Staging

Impact of biopsy on the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound staging of rectal tumors

PURPOSE

Endorectal ultrasound is a well-established method for the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. This prospective study was performed to establish whether obtaining a biopsy before endorectal ultrasound has an influence on staging accuracy.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2003, a total of 333 rectal tumors were examined preoperatively by using endorectal ultrasound. All patients underwent rectal resection, and the specimens were sent for histologic evaluation. Thirty-three were not biopsied, the remaining at various times before endorectal ultrasound. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis to compare the accuracies.

RESULTS

The overall staging accuracy was 71 percent but differed significantly (P = 0.004) between the groups as a function of time elapsed since biopsy. The best results were seen in tumors that were not biopsied before endorectal ultrasound, which were correctly staged in 85 percent of the cases. The least accurate staging (53 percent) was noted when endorectal ultrasound was performed in the third week after biopsy, mostly as a result of overstaging. Biopsy did not have a significant effect on nodal staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy before endorectal ultrasound significantly affects its accuracy. To achieve the most accurate staging, biopsy should be performed after endorectal ultrasound. Endorectal ultrasound staging performed in the first week after biopsy is the second best option but should be interpreted with caution in the second or third week.

Stage migration in colorectal cancer related to improved lymph node assessment

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical impact of improved cooperation between the treating surgeons and pathologists in a high volume surgical unit. As a measure we used the staging process with special focus on lymph node assessment.

FINDINGS

Comparing two periods 5 years apart, we found a significant increase in the number of nodes examined and also an increase in the number of metastasis-positive nodes. Concurrently, we observed a trend in stage migration from stage I/II towards stage III, whilst stage IV remained unchanged. This was one factor that contributed to an increase in the number of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. We also found that the number of assessed nodes had an impact on survival in stage II. The major change in practise was the implementation of a multidisciplinary team conference and the associated possibility of reciprocal feedback.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node status has a key role in cancer staging and in the selection of further therapy. The quality and the standard of the assessment can be improved through multidisciplinary cooperation and it has an impact on the clinical decisions and can affect long-term survival. A correct node status should be mandatory in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia

The aim was to study the influence of mesorectal volume, as estimated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is to be removed during total mesorectal excision (TME), on the accuracy of the first preoperative MRI of rectal cancer compared to histopathology, and its correlation to locoregional prognostic factors. A total of 267 rectal cancer patients from a multinational study (MERCURY or MRI equivalence study) had their mesorectal volume retrospectively estimated by researchers without knowledge of the assessments made by the radiologist or the pathologist. The evaluations made by the pathologist and the radiologist were then compared, including T- and N-staging, assessment of extent of extramural tumor invasion (the largest portion of the tumor beyond the muscularis propria or EMI) and distance to mesorectal fascia; the discrepancies in the results were correlated to the mesorectal volume. T- or N-staging accuracy by MRI and the difference between the EMI as measured by the pathologist and the radiologist were not dependent on individual mesorectal volume. There was no correlation between assessment of involvement of mesorectal fascia or local neighboring organs by MRI and histopathology with mesorectal volume. Mesorectal volume does not affect locoregional prognostic factors or the accuracy of local staging of rectal cancer.

Transvaginal Sonography as an Adjunct to Endorectal Sonography in the Staging of Rectal Cancer in Women

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of transvaginal sonography (TVS) in the staging of rectal cancer in women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty women with rectal tumors underwent TVS. Forty-five of the 60 women also underwent endorectal sonography. Forty-nine of the women had rectal carcinoma; nine, tubulovillous adenoma; and two, gastrointestinal stromal tumor confirmed at surgical pathologic examination (n = 41) and biopsy before chemoradiation therapy (n = 19). Four of the 49 rectal carcinomas were T1; seven, T2; 35, T3; and three, T4. Images from TVS and endorectal sonography were shown independently to two blinded reviewers, who staged the tumors and assessed examination adequacy for tumor presence, size, and depth and nodal status. Staging results with TVS were compared with those obtained with endorectal sonography and histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

All tumors were seen with TVS. In 30 of the 49 rectal carcinomas confirmed at surgical pathologic examination TVS tumor staging was accurate in 25 (83.3%) of the cases. Two (6.7%) of the 30 tumors were understaged, and 3 (10%) were overstaged. All tumors selected for chemoradiation (n = 19) were correctly staged T3. Endorectal sonography was suboptimal for tumors that were stenotic (n = 3), large (n = 2), high at the rectosigmoid junction (n = 4), or low at the anal canal (n = 3). In these 12 cases, TVS successfully depicted the lesion, and the images gave enough information for prediction of stage. In interpretation of the images of 45 patients who underwent both TVS and endorectal sonography, the blinded reviewers had good agreement and comparable accuracy for staging in adequate examinations with each technique. Four of the nine villous adenomas were overstaged as T1 on TVS. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors manifested as intramural vascular masses.

CONCLUSION

TVS is an excellent adjunct to endorectal sonography in the staging of rectal cancer in women. It helps resolve the findings after endorectal sonography has been unsuccessful because the tumors are stenotic or in a high or low position.

The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging

The purpose of the present study was to assess the size and configuration of the perirectal fatty tissues using magnetic resonance imaging, including the volume occupied by the rectum itself, and to establish a simple method by which such analysis could be derived. Included in the study were 25 consecutive patients without any large pelvic tumor (diameter of potential pelvic tumor less than 3 cm in any plane) referred for high-resolution pelvic MR imaging. The volume and cross-sectional parameters based on the amount of mesorectum to different sides of the rectum, and the total area occupied, including the rectum, were retrospectively measured using a transaxial three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence. The mesorectum, including the rectum within, occupied an axial area ranging from 320 to 5992 mm(2), and a total volume of 54-323 ml. There was a good correlation between anteroposterior diameter of the perirectal fat at 4 cm below S1-2 and the left-to-right diameter 7 cm below S1-2, and the total volume. Furthermore, the form of mesorectal tissue differed significantly between male and female subjects. In male subjects, measurements in the anteroposterior dimension accurately reflected the volume of mesorectal tissue, while in women, assessment of both the anteroposterior and the size parameters of the mesorectum from the left to right were required for the best evaluation of the volume of mesorectal tissue. The amount of fat posterior to the rectum was significantly more in men than in women, with or without consideration of length of the pelvis. Finally, the contour of the mesorectal fascia was subject to impression by other nearby visceral organs. There is a great individual variation in the amount of mesorectal fat, and in morphometric parameters between the two sexes. The morphological variations of the mesorectum can be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using a formula based on two simple measurements of the anteroposterior and left-to-right dimensions.

Ultrastaging of early colon cancer using lymphatic mapping and molecular analysis

Approximately one-third of node-negative colon cancers will recur, possibly due to understaging and inadequate pathological examination of lymph nodes (LNs). We evaluated the sensitivity, accuracy and feasibility of staging based on lymphatic mapping, focused examination, and molecular analysis of the sentinel node (SN) in patients with primary colorectal carcinoma. Between 1996 and 2000, 100 patients with colon carcinoma (CRC) underwent lymphatic mapping immediately after peritumoral injection of 1.0 cc of isosulphan blue dye. All LNs in the CRC specimen were examined by routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Sentinel nodes were examined by step serial sectioning, cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (CK-IHC) and/or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in an attempt to identify occult micrometastatic disease. Lymphatic mapping was successful in 97% of the cases. There were 5 false-negative cases, predominately associated with T3/T4 tumours. Aberrant lymphatic drainage was identified in 8 patients (8%) altering the operative approach. 26 patients had H&E-positive LNs. In 74 patients who were node-negative by routine H&E, 18 (24%) had occult nodal micrometastases missed on routine H&E examination, but detected by focused analysis of the SN. RT-PCR analysis of the SN was performed in 40 patients, 26 of which were negative by H&E and CK-IHC. In 12/26 (46%) of these patients, there was additional evidence of micrometastatic disease. In this study, focused examination of the SN in conjunction with RT-PCR analysis identified micrometastatic disease in a significant number of node-negative patients. This may have important implications when selecting patients for adjuvant treatment protocols.