dose distribution at seed insertion. However, for a number of reasons, this distribution may not reflect the real (reference) dosimetry as determined by subsequent CT, usually performed 1-2 months after implantation. The present study compared the two dosimetry data sets (US and CT) to evaluate how predictive extemporaneous US-based dosimetry can be of the real dose distribution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 450 patients with prostate cancer were treated with loose (125)I seed implantation between June 1999 and October 2002 by the Institut Curie/Hospital Cochin (Paris) Group. The mean patient age was 65 years. Most patients (74%) had Stage T1c; the stage did not exceed T2b for the others. All patients had a prostate-specific antigen level of <15 ng/mL and was <10 ng/mL for 72%; 84% had a Gleason score of < or =6 and did not exceed 7 for the others; and 56% were treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for a mean of 4.3 months. All patients were treated with loose seed implantation. Real-time US-based dosimetry was performed intraoperatively for all patients. CT-based dosimetry was performed 2 months after implantation, using the VariSeed software. The minimal dose to 90% of the outlined volume (D(90)) and percentage of volume receiving at least 100% of the prescribed dose (V(100)) were calculated with the two methods and compared for all patients.

RESULTS

On CT-based dosimetry, the D(90) was found to be > or =145 Gy (range, 115-240 Gy) in all patients except one. A large majority (86%) of patients showed a CT-based V(100) of >95%, and 48% had a V(100) of >98%. The mean CT-based D(90)/US-based D(90) ratio was 1.0 (range, 0.66-1.33). For 89% of the patients, the difference between the two values was <20% and for 62% was <10%. The mean CT-based V(100)/US-based V(100) ratio was 0.98 (range, 0-1.02), with 89% of patients showing a difference of <5%.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the D(90) and V(100) values obtained intraoperatively with our real-time US-based dosimetry are in reasonable agreement with the subsequent values obtained with CT-based dosimetry performed 2 months after implantation. Recent innovations in our dose planning software allowed better control of the longitudinal seed position and could still improve the correlation between real-time US-based dosimetry and the subsequent CT-based dose distribution.

Radioactive seed migration to the chest after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy: extraprostatic seed placement correlates with migration

PURPOSE

To examine the incidence of seed migration detected on chest X-ray and to identify the predictors associated with its occurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1998 and April 2000, 102 patients underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy at our institution and 100 were eligible for the study. Chest X-rays obtained at follow-up were examined for the number and location of seeds. The patient and treatment variables potentially associated with the occurrence and number of seed migrations were analyzed.

RESULTS

One or more seeds were identified on the chest X-rays of 55 (55%) of 100 patients. The mean number of intrathoracic seeds in patients with migration was 2.2 (range, 1-10), and the proportion of seeds that migrated to the thorax was 0.98%. The rate of extraprostatic seeds planned was 43.9%, and postimplant CT identified 37.9% in such a location. The number of seeds planned for extraprostatic placement and below the apex were statistically significant (alpha = 0.05) predictors in univariate logistic analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed the planned number of extraprostatic seeds as the only statistically significant predictor (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Extraprostatic placement of loose seeds is associated with an increased likelihood for, and frequency of, seed migration to the thorax. Nonetheless, the small proportion of implanted seeds that migrated (<or=1%) is highly unlikely to have significant dosimetric consequences.

3D visualization, analysis, and treatment of the prostate using trans-urethral ultrasound

In the year 2000, it is estimated that over 20,000 men underwent transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) for treatment of prostate cancer. Trans-urethral ultrasound (TUUS) is a new interactive, real-time 3D imaging method that may be effective in therapy-guidance during and after TIPPB. TUUS provides higher resolution than trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS). TUUS can be used to accurately localize radioactive seeds and therefore contribute to more accurate determination of radiation dose distribution throughout the tissue after the completion of the procedure, similar to information currently provided by expensive and offline CT scans. A TUUS catheter can be used to acquire 2D section images or 3D volume images for detailed analyses of the prostate and associated tissue. Initial development of TUUS imaging was carried out on an ultrasound-equivalent prostate phantom with cylindrical dummy radiation sources. This was followed by preliminary studies in animals and then in patients. Both CT and TRUS data were acquired in these studies for comparative purposes. Segmentation of the prostate capsule and radioactive seeds was carried out using several semi-automated 3D algorithms and image processing techniques. Presentation of the data to the clinician is provided by a variety of complementary 2D and 3D display methods. In comparison with the CT data, TUUS data provided both greater spatial resolution and better soft tissue differentiation. In comparison to the TRUS data, TUUS data provided greater resolution and better seed localization. Combining these advantages suggests the possibility of TUUS becoming the exclusive imaging method in prostate cancer brachytherapy.

Increased expression of PSA mRNA during brachytherapy in peripheral blood of patients with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent of iatrogenic tumor cell dissemination during brachytherapy by assessing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA expression in circulating prostate tumor cells using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. The instrumentation used in the radioisotope seed placement of the prostate causes trauma to blood vessels and provides a vascular access for tumor cells that can lead to potential iatrogenic dissemination and systemic failure.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients treated for brachytherapy were recruited in the study. Controls included 4 normal men and 1 woman; case controls included 4 patients who underwent prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. Peripheral blood (10 mL) was collected before, during, and after the brachytherapy procedure. Total RNA was isolated from mononuclear cells and phosphorus-32 RT-PCR was performed to analyze the mRNA expression of PSA and G6PDH genes.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients, 23 were negative for PSA mRNA expression and 2 were positive for PSA mRNA expression before brachytherapy. Of the 23 patients who were negative for PSA mRNA expression before treatment, 15 patients (65%) turned positive during or after brachytherapy and the remaining 8 patients remained negative throughout the treatment. Eight of the 25 patients developed rising serum PSA levels. Of these 8 patients, 1 (12.5%) did not have PSA mRNA expression in the peripheral blood before, during, or after brachytherapy; the remaining 7 patients who developed rising serum PSA levels had PSA mRNA expression after brachytherapy (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings strongly suggest that iatrogenic shedding of prostate cells occurs as a result of brachytherapy and raises the concern that these cells liberated at the time of brachytherapy increase the risk of metastatic deposits and results in systemic failure, as measured by serum PSA levels.

The role of external beam irradiation in patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy

6. From this cohort, a matched-pair analysis was performed to better assess the role of EBT and TIPPB (n = 215). PSA relapse-free survival was based on the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves were compared to assess various prognostic factors. The median follow-up for all 215 matched patients was 44 months (range, 24-81) with an actuarial PSA relapse-free survival (RFS) at 5 years of 81.1%. Patients treated with EBT and TIPPB had a 5-year PSA RFS of 83.5% whereas patients treated with TIPPB only had a 5-year PSA RFS of 79.4% (p = 0.715)10 ng/ml. Risk group analysis combining PSA, Gleason score, and stage failed to identify any risk group for which the addition of EBT was significant. Analysis of postimplant dosimetry using the dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) failed to distinguish any difference between groups. A significant advantage for combining EBT and TIPPB could not be demonstrated in this retrospective matched-pair analysis. These data indicate that the role and rationale of combined treatment in prostate brachytherapy requires better clarification, with a prospective randomized trial.

Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

Prostate brachytherapy is an effective treatment option for clinically organ-confined prostate carcinoma. Observed 5- and 10-year follow-up have documented prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels that were comparable to published radical prostatectomy series and were better than several published external-beam radiation series. Between January 1987 and June 1988, a total of 152 consecutive patients with Stage T1 to T3 low to high Gleason grade prostate cancer were studied at Northwest Hospital in Seattle, Washington. Patients' median age was 70 years (range, 53 to 92 years). All patients received Iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy with or without a 45 Gy dose of external-beam radiation. The average preoperative PSA, clinical stage, and prostate needle biopsy Gleason sum were 11 ng/ml, T2, and (5), respectively, and were known in all but five patients. PSA follow-up, clinical examination, and biopsy results judged disease-free survival at 5 and 10 postoperative years. Elevation of PSA above 0.5 ng/ml or a positive biopsy or a positive bone scan was considered treatment failure. The authors provide an historical review of prostate brachytherapy in conjunction with up-to-date implant techniques and long-term outcome results.

Isotope selection for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) is generally performed with either 103Pd or 125I. The use of 125I for low Gleason score tumors and 103Pd for higher Gleason scores has been suggested based on isotope dose rate and cell doubling time observed in in vitro studies. While many centers follow these isotope selection criteria, other centers have elected to use only a single isotope, regardless of Gleason score. No clinical data have been published comparing these isotopes. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes between 125I and 103Pd in a matched pair analysis for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six hundred forty-eight consecutively treated patients with clinically confined prostate cancer underwent TIPPB between June 1992 and February 1997. Five hundred thirty-two patients underwent TIPPB alone, whereas 116 received pelvic external beam irradiation and TIPPB. Ninety-three patients received androgen deprivation therapy prior to TIPPB. The prescribed doses for TIPPB were 160 Gy for 125I (pre-TG43) and 120 Gy for 103Pd. Patients treated with combination therapy received 41.4 or 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) external beam irradiation followed by a 3- to 5-week break and then received either a 120-Gy 125I or a 90-Gy 103Pd implant. Until November 1994, all patients underwent an 125I implant after which the isotope selection was based on either Gleason score (Gleason score 2-5:125I; Gleason 5-8:103Pd) or isotope availability. A matched pair analysis was performed to assess any difference between isotopes. Two hundred twenty-two patients were matched according to Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and stage. PSA relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) was calculated based on the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Group definition of failure. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves were compared to assess differences in pretreatment PSA and Gleason score.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis of the 648 patients identified Gleason score, pretreatment PSA value, and stage as significant factors to predict PSA-RFS, but failed to identify isotope selection as significant. To address the significance of isotope selection further, the matched pair groupings were performed. The minimum follow-up for all 222 matched patients is 24 months with a median follow-up of 42 months (24-82). The actuarial PSA-RFS at 5 years for all 222 patients is 86.5%. One hundred eleven of the 222 matched patients received a 103Pd implant with an 87.1% 5-year PSA-RFS. The remaining 111 patients underwent a 125I implant with an 85.9% 5-year PSA-RFS (p = n.s.). Analysis of Gleason score subgroups 2-4, 5-6, and 7-9 failed to show any significant difference in PSA-RFS comparing isotopes. Pretreatment PSA subgroups of < or = 10 or > 10 ng/ml also failed to show any significant difference in PSA-RFS survival comparing isotopes. Analysis of postimplant dosimetry using dose delivered to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) did not identify any difference between the isotope groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This matched pair analysis failed to demonstrate a difference for 125I and 103Pd in PSA-RFS for patients undergoing TIPPB. In addition, there were no observed advantages for either 125I or 103Pd in either the low or high Gleason score groups. This data indicates that the role of isotope selection for patients undergoing TIPPB requires further clarification.

Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation

PURPOSE

To assess the urinary morbidity experienced by patients undergoing ultrasound-guided, permanent transperineal seed implantation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1992 and September 1997, 693 consecutive patients presented with a diagnosis of clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, and were treated with ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (TPIPB). Ninety-three patients are excluded from this review, having received neoadjuvant antiandrogen therapy. TPIPB was performed with 125I in 165 patients and with 103Pd in 435 patients. Patients treated with implant alone received 160 Gy with 125I (pre TG43) or 120 Gy with 103Pd. One hundred two patients received preimplant, pelvic external beam radiation (XRT) to a dose of either 41.4 or 45 Gy because of high-risk features including PSA > or = 10 and/or Gleason score > or = 7. Combined modality patients received 120 Gy and 90 Gy, respectively for 125I or 103Pd. All patients underwent postimplant cystoscopy and placement of an indwelling Foley catheter for 24-48 h. Follow-up was at 5 weeks after implant, every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months for subsequent years. Patients completed AUA urinary symptom scoring questionnaires at initial consultation and at each follow-up visit. Urinary toxicity was classified by the RTOG toxicity scale with the following adaptations; grade 1 urinary toxicity was symptomatic nocturia or frequency requiring none or minimal medical intervention such as phenazopyridine; grade 2 urinary toxicity was early obstructive symptomatology requiring alpha-blocker therapy; and grade 3 toxicity was considered that requiring indwelling catheters or posttreatment transurethral resection of the prostate for symptom relief. Log-rank analysis and Chi-square testing was performed to assess AUA score, prostate size, isotope selection, and the addition of XRT as possible prognosticators of postimplant urinary toxicity. The prostate volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150) was studied in patients to assess its correlation with urinary toxicity.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 37 months (range 6-68). Within the first 60 days, 37.3% of the patients reported grade 1 urinary toxicity, 41% had grade 2, and 2.2% had grade 3 urinary toxicity. By 6 months, 21.4% still reported grade 1 urinary toxicity, whereas 12.8% and 3% complained of grade 2 and 3 urinary difficulties, respectively. Patients with a preimplant AUA score < or = 7 had significantly less grade II toxicity at 60 days compared to those with an AUA score of >7 (32% vs. 59.2%, respectively, p = 0.001). Similarly, prostatic volumes < or = 35 cc had a significantly lower incidence of grade II urinary toxicity (p = 0.001). There was no difference in toxicity regarding the isotope used (p = 0.138 at 60 days, p = 0.45 at 6 months) or the addition of preimplant XRT (p = 0.069 at 60 days, p = 0.84 at 6 months). Twenty-eight patients (4.7%) underwent TURP after 3 isotope half-lives for protracted obstructive symptoms. Five of these men (17%) developed stress incontinence following TURP, but all patients experienced relief of their obstructive symptoms without morbidity at last follow-up. The percent of the prostate receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150) did not predict urinary toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

TPIPB is well tolerated but associated with mild to moderate urinary morbidity. Pretreatment prostatic volume and AUA scoring were shown to significantly predict for grade 2 toxicity while the use of preimplant, pelvic XRT and isotope selection did not. Patients undergoing TURP for protracted symptoms following TPIPB did well with a 17% risk of developing stress incontinence. V150 did not help identify patients at risk for urinary morbidity. As transperineal prostate implantation is used more frequently the associated toxicities and the definition of possible pretreatment prognostic factors is necessary to

The effect of androgen deprivation on the early changes in prostate volume following transperineal ultrasound guided interstitial therapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To determine the change in volume of the prostate as a result of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation prior to prostate implant and in the early postimplant period following transperineal ultrasound guided palladium-103 brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-nine men received 3 to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy followed by treatment planning ultrasound followed 4 to 8 weeks later by palladium-103 implant of the prostate. All patients had clinical and radiographic stage T1c-T2b adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A second ultrasound study was carried out 11 to 13 days following the implant to determine the change in volume of the prostate as a result of the implant. The prehormonal and preimplant volumes were compared to the postimplant volume to determine the effect of hormones and brachytherapy on prostate volume.

RESULTS

The median decrease in prostate volume as a result of androgen deprivation was 33% among the 54 patients with prostate volume determinations prior to hormonal therapy. The reduction in volume was greatest in the quartile of men with the largest initial gland volume (59%) and least in the quartile of men with smallest glands (10%). The median reduction in prostate volume between the treatment planning ultrasound and the follow-up study after implant was 3%, but 23 (33%) patients had an increase in prostate volume, including 16 (23%) who had an increase in volume >20%; 11 of these patients (16%) had an increase in volume >30%. The time course of development and resolution of this edema is not known. The severity of the edema was not related to initial or preimplant prostate volume or duration of hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate edema may significantly affect the dose delivered to the prostate following transperineal ultrasound guided brachytherapy. The effect on the actual delivered dose will be greater when shorter lived isotopes are used. It remains to be observed whether this edema will affect outcome.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To develop and disseminate the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for the clinical quality assurance and guidelines of permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy with 125I or 103Pd.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The ABS formed a committee of experts in prostate brachytherapy to develop consensus guidelines through a critical analysis of published data supplemented by their clinical experience. The recommendations of the panels were reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of the ABS.

RESULTS

Patients with high probability of organ-confined disease are appropriately treated with brachytherapy alone. Brachytherapy candidates with a significant risk of extraprostatic extension should be treated with supplemental external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Patient selection guidelines were developed. Dosimetric planning of the implant should be carried out for all patients before seed insertion. A modified peripheral loading is preferred. The AAPM TG-43 recommendations requiring a change in prescription dose for 125I sources should be universally implemented. The recommended prescription doses for monotherapy are 145 Gy for 125I and 115-120 Gy for 103Pd. The corresponding boost doses (after 40-50 Gy EBRT) are 100-110 Gy and 80-90 Gy, respectively. Clinical evidence to guide selection of radionuclide (103Pd or 125I) is lacking. Post implant dosimetry and evaluation must be performed on all patients. It is suggested that the dose that covers 90% (D90) and 100% (D100) of the prostate volume and the percentage of the prostate volume receiving the prescribed dose (V100) be obtained from a dose-volume histogram (DVH) and reported.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for appropriate patient selection, dose reporting, and improved quality of permanent prostate brachytherapy are presented. These broad recommendations are intended to be technical and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decisions rests with the treating physician. This is a constantly evolving field, and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data becomes available.