Pioneers of shoulder replacement: Themistocles Gluck and Jules Emile Péan

Common Factors in Shoulder and Hip Arthroplasty Implant Failures: A Historical Review

In this era of subspecialty care in orthopedics, iterations of implant design can occur in a silo which then precludes gaining knowledge from failures of implant design that may have occurred in different subspecialties. This literature review describes the history of failures in hip and shoulder arthroplasties with the purpose of identifying similar factors that led to previous implant failures. A review of the literature was performed by two reviewers assessing articles that described failed hip and shoulder arthroplasty systems over time. We identified and analyzed 53 implant failures-23 in hip arthroplasty and 30 in shoulder arthroplasty. These failures were categorized as material, mechanical, and technical. In hip arthroplasty, 48% were material, 39% mechanical, and 13% technical failures. In shoulder arthroplasty, the distribution was 10% material, 70% mechanical, and 20% technical failures. The distribution of these failures highlights similar and sometimes repeated failure mechanisms between subspecialties. This accentuates the importance of a collaborative approach to improve future arthroplasty designs.

Implant breakage after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of data from worldwide arthroplasty registries and clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Implant breakage after shoulder arthroplasty is a rare complication after aseptic loosening, infection or persistent pain, resulting in malfunction of the components requiring revision surgery. This correlates with a high burden for the patient and increasing costs. Specific data of complication rates and implant breakage are available in detailed arthroplasty registries, but due to the rare occurrence and possibly underestimated value rarely described in published studies. The aim of this systematic review was to point out the frequency of implant breakage after shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that worldwide arthroplasty registry datasets record higher rates of implant breakage than clinical trials.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database were utilized for this systematic review using the items "(implant fracture/complication/breakage) OR (glenoid/baseplate complication/breakage) AND (shoulder arthroplasty)" according to the PRISMA guidelines on July 3rd, 2023. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted according to the Cochrane standards. Case reports and experimental studies were excluded to reduce bias. The breakage rate per 100,000 observed component years was used to compare data from national arthroplasty registries and clinical trials, published in peer-reviewed journals. Relevant types of shoulder prosthetics were analyzed and differences in implant breakage were considered.

RESULTS

Data of 5 registries and 15 studies were included. Rates of implant breakage after shoulder arthroplasty were reported with 0.06-0.86% in registries versus 0.01-6.65% in clinical studies. The breakage rate per 100,000 observed component years was 10 in clinical studies and 9 in registries. There was a revision rate of 0.09% for registry data and 0.1% for clinical studies within a 10-year period. The most frequently affected component in connection with implant fracture was the glenoid insert.

CONCLUSION

Clinical studies revealed a similar incidence of implant failure compared to data of worldwide arthroplasty registries. These complications arise mainly due to breakage of screws and glenospheres and there seems to be a direct correlation to loosening. Periprosthetic joint infection might be associated with loosening of the prosthesis and subsequent material breakage. We believe that this analysis can help physicians to advise patients on potential risks after shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Influential articles on shoulder arthroplasty: bibliometric analysis and visualized study

BACKGROUND

Shoulder arthroplasty has had increasing global demand, technical development, and research interest in the past few decades, with the publication of numerous articles. However, little is known about the characteristics and evaluation of these articles. Our objective was to study and analyze the top 100 cited articles in shoulder arthroplasty research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications on shoulder arthroplasty from inception to 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science. The top 100 publications were defined by the number of citations, and their characteristics were recorded and analyzed. A visualized study of the articles was performed using VOSviewer software.

RESULTS

The top 100 cited articles were published between 1981 and 2018, with the 2000s the most productive decade. Citations per article ranged from 103 to 822. The countries with the most articles were the United States followed by France and Switzerland. Most of the articles were level III evidence. The keywords for the articles were primarily in 5 clusters: infection, fracture, osteoarthritis, perioperative complications, and prosthetic design.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of influential articles on shoulder arthroplasty were thoroughly analyzed. Most studies focused on surgical techniques and perioperative complications with a relatively low level of evidence.

Innovations in the Realm of Shoulder Arthroplasty

Most of the surgeries regarding the shoulder were established over a century ago [...].

Evolution of shoulder arthroplasty

In the more than century-long history of shoulder arthroplasty, scientists have gone from primitive ivory designs to high-tech implants made of rare metal alloys. Along the way, surgeons and inventors have faced challenges, made mistakes, and succeeded. This literature review reflects trends in the development of shoulder arthroplasty, evolutionary changes in endoprosthesis designs and principles of surgical treatment of shoulder pathology, from the late 19th century to the present. This paper details the stages of formation of the major modern philosophies of shoulder arthroplasty, such as those of Ch. Neer (anatomical prosthetics), P.M. Grammont (reversible prosthetics), and J. Zippel (surface prosthetics). In the 70s and 80s of the 20th century the components of shoulder prostheses as well as their fitting techniques continued to be improved from a biomechanical point of view. It was found that if the shoulder head and scapular component have different radii of curvature during arthroplasty, a shoulder-b lade mismatch is formed. A non-congruent joint (the radius of curvature of the head is smaller than the radius of curvature of the glenoid component) increases eccentric loads on the scapula joint implant, increases the risk of implant fracture, and reduces stability in the joint. However, such a joint allows reproduction of the natural gliding of the head. Restricting the required glide increases stress at the fixation site and can lead to loosening of the glenoid component. A number of studies have shown that a mismatch of more than 10 mm increases the risk of loosening and fractures of the scapular component, while a mismatch of 5-7 mm can be considered optimal, as it provides long-term survival of the glenoid component and the best reproduction of normal movements in the shoulder joint.

Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty by year of index procedure: are we getting better?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative patient-reported outcomes improved over time following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes from our institution's registry between 2008 and 2018 (N = 1899). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were required. Univariable linear models were used to test the association between year of surgery and improvement in ASES scores at 2- and 5-year follow-up, as well as any association with age, sex, primary or revision surgery, hand dominance, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, rotator cuff status, primary diagnosis, and Walch classification. Multivariable models were created to analyze ASES score improvement by index year while controlling for significant factors.

RESULTS

In the univariable analysis, 5-year ASES difference scores increased each year by a mean of 1.65 (P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-2.55) for TSA, 2.50 (P = .014; 95% CI, 0.52-4.49) for RTSA, and 1.64 (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.81-2.47) for the overall population. Patient sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, rotator cuff status, primary diagnosis, Walch classification, and revision procedures were also significant factors affecting ASES scores. On multivariable analysis controlling for these factors, 5-year ASES difference scores were still significantly associated with year of surgery, increasing each year by a mean of 2.20 (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.91-3.50) for TSA, 4.83 (P < .001; 95% CI, 1.17-8.49) for RTSA, and 1.66 (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.81-2.51) for the entire population.

CONCLUSION

Both anatomic TSA and RTSA patients reported increasing ASES difference scores at 5-year follow-up as time passed. These findings may indicate that advances in shoulder arthroplasty have resulted in better patient outcomes over time. Further research is needed to clarify which factors influence improvements in outcomes, particularly for revision procedures.

Surgical Trends of Shoulder Arthroplasty: Nationwide Epidemiologic Study in South Korea

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the nationwide shoulder arthroplasty trends in South Korea based on an analysis of nationwide data acquired from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA).

Methods

We analyzed a nationwide database acquired from the HIRA that covered 2008 to 2017. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes and procedure codes were used to identify patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty, including total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Results

From 2008 to 2017, a total of 19,831 shoulder arthroplasties were performed; there were 16,162 TSAs and 3,669 hemiarthroplasties. During the 10-year study period, there was an exponential increase in the incidence of TSA (from 513 cases in 2008 to 3,583 cases in 2017), while the number of hemiarthroplasties remained steady. The most common diagnoses for TSA were rotator cuff tears (6,304 cases, 39.0%) and osteoarthritis (6,589 cases, 40.8%) for all 9 years. Osteoarthritis was the most common reason for TSA during the first 3 years (2008-2010), but rotator cuff tears ultimately surpassed osteoarthritis during the last 3 years (2015-2017). HA was performed to treat proximal humerus fracture (1,770 cases, 48.2%) and osteoarthritis (774 cases, 21.1%). In terms of hospital types, the rate of TSA in hospitals with 30-100 inpatient beds increased from 21.83% to 46.27%, while the rates of the other types of surgery decreased. A total of 430 revision surgeries were performed during the study period, and infection (152 cases, 35.3%) was the most common reason for revision surgery.

Conclusions

Overall, the total count and incidence of TSA, unlike HA, increased rapidly between 2008 and 2017 in South Korea. Moreover, at the end of the study period, nearly half of the TSAs were performed in small hospitals (30 to 100 beds). Rotator cuff tears were the leading cause of TSA at the end of the study period. These findings revealed an explosive increase in reverse TSA surgery.

[Shoulder arthroplasty]

Arthroplasty of the shoulder joint leads to excellent clinical results if the indications are valid and the implantation is technically correct. Taking anatomical requirements and mechanical functions as well as material properties and developments in surgical techniques into account, articulations and anchoring systems have been developed which, as modular systems enable successful restoration of the biomechanics and consider the importance of the surrounding soft tissues. Scientific data show promising medium-term and long-term results in terms of functionality and pain reduction. Nevertheless, due to the limited bone stock for implant anchoring, especially loosening of the prosthesis or instability of the glenoid joint component, revision arthroplasty remains challenging. This review article summarizes the relevant aspects of shoulder arthroplasty.

A multicenter, prospective 2-year analysis of the Sidus stem-free shoulder arthroplasty system

Background

The purpose of this multicenter, prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a stemless total shoulder arthroplasty compared with a traditional stemmed control.

Methods

Ninety-five shoulders were selected for participation in this Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial and underwent stemless total shoulder arthroplasty. Subjects returned for follow-up at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Outcome measures included pain; range of motion; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder, and Short Form 12 scores; and radiographic review. Baseline data were compared with 2-year follow-up data to determine the rate of composite clinical success compared with the stemmed control.

Results

All outcome assessments demonstrated significant improvements (P ≤ .007). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 20 to 89 (P < .0001), and the mean shoulder pain score decreased from 8.3 ± 1.6 to 0.7 ± 1.5 (P < .0001). The mean Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score decreased from 1443 ± 256 to 203 ± 267 (P < .0001). On the Short Form 12, the mean physical health score increased from 33 ± 7 to 48 ± 9 (P < .0001) and the mean mental health score increased from 50 ± 13 to 54 ± 8 (P = .007). Mean active forward elevation increased from 97° ± 27° to 143° ± 25° (P < .0001), and mean active external rotation increased from 21° ± 16° to 53° ± 18° (P < .0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an implant survivorship rate of 98% at 2 years. The composite clinical success rate was 87% compared with 85% for the stemmed control.

Conclusions

This study showed that a stemless rough-blasted humeral implant with metaphyseal bone fixation provides good clinical and radiographic outcomes and survivorship at 2 years, with outcomes comparable to a traditional stemmed implant.

Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review

Currently, an increasing number of patients benefit from shoulder prosthesis implantation. Radiologists are therefore more often confronted with imaging examinations involving shoulder arthroplasty, whether during a dedicated examination or incidentally. Standard radiography is the first-line imaging modality in the follow-up of these implants, before the possible use of cross-sectional imaging modalities (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), ultrasound, or nuclear medicine examinations. Shoulder arthroplasties are divided into three categories: reverse shoulder arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and partial shoulder joint replacement (including humeral hemiarthroplasty and humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty). Each of these prostheses can present complications, either shared by all types of arthroplasty or specific to each. Infection, periprosthetic fractures, humeral component loosening, heterotopic ossification, implant failure, and nerve injury can affect all types of prostheses. Instability, scapular notching, and acromial fractures can be identified after reverse shoulder arthroplasty implantation. Glenoid component loosening and rotator cuff tear are specific complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. Progressive wear of the native glenoid is the only specific complication observed in partial shoulder joint replacement. Knowledge of different types of shoulder prostheses and their complications’ radiological signs is crucial for the radiologist to initiate prompt and adequate management.

Jules Pean (1830-1898)-A Pioneer Surgeon: His Achievements and His Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study is to summarize the life and work of the French surgeon Jules Pean (1830-1898). Pean made an impact in the history of surgery through his work and especially with his innovative surgical techniques in abdominal surgery and in orthopedics as well as with the invention of numerous surgical instruments. He also made an impact with his pioneering total shoulder arthroplasty.

Pain After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

As anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) become increasingly common, differences between the 2 procedures are of importance. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in acute pain levels between patients undergoing aTSA and rTSA. Sixty patients undergoing aTSA or rTSA were assessed for participation. The primary outcome was postoperative daily visual analog scale scores, which were initially collected for 4 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, length of stay, and complications. Comparisons between the 2 groups were assessed using a multivariable analysis, which controlled for sex, age, body mass index, and type of anesthetic. A total of 57 patients consented and were analyzed. No significant differences were found in postoperative visual analog scale scores in the first 4 days following surgery or at 1 year postoperatively. Patients undergoing aTSA had a higher mean opioid requirement in the first 4 hours postoperatively (1.0±0.7 vs 0.4±0.6 morphine milligram equivalents, P<.01). Forty percent of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty were prescribed narcotics within the 3 months prior to surgery. Patients who were prescribed narcotics prior to surgery were more likely to continue to require narcotics at extended time periods postoperatively. Patients undergoing aTSA required more opioid medication in the immediate postoperative period. However, after 4 hours postoperatively, no significant differences in pain scores or opioid consumption were found. These findings suggest that patients undergoing aTSA or rTSA have similar postoperative pain profiles. Patients who are prescribed narcotics before shoulder arthroplasty are at an increased risk for postoperative opioid demand. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e247-e252.].

Continued Inpatient Care After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Short-term Postdischarge Morbidity: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Advances in surgical technique and implant design during the past several decades have resulted in annual increases in shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States. The purpose of this investigation was to use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to analyze the rates of morbidity following shoulder arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that, independent of predischarge patient factors, discharge to inpatient facilities is associated with increased short-term morbidity. Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and information about postoperative complications/readmissions up to 30 days after the operative event were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the period 2005 to 2015. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on discharge to home vs non-home facilities. Unadjusted baseline patient characteristics were compared using Pearson's chi-square test, and a propensity score-adjusted comparison was also performed. Overall, 9058 patients were included. Of these, 7996 (88.3%) were discharged to home and 1062 (11.7%) were discharged to a non-home facility. On propensity-adjusted analysis, complications determined to be statistically significantly associated with non-home discharge included cardiac (odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-10.04; P=.001), respiratory (odds ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-4.70; P=.001), urinary tract infection (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.67; P=.001), and death (odds ratio, 7.51; 95% confidence interval, 2.42-23.27; P<.001). Overall, complications were statistically significantly associated with non-home discharges (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.64; propensity-adjusted P<.001). This investigation indicated an association between postdischarge placement into non-home facilities and an increase in short-term morbidity, regardless of preoperative patient comorbidities. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e225-e231.].

[About history of surgeons hidden behind our daily surgical instruments: Forceps]

Many surgical instruments are named after their inventors, acclaimed surgeons of the past, because of their discoveries and their contributions in the field of surgical techniques. However, these daily reminders of History of Surgery are often forgotten by the modern practitioners. We propose to review, through a selection of instruments, short biographies of these precursors. This first original article will focus on the inventors of modern forceps: Debakey, Adson, Kocher, Péan, Tuffier and Halsted.

A new approach to knee joint arthroplasty

The main aim of this new approach dedicated to knee arthroplasty is to provide an automated method for determining the cutting planes of both the head of femur and the head of tibia in knee replacement surgery. This paper shows a new approach differing from standard procedures associated with manual determination of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity (during surgery) and replacing them with a procedure based on the imprints (with selected cutting planes) of the two heads of bones. Both these imprints have been performed on the basis of the toposcan of the lower limb (before surgery). This methodology has been implemented in MATLAB and tested in clinical CT images of the lower limb in the coronal and transverse planes (61 studies) and in clinical MRI studies of the knee joint in coronal plane (107 studies). Correct results were obtained for about 90% cases.

Past and present of interposition arthroplasties for joint repair with special tribute to the contribution by Vittorio Putti

Several techniques have been proposed to restore the compromised function of a joint. These include the arthroplasty by placing various tissues or materials between the articular surfaces. An important contribution to the diffusion of arthroplasty techniques was made by Vittorio Putti, head of the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute in Bologna from 1912 to 1940. Interposition arthroplasty is still used for some non-weight-bearing joints, such as wrist and elbow, and gives good results. This type of surgery has been further developed by the improvement in biomaterials, biomechanical studies and the regenerative medicine. This paper describes the development starting from a historical survey particularly focused on Putti's contribution and ending with the state of the art of regenerative medicine in the treatment of joint diseases. Level of evidence V.

Obesity is Not Associated with Increased Short-term Complications After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Few studies have analyzed the association between elevated BMI and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Previous studies have not consistently arrived at the same conclusion regarding whether obesity is associated with a greater number of postoperative complications. We used a national surgical database to compare the 30-day complication profile and hospitalization outcomes after primary TSA among patients in different BMI categories.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) Is obesity associated with an increased risk of complications within 30 days of primary TSA? (2) Is obesity associated with increased operative time?

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(®) database for 2006 to 2012 was queried to identify all patients who underwent a primary TSA for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. The ACS-NSQIP(®) database was selected for this study as it is a nationally representative database that provides prospectively collected perioperative data and a comprehensive patient medical profile. Exclusion criteria included revision TSA, infection, tumor, or fracture. We analyzed 4796 patients who underwent a primary TSA for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Patients who underwent a TSA were divided in four BMI categories: normal (18.5-25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-30 kg/m(2)), obesity Class 1 (30-35 kg/m(2)), and obesity Class 2 or greater (> 35 kg/m(2)). Perioperative hospitalization data and 30-day postoperative complications were compared among different BMI classes. Differences in patient demographics, preoperative laboratory values, and preexisting patient comorbidities also were analyzed among different BMI groups, and multivariate analysis was used to adjust for any potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

There was no association between BMI and 30-day complications after surgery (normal as reference, overweight group relative risk: 0.57 [95% CI, 0.30-1.06], p = 0.076; obesity Class 1 relative risk: 0.52 [95% CI, 0.26-1.03], p = 0.061; obesity Class 2 or greater relative risk: 0.54 [95% CI, 0.25-1.17], p = 0.117). However, greater BMI was associated with longer surgical times (for normal BMI control group: 110 minutes, SD, 42 minutes; overweight group: 115 minutes, SD, 46 minutes, mean difference to control: 5 minutes [95% CI, -1 to 10 minutes], p = 0.096; obesity Class 1: 120 minutes, SD, 43 minutes, mean difference: 10 minutes [95% CI, 5-15 minutes], p < 0.001; obesity Class 2 or greater: 122 minutes, SD, 45 minutes, mean difference: 12 minutes [95% CI, 6-18 minutes], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the surgical time increased for patients with greater BMI, the 30-day complications and perioperative hospitalization data after TSA were not different in patients with increased BMI levels. Obesity alone should not be a contraindication for TSA, and obese patients can expect similar incidences of postoperative complications. The preoperative medical optimization plan should be consistent with that of patients who are not obese who undergo TSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Shoulder replacements: a review

Shoulder replacement surgery is a common elective surgical procedure for those with progressive osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. This review explores the history of shoulder replacements, the different types of replacements and their advantages or disadvantages.

Shoulder arthroplasty in New York State, 1991 to 2010: changing patterns of utilization

BACKGROUND

Shoulder arthroplasty is now used to treat an expanding variety of glenohumeral disorders.

METHODS

This study assessed the demographic patterns and utilization rates of shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) within New York State (NYS) from 1991 to 2010. Using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, all shoulder arthroplasty procedures that occurred within NYS during the study period were retrospectively identified and analyzed.

RESULTS

During the 20-year period, 24,040 shoulder arthroplasty procedures were performed. During the second decade (2001-2010), there was a 393% increase in utilization of TSA with a 98% increase in HA. This disproportionate increase is likely due to the introduction and expanding indications of reverse TSA as an effective procedure in place of HA for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and rotator cuff arthropathy, as rotator cuff arthropathy as a primary indication for HA was significantly less prevalent in period 2. Also notable was an identifiable disparity in race; whites represented approximately 80% of the shoulder arthroplasty procedures in both decades, whereas African Americans made up <5%. This is significantly different from the general racial demographics of NYS during both periods analyzed.

DISCUSSION

It is clear that the volume of shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in NYS is increasing, mirroring the national experience. This trend reflects the expanding indications, the general success of these procedures, the aging demographic of our population, and a greater desire and willingness of patients to consider operative management to maintain or to improve quality of life.

Outcome and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis

This thesis includes four studies focusing on the functional outcome, shoulder-specific quality of life and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis without symptomatic rotator cuff pathology. The Danish version of WOOS, translated according to international standardized guidelines, had substantial psychometric properties comparable to the original version. It is recommendable to use WOOS in the evaluation of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis treated with shoulder replacement. Data from DSR showed that the shoulder specific quality of life following total shoulder arthroplasty was superior to that of hemiarthroplasty (resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty). The difference between stemmed hemiarthroplasty and resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was small and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. The revision rate following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was surprisingly high compared with previous reports but there were no statistical significant differences in revision rate between arthroplasty designs. The shoulder specific quality of life and revision rate in patients under the age of 55 was worrying. The use of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty has relied on the results from case series only. The efficacy in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been promising but the CMS found in the randomized clinical trial indicate that the functional outcome may be inferior to that of stemmed hemiarthroplasty and less favourable than previously reported. However, the limited number of patients may have influenced the results and a larger definitive RCT is needed.Shoulder replacement is relevant and effective in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was associated with a poorer outcome and a higher risk of revision than previously assumed especially in patients under the age of 55. Based on data from this thesis, and based on existing knowledge, it seems like total shoulder arthroplasty should be preferred in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Shoulder replacement is rarely indicated in younger patients where other treatment options (e.g., physiotherapy; intraarticular injections of hyaluronate; and joint preserving surgery) should be considered until the efficacy of shoulder replacement has been more thoroughly documented.

Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States

BACKGROUND

The number of total shoulder arthroplasties performed in the United States increased slightly between 1990 and 2000. However, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in recent years has not been well described. The purpose of the present study was to examine recent trends in shoulder hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty along with the common reasons for these surgical procedures in the United States.

METHODS

We modeled the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty from 1993 to 2008 with use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. On the basis of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty cases that were identified with use of surgical procedure codes, we conducted a design-based analysis to calculate national estimates.

RESULTS

While the annual number of hemiarthroplasties grew steadily, the number of total shoulder arthroplasties showed a discontinuous jump (p < 0.01) in 2004 and increased with a steeper linear slope (p < 0.01) since then. As a result, more total shoulder arthroplasties than hemiarthroplasties have been performed annually since 2006. Approximately 27,000 total shoulder arthroplasties and 20,000 hemiarthroplasties were performed in 2008. More than two-thirds of total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in adults with an age of sixty-five years or more. Osteoarthritis was the primary diagnosis for 43% of hemiarthroplasties and 77% of total shoulder arthroplasties in 2008, with fracture of the humerus as the next most common primary diagnosis leading to hemiarthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of shoulder arthroplasties, particularly total shoulder arthroplasties, is growing faster than ever. The use of reverse total arthroplasty, which was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in November 2003, may be part of the reason for the greater increase in the number of total shoulder arthroplasties. A long-term follow-up study is warranted to evaluate total shoulder arthroplasty in terms of patient outcomes, safety, and implant longevity.

A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Management of the cuff-deficient arthritic shoulder has long been challenging. Early unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty systems were associated with high complication and implant failure rates. The evolution toward the modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty includes many variables of constrained shoulder arthroplasty designs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This review explores the development of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, specifically describing (1) the evolution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs, (2) the biomechanical variations in the evolution of this arthroplasty, and (3) the current issues relevant to reverse shoulder arthroplasty today.

METHODS

Using a PubMed search, the literature was explored for articles addressing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, focusing on those papers with historical context.

RESULTS

Results of the early designs were apparently poor, although they were not subjected to rigorous clinical research and usually reported only in secondary literature. We identified a trend of glenoid component failure in the early reverse designs. This trend was recognized and reported by authors as the reverse shoulder evolved. Authors reported greater pain relief and better function in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the fundamental change of Grammont's design (moving the center of rotation medially and distally). However, current reports suggest lingering concerns and challenges with today's designs.

CONCLUSIONS

The history of reverse shoulder arthroplasty involves the designs of many forward-thinking surgeons. Many of these highly constrained systems failed, although more recent designs have demonstrated improved longevity and implant performance. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty requires ongoing study, with challenges and controversies remaining around present-day designs.

Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty

Introduction

The clinical outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is not satisfactory. Secondary fragment dislocation may prevent bone integration; the primary stability by a fixation technique is therefore needed to accomplish tuberosity healing. Present technical comparison of surgical fixation techniques reveals the state-of-the-art approach and highlights promising techniques for enhanced stability.

Method

A classification of available fixation techniques for three- and four part fractures was done. The placement of sutures and cables was described on the basis of anatomical landmarks such as the rotator cuff tendon insertions, the bicipital groove and the surgical neck. Groups with similar properties were categorized.

Results

Materials used for fragment fixation include heavy braided sutures and/or metallic cables, which are passed through drilling holes in the bone fragments. The classification resulted in four distinct groups: A: both tuberosities and shaft are fixed together by one suture, B: single tuberosities are independently connected to the shaft and among each other, C: metallic cables are used in addition to the sutures and D: the fragments are connected by short stitches, close to the fragment borderlines.

Conclusions

A plurality of techniques for the reconstruction of a fractured proximal humerus is found. The categorisation into similar strategies provides a broad overview of present techniques and supports a further development of optimized techniques. Prospective studies are necessary to correlate the technique with the clinical outcome.

„Resurfacing“ des Humeruskopfes

Surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder offers the ability to restore anatomy and biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint, if sufficient humeral bone stock of at least 60% of the humeral head is preserved and no severe deformity is present. The implantation following the individual anatomy helps to avoid complications such as prosthetic malpositioning and periprosthetic fractures. While the use of a glenoid component is technically demanding, revision to a stem prosthesis is relatively easy because of bone stock preservation. Indications for humeral head resurfacing are osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), avascular necrosis stages 2-4, and stable forms of cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Published results for OA and RA are comparable to those obtained with modern modular stem prostheses; the use in CTA appears promising under "limited goals criteria."

Developments in shoulder arthroplasty

Indications for shoulder arthroplasty are numerous, mainly owing to glenohumeral osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or fracture of the proximal humerus. However, the anatomy and the biomechanics of the shoulder are complex and shoulder arthroplasty has evolved significantly over the past 30 years. This paper presents the main recent evolutions in shoulder replacement, the questions not answered yet, and the main future areas of research. The review focuses firstly on the design, positioning, and fixation of the humeral component, secondly on the design, positioning, and fixation of the glenoid implant, and thirdly on other concepts of shoulder arthroplasty such as the reversed prosthesis, the cementless surface replacement arthroplasty, and the bipolar arthroplasty. This review demonstrates that more research is needed. Although, in the long term, large randomized trials are needed to settle the fundamental questions of what type of replacement and which kind of fixation should be used, biomechanical research in the laboratory should be focused primarily on the comprehension of glenoid loosening, which is a major cause of total shoulder arthroplasty failure, and the significance of radiolucent lines which are often seen but with no clear understanding about their relation with failure.